Marianne Williamson Aims to Defeat Henry Waxman, and Save Washington's Soul | Features | Los Angeles | Los Angeles News and Events | LA Weekly
Loading...

Marianne Williamson Aims to Defeat Henry Waxman, and Save Washington's Soul 

Thursday, Jan 16 2014
Comments (8)
feature1-1.jpg

Marianne Williamson doesn't like most articles about her. She seems to remember every slight, every snarky subhead that called her a shaman, a prophet, an ex–lounge singer.

"The press creates a caricature," she says.

Take, for example, the most recent headline from The New York Times: "Marianne Williamson, New-Age Guru, Seeks Congressional Seat."

click to flip through (5) PHOTO BY TED SOQUI - Marianne WIlliamson is an independent candidate for California's 33rd Congressional District seat.
  • PHOTO BY TED SOQUI
  • Marianne WIlliamson is an independent candidate for California's 33rd Congressional District seat.
 

Related Stories

  • Voter Guide 12

    Want to meet new people worth having over for poker or with whom to swap your second-hand novels? Try your voting precinct's active voters — also known as neighbors. There are about 1,000 of you per precinct, and it's always interesting to see who's out and about from your enclave...
  • Marijuana Legalization Wave Will Hit California in 733 Days, Supporters Say 5

    It might not have been a fruitful election for President Obama and his fellow Democrats, but one faction of lefties and libertarians had a banner day: We're talking about drug-decriminalization supporters. Voters in Oregon, Alaska and Washington, D.C. approved the legalization of limited amounts of recreational marijuana for the 21-and-older...
  • Election Results: California, November 4, 2014 (Updated Live) 77

    It's election night in America, and Jerry Brown is up for an unprecedented fourth term as governor of the great state of California. Will he defeat Republican and fake homeless man Neel Kashkari? Will State Superintendent Tom Torlakson win re-election over school-reform upstart Marshall Tuck? Will Sheila Kuehl defeat the...
  • How to Vote 8

    You know the incumbents. So our June 3 voter guide is about the other stuff - like a comedic race for judge featuring candidates so bad the bar association finds both "Not Qualified." One is Charles Calderon, who L.A. Weekly previously reported as one of the worst legislators in California. There's...
  • Wealth & Taxes

    It's no wonder that people from across the land and around the world still come to California seeking virtual gold. It's still the state with some of America's greatest potential salaries, at least when it comes to small-business employment. So says personal finance site NerdWallet, which this week revealed the...

" 'New Age guru,' " Williamson scoffs. "First of all, what is the suggestion here, that the 'old age' is working?"

Williamson is sitting on a wooden bench beside her press person, Ileana Wachtel, inside a vegan/organic/raw food café in Santa Monica called Rawvolution. "I've never worn a velvet scarf in my life. You label somebody 'New Age,' and that's automatic mockery: 'She cannot possibly be a serious thinker.' "

What would she rather be called?

"Author ..." she says, searching for something with more oomph.

Wachtel offers, "Author, lecturer, thought leader — how about thought leader?"

"That's what that world calls it," Williamson says. "I wouldn't call myself that. In the East, the guru never calls himself a guru."

She sips from her room-temperature carrot juice. On the sound system, Donovan is singing: "Wear your love like heaven. Wear your love like heaven."

" 'Spiritual teacher' feels a little grandiose," Williamson ventures. "What do you call Alan Watts? What do you call Ram Dass? What do you call Wayne Dyer? If it's a man, there's not even a question."

Wachtel breaks in: "What do you call Deepak Chopra?"

"Well, he's a doctor," Williamson says. "To me, when I think of New Age, I think of crystals and rainbows and platitudes. A Course in Miracles — what do you see in there that's silly? That's a very serious book for very serious thinkers."

It has been nearly three months since Williamson — best-selling author, spiritual teacher, founder of Project Angel Food, international lecturer — announced her candidacy at the Saban Theatre in Beverly Hills, an art deco movie palace that once served as home to her spiritual lectures. Alanis Morissette performed at the event.

The announcement was met with guffaws from political insiders — a challenge to Henry Waxman? From the left?

"She has some very unusual beliefs about the world, a cult following, but she's not a credible candidate," says Eric Bauman, chairman of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party. "She's done a lot of work helping people heal, but that's not preparation to be in Congress."

Then again, with Congress' approval rating hovering at about 10 percent, the feeling toward career politicians is hostile.

"No question about it, Waxman is one of the most powerful and influential Democrats in Washington," says Dan Schnur, director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at USC. "But in this type of political environment, that both helps and hurts."

Schnur, who is preparing his own unlikely run for California secretary of state as an independent, says the battle for California's 33rd District congressional seat may throw a few curveballs. Too much is unknown about Williamson, her campaign style, how hard she'll work, how hard her rabid fan base (she has 200,000 Twitter followers; Waxman has 3,100) will push, how much money she'll raise, how much of her own money she'll put in.

"A campaign against Williamson," Schnur says, "is a much less straightforward one than [Waxman] had last year."

California Congressional District 33 contains one of the wealthiest demographics in the nation, hugging the Pacific Ocean from Point Dume to Rancho Palos Verdes, with a small, east-reaching finger that includes Beverly Hills and ends at tony Marlborough School in Hancock Park.

Waxman, a congressman since 1975, couldn't be less concerned with Williamson. The candidate who really keeps him up at night is independent Bill Bloomfield, a multimillionaire who came within eight points of unseating Waxman in 2012, thanks to spending $7.5 million of his own money — more than any other congressional candidate that year.

Waxman is aching to know if Bloomfield will run again. Bloomfield says he hasn't decided.

As for Marianne Williamson? "If she ended up in a runoff against me, which is not easy to imagine, but it could happen," Waxman says, carefully playing out the scenario at his Miracle Mile district office, "it would be like two Democrats, she more to my left. I don't think she would win."

A debate between the two would be a fascinatingly asymmetrical encounter, akin to one speaker reading Shakespeare and another reading an interdepartmental memo from a box factory.

Even setting aside obvious stylistic differences, their visions of liberalism couldn't be more different — she the utopian, reaching for the moon and the stars; he the coldly effective pragmatist with a résumé that could drown a man in ink.

Williamson had toyed with the idea of making a symbolic presidential run. "But I don't think this is a time for symbolic gestures," she says. "I think running for Congress is scale."

Tags:

Related Content

Now Trending

Los Angeles Concert Tickets