MORE

McCourt Divorce Trial, Day Three: Screwing The Fans

Day Three. The Dodgers began the day 6.5 games out the wild card, but fell 7.5 games back with an afternoon loss to the Phillies.

How's this for karma? At the same moment that Roy Oswalt was mowing down Dodger hitters this afternoon, David Boies was grilling Frank McCourt about his plan to turn the Dodgers around by cutting player payroll.

You might ask how that's relevant to the divorce trial, and Judge Scott Gordon seemed to have the same question. Mostly, it looked like Boies was having fun and couldn't help himself.

At the end of the day, I asked Boies how Frank compares to Bill Gates as a witness.

Boies famously dismembered the Gates in a federal anti-trust case in the late 1990s, drawing him into making blanket denials that were easy to refute.

"They have many similarities," Boies said, leaving one to guess what those might be.

This is the third day in a row that Boies has worn the same red tie. Some sort of good luck charm, apparently.

The payroll issue came up because Frank says that Jamie thought the Dodgers purchase was too risky, and she signed away her right to the team because she didn't want to share in that risk.

Jamie's lawyers are trying to show that the purchase was in fact a sure thing. As evidence, they point to the Dodgers' Summary Business Plan from Oct. 23, 2003. In short, the plan was to screw the fans.

There was actually a two-pronged strategy: raise ticket prices and cut expenses, primarily payroll. Frank says he never saw the plan, which raises all sorts of other questions, but let's try to stay focused.

Boies: First, did you believe and did the acquisitions team believe it was practical to reduce the operating expenses of the Dodgers?

McCourt: Yes, sir.

Boies: What were some of the ways to reduce operating expenses?

McCourt: The most significant expense was player compensation. That would be by far and away the biggest line item.

The plan was to cut payroll incrementally to $85 million by 2006, and Frank -- ever the over-achiever -- actually beat that goal by a year, cutting payroll from $105 million in 2003 to $83 million in 2005.

Payroll was supposed to rise only 4% per year after that, and there he was not so successful. Player salaries rose to $118 million in 2008 -- at the height of the credit bubble -- before crashing back down to $95 million now.

The plan also projected a deep cut in "baseball operations" -- things like scouting, farm teams, the Dominican academy, and so on -- of 11% in 2005 and 21% in 2006. And now they wonder why they don't have any prospects.

The other part of the plan was to raise ticket prices. From the plan, it sounds like they think Dodger fans are a bunch of suckers.

"Dodger fans continue to buy tickets and pass through the turnstiles of Dodger Stadium in remarkable numbers despite the team's lack of success on the field... However, Dodger tickets currently are priced, on average, well below those of other large-market (and many mid-market) teams."

And, of course, they raised average prices about 70% from 2004 to 2009. Though from the looks of the crowds lately, it seems like fans have less tolerance for failure than they used to.

Also worth noting: Not only did the McCourts buy the Dodgers entirely with loans, but they also took $2.5 million in cash out of the team immediately upon the purchase. If this were a home mortgage, they'd call that "cash back at closing," which is considered a form of loan fraud. Nobody's alleging that here, but it's yet more evidence -- if more were needed -- that Fox was a highly motivated seller and that the McCourts got one hell of a deal.

So what does this have to do with who owns the team? Not much, and Gordon seemed impatient to move along.

One of the highlights of the day was the trash talk at the postgame press conference.

McCourt Divorce Trial, Day Three: Screwing The Fans

Frank's lead attorney, Steve Susman, dared Boies to ask Frank a particular question about the drafting of the MPA on Thursday. "Let's see if he has the nerve," Susman said, as Boies watched him perform.

When it was Boies' turn in front of the cameras, he also challenged Susman to ask a question: "I don't think he can dare have his client get on the stand and testify in response to this question," Boies said.

Asked what he thought Frank would do on Thursday, Boies said: "Maybe he'll just run for cover."

So, at least they're having fun.

Updated at 10:42 p.m.

Full McCourt coverage:

Day 11:

Wasser The Dealmaker Versus Susman The Carnivore

It Ain't Over Till It's Over

Day 10:

Dodger Execs Circle The Wagons Around Frank

Mediation Day:

A Long Day Ends Without A Deal

Day 9:

A Settlement Looms As Silverstein's Agony Ends

Day 8:

The Screwing of Larry Silverstein

The Return of Silverstein's Boner, In Which Two Interpretations Are Explained

Day 7:

Silverstein's Boner

Reynolds Cafferata's Dodger Dreams

Day 6:

Frank's Four Self-Defeating Arguments

Steve Susman Sharpens His Knives

Jamie Dummies Up

Week 1 Wrap-Up:

The Desperate Hunt For Exhibit A, Or, How To Blame The Conquistadors

Day 5:

The Return Of Vladimir Shpunt

Jamie Takes The Stand

Day 4:

Boies Puts Frank On The Run

The Billable Hours Mount

Day 3:

Nervous? Frank McCourt Blinks 75 Times/Min.

Screwing The Fans

Day 2:

Steve Susman Goes On The Attack

McCourt vs. Boies

Day 1:

Trial Opens With A Win For Jamie

The Screaming Meanie

Even more McCourt:

L.A. Weekly cover story, Dodger Dog, from August 

Newsletters

All-access pass to top stories, events and offers around town.

Sign Up >

No Thanks!

Remind Me Later >