Tuesday nights mayoral debate, the first of five between City Attorney James Hahn and former Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa, was notable for -- well, not a hell of a lot. The candidates repeatedly pitched their answers to swing voters, attacked each other only delicately and sporadically, and took refuge -- particularly early on, in a mutual effort to overcome debaters stage fright -- in wonk-speech.
In the category of industrial-strength blithering, the debate reached its high point right at the start, when moderator Warren Olney asked Hahn whom hed appoint to the board of the MTA. Hahn told Olney he wanted to put a transit rider onto the board, and then zoomed into rhetorical overdrive. I want forward thinkers, he said, wholl favor common-sense solutions, to get more bang for the buck.
As Old Mayor Daley once said, We will rise to higher and higher platitudes of achievement.
For his part, Villaraigosa went out of his way to say something nice about Steve Soboroff and Dick Riordan, whose endorsements hes seeking. Under the heading of It Shouldnt Be a Total Loss, he attacked Hahn for supporting the 3-12 work schedule (three 12-hour shifts weekly) for police officers, a change in Hahns position that enabled the city attorney to pick up the support of the Police Protective Leagues board. This was a twofer for Villaraigosa: He could indignantly oppose this erosion of public-safety standards, while publicizing the fact that hed said No to a union.
The candidates actually spent much of the time agreeing -- on the need for diversity, affordable housing (though only Villaraigosa advocated a linkage fee on developers) and the merits of state Treasurer Phil Angelides efforts to direct more capital to the inner cities. (Note to Gray Davis: Both candidates speak glowingly of a statewide official these days, and it aint you.) a
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
At the close, Olney asked the candidates for their vision for Los Angeles. When it comes to matters personal (like his own life) and matters cosmic (like the destiny of the city), Villaraigosas plainly the more compelling speaker, and Tuesday night was no exception. His own life, he said, illustrated the opportunities that L.A. at its best affords its residents; the mayors task is to help the city do a better job of providing those opportunities for all Angelenos. Hahn followed, agreeing that L.A. must be a place where no barriers of birth or station should stand athwart what citizens can achieve. It sounded, for a moment, like an argument for his rival, but by then, it didnt seem that anyone was listening.