Dirty Air Deals
TO MAKE WAY FOR MORE fossil-fueled power plants and imports of oil and gas, the South Coast Air Quality Management District is preparing to sell air-pollution credits reserved for essential government services, like schools and water treatment, to big energy companies at a discount that will save these giants tens of millions of dollars.
The price break for Big Business undermines the region’s air-pollution-credit program just as pressure has been building for the industry to use sustainable technologies and improve energy efficiency to cut both air pollution and emissions of global-warming gases.
Not only does the AQMD’s plan contradict those efforts by promoting fossil fuel, it also threatens to create clouds of toxic pollution in neighborhoods that border new fossil-fuel plants enjoying the credit giveaway. “These are monster deep-pocket entities,” said Bill Powers, a member of Ratepayers for Affordable, Clean Energy, a coalition pushing for renewable power. “It’s set up so when the market gets tight, you get innovative. That’s not happening.”
Edison International, parent of just one of the companies that would benefit under the AQMD plan, had a profit of $1.1 billion in 2005. Under AQMD’s plan, its Edison Mission Energy subsidiary could save up to $41 million on the credits needed to build two new power plants, as compared to buying them on the open market at the most recent high price.
Los Angeles Angels vs. Houston Astros
TicketsFri., Aug. 25, 7:07pm
Los Angeles Rams vs. Los Angeles Chargers
TicketsSat., Aug. 26, 5:00pm
Premium Seating: Los Angeles Angels v. Oakland Athletics
TicketsMon., Aug. 28, 7:07pm
Los Angeles Angels vs. Oakland Athletics
TicketsMon., Aug. 28, 7:07pm
UCLA Bruins Football Season Ticket Deposit
TicketsSun., Sep. 3, 4:30pm
Mitsubishi Corp., a Japanese company that would gain under the plan, made a profit of $868 million in the last quarter of 2005. Its Sound Energy Solutions subsidiary, which is planning to build a liquefied natural-gas-import terminal at the Port of Long Beach, could save $5 million under AQMD’s scheme.
Many more energy companies could benefit too, under the AQMD credit bonanza.
The giveaway scheme comes just as the nation’s smoggiest region reaches the technological limits of controlling air pollution created by its fossil-fuel-based economy. Consequently, the availability of credits, also known as offsets, has plummeted and their cost has soared.
“At this point there are not enough available offsets in the air basin for anybody’s plants,” said Larry Kostrzewa, managing director at Edison Mission Energy, which is banking on credits from the district to construct two new natural-gas-fired power plants.
The federal Clean Air Act requires companies planning to build new plants that spew pollutants to first obtain credits to offset their emissions. Firms can earn the credits either by reducing pollution at their existing facilities more than is required, or by shutting down old equipment and plants. Companies that cannot do these things themselves can purchase air-pollution rights from other firms that have earned credits.
The requirements — enforced through AQMD’s so-called “new-source review” rules — are meant to keep air pollution from increasing as the economy grows, by giving companies an incentive to develop innovative clean-air technology.
“We do support the use of the cleanest technology, but being realistic, we know this is not going to happen overnight,” said Mohsen Nazemi, assistant deputy executive officer of the AQMD. He said that within a couple of years Southern California will face an energy shortage unless more power plants are built and more oil and liquefied natural gas are imported through the region’s ports.
Renewable energy and fuel efficiency are “a piece of the puzzle,” said Nazemi. “They are not the only solution.”
AQMD would sell credits for emissions of sulfur oxides for $18,000 a pound, and for particulate matter for $50,417 a pound, as compared with recent market highs of $18,000 and $74,250 per pound, respectively, for the pollutants. The price for credits for particulate matter — the region’s worst pollutant — represents a discount of 32 percent. AQMD also is considering making carbon-monoxide credits available.
Nazemi said AQMD’s proposed price for particulate is at market rate, characterizing the higher-priced trades as outliers. The board is expected to approve credits for the energy industry this summer.
However, Samantha Unger, Evolution Markets’ environmental broker, said AQMD’s proposed prices are low. “The particulate matter and sulfur oxides are below market,” said Unger. “There are still people who would pay more than that pricing.”
