Pushkin Comes to Shove
Images courtesy of the StatePushkin Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow
Summer museum blockbusters are a genre unto themselves. In contrast to the sparsely populated conditions under which most non-performative art is experienced, these big tickets with their broad audiences, atmosphere of hustle-bustle self-importance, and physical crowding bring some of the sweaty mob thrill of a rock concert or football game to the contemporary experience of art. Of course, this is a quality that once defined fine art, which in pre-industrial times was usually experienced as part of a jostling, multimedia religious environment. So while these big shows may seem to be devised solely to compete with lucrative public mass entertainments, they also hearken to their own history. And from the shuffling-through-the-stations-of-the-cross choreography of the audio-tour zombies to the constant mutter of rationalizations and half-believed truisms not to mention the strong whiff of resentment from bored children and spouses the religious model holds true.Pierre Bonnard, Summer in Normandy (1912)
Anyone with any sense would be making the pilgrimage to cooler northern climes to genuflect through the Philip Guston retrospective at SFMOMA, but the most I could manage in this heat was to haul the un-air-conditioned 85 Country Squire to LACMA to check out Old Masters, Impressionists and Moderns: French Masterworks From the State Pushkin Museum, Moscow. While its title and faux stately installation align the Pushkin exhibit with the aura of timeless authority that museums cultivate, its own history suggests just how arbitrary a construction the Museum is. From the origins of the home institution as an academic repository for plaster casts of Roman statues, to the Bolshevik liberation and repression of the great modernist collections of Morozov and Shchukin (divvied up between the Pushkin and Hermitage and the focus of a lawsuit that tried to block this show), to the recent partnership with the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston (and the improbable conflation of the Soviet Unions cultural legacy with the dual capitalist monsters of Texas energy dollars and major provider Philip Morris), the circumstances that resulted in this show are a virtual primer in making art history up as you go along. Which is a good thing; it gives dimension to the show. A communist-state cultural showpiece winds up a strange hybrid of industrial consumerist entertainment and collective religious ritual funded by nicotine addiction and electrical-maintenance deregulation!Jules Bastien-Lepage, The Village lovers (1882)
That would be the litany running through my head as I pace the 76 stations in Pushkin, if there was much of anything running through my head at all. Its partly the effect of drinking an iced cappuccino and plunging into LACMAs A/C chill freezes up the cognition. But mostly its the art that is arresting. While its quite a stretch to call some of these works masterpieces (Preliminary Sketches for Masterpieces would be a more accurate title), there are plenty of good, even great paintings, copious curiosities and, yes, even the occasional masterpiece capable of stopping you in your tracks, mentally and physically: Pierre Bonnards ravishing Summer in Normandy, for example, or Matisses perfect Goldfish.
Some of the best works are obscure Corots small, radiant Morning in Venice, Jules Bastien-Lepages subtly hallucinatory The Village Lovers, which veers from the hyperreal to the crustily abstract every couple of inches. Other obscurities worth searching out include Millets exquisitely composed Women Gathering Kindling; Hubert Roberts twin architectural view paintings depicting tiny, awkwardly rendered tourists scuttling in romantic ruins; and Albert Marquets pair of small, blurry, mundane but formally virtuosic fauvist landscapes. Any of these are enough to shut up the inner critic and induce a trancelike state, as are many of the more highly touted pictures the van Goghs and Monets, in particular.
As one who expresses his opinions only for professional reasons, Im constantly surprised by the amount of audible judgment, ranking, interpretation and explanation that goes on in the public reception of art. Move up close, says a woman to her daughter in front of a Monet. See the dots? Now stand back. Its a person! Thats what they did that was so important. Oh yeah, I see it, claims the kid. Unconvinced, Mom repositions her before the next Impressionist painting: Look close . . . Further along, a man explains to his partner, You see, in Impressionist painting there is no focal point. A dutiful daughter wheels a seemingly catatonic 90-something past a Cézanne landscape, intoning, Just look at the brushwork! A gaggle of seniors briskly follow their evident ringleader who manages a dazzling précis within seconds of seeing each piece: Not enough going on in this one, she says before Diaz de la Peñas Autumn in Fontainebleau. Next! Those clouds are too white, she observes while inspecting Corots The Castle of Pierrefonds. They must be a mistake. The woman has a future in graduate education!
Its not that Im particularly bothered by all this chatter. One unique feature of the close quarters of blockbuster shows is the inescapability of this peripheral narrative stream a burble that ebbs and flows, punctuated by silent clusters of five or 10 or 20 audio-tourists frozen in front of a numbered masterpiece for the duration of the sound clip. It has a peculiar rhythmical quality, like a collectively orchestrated experimental theater piece. (And in fact the technology used by LACMA was pioneered by San Franciscos Antenna Theater.) Certainly many of these conversational gambits have been appropriated verbatim from Sister Wendy or Robert Hughes, or Masterpieces of Impressionism wall-calendar captions. But, as with any opinion, after a while it all blends together, and you begin to realize that opinions only function to keep our anxious, voracious left hemispheres occupied while we soak up the deeper pleasures and meanings available to our nonverbal senses. And then once in a while you run into someone who strikes a balance between the two, such as the stocky engineering type standing with his lady friend in front of Manets sketch-for-a-masterpiece The Bar, waving his arms wildly, exclaiming, Its so great! Its great! So confident! Its so . . . so great!
My sentiments exactly.
OLD MASTERS, IMPRESSIONISTS AND MODERNS: French Masterworks From the State Pushkin Museum, Moscow | LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART, 5905 Wilshire Blvd., (323) 857-6000 | Through October 13
Get the Theater Newsletter
Get a rundown of upcoming theater events and ticket deals in Los Angeles.