Top

news

Stories

 

Who Will Buy the Los Angeles Times?

Why do so many rich men want to buy it? And how did it get to this point anyway?

Yet until the early 1960s, the Times was a wretched newspaper, the second-worst big paper in the country (after the Chicago Tribune). Its news reporters delivered propaganda for the Chandler family and downtown businessmen, promoting the region's real estate and Republicans, defaming unions and opposing civic reform.

But after the third Chandler, Otis, took over in 1960, the prodigal son not only turned the Times into a world-class paper but he also made it fantastically profitable. He did so by spending heavily on advertising, promotions and, most of all, journalism.

"He opened up bureaus around the world," Wolinsky says. "He spent money like water."

In the 1980s and '90s, reporters at then–Times-Mirror Square were handed first-class tickets when flying to cover stories in other cities. Top reporters took the occasional rare lunch in the Tamayo Room or Picasso Room, both elegant, upstairs dining rooms where Times executives ate among low-numbered lithographs by the two famed painters.

In 2000, the Chicago-based Tribune Co. bought Times-Mirror for $95 a share. The Chandler family came out owning a chunk of the Tribune Co.'s many papers, TV stations and the Cubs, while Tribune Co. got control of the L.A. Times.

Tribune Co. execs demanded that the Times' balance sheets start to resemble the Chicago paper's balance sheets.

"They seemed to consider the things they saw at the Times as hedonistic," Wolinsky says. "The L.A. people lived too well, spent too much." The Chicago owners "were insulted by it."

Coin-operated aspirin machines were installed in the Times newsroom — no more free aspirin handed out by secretaries. Executives' names were removed from special parking spots.

Those small insults might be forgotten today, but they accompanied a national collapse in display advertising, thanks to the Internet, as well as the near-obliteration of newspaper classified ads due to Craigslist and free websites. In a parallel to what slammed the unprepared music industry, millions of consumers stopped paying for newspapers — they could get their news free, and fresher, online.

By 2006, the Chandlers wanted out. Geffen was interested; so were L.A. billionaires Eli Broad and Ron Burkle. But the spoils went to Sam Zell, the real estate mogul who looked like a character from Tolkien's Middle-Earth dressed for a night at a disco.

Zell's nickname was "Grave Dancer," and his crassness disgusted many journalists — he once suggested that Tribune papers allow X-rated ads because "everyone loves a good blow job."

"He was the most vulgar, repellent rich person I've ever met," says Tim Rutten, a journalist at the Times for 40 years, who was laid off in 2011.

Zell borrowed $12 billion from four investment banks and bought up all Tribune Co. stock — at $34 a share. He made the purchase through an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), saving Zell a small fortune in taxes if he could just hold on for 10 years. Best of all, the debt was loaded onto Tribune Co. itself. Zell personally put in only about $315 million.

Zell figured that if he could keep revenue from falling and pay down the $12 billion debt — from that same Tribune Co. revenue — he could make $5 billion, an enormous return. But if revenue fell, Tribune Co. would owe more than it was worth, like a house with an underwater mortgage. That's what happened, amidst the global financial meltdown. By April 2008, four months after buying it, Wolinsky says, Zell "had already hired a bankruptcy firm." On Dec. 8, 2008, Tribune Co. filed for Chapter 11.

"Given how ugly the Tribune leveraged buyout was, and how poorly conceived it was, there was gonna be nasty litigation," says Jonathan Lipson, who teaches bankruptcy law at Temple University.

The L.A. Times (plus the Chicago Tribune, Baltimore Sun, Orlando Sentinel, South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Hartford Courant, Daily Press and Morning Call) fell into what Lipson calls the "shadow bankruptcy system," an unregulated market where debt is bought, sold, sliced, diced and resold — like mortgages.

In this market, banks get rid of crappy assets and take a modest loss while the new investors get a chance to own a large piece of a company at a discount.

After years of bankruptcy-court wars, three large firms emerged as the key buyers, or holders, of Tribune senior debt: Los Angeles–based Oaktree Capital Management; Angelo, Gordon & Co.; and JPMorgan Chase & Co.

The biggest voice among these, in deciding the great civic and political question of who will buy the Los Angeles Times, is Oaktree Capital, run by dashing billionaire Bruce Karsh. Oaktree was awarded roughly one-quarter ownership of Tribune Co., while Angelo, Gordon & Co. and JPMorgan got about 9 percent each. Many other players got smaller chunks.

