Bonnie Blue is feeling singled out. Her recent ban from OnlyFans, where she earned hundreds of thousands of dollars per month for her pornographic content, came on the heels of her ill-fated “petting zoo” challenge. The would-be stunt promised 2,000 men with free use of Blue, confined in a glass box.

It wasn’t the first time Blue’s content had been removed from OnlyFans. Her infamous 1,057 men in 24 hours world record was taken down, amid concerns with verifying the identities of all the men in attendance.

These sorts of extreme challenges and sex stunts were Blue’s claim to fame, although she was not the only one participating in them.

If Bonnie Blue isn’t the only star engaging in extreme sex stunts, why’d she get reprimanded and ultimately banned before anyone else?

Bonnie Blue doesn’t just rely on extreme sexual content to make herself known. She relies on rage baiting the internet on the social media outrage engine: Blue says she’s going to do something controversial, she goes on podcasts and says provocative things, then other people comment and react and create their own content speaking out against her. The result? Blue gets more famous, and her subscriber count goes up. As it turns out, a bad reputation can be more profitable than a good one. Blue isn’t the only creator who makes her money from outrage and extremes. She’s just the most notorious one.

However tarnished Bonnie Blue’s reputation may be, OnlyFans still has its own public image to consider.

At the time of this writing, OnlyFans is up for sale. Historically, investors have shied away from the platform, given its adult nature. But with its valuation in the billions? Its impact is now undeniable.

Is Bonnie Blue’s removal from OF a sign of what’s to come if the site sells to an investor group?