Queer Town: Olson/Boies Appeal to the Heart, Then the Brain
The first day of the federal trial to overturn Proposition 8 started in San Francisco yesterday, with attorneys Ted Olson and David Boies, who want to end the gay marriage ban in California, first pulling on the heartstrings and then following it up with expert testimony to appeal to the brain.
David Boies, foreground, with Ted Olson and plaintiffs at May, 2009, press conference.
American Foundation for Equal Rights
Variety Managing Editor Ted Johnson provides solid, courthouse coverage of the first day, which saw one of the plaintiffs in the case, Jeff Zarrillo, "choking up" at times when he explained why Proposition 8 is unacceptable.
"Domestic partnership would relegate me to a level of second class
citizenship, maybe third class citizenship," said Zarrillo. "That is not enough."
The three other plaintiffs -- Kris Perry, Sandy Stier and Paul Katami -- also testified at the beginning of the trial.
From there, things got a bit more cerebral.
In the late afternoon, Harvard University professor Nancy Cott started her testimony, which went into the history of marriage.
Cott did not finish her time on the witness stand and will continue this morning.
The Harvard professor will then be followed by another Ivy League witness -- Yale professor George Chauncey. He will
testify about the history of discrimination experienced by gays and
lesbians in the United States.
The American Foundation for Equal Rights, the Los Angeles-based, pro-gay marriage group that's bankrolling the federal lawsuit, has also set up an informative Web site.
Contact Patrick Range McDonald at email@example.com.
Get the This Week's Top Stories Newsletter
Every week we collect the latest news, music and arts stories — along with film and food reviews and the best things to do this week — so that you’ll never miss LA Weekly's biggest stories.