But why not get a Mexican in the mix?
Hunter claims it's not about race -- just like, prestige and stuff. Which doesn't really sound much better. Here's what he told Fox News:
What Fox doesn't mention is that Chavez was in the Navy, too. According to NBC LA, "Chavez served two years in the U.S. Navy in 1940s after World War II." He also helped make it possible for Latinos to be seen as equals in any workforce, not just the Navy. (Instead, Fox chooses to include this snippet: "To this day, the hatred still runs deep among farmers who believe Chávez hurt California's agricultural industry." Classy.) The yard where the ship was built -- General Dynamic NASSCO -- is located in a Latino-heavy hood called Barrio Logan. NASSCO's spokesman also tells press that the yard "suggested the name to the Navy because it wanted to honor its mostly Hispanic workforce.""Naming a ship after César Chávez goes right along with other recent decisions by the Navy that appear to be more about making a political statement than upholding the Navy's history and tradition," said Hunter, only a week after another spat he had with the Navy over its decision that would have allowed chaplains to perform same sex-unions in states where gay marriage is legal.
Hunter said a better choice for the last of the 14 Lewis and Clark-class cargo ships would be Marine Corps Sgt. Rafael Peralta, who was nominated for the Medal of Honor for action in Iraq -- or World War II Medal of Honor recipient John Finn, a lifelong San Diego resident.
"If this decision were about recognizing the Hispanic community's contribution to our nation, many other names come to mind," said Hunter, a former Marine who served in Iraq and Afghanistan.
What do you think? More Southern California racism at work? Or does Chavez belong in the fields, not the fleet?