Taxi drivers must abide by the rules of each city, which charges its own permit fees or franchise fees, and it's quite a jumble: Some can't pick up passengers in certain locations unless they pay the fee or can acquire the license, which can be tough.
If a driver doesn't have a license to operate in Beverly Hills or Santa Monica, he can't pick up there. If he does, he can be fined.
Yet Lyft can operate in any location — as long as its drivers are contacted through the app. And these drivers are not assessed the fees imposed on taxicab companies, fees that hit the cabdrivers.
PHOTO BY TED SOQUI
The Authorized Taxicab Supervision system was created to keep bandit cabs out of LAX — but ride-sharing apps are proving more complicated.
Related Stories
More About
Under the PUC proposal, Lyft drivers would pay more insurance. On the other hand, cabbies must purchase "seals" and pay a fee for bandit-taxi watch, car leases and other costs in addition to insurance.
"We provide our functions in a tight regulatory environment, and the regulatory environment imposes costs on us," says William Rouse, general manager of Yellow Cab and one of nine members of the ATS board. "We're now in a state of competition where ... competitors are able to skirt huge portions of our cost structure."
While Lyft is surely changing the transportation landscape and providing a cheaper and faster service, there's no question that these innovative firms threaten jobs in the taxicab industry. But is Lyft actually causing the instability, or is it the inability of organizations like ATS, with its multilayered regulations, to evolve with a new technology?
"They can pick up anywhere in the city of Los Angeles," Tadesse says. "I can't pick up right here in El Segundo. I can't because I don't have a state license. Uber and Lyft, they can pick up anywhere. That's unfair."
Behzad Bitaraf, general manager at ATS, had "no comment" when asked about the relationship between ATS and Lyft drivers.
Yellow Cab's Rouse argues that without all these rules, there would be disorder; taxis would fight over customers and begin cheating passengers in order to make a living; and the entire city wouldn't be covered, leaving less lucrative areas of the grid without service.
But perhaps a little disorder in the taxicab industry is just what the city needs in order to change regulations so cabdrivers have a chance to compete against "ride-sharing apps" like Lyft, which raised $60 million in venture capital last spring.
Maybe a competitive and modern transportation environment in L.A. can finally free Angelenos from the drudgery of the city's highway hypnosis while giving taxicab drivers a chance to maintain their quality of life and their jobs.
As one taxicab driver at ATS says, "We are working here because there is no other option."