Bonfire of the Vanity Affairs
Let us set the fantasy sequence for you: Karl Rove is determined to destroy the reputation of an anti-Bush crusader whos a high-profile Hollywood insider. The White House dispatches a Republican operative to disseminate dirt to the Los Angeles Times about the hero. Suddenly, theres a media frenzy to "get" our guy. Alarmed, the Bush basher meets on Monday with three of the best media minds in the country, one of whom wants him to hire a crisis manager to repel Roves rapacious assault.
No, were not talking about Michael Moore, whose Fahrenheit 911 is creating quite the stir in W World. Were talking about the paranoid musings surrounding the editor of Vanity Fair magazine. All thats left, in V.F. minds, is to connect the dots between Paul ONeill, Joseph Wilson, Richard Clarke and now Graydon Carter.
Really, you couldnt make this stuff up if you tried; yet its being slung as gospel around the offices at that oh-so-glossy magazine. And thats not even considering Condé Nasts just-released ethical-policy guide, the timing of which seemed a tad suspicious since it casts an unflattering light on, among other peccadilloes, the $100,000 Universal Pictures gave Carter some time after he first suggested to big-time producer Brian Grazer that the book A Beautiful Mind would make a decent motion picture.
Oh, and one thing more: Dont ever, ever, try to ask about any of it. Or, if youre a woman, youll be called a "cunt" by a powerful New York Times Washington reporter.
Premium Seating: Los Angeles Angels v. Philadelphia Phillies
TicketsTue., Aug. 1, 7:07pm
Los Angeles Angels vs. Philadelphia Phillies
TicketsTue., Aug. 1, 7:07pm
Premium Seating: Los Angeles Angels v. Oakland Athletics
TicketsFri., Aug. 4, 7:07pm
Los Angeles Angels vs. Oakland Athletics
TicketsFri., Aug. 4, 7:07pm
Since he became chum in a media feeding frenzy, Graydon rather startlingly has not strayed outwardly from being, well, Graydon. As is usual, he has been out of the magazines offices far more than hes been in them: throwing parties at the Cannes film festival; tripping to London to publicize V.F. and work on his manuscript; overnighting to Chicago to host a Book Expo panel; dining in Washington, D.C., with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd and its Washington correspondent, Todd Purdum; hanging in South Carolina with his new best friend John Mellencamp. Nor does he seem to have toned down his characteristic bravado. At the June 6 Book & Author Breakfast, before 600 bibliophiles in the Grand Ballroom of the McCormick Place Convention Center, Graydon shocked booksellers and fellow panel member Tom Wolfe by saying that, in a book, "What Im looking for here is the fuck factor. I want them to stop every three or four lines and say, Fuck!"
Though Carters pals contend this continuing bad publicity is much ado about nothing, "Graydon knows it isnt," says one intimate. And the only reason hes not in total panic mode is because he believes he still has Condé Nast owner Si Newhouses backing despite the stink of scandal even though, bizarrely, no Condé Nast mogul has gone on the record to try to stop Carters morphing from golden boy to damaged goods. "One has to understand the culture of Condé Nast," says a V.F. insider. "Si lets Graydon have this other world. In terms of what Graydon does or doesnt do, Si doesnt care as long as it doesnt affect the integrity of the magazine."
Still more problematic for Carter than questions about his moneygrubbing is how long Si will finance Graydons too-obvious attempt to create an even higher-flying second career for himself.
As for Hollywoods attitude toward Carter right now, it can be summed up by this bon mot from a studio head: "Of course hes a pig. But hes smarter than the other journalist pigs because hes at least making money being one."
Lets backtrack a little. Media bigwig and mogul intimate Carter is going along in fine fettle until the Los Angeles Times, led by well-sourced editor-writer Michael Cieply, begins investigating incidents from years back calling into question whether Carter was using his close ties to Hollywood to benefit financially. Not wanting to be beaten on a story in his own back yard by his multi-Pulitzer-winning rival John Carroll, New York Times editor Bill Keller orders a full-court press to match the LAT reporting. Then, on Wednesday, the LAT publishes a rambling, front-page second installment dryly portraying Carter as a striving sleazeball but failing to find a juicy smoking gun.
Meanwhile, before the stories are published, Carter and his staff ponder the meaning of it all. Why is he a target? And why now?
Conspiracy-filled e-mails start flooding the Vanity Fair offices, and suddenly dark mutterings are openly discussed. Is Carter in the crosshairs because of his yearlong editorials excoriating the Bush administration? Is the timing due to the approaching publication of his nonfiction book, What Weve Lost, which, according to Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, is an "impassioned argument" that "addresses the fragile state of U.S. democracy with a critical review of the Bush administration?" (Publishing sources say Carter has missed several deadlines for the manuscript, even though he has six count em V.F. researchers busy helping him with his private work. V.F. spokeswoman Beth Kseniak explains, "They are paid appropriately for their work on the book.")
Wait a second. Someones found the equivalent of plumbers breaking into the Watergate. A source from within the magazine breathlessly tells L.A. Weekly that "a Republican operative" was feeding Cieply. And as proof the insider quotes the GOP rabble-rouser as telling a Hollywood dinner party that "Cieply is going to bring down Graydon." See? See?
And the name of this Republican operative? "Tom Strickland," the source confides.
Hmmm, Tom Strickland, Tom Strickland . . . And hes a Republican operative? . . . A Republican operative working Hollywood? . . . The only Tom Strickland I know of was a 2002 Democratic candidate for Senate in Colorado (who had Robert Redford campaign for him and still lost) . . . Wait a minute, you dont mean Tom Strickler, do you? The brilliant literary agent at Endeavor?
Yeah, thats the one, the source replied.
Huh? Stricklers as much a Republican operative as Martin Sheen is the real president of the United States.
