Top

news

Stories

 

YouTube Stars Fight Back

Machinima and Maker Studios, two of YouTube's most high-profile networks, have come under fire from their own talent

But after dozens of his subscribers succeeded in getting the attention of Kotaku's Stephen Totilo, KSIOlajidebt went silent — he did not respond to calls for comment. His video, like Vacas', quickly was switched to private.

A representative for Machinima downplays the contract disputes.

Ben Vacas, known online as Braindeadly, stopped making videos due to Machinima's onerous contracts.
Ben Vacas, known online as Braindeadly, stopped making videos due to Machinima's onerous contracts.
Hugh Hancock, Machinima.com founder
Hugh Hancock, Machinima.com founder

"Machinima's network is now comprised of over 6,000 creators. Even with our large network, we find disputes are rare. In these rare cases, Machinima engages and focuses on mutual success for the company and our network partners," Sanjay Sharma, executive vice president for strategy and business development, says in a statement. "Today, Machinima's agreements are consistent with developing norms for multichannel networks."

Ben Vacas' video was posted to YouTube on May 8. Within hours, it appeared on Reddit, where the post racked up 2,221 comments and 7,964 "up" votes. That was enough to promote the video, and the commentary it provoked, to the website's massively trafficked front page — the Internet equivalent of getting on Good Morning America.

The most popular comment in the resulting thread came from user HuskyStarcraft, a YouTube creator with more than 600,000 subscribers. He explained that he had been approached by Machinima years ago but turned the offer down because he felt the terms of the contract were unfair.

The experience motivated him to create his own channel, he wrote. The Game Station channel is now an affiliate of Maker Studios. "It's really sad that this keeps happening (this is the fifth or so video I've seen on this EXACT topic) but keep fighting the good fight," wrote HuskyStarcraft, whose real name is Mike Lamond.

Thousands of other users wrote messages of support; the publicity from Reddit even helped Vacas to connect with a lawyer.

The same day, back at Machinima's Hollywood headquarters, an employee, presumably without knowledge that the network was being ripped apart on Reddit, uploaded a piece of new content to the network's home page: a trailer for the video game Primal Carnage.

Immediately, angry Reddit readers "nuked" it: Within minutes, the clip received more than 500 dislikes and racked up hundreds of comments decrying the company's shady practices. The video was hastily wiped from the site.

Also that same day, a 32-year-old Belgian named Bachir Boumaaza, the self-proclaimed "Best Gamer in the World," known online by his YouTube user name AtheneWins (or simply Athene), made his own video.

Shot in black-and-white, the video features the same soft, sad piano music as Vacas' video. In it, Boumaaza makes a shocking announcement.

"If things are wrong, I'm not the kind of guy that — that just ignores it," he says, gazing earnestly at the camera, head cocked to one side, a shock of shiny black hair falling over his face. "This is a very hard decision and I've been thinking about it. But the only thing that I can do — the only thing that feels right, right now — is to leave Machinima." Boumaaza apparently had an older version of the network's contracts, one that allowed him to come and go as he pleased.

The news that Athene, a bona fide YouTube celebrity with 589,798 subscribers and 382 million video views, was leaving Machinima reverberated throughout the YouTube community.

Reached by email, a representative for Boumaaza told the Weekly, "Over the past six months, we've regularly talked to several people from Machinima about complaints we have been hearing from partners about how they felt intimidated by their business and contract practices," he says. 

"Every time that we brought this to Machinima's attention to make them aware that this could lead to a PR disaster, we were assured that these were things of the past and that they had started taking a different approach. But when the situation with Braindeadly occurred, it was clear to us that nothing had changed," the representative says.

At the time, Athene had made no decision regarding which network he would join, the spokesman added. The star would be open to joining a network that "wants to make YouTube a better place for content producers or wants to give gamers more freedom and resources."

Shortly after the controversy blew up on Reddit, L.A. Weekly reached Vacas via Skype.

"It was really amazing to see how many people took the time to support me after I made that video," Vacas said, reflecting on the fallout. "It just shows how much the community can do when they all group together and help others out."

He added that Machinima had since offered him another deal, but with terms that were no more favorable than his previous contract. He said he would be working with a lawyer to settle the matter.

Machinima has borne the brunt of the public criticism, but complaints about unfair YouTube contracts are heard throughout the industry. No one is immune, not even YouTube's biggest star.

On Dec. 10, Ray William Johnson, whose channel boasts more than 6 million subscribers — more than any other on YouTube — couldn't keep quiet any longer. A little after 7 p.m., he fired off a pair of tweets heard 'round the world.

"Yo @MakerStudios I left your company two months ago. **ANY TIME** would be good to sign my AdSense account back over to me." AdSense is the account into which YouTube ad revenue is deposited — the way in which YouTube stars receive compensation for their work.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
19 comments
starjonestown
starjonestown

This is Hilarious!  Web slaves...  

Only issue here is that this article is out-of-date.  Most of the VC action has already moved on, at least the smart money.  Google's own supposed channel "investment"  was actually structured like old record-company deals in that their 'artists' had to pay back the parent's seed money.  It's easy to get scammed and these crappy web content producers pay their talent sh*t.    

Cable television money dwarfs this backwater junk.  

Machinima may have $35m...  Even a 5th rate cable brand like Spike makes that look like a children's sandbox.  

SimonFraser4
SimonFraser4

The YouTube network bubble is going to burst. Just as the dot-com bubble burst 12 years ago. If you believe the hype, then you'll be in the bubble when it bursts. Signing a contract because of all the money you think it will bring you IS believing the hype.

YouTube networks are middle men. Middle men only offer lubricant. Which is nice and all, but not necessary.

