fbpx

Seeing the Prairie for the Trees



Your Tree People article was no doubt inspiring to many [“Citizen
Forester,
” April 15–21]. It was frustrating, however, to those of us students
of the historical landscape of Los Angeles.



Trees clearly benefit humans to a certain degree, providing shade under which
to sit and picnic or park your car. Trees also make things look pretty. Non-native
trees sometimes even host native species in urban environments.



Still, if we are to live within the ecology of the landscape here, we must recognize
that this Mediterranean land was historically mostly prairie. There were a few
rivers, along which many willows grew, and a few sycamores and cottonwoods,
with a smattering of cienegas or marshes.



But mostly, the plants were low to the ground and evolved to survive without
much water and with plenty of sunshine.



If there are too many trees where they ought not to be, unintended consequences
happen. For instance, common crows have proliferated because of the many trees
where they can now survive in large numbers. These unnatural crow populations
have decimated the California least tern, an endangered bird species.



It is great that Andy Lipkis has built an organization that is listened to by
the politicians. I just hope people listen with an educated ear.



—Marcia Hanscom

—Robert Roy van de Hoek

Wetlands Action Network & Ballona Institute





I recently received a link that led me to the wonderful story Judith Lewis wrote
on Andy Lipkis and his quest to make changes in the Southern California area.




I haven’t been so inspired to read a lengthy article in a long time. I met Andy
some years back at a Soil and Water Conservation Society meeting, a very pleasant
and enthusiastic character. And recently I have had the pleasure to be associated
with his group, TreePeople, on a project that the Natural Resources Conservation
Service supports in the replanting effort of the San Bernardino Mountains.



—Paul Laustsen

Riverside





Regarding your most complimentary cover feature story on Andy Lipkis, I find
it curious that Andy’s version of his background includes acknowledgment of
a two-week summer camp’s impact on his development but mentions not a word of
his two years’ high school experience in which his faculty enabled him, with
guidance, to devote all two years to research and exploration of his interest
in trees. This included looking at his interest through each frame of reference
mandated by California public school curricula: mathmatics, rhetoric, history,
science, social psychology, art and physical fitness.



We were a school-within-a-school out of University High School, West Los Angeles,
1970–1978. We had to battle every day, politically, for our existence during
our eight years of operation. Operating an automous model program that eliminated
failure and graduated scores of students who, like Lipkis, are now making significant
contributions to society across most every discipline. We were forcibly closed
in 1978 — a subject worthy of an L.A. Weekly story.



Now, thirty-five years later, Los Angeles Unified School Districts administration
is mandating district-wide creation of schools-within-schools as the salvation
of what thwarts secondary schools’ poor performance. None has returned my emails
nor phone calls offering to share what we learned about making our model work.




For shame, Andy Lipkis!



—Caldwell Williams

Los Angeles





Witness for the Defense



Re: “The Defender
by Seven McDonald (April 15–21), I found it interesting that this supposed “defender”
of Los Angeles, Hillel Aron, failed to mention anything that makes this city
great. I suppose at one point Aron says “freeways are cool,” but is that it?
Los Angeles “supplied the world with movies and television” — right, dude, that’s
something we all should take pride in.



Los Angeles is great, to be sure, and it’s not because of the city’s San Francisco–like
views, or Manhattanesque skyline. Rather it’s the 24-hour donut shops in every
strip mall that you only notice when you’re looking for a maple bar at 4 a.m.
It’s the pleasure in knowing that you got from Wilshire and Vermont to the Santa
Monica pier faster by the 720 Rapid than you would have driving on the 10. (The
freeway traffic is hell, and that is nothing to celebrate, but this inevitability
makes it all the more satisfying to cross town in 25 minutes by bus.) I could
even mention how great the F Dash is, but this “defender” from West Hollywood
doesn’t care, and that’s another reason why I love this city.



—Brigid McManama

Los Angeles





More Than Fair Play



I see many plays each year but few that challenge me to think. That is why I
am baffled by your reviewer’s comments on Questa by Victor Bumbalo [Theater
New Reviews
, April 22–28]. This is a well-crafted play, well-acted, and
it includes issues and interrelationships that we don’t usually see. Your reviewer
is entitled to her opinion, but she obviously didn’t see the play that I saw.
This thought-provoking, edgy work should be seen by everyone in the gay and
non-gay community.



—Bill Kaiser

The Purple Circuit

Burbank





Raging Grassroots Fire




I had a good laugh at one paragraph in Robert Greene’s column about Mayor James
Hahn [“Not So Rosy,
Jim
,” April 22–28; Web exclusive]. With exquisite understatement he says,
“The level of suburban outrage against illegal immigration . . . and the tendency
to blame Latino immigrants for the city’s ills, is growing . . . The level of
understanding on the part of policymakers and the political left about the power
of the anti-immigrant resentment, and the relationship between the immigration
issue and the failure of government institutions, remains low.”



A puppy can be paper trained in just a few weeks, but our glorious leaders just
don’t seem to learn. And this unteachability (is that a word?) extends to both
major parties, left and right. Blame it on reapportionment, which creates districts
so incumbent-safe that none are ever voted out. They feel they have nothing
to fear from even the deepest citizen resentment. But that may soon come to
an end, even without the reapportionment panel that Governor Schwarzenegger
wants. The Internet puts Joe and Jane Average in touch with things like a legislator
report card (www.betterimmigration.com) and networking opportunities that maximize
the effectiveness of our no-longer-plaintive cries to be heard. San Diego talk-radio
host Roger Hedgecock is leading a Hold Their Feet to the Fire trip to D.C. next
week (www.nomoreamnesty.com). He and 10 other radio hosts will remote their
shows from D.C. There is a raging fire in the true grass roots that will burn
the butts of any “leaders” who don’t shape up.



—Barbara Vickroy

Escondido





We Have a Winner



L.A. Weekly restaurant critic Jonathan Gold won the 2005 James
Beard Foundation Journalism Award last week for newspaper restaurant review
or critique. This is his sixth James Beard nomination and third time he’s won
the award. He previously won in 2001 for magazine restaurant reviewing at Gourmet
magazine and in 1999 for newspaper restaurant reviewing here at the L.A.
Weekly. Also honored were Lee Hefter of Spago Beverly Hills for Best
California Chef. The restaurant also won for outstanding service. And the tiny
but wonderful taco stand Yuca’s was one of four restaurants named to the foundation’s
America’s Classics roster.







Send letters to L.A. Weekly,
P.O. Box 4315, L.A., CA 90078. Or fax us at (323) 465-3220. Or e-mail us
at letters@laweekly.com. Letters,
which must be typewritten and include a daytime telephone number for verification,
may be edited for purposes of space or clarity.