MR. MACHIAVELLI HAS LEFT THE BUILDINGMerci Dieu
. The Italians are done in, and beyond the borders of the boot-shaped country itself and half a million expatriate pizzerias, the tears are not exactly flowing. The Italians ruined the last World Cup Final with their ultracautious play, and its a relief to know they wont be around to ruin this one. Year after year they produce breathtakingly skillful players, and year after year they play in exactly the same defensive style, stifling their opponents, hoping for one deadly counterattack to steal the game. They have some of the best players in the world, the most prestigious league (Serie A
), and, in Roberto Baggio, arguably the most cunning footballer around, but their style of play feels increasingly inbred. Given that theSerie A
is positively awash in international talent Brazils Ronaldo, Chiles Ivan Zamorano, Hollands Patrick Kluivert and half the French team all play in it, to name just a few its odd that none of it seems to rub off on Italys national side. They have now gone out of the World Cup for the third time in a row on penalty kicks, and it serves them right. If you play for a 1-0 victory, dont complain when you get a 0-0 draw instead. And another thing . . . one minute from the end of extra time, after he and his teammates had spent 120 minutes trying to penetrate Italys blue wall, Frances Emmanuel Petit kicked the ball out of play when he saw Luigi Di Biagio writhing in pain in Italys penalty area. This almost surreally old-fashioned bit of good sportsmanship the French were literally in the midst of their final attack before the horror of the penalty shootout drew a gasp of amazement from the 77,000 spectators at Saint-Denis and sent Univisions Andres Cantor into an aria of stunned emotion. "El premio
fair playdel Mundial!
" he called it. "Del Mundial!
" And what did the Italians do after their player had received treatment from the doctor? Did they give the ball back to their sporting opponents? No. Paolo Maldini, the coachs son, took the throw-in himself, and instead of sending the ball out of play (so that France would regain possession), he threw it to a teammate, who promptly booted it upfield toward the French goal.Arrivederci!
IBID IAGO Diego Simeone, Argentinas captain, is a good actor and a devious mind. If he were a Brazilian, theyd call him Iago. (For a movie The Maltese Soccer Ball
, say starring Hollands Wim Jonk as a private detective, Simeone would make an ideal villain.) In the game with England, his histrionics won Argentina a penalty kick and later got David Beckham sent off. Going for an Oscar, Simeone repeated the trick in the quarterfinal with Holland, getting Arthur Numan red-carded in the 77th minute. Before Simeone could entrap another Dutch victim, his teammate Ariel Ortega screwed up Simeones master plan by head-butting the Dutch goalkeeper and getting sent off himself two minutes from time. The Dutch, who had dominated the second half before Numans dismissal, quickly re-established themselves. All afternoon Holland had swept the ball around the field in an awesome display of laserlike passing. Then, Frank de Boer sent a final long ball in Dennis Bergkamps direction, and with a mere three touches (one to control it, one to take it around his defender, one to knock it in the net), the Arsenal striker and English League Footballer of the Year did what the English couldnt do: He sent the Argies packing. It wasnt the most spectacular goal of the World Cup, but it may have been the most perfect. War Games "The World Cup is every bit as much about past wars and nationalistic fervor as it is about football," wrote a letter writer to theL.A. Times
the other day, sounding, like a lot of recent letter writers to theTimes
, as if he wasnt enjoying the soccer very much. He then went on to suggest that, during halftime in the U.S. match with Iran, American coach Steve Sampson should have pumped up his "underachieving" players by showing them news footage of the 1979 hostage crisis as if you could simply inject people with a sense of history by showing them five minutes of video clips at halftime. You either have a sense of history or you dont. American-Iranian relations, or the lack of them, probably mean a lot to Iranians, but how much do they mean to Americans? And how much would an American victory have meant to the American public? Judging from the ratings, not much. When England played Argentina, on the other hand, the stupendous din raised by Englands fans left no doubt as to how much a victory would mean to them.This
If you like this story, consider signing up for our email newsletters.
SHOW ME HOW
You have successfully signed up for your selected newsletter(s) - please keep an eye on your mailbox, we're movin' in!
was nationalistic fervor all right, and it was one reason why the game was so exciting. But there was also the game itself. At its best, there is something epic about soccer the size of the field, the number of players, the extraordinary flow and unpredictability of the game and, once in a while, it actually lives up to its potential. This was one of those times. If youre going to have a war, this is the way to do it, with red cards rather than guns. David Beckham is not dead and buried, he is merely lying low beside a posh Spice Girl. Soccer players like it harder "Its obvious to anyone but a FIFA traditionalist that the game needs to generate more scoring chances," thundered another letter writer to theTimes
, unhappy with the way the 2-2 tie between England and Argentina had been settled by penalty kicks. He has a point, especially now that Brazil has gone through to the final on penalties after a 1-1 draw with Holland. On the other hand, the latter was hardly a game that failed to generate scoring chances. Ron aldo, who gave Brazil the lead in the 46th minute, looked sharper than he has all tournament and with a bit of luck, might have had a hat trick. Hol lands Patrick Kluivert could have scored six. Only brilliant last-minute tackles kept the score down. Every sports fans dream is a dream of total domination, but theres precious little of it to be found in the World Cup. By the time the competition reaches its final stages, only a sliver of luck or talent or refereeing separates the teams which is why soccer is cursed with penalty shootouts. For some Americans, this is the crippling flaw that underlines the essential wrongness of the game and by the time this World Cup is over, they may have more ammunition for their argument. Change the rules, they say. Lets have more goals, less ties. Make it more entertaining, goddamit! Maybe: If I were head of FIFA, Id probably increase the size of the goal by 2 or 3 inches goalies are bigger than they used to be, after all and scrap the offside rule when the ball is played within, say, 20 yards of the goal. But thats about it. Difficulty not ease is what soccers about. (If it was supposed to be easy, it wouldnt be played with the feet now, would it?) To the true soccer fan, a score of 0-0 may be unappealing, but a score of 5-4 is apt to feel childish. Thats a goal every 10 minutes. Thats two teams that dont know how to defend. In any case, it is not so hard to criticize a sport. One might, for instance, inquire of an American basketball fan why a 48-minute game should take two and a half hours to play. Is it so we can all watch an hour and a half of commercials? And if basketball is so exciting, why does it need to be accompanied by tacky organ music? Why is a coach allowed to stop the game whenever his team isnt doing well? Why not just let them play? And since teams essentially spend the first 30 minutes of a game casually swapping baskets to no great effect, why not start the game in the fourth quarter? And...?Next week: the semis, the final and a wrap-up. Brendan Bernhard can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.