There was a problem with my television all last week. Or rather, there was a problem with me: I didnt want to watch it. Its strange to feel guilty about not watching enough television, but guilt comes in many forms, and Im no longer surprised when a new one shows up. Did you see the new Survivor? someone asks. Er, actually no, I reply sheepishly. There was a problem with the satellite dish. Couldnt get a picture. Damn thing just went south on me -- took days to clear up.
Actually, instead of watching the latest batch of exhibitionists duke it out in their beachwear, I was reading the newspaper at City Spa, glory of Pico Boulevard. There are TVs all over City Spa -- in the gym, in the changing room and restaurant -- but the sauna is sacrosanct, or perhaps just too hot. Its the perfect antidote to a cool medium, and Ive been making use of it extensively. It was there that I read an article by Norah Vincent in the L.A. Times, damning us all for chortling at the silly sadism of programs such as Fear Factor (in which contestants bob for chicken feet in a vat of live maggots) while, in real life, journalist Daniel Pearl was being held by kidnappers (and, as it turned out, tortured and killed) somewhere in Pakistan.
The entertainment industry cant grind to a halt because an American journalist has been abducted, but I could understand Vincents anger. My God, the oceans of junk we produce! And how grotesque it was to hear newscasters squeeze an obligatory sentence about Pearls plight into a paragraph otherwise taken up with promotional show-biz blather. Yet it was only a few evenings earlier that, still dripping from the sauna, Id wandered upstairs to the gym, glanced at the TV, and then, like someone placed under a spell, become utterly engrossed in a dating show that included real-life footage of a hot young couple out on the town. There was no sadism here, silly or otherwise; this was just plain old voyeurism, and it was riveting in the same way that happening on two people making love in a field is riveting. Only, in this case, there was no shame attached. No one was going to scold me for watching two people I didnt know make eyes at each other on a television program.
La La Land In Concert: A Live-to-film Celebration
TicketsFri., May. 26, 8:00pm
La La Land In Concert: A Live-to-film Celebration
TicketsSat., May. 27, 8:00pm
Dirty Dancing: 30th Anniversary
TicketsFri., Jun. 16, 7:00pm
Fight Club With Live Score: Movie Night At The Wiltern
TicketsThu., Jun. 22, 7:00pm
Well, Norah Vincent might have had something to say about it, although Im not sure whether the soulless frippery she condemns includes dating shows as well as programs involving scenes of mock torture. Asked to explain my reasons for watching this program, I suppose I would have said something like: Because its there. Because that girl is sexy as hell and I want to see her stick her freakishly long pierced tongue into her dates ear again. I think that would probably have covered it. And though I wouldnt have felt ashamed of myself, lets not underestimate shame: Like guilt (see above), its remarkably durable stuff, despite our increasingly strenuous efforts to conquer it.
A week after Pearls death was reported, I finally got around to watching Survivor, where the two tribes were competing to see who could eat the most pieces of fish soaked in a marinade that smells worse than a public toilet on a hot summer day, as presenter Mark Burnett put it. What this competition proved, other than the fact that almost any activity can be turned into a game, is that macho sports talk has become so pervasive as to have lost all sense of reality. Its one thing to shout, You can do it, man! on a basketball court; its another to holler Cmon, bro! or Youre doin it, baby, you got it! at someone trying not to regurgitate a putrid fish sauce. When it was all over, the victors acted as if theyd won the Super Bowl, while the man who let his team down looked appropriately put-upon: Sorry guys, Im just not as good at eating rotten food as you are.
Another day, another sauna, reading the L.A. Times yet again. (Unfortunately, no one leaves The New York Times or the Guardian lying around.) This time I came across an op-ed piece by Jeremy Rifkin, author of The Biotech Century, on the dangers of human cloning. As it happened, Id just seen Rifkin discussing that very topic on an obscure university channel whose program lineup promised such thrill-packed items as Faculty Lounge Special and Denman Forestry Issues. Rifkins argument, by now a fairly familiar one, is that once people start screening fetuses for disease-prone genes, theyll start fiddling around with them in other ways too. In other words, if youre going to remove a gene that causes childhood leukemia, you might as well remove one that causes childhood obesity too. And while youre at it, why not give babys IQ a nudge and get rid of any potential myopia? If were not careful, Rifkin warned, procreation as we know it may turn into the ultimate shopping experience.
