Henry Rollins: Worried About the NSA? What About Google?
[Look for your weekly fix from the one and only Henry Rollins right here on West Coast Sound every Thursday, and come back tomorrow for the awesomely annotated playlist for his Sunday KCRW broadcast.]
I have a feeling (no hard data) that the habits and communications of 99.9 percent of America's population hold little to no interest for American intelligence-gathering agencies. I do not lose any sleep over aspects of my life being the topic of discussion at the NSA.
Please don't get angry with me and say that I am one of those "I have nothing to hide, go ahead and rip up my Fourth Amendment protections" types. I would never be that civically lazy. I guess I am saying that I am quite over myself.
Since I got all growed up, I have found the existential ennui of adulthood rather humorous and strangely comforting. Pleasures of the flesh used to include sleep-depriving conquests with great consequences of humiliation and heartbreak. Now it's a glance at the watch, a brief pondering as to how many years I have left and if it would be rude to check my email once more before disrobing. Know what I mean? I hope not.
I am not trying to turn this into an analysis session, but Doc, I just don't feel like NSA-grade crosshairs material. I don't think it's a shortcoming on my part, just the way the cards were dealt.
As a "person of interest," I fall flat. I don't hate the government. I don't think the Second Amendment is being infringed upon. I don't want to secede from the union and I don't want to blow anything up or harm anyone. I know, that's not the point.
I feel far more felt up by Google and the like. My laptop seems to know where I am, even if I don't. My cellphone asks me if I want directions to anywhere from the spot I am standing in. I buy a record online and Amazon.com sends me letters, telling me that people who bought what I bought also bought these other records. (By golly, Amazon also happens to sell them, too.) My small publishing company's email address has been the same since the last century. It's on AOL and, yes, we get teased about it. We figure it's not broke and humans are resistant to change, so we keep it.
AOL has made some interesting assumptions about yours truly. Often when I open the mail page, on the right side of the screen is an advertisement informing me that there are gay men in Los Angeles looking to meet gay men in Los Angeles. While I am quite sure this is true, I don't know how this is benefiting me, as I am not gay. AOL knows I live in L.A. but it has my orientation all wrong. Is this some of that "bad intel" that leads to catastrophic actions, like the invasion of Iraq? Hardly, but it does make me wonder: What is the endgame here? Perhaps someone at AOL thinks that if they keep putting the man ad in front of me, I will eventually cave in or become so curious, or perhaps default to my primordial, capitalistic urge to perpetually Seek & Consume, that I will finally click the box. What is it about me and what I do that indicates that I want to meet a man in Los Angeles? While none of this offends me, it does make me wonder where all my keystrokes end up.
I have lived in public as a somewhat recognizable person since I was a teenager. Emails I answer end up posted on sites; pictures of me and someone I just met, taken by a cellphone, literally number in the thousands and are easily accessed. I have been followed by stalkers and waited for by photographers in some of the most boring locations you can imagine.
What I am trying to get across is that for well over half my life, I have been walking around with my ass hanging out of my pants for all to see, and while I have never gotten all that comfortable with all that, I do consider it normal.
With all the social media sites, blogs, amateur porn and downloadable music, film, television shows online, it seems to me that Americans are fairly yelling at the top of their lungs to be checked out. Yes, I know, not the point.
I think a relevant question is, in this age, what is your expectation of privacy? Is it egregious that your information is perhaps being willfully turned over to the NSA by the Zuckerbergs of the world, the renewing of the Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act?
I find it all offensive. However, what I think is the most dangerous has sadly been in place for years. Unimaginable access to data and the rendering of it has been handed over to corporations at great cost to the American taxpayer. Edward Snowden, who worked for Booz Allen Hamilton, professes to have had access to whatever he wanted to know about anyone's anything. If he's telling the truth, why does he have such permeability without any government oversight? Is that OK with you? The amount of private information in the hands of firms like BAH is incredible.
Who holds these groups accountable? It is not "Big Government," I fear -- it is big private-sector corporations who operate for profit having this information in their possession.
They profit from unrest and conflict. Peace, progress, climate-change awareness, alternative energy, responsibility and other hope/change actions are their enemy. If you value any of these, you're part of their problem.
There has not been significant involvement by American forces in a conflict since President Obama has been sworn in. They're looking to sell some of their heavy-duty shit. Iran, Syria, good to go.
This is what is at play, not what kind of porn you watch.
Government and corporations are one. There's a word for that. As but one mere mortal, my way forward through this is to remain clear and count you as an asset.
Get the Music Newsletter
Keep your thumb on the local music scene with music features, additional online music listings and show picks. We'll also send special ticket offers and music promotions available only to our Music Newsletter subscribers.