The war began with a pre-emptive strike at the enemy. It wasnt long before the first attackers quickly snatched the upper hand. But then the other side fought back fiercely, if not necessarily effectively. There were frontline battles, some skirmishes and sniper fire, even outright kidnappings. Now battle-weary troops need to be bolstered.
No, this isnt a status report about Iraq. Its the latest twists and turns in the Great Hollywood Newspaper War (or GHNW, as it will be known in these pages from now on).
The New York Times is mulling yet more hires to expand its global infotainment coverage in that increasingly ridiculous mano a mano battle for show-biz dominance with the Los Angeles Times. L.A. Weekly has learned that the Gray Lady may add two high-profile jobs: another Big Media beat reporter and another Hollywood correspondent.
First the positions have to be funded. But there seems to be no reason they wont be because, suddenly, money is no object. Which should come as a surprise to no-longer-patient NYT shareholders, who are watching the stock price sink like a stone to near-9/11 lows, and to no-longer-coddled NYT reporters, whom management harangues with increasingly threatening e-mails about late expense reports (including the most dire consequence: that past-deadline expenses wont be paid at all).
TicketsFri., Dec. 9, 7:00pm
Anaheim Ducks v. San Jose Sharks
TicketsFri., Dec. 9, 7:00pm
Los Angeles Lakers v Phoenix Suns - Verified Resale Tickets
TicketsFri., Dec. 9, 7:30pm
UCLA Bruins Men's Basketball vs. University of Michigan Men's Basketball
TicketsSat., Dec. 10, 5:00pm
If indeed all-out war requires all-out commitment that is, unless youre Rummy and Cheney and Shrubby trying to club Iraq into submission on the cheap this represents an abrupt about-face for the newspaper of record. The NYT used to follow the personnel philosophy of Do More With Less. Now its rapidly coming around to the LATs way of staffing, which is Do Less With More. (Cmon, how often have we wondered what those hordes on Spring Street do all day? It only seems like Susan King is putting out the Calendar section single-handedly, especially when compared to the infrequent occurrence of Rachel Abramowitzs byline or the rarity of Robert Weklos.)
Specifically, the two NYT gigs, if approved, would give the Business sections Geraldine Fabrikant a Tweedledum on the Big Media beat, and Cultures Sharon Waxman a Tweedledee on the Hollywood circuit. While Business wants a seasoned veteran, Culture may use the slot to groom an up-and-coming talent. Meanwhile, the NYT is looking for a TV editor and a TV-beat replacement for retiring Bernie Weinraub.
Still, beneath the vaingloriousness of any caged match between media rivals lies the reality of their motives for fighting in the first place. And so the question has to be asked: Isnt pouring all this money and militia into something as ultimately silly as show-biz coverage demeaning to both papers when theres real news not being covered?
They do it because its in their self-interest, not the publics interest. Newspapers like the NYT and LAT are desperate for young eyeballs, and entertainment crap attracts them like sharks to chum. It also lures the affluent, as evidenced by recent demo info showing Us Weekly had richer readers than far more glamorous glossies. Then theres sheer greed, since all those supersized two-page film ads placed for ego feeding in the prestige papers generate big bucks, which in turn encourage more movie coverage.
Okay, in the real world, you take profits where you can get them, especially in this weak economy. But, really, youd think the NYT and LAT with this mo money and manpower would try not just to widen and deepen its infotainment coverage (which still consists too frequently of ad nauseam apologies by failing suits, or suck-up sit-downs with preening and profligate talent) but do something new. At least put someone on the trail of Big Media conflicts of interest, which grow worse by the hour.
Everybody complains about Fox but who dares to tell how NBC news programs are selling the public on the war in Iraq in its network and cable stations because parent company General Electric is expected to have up to $3 billion in contracts in that country by 2006? And how NBC news programs are selling the public on the war on terrorism because G.E. is an industry leader in developing advanced technologies to meet the worlds increasing security needs. And how NBC news programs are also selling the public on the re-election of GWB since the Bush administrations warmongering and scarifying have been good for G.E.s bottom line.
Its not just the 24/7 bashing of Kerry in unison by MSNBC hosts thats so unethical. Its that clapping wildly behind the prez on Tuesday inside the Pensacola Civic Center, where Bush spoke to supporters, was none other than current MSNBC talk show host Joe Scarborough. Thats allowed by the network, yet NBC recently refused to give political documentary filmmaker Robert Greenwald a one-minute clip of Ws inarticulate interview with Tim Russert on Meet the Press.
You may recall that moment where our commander in chief tried to defend his decision to attack Iraq, but lapsed into incoherence. NBC refused to give up the clip to Greenwald, explaining to his agent that its not very flattering to the president and that the network wished to remain neutral. (Relying on the fair-use doctrine, Greenwald included the clip anyway in the upcoming theatrical release of his documentary, Uncovered: The Whole Truth About the Iraq War, even though it exposes the film to a potential copyright-infringement lawsuit.)
That same phony baloney about nonpartisanship was given by the Walt Disney Co. to explain its boneheaded decision not to distribute Michael Moores Fahrenheit 9/11 ($113 mil in box office and still climbing, as compared to flops like The Alamo, Hidalgo, Around the World in 80 Days and King Arthur the studio did release). Yet Eisners company enjoys a wealth of perks from Bush and bro, from Homeland Securitys March 2003 granting of a no-fly zone over Disney World, to tax breaks for its theme parks and hotels in Florida, where Brer Jeb just happens to be governor.
In any case, after this months vacation cease-fire, the NYT-LAT battling begins intensifying when the troop movements are in place. To recap, movie editor Michael Cieply defected from the LAT to the NYT, as did film critic Manohla Dargis, music business writer Jeff Leeds and architecture critic Nicolai Ouroussoff.
To counter, the LAT made TV critic Carina Chocano into Dargis Lite while Calendar columnist Paul Brownfield became Mr. Chocano. Then, Spring Street added Maria Russo from the New York Observer and Amy Wallace from Los Angeles magazine to estrogen up its editing staff. But did Wallace jump too soon? After all, she coulda been a contendah for the NYTs second Hollywood gig. Instead, she sounds like journalisms version of Xena: The Warrior Princess with eye-rolling pronouncements guaranteed to endear her to the bosses: The L.A. Times is going to be at war with the N.Y. Times over entertainment coverage, she told the Weekly recently. And you know what? Were going to win!
All well and good, but if an army marches on its stomach, as Napoleons said, then we contend newsroom soldiers need at least a computer. On Tuesday, an amusing little NYT memo announcing not just the literal but the physical reorganization of the Culture section reminded the staff of the downside of all this hiring: not enough desks.
E-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Get the ICYMI: Today's Top Stories Newsletter
Catch up on the day's news and stay informed with our daily digest of the most popular news, music, food and arts stories in Los Angeles, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.