Updated after the jump with reaction from Patch's Venice editor. First posted at 7:07 a.m.
We recently came across another case of questionable use of content by Patch:
In a report this week on a $1.6 million plan to replenish sand along the Venice coast, Patch's Venice site posted a story under the name of one its local authors that mirrored -- word-for-word -- a City News Service story on the sand that ran at nbclosangeles.com. Click that link then compare for yourself:
Checking back, we noticed that Patch remixed the story so that it's not a word-for-word biting of the CNS/NBC piece:
Now, it's possible that Patch subscribes to City News Service, as does the Weekly and a lot of local outlets. If so, a reporter shouldn't just put her name on top of wire copy without explaining at some point where it came from.
Even the remixed version takes content -- including information from William Fujioka, the county's chief executive officer -- from CNS without really crediting it.
The Fujioka-attributed fact that the new sand will "provide a buffer to protect inland structures from coastal storm flooding and damage" remains in the remixed version of the Patch story without credit regarding where it came from.
Where else did they get the exact same info CNS and NBC had?
Another case of Patch plagiarism? What do you think? Comment below or tell Patch West Coast editorial director Marcia Parker in person. She'll be in town Thursday to speak at a Los Angeles Press Club event.
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
Update: Patch's Venice editor, Samantha Page, weighed in via the comments section below, saying that the site does indeed subscribe to City News Service and that she posted CNS wire copy:
"My job is to provide news for the Venice community. In doing so, I am lucky to have access to City News Service, which helps me report stories that directly affect us in the most timely and efficient way possible," she said.
She didn't, however, explain why the copy was used under a byline without telling folks that the info actually came from a wire service.
Before we posted this story, we quickly scanned Patch's local coverage could not come up with instances of the site having used CNS copy for other stories, though it's possible.