[Update: Associated Press reported Saturday that Suleman has signed a reality TV deal for each of her 14 children with Eyeworks worth $250,000 over three years. Eyeworks will contribute 15 percent of the gross compensation into a "Coogan account" for the children, who won't be able to access the money until they turn 18.]
Well, it took them long enough, but Nadya Suleman's side has responded to a lawsuit filed by Los Angeles uber-lawyer Gloria Allred and former child actor Paul Petersen with its own suit. Last May Allred and Petersen petitioned the Orange County Superior Court to appoint a conservator to look after the financial interests of the infant octuplets belonging to Suleman, who is better known as OctoMom. The reason wasn't because Suleman was a childbearing-obsessed single mom without a job, but because she allegedly was exploiting her children for profit. Namely, by allowing RadarOnline into her home to record life at OctoCentral without paying too much heed to California's child-labor laws regarding film shoots. Petersen heads a child-actor advocacy group called A Minor Consideration.
Associated Press reports that Suleman's attorney, Jeff Czech, claims that an entertainment lawyer has been retained by Suleman, obviating the need for a court-appointed conservator. Suleman is reportedly still considering reality TV program opportunities, including proposals from U.K.-based Eyeworks.
According to the San Gabriel Valley Tribune's Octorazzi blog, Czech filed a motion Friday to dismiss the Allred-Petersen petition. Perhaps inadvertently striking at the very foundation of modern news reporting, Czech claimed the original lawsuit was "based on a bunch of blogs and interviews on the Internet."
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
Suleman and Allred are scheduled to square off in court next Monday, July 27. Meanwhile, Octorazzi's nemesis blog, NadyaSuleman.com, reports that a judge has denied London-based Eyeworks' request to film the proceedings.