Collaborate with other content creators, keep making content and keep improving your abilities and your content. And when you enter into a contract with someone who offers you lubricant, remember that they work FOR YOU. You are the client, you are the source of the product. They are the service provider. Therefore, YOU call the shots. If a contract doesn't meet with your approval, don't sign the contract. Otherwise, you're in the bubble.

crmartell
crmartell

I'm an ex-machinima director, who had one of those "perpetuity contracts". Coincidentally I said many of the same things in my video as appearing in this article. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOPEYYm_Z-0 The situation looks really dark, but I do have a solution, if the community would just embrace it. Anyone interested should check out my video. 

edohiguma
edohiguma

So basically Vacas signed the contract and read the fine print afterwards. And that with Machinima, which has been known to be itchy, at best, for a while. Good gods. One of the first things I learned in my life was not to do that. Always read everything. Always.

As for this: "Can networks like Machinima and Maker sustain their rapid growth if the creators on whose backs they built their businesses revolt?"

Simple answer is no. Even without the creator revolt unlimited growth is impossible.

krystaBlade
krystaBlade

I just started a YouTube Channel and in less than two months it has over 1500 Subs so I just do not understand why you need an Network Anyway???

HaasGaming
HaasGaming

@krystaBlade Varied reasons. With gaming it is a pretty simple one; licensing. You can't monetize most gaming content (Exceptions exist; e.g. the popular game called Minecraft) without licensing and specific networks provide this. There's a lot more to it though. 

cobrachoppergirl
cobrachoppergirl

This guy is an idiot.  All he has to do is ignore the contract and release videos uner a new pseudonym anonymously.   F your contract.  Contracts can be broken and better yet... ignored.   The US government does it all the time...   just ask the Native Americans... how binding contracts are.

Style101
Style101

Crazy how about working with Blip.tv or Maybe Openfilm.com or they just as evil 

310kidd
310kidd

I think these users would do great creating their own Live content on sites like Stickam.com. It will be a way to get closer to fans and answer questions on the spot. Maybe even find new ways to fangate new users.

invadermak97
invadermak97

I would have been starting my youtube channel in a few days, but this is disheartening and has caused me to reconsider even trying.

HaasGaming
HaasGaming

@invadermak97 Keep in mind these are, in large part, anomalies. I've been partnered with a network (Maker Studios, part of TheGameStation) for a good year now without any complaints thus far. I wouldn't let these problems dissuade you from starting something if you really want it, just be careful - in everything you do - what you sign up for. That being said, it's a lot of work so be prepared to spend a lot of time and you'll need quite a bit of patience! 

chilltowntv
chilltowntv

Agree with you also, @kati.morton  I'm just starting my channel and it's an overwhelming thing to do in general. This definitely is a lot of food for thought...

kati.morton
kati.morton

Thank you for writing this article. It's very interesting for a smaller Youtube creator like myself to see what is going on with MCN's at Youtube...

ryanthomaswoods
ryanthomaswoods

@kati.morton Completely agree with you kati! It was so informative for us as smaller youtube creator's to know what to expect as well as give us an inside look at what is going on.

networkfree
networkfree

From what I can tell, these networks are realizing that their business models are flawed in that they do not own any of the content or the distribution. Even while "owning" a creator's YouTube channel, the networks are actually just renting the channel from YouTube. It's a flawed model when the intent is to add another layer to YouTube's business model. See: Zynga + Facebook.

richardstarr
richardstarr

This also reminds me of the type of contracts still prevalent in the comic book industry.  Greats like Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko have had their work attributed to Stan Lee who acted as the front man for Marvel comics.  Newsflash, the editor of a masterpiece is not the artist and I've never seen any evidence that Lee was anything other than an editor.

In any case, the work from the geniuses of the past have become the "property" of Marvel comics continuing industry "practice" of DC comics who took Superman from Siegel and Schuster when they thought they were only selling the individual STORY instead of the CHARACTER.

The creation of Image comics gave independent creators a venue to produce comics and still retain the rights while giving the company distributing them a fair share.  They need something like this in the YouTube world to help keep the "suits" from stealing from yet another generation.

The open ended contracts and options still exist, to a lesser extent, in the music industry.  You have the rappers getting rich not from their own music, but from the artists they sign, following the pattern of exploitation that they were often the victims of. 

chvyvele
chvyvele

@richardstarr Stan Lee wrote and edited the comic books for all of the characters that he is credited for creating. Steve Ditko and Jack Kirby were artists who helped shaped the story and the characters, but Lee was often the one to create the stories and dialogue. Ditko and Kirby are almost always given credit for co-creating characters.

richardstarr
richardstarr like.author.displayName 1 Like

@chvyvele @richardstarr  

No, Stan Lee is given credit for stuff he did not do.  If you read Jack Kirby's book you will have a better grasp of this.  Too much credit is often assigned to the wrong people.  I'm not say Stan had zero contributions, but for something like the Fantastic Four he would say, "Give me a superhero story based on the 4 elements (fire,water,earth,air) and Jack created the Fantastic Four.  Lee would then modify some of the script Jack created, but did not come up with the story himself.  The credit he takes, now that so many are dead and unable to gainsay him, is far more than he deserves.

 Take a look at the output Lee did after Jack left, and look at what Jack continued to do from that point on at DC.  Kirby was a genius, Lee was a hanger on.  Without the real artists, Lee created nothing.  Credit was only begrudgingly given at times, often after law suits.  Kirby signed away much of his rights to recover his artwork.  Actually, only a portion of it, which was rightfully his.

If there was any justice Kirby would have ended up owning Marvel, but that was not to be.

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city