1) Russell Crowes accent. Is he from West Virginia, Australia, or is he a transnational dropout from the Meryl Streep Academy of Dramatic Arts?
2) The scene introducing Jennifer Connellys female lead is a textbook case of the disembodied male gaze in action. In a medium close-up of Connellys derrière that could not realistically be from the POV of professor John Nash as he stands at the front of the classroom, Connelly, near the back of the room, leans out a window and uses her feminine charms to get noisy workmen outside to cease and desist. The ubiquitous male gaze, therefore, not only undermines womens ability to act as subjects and express their subjective experience, it also undermines the audiences ability to notice that this womans experiences are largely missing from the narrative.
3) Costuming Connelly in a few retro dresses just doesnt cut it in terms of evoking the look of the postWorld War II period. I suppose its nice for the actress and her fans that she got to look so gorgeous on the big screen, but its hardly likely that a female college student who managed, against all odds, to get into a top-level math course at MIT in the early 1950s would look like a 21st-century Hollywood actress with a personal trainer, an incredible hair stylist and a regimen of spa facials.
4) Once Alicia (Connelly) marries, we never again hear a peep about her purported interest in mathematics.
5) The films central narrative twist allows the audience, initially, to hallucinate along with Nash. To accomplish this cinematic trick, Ron Howard relies upon and promotes a view of the Soviet Union as an Evil Empire and communism as an imminent threat. Yet there is no attention in this film to the actual context of anti-communist paranoia in which Nashs Cold War hallucinations take shape no mention of loyalty oaths, the Hollywood 10, HUAC, the Rosenberg executions, nor the real fears of impending atomic war felt by people in the U.S. and elsewhere during the Korean War.
6) Howards pastiche of McCarthy- and Reagan-era views on the evils of communism is not unrelated to the movies assumption that no one had criticized Adam Smith until, according to this film, Nash did in the late 1940s. Apparently Howard has never heard of Karl Marx, or any of the other political economists and theorists who critiqued capitalism during the nearly 100 years separating Marxs life from Nashs.
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
7) Howard turns Nashs Nobel award ceremony into a parody of gushy Oscar-night acceptance speeches, presumably a not-too-subliminal attempt to get Academy members primed to vote for his movie.
8) There is a moment in A Beautiful Mind reminiscent of the right-wing revisionism of Forrest Gump: In a montage sequence depicting the passage of time as Nash haunts the Princeton campus over several decades, only once does Howard choose to show Nash getting taunted by college hippies in the late 60s!
9) Anyway, whats the point of seeing a trashy melodrama if neither Bette Davis, Barbara Stanwyck nor Joan Crawford is in it?
10) Then again . . . the goofy special effects Howard inserted every time Nash had a nutso moment were pretty amusing.