Companies building new plants must obtain 1.2 pounds of credits for each pound per day of pollutants they emit, based on the day of the year they would pump out the most pollution. For instance, Edison Mission Energy’s two proposed power plants together would emit 1,434 pounds of particulate matter under peak operation, so the company would need to obtain 1,721 pounds of credits. Based on the $23,833 discount Edison would enjoy at AQMD’s proposed price of $50,417 per pound, the company would save $41 million, as compared with purchasing credits at the open-market high price of $74,250.
All of the pollutants covered by the proposal present health hazards. Sulfur oxides irritate the respiratory system and form particles downwind. Particulate is considered the region’s worst air pollutant, linked to asthma and premature death from heart and respiratory disease. Carbon monoxide reduces the supply of oxygen in the body.
AQMD acquires credits when companies go out of business and do not bother to request certificates for their pollution rights. The agency then places the pollution rights in its priority reserve. The reserve normally is open only to public agencies that operate water-treatment plants, public transit, schools, police and fire stations, and hospitals, not to for-profit companies that must obtain credits on the open market.
AQMD would use proceeds from the energy companies, Nazemi said, to convert trucks and other dirty equipment — which often runs on diesel — to clean fuels.
The immediate beneficiaries of the plan would be Edison Mission Energy, which plans to build power plants in City of Industry and Riverside County, and Sound Energy Solutions, with its planned LNG-import terminal in Long Beach. The city of Vernon, which consists of private industries, except for a handful of residents, would be able to get credits too for a major power plant it is planning.
A SHORTAGE OF CREDITS on the open market is a “major issue” when it comes to building the fossil-fuel power plants, confirmed Susanne Garfield, spokesperson for the California Energy Commission.
However, Bernadette del Chiaro, clean-energy advocate for Environment California, noted that the fossil-fuel plants are competing with solar energy and other types of renewable power. The credit scheme, she said, “undermines everything we’re trying to do.”
For instance, she said that under the state’s recently adopted $3.2 billion solar-incentive program it would be quicker to install enough solar panels to produce the electricity Edison would make with its new plants without any pollution.
AQMD conceivably could require power-plant builders to consider using renewable energy as the best available pollution-control technology, said Matt Haber, deputy director of air quality for the federal Environmental Protection Agency in San Francisco. “It’s a qualified yes,” he said, noting AQMD could, for instance, use wind power instead of fossil fuel.
Oil companies seeking to import more gasoline and crude oil at the Port of Los Angeles would also enjoy discounted credits under the AQMD scheme. Pacific Energy Partners — which is planning to build a major new import terminal in Los Angeles Harbor — claims it will not need the AQMD pollution rights, said Jennifer Shigei, manager of investor relations for the company. However, Shigei said the company would not rule out dipping into the credit pot in the future.
AQMD may be able to clean up some mobile sources with the money from the energy companies, but those living around the new facilities would see increases in pollution, said Joe Lyou, executive director of the California Environmental Rights Alliance.
People who already live in the highly polluted port area will face more pollution, said Lyou, as will those downwind from the power plants, which are being planned next to working-class neighborhoods that are largely Latino.
Typical of the effects of such large energy facilities is Edison’s proposed Walnut Creek Energy Park in City of Industry, which would emit 53 tons a year of fine-particulate pollution, as well as tons of other pollutants. Vernon’s proposed power plant would emit 113 tons a year of particulate matter. The LNG terminal in Long Beach would be the largest single new source of air pollution built for years.
All of the projects would emit tons of toxic pollutants too, such as formaldehyde, xylene and toluene, pollutants which have helped make the region’s air carcinogenic.
Lyou noted that a coalition of energy companies has pushed the credit plan through an advisory council at AQMD.
Minutes of meetings from AQMD’s Home Rule Advisory Group — which consists largely of business interests — show that energy companies and their representatives have been pushing the district to make more credits available for industry. For instance, Mike Carroll, a Latham & Watkins attorney who represents energy companies, advocated at the January 18 meeting of the group that its principal focus in 2006 should be “expanded to include evaluating alternative sources of offsets, such as the priority reserve.” Carroll did not return the L.A. Weekly’s phone calls for this story.
Get the ICYMI: Today's Top Stories Newsletter Our daily newsletter delivers quick clicks to keep you in the know
Catch up on the day's news and stay informed with our daily digest of the most popular news, music, food and arts stories in Los Angeles, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.