Top

news

Stories

 

Who Will Buy the Los Angeles Times?

Why do so many rich men want to buy it? And how did it get to this point anyway?

Broad is rumored to be among the bidders approaching Karsh and the board to discuss buying the L.A. Times. Tribune Co.'s board of directors, laden with major entertainment and finance industry players, convened for the first time in January.

This week, news broke on CNBC that the papers would be auctioned off in a process overseen by bankers Evercore and JPMorgan. A more accurate description is that the two firms have been hired to explore which suitors are legit — and willing to pay the magic number.

Tribune spokesman Gary Weitman, in an email, said, "There is a lot of interest in our newspapers, which we haven't solicited. Hiring outside financial advisers will help us determine whether that interest is credible, allow us to consider all of our options, and fulfill our fiduciary responsibility to our shareholders and employees."

Media consultant Alan Mutter says of Karsh and Tribune's board, "Those guys don't care if it's a newspaper or a taco stand. Right now, they're testing the market to see who's out there and how much they're willing to pay. If they find the right buyer, it's gone."

Rows of telephones and lime-green ergonomic chairs sit idle in Austin Beutner's West L.A. office, which was supposed to be campaign HQ for his 2013 L.A. mayoral run. These days, Beutner, the investment banker who made a fortune on Wall Street before becoming Antonio Villaraigosa's top deputy mayor, is essentially unemployed.

"My day right now is ... ," he says, his voice between a mumble and a whisper. "You ever been to one of those English hotels where they have tea at 4 o'clock in the afternoon? Probably not. So you travel there, and they have these little sandwiches, tea sandwiches. They take a regular old sandwich and cut it into 15 pieces. That's my day, as a metaphor."

The 52-year-old Beutner is looking for a bigger sandwich. He raised more than $600,000 to run for mayor in 2013, but most residents had no idea who he was, and his wonky if credible campaign ideas made little news. He dropped out in May.

Beutner now is putting together a group of wealthy Angelenos to make an offer on the L.A. Times and operate it as a nonprofit.

"There is no voice to rival the L.A. Times," Beutner says. "I'd love to see it restored to its prior stature in terms of it being a voice of civic consciousness. And I think the best ownership for that voice is local."

Local is everything to Beutner: local ownership, more local-news coverage. He says he would bulk up coverage of L.A. and Southern California but trim back some foreign and national political coverage in locales where a dozen or more news outlets often cover the same story.

If his group bought the Times, he'd consider using more stories from pool reporters and wire services. As an example, he cited a reporter stationed in Afghanistan for three years at great cost to the Times. "Afghanistan is not unimportant," he says. "But you can't do everything. You can't be everywhere in the first person."

Editor-in-chief Davan Maharaj takes exception to this example of costly foreign coverage, saying: "Afghanistan is a straight case where foreign is local. ... People here are very interested in those wars, because they give their sons and daughters [to them]."

Similar to when rich locals began banding together to bid on Frank McCourt's Los Angeles Dodgers, Beutner won't say who is in his group. Rumors seem to suggest that Broad and former Mayor Richard Riordan are involved, and possibly even mega-billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong.

"I think we have the resources to pay an appropriate amount," Beutner says. "I'm not being coy; we haven't seen the books and records yet. ... We'd definitely be prepared to move quickly." It probably can't hurt that Beutner in 1996 co-founded Evercore — the very investment bank hired by Tribune this week to vet prospective buyers.

Though Beutner steadfastly refuses to say who "we" is, Soon-Shiong makes a certain amount of sense as one of the deep pockets. The richest man in Los Angeles and a brilliant doctor and inventor, he is co-inventor of more than 50 patents, including one for a drug called Abraxane, which uses nanoparticle technology to fight breast cancer. He has a daughter, Nika, who interned at the L.A. Times last summer.

Soon-Shiong declined to comment, but clearly he wants to own something civic — and big — in L.A. He bought the El Capitan Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard and a minority share of the Lakers, and teamed up with hedge fund billionaire Steven A. Cohen to convince McCourt to sell him the Dodgers, although that didn't work out. Now, he's reportedly interested in buying AEG, owner of Staples Center.

