A GUY NAMED JOE
I wanted to inform you of an error. You mistakenly slotted Doug Irelands story about Senator Joe Lieberman [Holy Joe, Corporate Joe, G.I. Joe, July 1117] in your news section. Language such as junk science for bigots, notorious homo-hater, notorious theocrat and anti-intellectual hysteria clearly has its place in your columns section, where articles of opinion are published. (You probably want to publish this letter in your columns section as well.) For further reference, I recommend Associated Press Guide to Newswriting by Rene J. Cappon.
Keep up the good effort. Youll get there eventually.
Kalon Pilmanis San Pedro
Doug Irelands recent article on Joe Lieberman which asked Will the real Senator Lieberman please stand up? was so filled with inaccuracies, distortions and smears that no one could recognize the progressive, procivil rights leader that I and many others know Joe Lieberman to be. I worked closely with Joe during my time in Congress, where I represented Los Angeles for 10 years and regularly compiled ADA ratings in the mid-90s. I have also worked closely with the progressive community. So I am in a unique position to correct the most egregious errors in your piece and stand up for the real Joe Lieberman.
Its just plain laughable and an outright lie to suggest as Ireland does that Joe is or ever was a fan of the racist theories of The Bell Curve. Ireland does a similar job on the truth in portraying Joes record on affirmative action. The fact is that Joe Lieberman has always supported affirmative action as a means of realizing equal opportunity from his days as a state senator in the early 1970s through to his strong defense of the University of Michigan admissions program this year. Its true that in the mid-1990s Joe raised questions about some affirmative action programs that had become or were on the verge of becoming quotas much as Bill Clinton, John Kerry, Dick Gephardt and many other Democrats did. But he never supported Prop. 209, as Ireland wrongly alleges: While he said that the literal language on its face might have been hard to disagree with, he has expressed his opposition to the initiative. More important, Joe supported President Clintons Mend It, Dont End It reforms to federal affirmative-action programs, and he has voted against every Republican effort to dismantle them. If you have any doubt about where Joe stands, go to his Web site (www.joe2004.com) and read the unequivocal statements he has made lauding the Supreme Courts decision on the Michigan case and denouncing the anti-affirmative-action initiative that Ward Connerly is trying to get on the ballot in Michigan. He has also strongly condemned Connerlys racial privacy initiative here in California.
Ireland also grossly distorts Joes record on religion. Joe is a strong believer in the separation of church and state, and the fact that a Jewish-American leader could openly profess his faith in God during a presidential campaign is not a violation of that principle. Consistent with that belief, Joe opposes state-sponsored or coerced school prayer and, like Bill Clinton, supports the First Amendment rights of students to pray on their own. And, contrary to Irelands misreporting, Joe helped defeat George W. Bushs right-wing version of the faith-based initiative, which would have eroded the church-state line and pre-empted state and local civil rights laws. Then he helped pass a compromise in the Senate that focused on helping all charities help more people in need, provided $1.3 billion in new funding for the Social Services Block Grant program (which supports critical local services like low-income day care and Meals on Wheels) and won the support of Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton and every other Democrat in the Senate.
Ireland seriously exaggerates and twists Joes limited work with some conservatives. But his larger crime is engaging in guilt by association. In a Congress controlled by Republicans, if Democrats want to pass legislation, it is not uncommon for Democrats who strongly disagree with Republicans on most things to team up with them on single issues to garner a majority. Ted Kennedy worked with President Bush to craft the No Child Left Behind Act. Hillary Clinton teamed up with Tom DeLay to improve the nations foster care system. And the late Paul Wellstone collaborated with Pete Domenici on a mental health parity plan. But to suggest that this means they agree with these Republicans on broader philosophical issues is either naive or intentionally misleading.
Like many other things, Ireland conveniently overlooks these facts, just as he overlooks Joes strong record on gay rights. In 1975 Joe called for a state ban on discrimination in employment, accommodation and housing based on sexual orientation, and was the deciding vote in passing the bill in 1979. He has been a longtime, leading co-sponsor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act in the U.S. Senate. And this year he is cosponsoring legislation to provide domestic partnership benefits to gay and lesbian federal employees. Hardly the work of a political homophobe. As for gays in the military, Ireland got his story completely wrong. Joe did not help Sam Nunn craft the Dont Ask, Dont Tell policy in fact, he opposed legislation banning gay men and lesbians from serving in the military and voted against Dont Ask, Dont Tell both in the Senate Armed Services Committee and on the Senate floor. He believes this policy violates fundamental American values of fairness, equality and equal opportunity, and that it also denies us talent we greatly need.
The list of fictions goes on and on, and there is not enough space here to debunk them all. Suffice it say that the real Joe Lieberman stands up for what he thinks is right. That means sometimes disagreeing with some members of his party, as he did in supporting the war in Iraq. But it also means fighting for core Democratic values like opportunity, freedom, fairness and tolerance. And it means fighting against Bushs divisive right-wing agenda the gutting of critical environmental protections, the eroding of a womans right to choose, allowing corporate crooks off the hook, etc. Joe Lieberman opposed John Ashcrofts nomination. He opposed the partial-birth-abortion bill. And he is leading the fight to stop Bushs assault on the environment. Thats the real Joe Lieberman principled, progressive and proud to be a Democrat.
Mel Levine Former U.S. congressman Los Angeles
Re: Howard Blumes The Fix Is Out [June 2026]. The firing of Los Angeles Unified School District General Council Hal Kwalwasser is just another example of the obscuring of the real happenings there since the reform board brought in by Dick Riordan took power a few years ago. Given a clear view, what has happened at the LAUSD in the last few years, following the Riordan Revolution, is the greatest price increase in bureaucrats the district has ever seen. (And, oddly enough, it occurred with union acquiescence.) Kwalwasser, handpicked by Superintendent Roy Romer, made $100,000 per year more than his well-liked and extremely capable and competent predecessor, Richard Mason. Romer himself makes $80,000-plus more than my former boss, Superintendent Ruben Zacarias. The person who replaced me in my position as communications adviser to the superintendent makes $40,000 more than I did.
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
These salaries and the many others not mentioned, with accompanying parachutes are obscene when you consider that many young teachers are struggling just to get by on $30,000$40,000 per year, with no bail-out clauses in their contracts. All things considered, perhaps its time for a new revolution at the LAUSD.
Brad Sales Former spokesperson for LAUSD superintendents Ruben Zacarias and Sid Thompson Los Angeles
The photograph of the band Rose for Bohdan, which ran in the July 1117 issue (in Scoring the Clubs), was taken by Wild Don Lewis.