Karsh now is chairman of Tribune's board of directors, and the company is valued at about $4.5 billion, mostly thanks to TV and cable properties including WGN, KTLA Channel 5 and the Food Network. The eight newspapers are valued at just $623 million. (Zell sold the Cubs in 2009.)

L.A. residents will hear more of Karsh, a former appellate clerk to now–Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, summa cum laude grad of Duke University and a former assistant to billionaire Eli Broad in Broad's days at SunAmerica.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
obbopp
obbopp

Freedom of the press is a wondrous thing... for those able to afford the presses.


Never forget the power advertisers have over a paper's content.


And those with internal power offering the ability to make their ONE opinion/belief/cause to appear much more massive by crouching behind the name/banner of the paper.


The above can be witnessed when a newspaper has in it's op-ed page the oft-seen The Bee recommends.... then inserts candidate names or or statutes appearing on the ballot, etc.

Replace "Bee" with your local paper's name.

Seldom will the newspapers using that common tactic ever reveal who is behind the decision to make it appear an entire newspaper and those within stand behind the recommendations..

geevarez
geevarez like.author.displayName 1 Like

Just curious to know when the last time people making comments actually bought a newspaper? 

It cost money to this type of reporting, everyone wants but nobody wants to pay for it. Just saying....


LANative
LANative

This is a fascinating account of what happened at the Times. But I wish the idea that the paper's economic and readership declines were inevitable due to the sad state of newspapers and the terrible economy would die a well-deserved death.  If the series of inept owners had promoted their "product," instead of brutally slashing staff and tearing it down publicly (a la Sam Zell's idiotic comments), perhaps the Times could have weathered the severe economic downturn in the industry, as has the New York Times. (Which does have problems, I know.) Also, it should be pointed out more strongly that the greedy Fitz$imons and his cohorts wouldn't sell to Californians, but gladly gave away the store to the fellow Chicagoan troll Zell as part of their anti-West Coast temper tantrum. I've always wondered if/why that issue has never been addressed in court by the shareholders who lost a bundle in the deal. 

kargforcongress
kargforcongress

03/01/2013

Dear Citizens,

We just saw what happened to Bob Woodward [Gene Sperling--White House].

And in the past Lou Dobbs reported to us what was happening to the Newspapers in Texas [2005].

While time goes on the slide of hand moves.

There is little to no Freedom of the Press, even Sean Hannity knows this on Fox.

Karlheinz Halter knew this when the LA Times reported incorrectly about the LA Harbor College Student Newspaper--The Hawk [See the Federal District Case].

Even John Bogart, Daily Breeze, knew this...as he was dying of cancer [see his book].

Even our Congresswoman Harman, proud owner of Newsweek of a $1, can tell you how things will go.

But who is listening?

Sincerely,

Don Karg

Former Candidate in the 1992 Congressional Elections, 36th District








siteser
siteser

I know....how about Al Jezeera....their fair and balanced ! 

FormerlyDisgusted
FormerlyDisgusted

Great article but the LA Times has become nothing more than a delivery vehicle for Ad  inserts and "special publications" that have no Editorial content with mentioning.  I get home delivery and on Monday's if the winds are strong the paper gets blown away.  Sad ending to a once great paper. To far gone now to bring it back.  Go for a walk in the morning and see how few papers you see in Driveways.

4carnations
4carnations

Now if someone could tell us the gripping, nail-biting story behind the L.A. Daily News...if there are people who actually read the Daily News, that is...

OldNorseBruin
OldNorseBruin

NOW this kind of PANACHE in this article is what I want to see from the Los Angeles Times!!!  Very, very informative, lively, fascinating behind the scenes digging/reporting!  I only wish the LA WEEKLY would buy the LAT;  hopefully a TRUE CALIFORNIAN will buy the LAT.  PLEASE GOD IN HEAVEN do NOT let that goddamn GeeOhPee-DoucheBagg M.F.er MurCock get his slimey, paralytic, fetid fingers on the TIMES;  It would be better to LITERALLY burn the entire LAT Complex down!  DAMN, when the LAT was on the market years ago, GEFFEN would have been the terrific buyer/savior of that fascibating paper.  Otis Chandler made the LAT a world class SoCal  institution;   I still hold out hope that it will return to its lofty perch in the journalistic world!!!

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city