A rare type in Hollywood the quintessential blond-haired, blue-eyed WASP, the Harvard-educated son of a Morgan Stanley investment banker father and commercial banker mother who possesses that upper-class self-confidence Strickler if anything is a Republican with a small "r." After all, how Republican can you be when one of your partners and closest pals is Ari Emanuel, brother of Rahm Emanuel, the Clinton White House adviser and now a Democratic congressman from Illinois whos on the tube all the time promoting Kerry?
True, after being famously fired by CAA, Strickler went to New Hampshire to work for Bob Doles 1988 presidential primary campaign and now supports (but doesnt campaign for) G.W. And he once hilariously told The New York Times, right after Hollywood-funded Al Gore chose Hollywood-hating Joe Lieberman, that "the Democrats could have selected Idi Amin as vice president and Hollywood would have welcomed him."
And also true that Strickler knows Cieply well, but thats because Cieply spent years trying to be a Hollywood producer and did business with him.
Reached by L.A. Weekly on Tuesday, Strickler sounds mildly amused. No, he hadnt a clue that he was being outed by Vanity Fair behind the scenes. "I guess all Republicans are operatives to them," the agent notes dryly. And, no, he doesnt remember ever making those remarks at a dinner party. And as for harboring any animosity toward Carter, Strickler replies, "Ive never met him. I didnt know he was doing anti-Bush rhetoric because I dont read his magazine."
After the articles about Carter were published, L.A. Weekly had more e-mails and phone calls from inside Vanity Fair claiming that Rove was behind Carters comedown.
Then, two weeks ago, came a supposedly new Condé Nast policy guideline which, besides spelling out matters of maternity leave and insurance forms, dealt with ethical behavior. This part in particular seemed pointed at Carter: The integrity of Condé Nast and its employees depends greatly on avoiding conflicts of interest or appearances of such in editorial and business conduct . . . For example, employees should not accept any favors, discounts, services, lodging, meals, travel, entertainment or gifts of more than a nominal value that could lead to such a sense of indebtedness.
Even V.F. insiders, while dismissing it as just another human-resources directive that had been in the works for some time and "had absolutely nothing to do with Graydon," acknowledged the timing was strange and that "one could make a leap." About whether accepting that cool hundred-grand finders fee and his propensity to pitch projects, and other journalism misdemeanors, made Carter indebted to Hollywood, V.F. sources made it clear that at Condé Nast the rules were made to be broken by the privileged few. "Then every single fashion writer at every single Condé Nast fashion magazine should resign if they read these rules," one insider blustered. However, fashion magazines rarely run investigative journalism.
As for the obvious fact that, ever since Carter got so cozy with Hollywood, his magazine stopped covering the industry in any serious way, V.F. spokeswoman Beth Kseniak responds about the entertainment business, "thats being covered to death in the newspapers," and "Graydon has shifted his focus to politics."
"One could argue that whats important now is Bush and Iraq and whats happening in America. And you can tell thats exactly [Carters] focus when you just look at the table of contents over the past year and a half," she states.
With the media still mulling the direction of Carters ethical compass, L.A. Weekly learned that Carter traveled to Washington Monday to meet with three high-profile journalists whom the right-wing would delightedly describe as card-carrying members of the anti-Bush cabal.
There was Maureen Dowd, the Pulitzer Prizewinning op-ed columnist for The New York Times, whose book Bushworld, described as "a powerful look at the current administration," will be published in August. There was her Washington bureau colleague Todd Purdum, one of the newspapers most insightful correspondents who used to cover the Clinton White House and then served as the papers Los Angeles bureau chief during which time he mixed easily with and occasionally reported on Hollywood. There was Purdums wife, Dee-Dee Myers, the Clinton flack who was the first woman and youngest person ever to serve as White House press secretary and is currently a contributing editor to Vanity Fair magazine and a consultant to the down-on-its-luck NBC drama The West Wing. And, accompanying Carter, there was his serious squeeze Anna Scott, the former Anna Bing, who was V.F.s London PR woman.
Sources tell L.A. Weekly that Myers has been urging Carter to hire a crisis manager. Makes sense, since Vanity Fair was in full-stage red alert beginning last Friday after the LAT informed the magazine that they were publishing their "Get Carter: The Sequel" over the weekend. (It didnt run until Wednesday.) According to V.F. sources, staffers like senior articles editor Doug Stumpf, for one, wanted permission to go on the record with the LAT to defend their boss honor.
Yet were supposed to believe that, on Monday night, the dinner at Café Milano was merely a social occasion ("like old home week") since Dowd and Carter have known each other dating back to their Time magazine days, Myers is a trusted confidante and Purdum her tag-along spouse. If Rove or Republicans were discussed, one insider claimed, "I couldnt hear it. It was so noisy." Instead of the subject of politics punctuating a lot of glad-handing, a source painted an image of chitchat about the South Beach diet, the Cannes film festival "and the love life of Artie Shaw."
Nevertheless, just the subject of the get-together was touchy enough that when I phoned Purdum Tuesday to ask about his meeting with Carter, the NYT journalist heard only a few words of the first question, and shouted, "Youre just kind of a cunt," and hung up the phone.
A few minutes letter, Purdum sent an e-mail apologizing but still taking me to task for trying to ask questions about the evening.
Interestingly, that same day, in a sworn statement about alleged sexual harassment made public and carried by many media, University of Colorados president was quoted as defensively saying that the C word can be "used as a term of endearment" toward women.
Isnt it nice to know so many people live such a rich fantasy life?
E-mail at email@example.com.
Get the ICYMI: Today's Top Stories Newsletter Our daily newsletter delivers quick clicks to keep you in the know
Catch up on the day's news and stay informed with our daily digest of the most popular news, music, food and arts stories in Los Angeles, delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday.