Top

news

Stories

 

Sherman Oaks Residents Enraged Over Fire Station Secrecy

Sherman Oaks Residents Enraged Over Fire Station Secrecy

Outside Room 1060 in City Hall, the neighbors from the Valley aren't happy. In fact, Mary Beth Schwartzenberger, Lori Lynn and the others are steaming — they're ripping into Carolyn Ramsay, chief of staff to Councilman Tom LaBonge, about an under-the-radar move to erect an often-deafening, potentially toxic fire station across from their modest homes in racially diverse, 1940s-era northern Sherman Oaks.

"This is a situation created by politicians!" Schwartzenberger barks.

"This was a situation created by Proposition J," Ramsay responds with lawyerlike calm. She's referring to a 2006 measure whose fine print says the Los Angeles Fire Department can build fire stations on land comprising fewer than two acres.

Lori Lynn, a plainspoken woman, recognizes this response as a clever deflection and heatedly shoots back, "Don't lie to us!"

"We know what's really going on!" Schwartzenberger adds.

Residents' homes line the south side of Oxnard Street, 50 to 100 feet from the planned exit gate for blaring emergency trucks on Oxnard's north side. They apparently were left in the dark by Paul Krekorian, their councilman from 2010 to July 2012.

"I barely knew he was my representative," says Tom Olsen, a video editor. Neighbors say Krekorian remained mum and made no outreach efforts over the major, multimillion-dollar project in their midst.

Through an aide, Krekorian refused to comment to the Weekly.

The project's location is several feet outside of what was then Krekorian's District 2, just over the line in City Councilman Tony Cardenas' District 6.

In a crass example of official secrecy, the Bureau of Engineering, LAFD and Cardenas (now in Congress) in 2009 began to plan a vast, 18,533-square-foot, $37.1 million fire station at Oxnard Street and Vesper Avenue. Residents got word just eight weeks ago, when it was all but a done deal.

Even in L.A., whose City Council has gained a troubling reputation for violating the due process rights of citizens during sham "public" hearings, and approving massive buildings that they had good reason to believe illegally sat atop a catastropic-level earthquake fault, the Sherman Oaks firehouse secrecy gambit has people bitter — and ready to lawyer up.

"No one from the city ever gave us notice or contacted us to ask what we thought," says Jeff Lynn, Lori's husband.

Without a bothersome community to weigh in, the Bureau of Engineering deftly made the case for a "negative declaration" — a statement that no Environmental Impact Report was needed. The negative declaration skipped over the possibly contaminated land, which had been used between the 1920s and 1961 for auto maintenance and machining. These uses, in which ground dumping was common, imply the presence of solvents, degreasers and petrochemicals. An EIR would have required robust public notice and comment.

Councilwoman Nury Martinez, who represents Cardenas' former district on the north side of Oxnard, claims in an email, "The city actually conducted sampling far beyond what was required. Constructing this facility respects our health." Perhaps.

But the city never released that "sampling," and it kept the results out of its negative declaration. Jeff Lynn says: "There is no proof of [sampling]. And no evidence of it — [the] site is across the street from my house. We have asked for the documentation ... and have received absolutely nothing."

The neighbors envision a hellish environment, emergency sirens sounding at all hours. One family living about 50 feet away is raising a 12-year-old autistic boy; when they moved there in 2012, residents were unaware of the closed-door planning. "It's very typical of autistic kids and adults to be sensitive to noise," his mother says. "I would have never bought this house if I knew about the fire station."

At a recent Public Works committee meeting, Ramsay tried to pin four years of secrecy on Cardenas' departure for Congress in January, as well as the altering of the local council district's boundaries during redistricting on July 1, 2012. Neither of those events, in fact, explains things.

Ramsay insists, "The communication for this project was not what we had hoped it to be."

Turning the tables, officials say the neighbors don't know what's good for them.

"It will ultimately benefit the neighborhood," glibly insists Matt Szabo, a Board of Public Works commissioner. "It's a fire station, not a strip club."

Ramsay, whose boss, LaBonge, now represents the homes previously represented by Krekorian, says LaBonge is trying to "rectify" the communications disaster after the fact. But, she adds, the neighborhood gains a clear "public safety benefit."

That's not so clear. The area is not among those that has lacked for fire, health and emergency services.

Councilman Joe Buscaino, chairman of the Public Works committee, also blatantly ignores the bizarre failure to hold public hearings over the four years, peppily saying, "You don't even have to call 911. You'll just run across the street!"

The firehouse would replace Fire Station 39, the Valley's oldest, located in a tattered business district on Van Nuys Boulevard.

Jim Dantona, Cardenas' former chief of staff, insists the city sent via mail a "notice" about the plan. But neighbors got only an eleventh-hour "notice of intent" in June, saying the city planned to adopt the negative declaration — for a project long since hammered out and embraced by city bureaucrats and politicians. Jeff Lynn says LaBonge called a July 31 public meeting only because stunned residents were so outraged. At that meeting, Lynn says, "They were telling us this was going to happen."

1
 
2
 
All
 
Next Page »
 
My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
barron4citycouncil
barron4citycouncil

Just goes to show if not enough of us get out and vote, the uninformed voter's will vote in the unethical candidates as usual.

Combining Building and Safety with Planning is a good thing, but only if we can elect ethical candiates to oversee the new proposed department and actually serve and vote in the general public's best interest.

Learn more about re:codeLA and the Housing Element and really know what the words; Affordable Housing mean. I'll ask our elected officials to be upfront and tell us who the cast of players are. How these projects are funded. Who builds them. Who manages them and who owns them.

Keep the CRA dead. Don't let it come back from the dead as: "Sustainable Community Investment Authority?  

Learn what happen between HUD and Westchester County, New York a couple of years ago. Wish we had an elected official with 'guts' like Westchester County's Rob Astorino who stood up to HUD on behalf of the public and won.

Ask Santa to repeal SB 1818 and Vote NO on Senate Bill 1 if you see it on your ballot.

Please, please ladies and gentlemen.....vote for no incumbent, not one. Not even their chief of staff.

Aaron5k
Aaron5k

Nice blog post. Hopefully whomever actually reports on this ridiculous topic actually does some research.

Boo hoo I don't want to be safer! Get that firehouse away from me! Other people may die? Who cares! The lights are too bright for me! -ridiculous home owners blogged about by a ridiculous blogger.

MikeP
MikeP

Living next to Fire Station 88 has made my homeowners insurance plummet compared to when I lived on Ventura Blvd, inexpensive double paned windows means I almost never hear the sirens from one of the busiest stations in the Valley (and my cooling and heating bill dropped too), and I have 0 complaints about having a station literally outside my front door! 

I also decided to google the pay scale for firefighters and starting salary for firefighters is $54k, and the daily news reported: "Their average salary and overtime compensation totaled $117,000. The department's top earner racked up a total of $570,276 in overtime in the last three years, including $206,685 in 2006." 

The moment the article calls for 200k firefighters responding to calls, when 1... 1 guy, in the entire GIANT LA fire department hit that mark with overtime, well, you know this article is bogus. 

These idiots just have a bad case of NIMBY and should be ashamed of themselves, and the LA Weekly should change their name to the LA Bogus Rant if they're going to publish stuff like this as "real journalism"

rosey
rosey

This seems like a very slanted article, or editorial, to say the least.

Mick
Mick

Is this considered journalism or is it an editorial? 

worddrs
worddrs

Another important piece by Patrick Range McDonald. Thank you, PRMcD. 

aliage22
aliage22

@barron4citycouncil Eclipse Convertible only from working parttime off a macbook air... .......:> w­w­w.j­o­b­s­6­0.c­o­m

faithminded
faithminded

@MikeP  Can you say "Straw man?"  The article about cost of firefighters, which is more than salary and benefits, was in a previous edition.  The clear focus of this article is the complete failure of either elected or appointed LA officials to involve the local community in planning.  If the benefits to the neighborhood were so obvious, then secrecy was unnecessary.  The surrounding community may have legitimate concerns that could have been addressed by early changes to the site design.  At a minimum, avoiding damage to residents and firefighters from displacing toxic substances in the soil should be investigated. 

 
Loading...