Free Music

Which Is Better: Spotify or Grooveshark?

Comments (0)


Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:57 AM

click to enlarge Which one gets your money? - LJ WILLIAMSON
  • LJ Williamson
  • Which one gets your money?
The arrival of Google+ is forcing us to make some tough choices about Facebook -- what about the friends, carefully-curated photo albums, and goofy little notes you're not sure you want to pack along to the new place? And now there's Spotify, which is trying to force our hand when it comes to our beloved music source Grooveshark.

Much like with the likely-soon-to-be-passe Facebook, it's tough to make a clean break with Grooveshark's free music streaming site. Spotify recently hit American shores, leaving us with more difficult decisions and unsatisfying choices. At present, neither music streaming site feels complete, but if you rolled them both together, you'd have close to everything you wanted -- in one large, lumpy, and inconvenient package. So, the question is: Which is better?

Spotify, like Google+, is shiny and well organized. On the other hand, Grooveshark has a friendlier interface, not to mention a more lawless, less-corporate feel. That's because Grooveshark's user-uploaded database has plenty of music that can't be found on Spotify. For example, Grooveshark has Adele's album 21, but Spotify still doesn't. Then again, when Spotify has an album, all of the tracks will play properly. Grooveshark, not so much.

Both sites cost about the same to use. They're free in basic form, and getting rid of interface ads will set you back a few bucks per month: six on Grooveshark and five on Spotify. Getting Grooveshark on your mobile, meanwhile, is $9 more, $10 on Spotify.

But unlike the suddenly-ubiquitous Spotify, Grooveshark is still the place to go for tracks of dubious legality. For example, you'll never find Negativland's "U2" on Spotify, but you can punch up several versions of the uncopyrightable classic on Grooveshark. Grooveshark also beats Spotify on house music mashups, boasting an impressive collection of tracks from Bootie, et al.

Both sites have labeling problems. The quality control at Grooveshark -- reminiscent of pirate programs like Limewire -- is far poorer than that at Spotify, but Spotify isn't flawless either. For example, if you want to look up the music of one Polly Jean Harvey, entering "P.J. Harvey," with periods, yields a different set of results that entering "PJ Harvey," without.

Another nifty feature is that Spotify seamlessly integrates with your iTunes playlists. Grooveshark doesn't. Spotify also has a hefty selection of vocals-free karaoke tracks that pop up, for those playing along at home.

In the end, though, I don't want to be paying for two different services. So, which will I choose?

Related Content

Now Trending

  • Fanatics! Rock the Omar

    RADIO BROADCAST #279 08–03–14 Fanatics! Good radio is what it’s all about on this show and tonight, we again deliver the goods. You will notice the slightest of concepts here as we rock Omar Souleyman on both hours. He will be in LA on Sunday night. I will be interviewing...
  • The 10 Best Rock 'n' Roll Pinball Machines

    I am a devoted video-game fan and a constant cheerleader for them to be considered art, but honestly I would give up most of the compelling stories and high-definition graphics in the world for the simple pinball machines. They're crafted and mechanical, and when done with a loving hand can...
  • Party Picks of the Week: Jarvis Cocker Alert!

    Summer fun is burning hot about now with a slew of big bashes, many of them marking the not-so-timid Leo birthday contingent. Here, the best of the batch, kicking off what is sure to be an action-packed August. Party with ninjas: Studio 69’s Pirates vs. Ninjas dance and dress-up affair is always...
Los Angeles Concert Tickets