Listening to Rifkin speak, I couldnt help thinking of Jennifer Garner and Alias, several episodes of which Id just watched on tape. Stunningly beautiful in an almost manufactured way, Garner strikes me as the perfect female designer baby all grown up with her own television program. As Sydney Bristow, a CIA double agent infiltrating an enemy agency, theres nothing she cant do except have a meaningful relationship with her dad. Everything else is a breeze. She has only to glance at a telephone number to memorize it. The worlds languages trip off her tongue. She runs like a sprinter, scales buildings like an acrobat and flattens martial-arts experts twice her size with a flurry of balletic kicks. And when she gets home, after trouncing shadowy forces in Sao Paulo or Moscow or the Middle East, she enjoys a life of earnest study and warm interracial relationships until her beeper calls her back to duty. Shes just a little too good to be true.
Well, of course she is: Shes essentially a cartoon character, and on one level it doesnt really matter. The show isnt about the characters so much as its about the ever-shifting relationships between them and the various intelligence groups they represent. Its also a one-woman fashion show and, as far as that goes, its a masterpiece. (If a curiously strait-laced one: On Alias, only villains flirt, and when Bristow dons a tight rubber dress, its purely for the good of the CIA.) But despite the dizzying, ever-expanding plotline and the cliffhanger endings that propel you toward the next episode, I cant say that much of it stays with me, even though I enjoy it enormously while its happening. The reason, I think, is that theres very little reality to it. All the characters on the show act as if they were born and bred inside a TV.
You couldnt say that of The Avengers, old, pre--Diana Rigg episodes of which have been showing up almost every night on the Encore Mystery Channel. Patrick Macnee is there as secret agent John Steed, of course, with Honor Blackman as Mrs. Gale, the glamorous widow-spy. Like Garner, Blackman gets to show off her martial-arts moves, although they look comically feeble now. Its hard to tell whats less realistic: Garner dispatching the kind of men most men would run away from, or Blackman knocking someone out with a punch that would barely dent a pillow.
But this is early-1960s television, as amateurish as a school play compared to the pulsating high-tech razzle-dazzle of Alias. Some of the props look like theyre made out of cardboard, and when it rains the sound is so badly miked you can barely make out the dialogue. But there are compensations. Watch enough of these episodes and you get a sense of Britain at the dawn of the Beatles era. A real cross section of society is presented, including a surprising number of formidable women. (Britain seems to have been absolutely crawling with villainesses.) Theres some wit to the writing, too. (A self-effacing chemist: As a group, Mrs. Gale, scientists are boring, narrow-minded, and self-opinionated -- rather like everybody else, in fact.) And speaking of Mrs. Gale, Blackman is even lovelier than Garner, with the added virtue of appearing unmistakably flesh-and-blood. As for the purring, feline Macnee, I wonder what he would make of Alias agent Bristow. My guess is that hed find her a bit starved for fun, but then Macnees character belongs to a generation of action heroes who were able to save the world and enjoy a drink afterward.
My favorite Avengers moment so far is actually all about drink. It comes at a winetasting, to which Steed has gone to slyly pump a crook for information while they sample the various vintages. Whats so wonderful about the scene is the way Macnee mixes his habitual teasing irony with an oenophiles unabashed delight. He may be there on business, but thats not about to stop him from having fun, mocking the ritual of winetasting even as hes loving every minute of it. And his flirtation with Blackman is priceless: Shes beautiful, hes suave, and they both know it and enjoy it. The scene is all about something you dont see much of on TV these days: pure pleasure.
Get the Film & TV Newsletter
Stay up to date on the best new movies with our critics' latest reviews, interviews and trailers for the films coming to a theater near you each week.