The Mill and the Cross Review
An extraordinary example of both art-historical interpretation and CGI as passport to unknown lands, The Mill and the Cross, based on a book by Michael Francis Gibson, is a moving image tribute to the still image, with its ability to "wrestle the senseless moment to the ground." The subject is The Way to Calvary, the year 1564, the place Flanders. The signer of that vast canvas, Pieter Bruegel the Elder (Rutger Hauer), takes a hillside vantage to scout out faces for his painting. Those faces are in turn seen individuated from the swarm below, in vignettes depicting the daily life of the 16th century, which mingles with the painting's more fantastic elements (a windmill on a rocky precipice, the scourging of Christ), as it does in Bruegel's depiction.
The film's little dialogue comes from the artist, his patron (Michael York) and the Mary figure (Charlotte Rampling); the soundtrack is given mostly to the musique concrète of clogs against stone, the caw of carrion birds and the lash of the whip, for Bruegel's Flanders is the property of the Spaniards, no less casually violent in the Old World than in the New. Against this context, Bruegel's transplanting of the crucifixion scene to his present day is explained as a sort of protest art — and an altogether more philosophical idea of human suffering. —Nick Pinkerton (Nuart)
11272 Santa Monica Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Get the Film Club Newsletter
Stay up to date on the best new movies with our critics' latest reviews, interviews and trailers for the films coming to a theater near you each week.
More Film News
- I Never Liked the National Lampoon's Vacation Series, and This New Version Is...
- Five Reasons to Enter the Silly, Sad World of Netflix's BoJack Horseman
- You Will Learn Exactly Three New Things From the Chris Farley Documentary
- Jason Segel Had His Book Club Read Infinite Jest Without Telling Them He Was...