
In September 2012, a would-be pop star who goes by BAKER — one word, all caps — was scheduled to play the House of Blues on the Sunset Strip from 8 to 9 p.m. Tickets were available for $10 at eventbrite.com, a do-it-yourself event-ticketing site.
Yet three months later, BAKER was on the verge of superstardom — at least, according to the Internet. The video for the singer's "Not Gonna Wait," a slick dance track, had racked up millions of views on YouTube, catching the attention of the online music press.
"Earning well over 4 million YouTube hits, we are POSITIVE that if it hasn't already, 'Not Gonna Wait' will find its home in da club," MTV's Buzzworthy Blog wrote on Dec. 3. Ten days later, BAKER was the subject of a short write-up on Billboard.com, which similarly focused on the impressive views notched by "Not Gonna Wait." The next day, the O Music Awards blog published a glowing review of BAKER's concert in the basement studio at Webster Hall in New York City: "BAKER looks good, sounds good, gyrates and fist-pumps along to his hits. The only thing missing is an audience."
Despite those millions of views, only 30 people bothered to show up.
Hypebot, another music website, found the discrepancy between the singer's online fan base and his real-life star power to be odd, suggesting the singer had committed one of the music industry's oldest forms of fraud: paying for his fans. "The possibility that BAKER bought social media support is worth further investigation," HypeBot's Clyde Smith wrote.
Musicians have long manipulated their social media numbers, in hopes that the appearance of an online fan base, no matter how artificial, will translate into real fans and big sales. Buying YouTube views became big business about four years ago, reportedly after a former YouTube employee turned rogue. Now, social media manipulation is a multimillion-dollar industry.
It's not just musicians buying in: During the presidential election last year, both Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich were accused of buying Twitter followers. It's an updated spin on the age-old practice of buying your way to the top — you fake your popularity until, maybe, all those make-believe fans attract real ones.
So music industry insiders' inboxes are flooded with pitches from sites promising to help juke their stats. While YouTube cracks down on so-called "black hat" services that make use of spambots such as YouLikeHits and AddMeFast, it seems to be OK with other services. Companies such as Vagex.com and Virool claim to offer customers "real YouTube views" for a small fee. On Vagex, users download a social exchange software that gives people credits for watching others' YouTube videos, which they then "spend" to boost their own views. Virool, an online marketing company and "the most affordable source of real YouTube views," will work on an advertising campaign with artists who deposit just $10.
Musicians say the so-called real-views sites work — but only if your goal is gaming YouTube.
Joshua Smotherman, a PR consultant who founded the Middle Tennessee Music blog and admits to using exchange sites for his band, BUNKS, says: "Our album sales didn't increase, our downloads didn't increase, our mailing list sign-ups didn't increase, and that's really what we care about."
Indeed, inflated stats are so prevalent that music industry insiders say that millions of YouTube views don't mean all that much anymore. In fact, having an unreasonably large social media following could backfire.
"That they work and they're touring and they're actually doing their part of the deal, that's way more important to me than if they have 100,000 YouTube views," says Erv Karwelis, president and founder of Dallas-based indie label Idol Records. "For the most part, that doesn't translate to sales anyway."
Karwelis spent 20 years working for major labels, back when they still had offices in Dallas. Before the Internet, he acknowledges, the majors inflated their stats the old-fashioned way — by bribing radio DJs. That practice dates back to the 1950s and remains pervasive. "Major labels will do absolutely anything to trick people into buying their music," Karwelis says. "I mean they will do absolutely anything — there's nothing that they won't do, especially if it's shady."
That includes juking online stats.
In December, YouTube stripped Universal and Sony of a combined 2 billion views, saying it was "an enforcement of our view-count policies." No one has nailed down what service the labels used to game their states, but the Daily Dot, a website that broke the news of the crackdown, drew a connection between YouTube's enforcement action and an online marketer known only as Tapangoldy. (During the crackdown, Tapangoldy went offline "to fix all issue thanks.")
The availability of cheap YouTube views means that even D.I.Y. artists can participate in payola.
Michelle McDevitt, president of Audible Treats, a small entertainment PR company, has been approached by so many young artists with bogus views that she has become expert in catching phonies. If someone gets, say, 150,000 SoundCloud listens in a week, she'll research their previous projects. If the previous one got a mere 2,000 listens, it's a red flag: "Unless that person has done something significant between the projects or has blown up to [A$AP] Rocky status or something like that, there's no explanation for that sudden increase in listens and views."
Oh wuuuut..so you mean to tell me pple are more interested in faking it til they make it rather than really producing a good product or talent?!!! Well slap my ass and call me Johnny
There is a very strong temptation to buy fans. There is such a massive surplus of "bands" today that many artists do whatever they can to try to cut through the BS. But buying fans can definitely backfire as BAKED has proven. At some point, a "real fan" validation app will appear, and this type of nonsense will cease. (The best way to cut through is to make better music, and hope you meet the "right people")
Interesting topic, seemingly researched with more than Google, and not written in a college-humor style. Not too shabby. Worth the read. Thanks.
Well, just like it said, some bands were just using some ads on facebook to spread the word for their locals shows. Those ads attracted scammers. When someone buys fake likes, those fake likes sometimes like other bands in the genre to keep them from being caught. So any band may end up having a ton of fake likes, even if they don't even promote a show. How sad is that? Facebook blocks full viewing. They only allow 20 percent of your total fans see any one post. They do this so you pay for all of your fans to see the posts (especially for shows, to let them know when, where, ECT) These are the current things that make it easy for bands to get shafted.
shame on the payola players,you should have skills not deep pockets (in in some cases 10$)
The Silver Conductor here. Wow! it's like padding the score in a football game. Get fans because they Luv you and your music, not because it's being force fed to them. Don't we have enough Fake everything in the land of La La?
MusicLuv, The Silver Conductor (www.thesilverconductor.com)
@Emanuel Garz Part of the danger is fake likes are happening just from simple things as promoting a show through facebook. That is the issue, and most case scenarios that happen.
No Rewind
Phoenix New Times
Top 10 Bars on the West Side
Houston Press
Sister Cities Goes Global to Craft Its American Indie Rock
Phoenix New Times
