Some letter writers apologized for other people's flames before I'd even read them, which is how I learned that, with few exceptions, the letters came from readers of a Web site called Slashdot (www.slashdot.org), "news for nerds." I look to Slashdot (aka "/.") somewhat regularly for its links to stories on open-source software, but I hadn't known they'd linked to me until a sympathetic reader wrote to console me. "I'm sorry about what they're saying about you on /.," wrote one respondent. "I think it's really unfair." So I went to the site to read about myself, a "semi-informed journalist," writing a "not entirely negative" story about Linux. By the time I got there, the follow-up comments numbered in the 100s.
Oh, I had supporters, to be sure. Several of them denounced the sexism of an "Anonymous Coward" -- Slashdot's blanket pseudonym for anonymous posters -- who called me the "Martha Stewart of computing"; a few more admitted that they, too, are forced by either cultural pressure or professional need to resort to Microsoft applications. But mostly, the thread of discussion on Slashdot could be best described as Orwellian.
I was shocked. Could these Linux fascists be related to the freethinking, friendly Linux community I met years ago on the Internet Relay Chat, where once a helpful soul stayed up half the night walking me through the setup for Slackware? Honestly, even feminists have come to realize that their movement is about choice, not new rules; how is it that Linux fans, like abusive husbands, have adopted the creed of Redmond: If you don't like it our way, you're wrong?
On the other hand, I have Slashdot to thank for furthering my technological progress. After its club gangbanged my personal reflection on Linux, I recognized that Linux didn't need my advocacy anymore. With companies both young and entrenched lining up to develop business applications for the Windows alternatives, Linux has developed its own profit-motivated momentum, complete with zealous evangelists who have invested their professional futures -- as consultants, systems analysts and pundits -- in the operating system's success. The Slashdotters have become a cautionary tale: Never get married to an OS. No one will ever invent one that can meet all your needs, and you'll turn out defiant, unreasonable and angry, dogmatic in your inability to make rational decisions about how to tailor a system to an individual.
Peisha McPhee & Sergiu Tuhutziu's Chopin Meets Broadway
TicketsFri., Sep. 30, 8:30pm
Andrew Dice Clay
TicketsSat., Oct. 1, 8:00pm
Panic! Productions presents Bring It On: The Musical
TicketsThu., Oct. 6, 7:30pm
TicketsThu., Oct. 6, 7:30pm
TicketsFri., Oct. 7, 7:30pm
I originally chose Linux in 1994 because I had a 386 with no operating system to rehabilitate, and Linux was, and remains, free (as in beer, not speech). I still use it. But I'm no longer religious about it. In fact, a few weeks ago, when I made plans with a fellow aspiring gearhead to build a local area network in his four-plex, connecting several computers via Ethernet to one high-speed Internet connection, I jettisoned plans to install Linux on the server and moved on, to another free, open and stable Unix clone: FreeBSD (named after its precursor, the Berkeley Software Distribution), version 2.2.8.
Like Linux, FreeBSD is free in every sense of the word. It can be downloaded from an FTP site (ftp.freebsd.org) to floppy disks, installed over a network, or purchased prepackaged on a CD-ROM for $39.95. The operating system and its applications are maintained by a large group of individuals who call themselves the FreeBSD Project (www.freebsd.org/handbook/staff.html) and keep their source code and development progress exposed to the public so outsiders can contribute to perfecting it. It runs on Intel-based PCs, and it's remarkably stable. According to a recent issue of PC Week, several systems managers have opted for FreeBSD over Windows NT not because it costs $600 less, but because it has fewer bugs.
And several Webmasters have chosen FreeBSD over Linux, not because they got pounded by Slashdotters, but because FreeBSD handles twice the Web traffic. On the other hand, user-friendly, everyday applications for FreeBSD -- word-processing programs, spreadsheets and the like -- are even scarcer than they are for Linux. So here's my perfect world: Microsoft Word for writing, FreeBSD for the network, Linux for e-mail, Web browsing, syncing the Palm Pilot and playing programmer. The best application wins, politics be damned. I can't imagine why anyone would want it any other way.
Get the Theater Newsletter
Get a rundown of upcoming theater events and ticket deals in Los Angeles.