Okay, okay. I admit it. Its my fault. Lord knows, Ive tried to pretend that Im not to blame. After all, I opposed the invasion. I spent years assailing the Bush administration you know, the people who chose the war. Ive even spent thousands of dollars in taxes paying for our soldiers in Baghdad and Falluja. How could I be responsible for the mess over there? I finally faced the cruel truth when President Bush and Vice President Cheney recently lifted their noses from the grindstone what hours of hard work they put in keeping us safe! and tackled this question head-on. With customary Kantian rigor, they pointed out something that had never once occurred to me. It is my skepticism, defeatism and invidious realism put simply, my bad attitude that have been undermining our nations mission in Iraq. As you can imagine, their words sobered me up. And I began a thorough and searching moral inventory of the political mistakes Ive made over the past three years, misjudgments that lets be brutally frank have given aid and comfort to every pro-fascist murderer who straps on a bomb to blow up a mosque or a market.The list of my blunders could hardly be more damning: 1. Although Saddam was a despicable tyrant, I opposed toppling him because I thought the war would prove bloody and hugely expensive, and would probably leave the world more chaotic and dangerous than before.2. I insisted that the White House was inflating its claims about Iraq being an imminent threat.3. I doubted that Saddam had anything to do with 9/11.4. I believed that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld would botch the reconstruction of Iraq.5. I was shocked and appalled by Abu Ghraib.6. I worried that the war would turn the world against us.7. I scoffed every time we captured or killed the insurgents number-two man.8. I . . . You get the point. Blaming the wars failures on those who actively opposed it and predicted, often with scary accuracy, just how it would go wrong, reminds me of the time in high school when our football coach blamed the teams lousy performance on our lack of school spirit during a pep rally. Knowing that the public has soured on the war, the administration has itself been staging pep rallies for both Bush and his vice president for torture, as former CIA head Stansfield Turner recently dubbed Dick Cheney. With the righteous self-pity that defines modern conservatism, the administration has been blaming its problems on everybody to the left of Bill OReilly. No matter that the right controls the White House, the Congress, the Supreme Court and most corporate boardrooms. No matter that Iraq was the Bush administrations war of choice. Somebody else is to blame.And so, to the cheers of their flying monkeys in the blogosphere, Bush and Cheney spent the past fortnight practicing their usual tricks slandering critics patriotism, implying that dissent is an attack on our troops, and dishonestly claiming that a bipartisan Senate commission cleared them of misrepresenting prewar intelligence when, of course, it did no such thing. True sore winners, they bristled with outrage at being judged for their results, not their professed intentions.While I always enjoy the rare appearances of the incomparable Cheney, who emerged from his spider-hole wearing his cummerbund as high as a doo-rag, true connoisseurs of flop-sweat have relished watching Bush grow more rabbity with each passing day. Talk about your ironies of history. Dubya doubtless thought Vietnam was finally behind him when Dan Rather got zapped, yet here he is hunkering down in full Lyndon Johnson mode. Just as LBJ spent his final time in office speaking only to uniformed personnel who wouldnt dare diss their commander in chief, so Bush has been spending an eerie amount of time on military bases talking to captive audiences. (He likes being seen with American soldiers as long as theyre not dead or wounded.) You have to admire his stern claims that he wont cut and run from Iraq, when everybody knows members of his administration are busy figuring out how, before next Novembers elections, theyll be able to cut and jog.The real cutters and runners are in the GOP theyre suddenly worried about getting re-elected. Whether its Pennsylvanias reactionary senator Rick Dead Fetus Hugger Santorum ducking the chance to appear with the president at a Veterans Day speech, or Representative J.D. Hayworth saying hed prefer that Bush not campaign with him in his home state of Arizona, Republicans are now scurrying to make sure that they arent harmed by the increasing unpopularity of whats happening in Iraq. Like the White House, they know that their real problem isnt Americans who opposed the war all along they didnt vote Republican anyway. Its the millions of Americans who trusted in Bushs judgment, supported the war, and now see the whole thing as a debacle.The rights political jockeying finds an echo in the bad-faith fiesta thrown by liberal hawks who must deal with the fact that they promoted an invasion thats turned out badly. None has been more egregious than smug, gee-whizish New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, who always seems like the sort of high school history teacher who couldnt finish his doctorate but wows 16-year-olds by calling Brazil amazon.country. Although he served as the wars most prominent liberal fig leaf, hes still trying to have it both ways, taking credit for his visionary ideals in supporting democracy and a remade Middle East, then faulting other people for their incompetence in executing the master plan. What did he think hed get from George Bush and Dick Cheney? They didnt exactly turn Afghanistan into the Switzerland of Central Asia (with opiates instead of chocolates); in fact, they mocked the idea of nation-building during the 2000 campaign, and, in the run-up to war, kept claiming that the whole Iraq operation would be a piece of cake.Democratic politicians have been just as bad. As Rosa Brooks noted in her Los Angeles Times column, November has become Repudiate Your Iraq Vote Month which is obviously linked to the wars poll numbers. Years after it might have made a difference, Bill Clinton called the war a mistake, a declaration that was immediately viewed through the prism of his wifes presidential ambitions. Was this Willies slick way of signaling to liberal voters that, despite all Hillarys hawkish talk, she didnt believe in the war?Meanwhile, both members of last years Democratic ticket publicly said that theyd been wrong in okaying the war. While John Edwards did this the canny way identifying himself with all the ordinary Americans who put their faith in the president to do the right thing John Kerry displayed his customary tin ear. He blamed the administration for misleading him into approving an invasion. (Didnt he learn anything in Vietnam?) Knowing what we know now, he brayed, I would not have gone to war in Iraq. Now thats leadership. I imagine he also feels strongly that it was a mistake to have booked steerage on the Titanic, failed to defend Pearl Harbor or traded Shaq to Miami.While one could only laugh at Kerrys political ineptitude, I found myself admiring the gutbucket integrity of Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha, a veteran of the Korean and Vietnam wars, whos known as a sentimental tough guy he visits soldiers in military hospitals and grows teary at their suffering. Murtha had been solidly behind the war in Iraq, so when this great friend of the military called for an immediate withdrawal, you knew that the war was over in the American peoples heads, if not yet on the streets of Baghdad.Predictably, the White House dragged out its familiar playbook, The Chickenhawks Guide to Smearing War Heroes, and tried to besmirch Murthas good name. Looking like he was battling a severe case of flatulence, beleaguered Scott McClellan compared the beefy old congressman to, of all people, Michael Moore. Well, I guess they both could shed a few pounds.Its unlikely that such attacks will work this time. Indeed, watching Murtha on Meet the Press, one saw a decent, profoundly sincere man who, though a Democrat, was conservative in the old-fashioned sense of the word. You didnt have to agree with his call for immediate withdrawal to grasp that he was articulating a feeling now shared by the majority of Americans.In hindsight, Tim Russert asked him, do you believe your vote in Iraq was a mistake?Obviously, it was a mistake, Murtha replied. And hearing this doughty old Marine say such words, you knew that the question was no longer, Should we have gone to war in Iraq? but How do we get our asses out of there?
Recommended For YouPowered by SailThru
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!