For many Times journalists, past and present, Beutner's team represents the Dream Team, just as many Angelenos hoped developer Rick Caruso and former Yankees/Dodgers manager Joe Torre would buy the Dodgers.

But even an earnest-sounding nonprofit would have to halt the Times' decline in revenue. "If you look at the bankruptcy documents, they show continuing, rather precipitous declines," says Beutner, who was deputy mayor for 15 months at an annual salary of $1.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
obbopp
obbopp

Freedom of the press is a wondrous thing... for those able to afford the presses.


Never forget the power advertisers have over a paper's content.


And those with internal power offering the ability to make their ONE opinion/belief/cause to appear much more massive by crouching behind the name/banner of the paper.


The above can be witnessed when a newspaper has in it's op-ed page the oft-seen The Bee recommends.... then inserts candidate names or or statutes appearing on the ballot, etc.

Replace "Bee" with your local paper's name.

Seldom will the newspapers using that common tactic ever reveal who is behind the decision to make it appear an entire newspaper and those within stand behind the recommendations..

geevarez
geevarez like.author.displayName 1 Like

Just curious to know when the last time people making comments actually bought a newspaper? 

It cost money to this type of reporting, everyone wants but nobody wants to pay for it. Just saying....


LANative
LANative

This is a fascinating account of what happened at the Times. But I wish the idea that the paper's economic and readership declines were inevitable due to the sad state of newspapers and the terrible economy would die a well-deserved death.  If the series of inept owners had promoted their "product," instead of brutally slashing staff and tearing it down publicly (a la Sam Zell's idiotic comments), perhaps the Times could have weathered the severe economic downturn in the industry, as has the New York Times. (Which does have problems, I know.) Also, it should be pointed out more strongly that the greedy Fitz$imons and his cohorts wouldn't sell to Californians, but gladly gave away the store to the fellow Chicagoan troll Zell as part of their anti-West Coast temper tantrum. I've always wondered if/why that issue has never been addressed in court by the shareholders who lost a bundle in the deal. 

kargforcongress
kargforcongress

03/01/2013

Dear Citizens,

We just saw what happened to Bob Woodward [Gene Sperling--White House].

And in the past Lou Dobbs reported to us what was happening to the Newspapers in Texas [2005].

While time goes on the slide of hand moves.

There is little to no Freedom of the Press, even Sean Hannity knows this on Fox.

Karlheinz Halter knew this when the LA Times reported incorrectly about the LA Harbor College Student Newspaper--The Hawk [See the Federal District Case].

Even John Bogart, Daily Breeze, knew this...as he was dying of cancer [see his book].

Even our Congresswoman Harman, proud owner of Newsweek of a $1, can tell you how things will go.

But who is listening?

Sincerely,

Don Karg

Former Candidate in the 1992 Congressional Elections, 36th District








siteser
siteser

I know....how about Al Jezeera....their fair and balanced ! 

FormerlyDisgusted
FormerlyDisgusted

Great article but the LA Times has become nothing more than a delivery vehicle for Ad  inserts and "special publications" that have no Editorial content with mentioning.  I get home delivery and on Monday's if the winds are strong the paper gets blown away.  Sad ending to a once great paper. To far gone now to bring it back.  Go for a walk in the morning and see how few papers you see in Driveways.

4carnations
4carnations

Now if someone could tell us the gripping, nail-biting story behind the L.A. Daily News...if there are people who actually read the Daily News, that is...

OldNorseBruin
OldNorseBruin

NOW this kind of PANACHE in this article is what I want to see from the Los Angeles Times!!!  Very, very informative, lively, fascinating behind the scenes digging/reporting!  I only wish the LA WEEKLY would buy the LAT;  hopefully a TRUE CALIFORNIAN will buy the LAT.  PLEASE GOD IN HEAVEN do NOT let that goddamn GeeOhPee-DoucheBagg M.F.er MurCock get his slimey, paralytic, fetid fingers on the TIMES;  It would be better to LITERALLY burn the entire LAT Complex down!  DAMN, when the LAT was on the market years ago, GEFFEN would have been the terrific buyer/savior of that fascibating paper.  Otis Chandler made the LAT a world class SoCal  institution;   I still hold out hope that it will return to its lofty perch in the journalistic world!!!

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city