Top

news

Stories

 

Hollywood's Urban Cleansing

12,878 mostly Latinos are pushed out by City Hall, high rents and hipsters

In the 1960s, Mercedes Cortes arrived in Hollywood after fleeing her homeland of Guatemala, which was roiled by bloody unrest. After moving around a bit, she and her husband and their three sons settled in a two-bedroom apartment on Eleanor Avenue, a community of run-down apartment buildings and old Craftsman-style houses, which is a short walk from Paramount Pictures and Hollywood Forever Cemetery, where many stars are buried.

Ted Soqui
Leon Gubler, Hollywood Chamber of Commerce president
Ted Soqui
Leon Gubler, Hollywood Chamber of Commerce president
Ziggy Kruse, waitress-turned-activist, sees Eric Garcetti as a cold figure who supports regular Hollywood folks when it's "politically smart."
Ted Soqui
Ziggy Kruse, waitress-turned-activist, sees Eric Garcetti as a cold figure who supports regular Hollywood folks when it's "politically smart."
Manny Romero, groundskeeper at Blessed Sacrament Church on Sunset Boulevard
Ted Soqui
Manny Romero, groundskeeper at Blessed Sacrament Church on Sunset Boulevard

A decade later, Cortes' world was shattered again — when gang violence and drug dealing hit her beloved neighborhood. This time, the affable, soft-spoken housekeeper bravely stood her ground as Hollywood was engulfed in the wave of bloodletting that gripped Los Angeles from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s. A small, unimposing woman, she became a visible member of Neighborhood Watch, walking the dark streets in candlelight vigils to confront the thugs.

And it worked. Cortes and her neighbors slowly won back Eleanor Avenue. She never dreamed that she'd be evicted — for being too poor to live in her improved, more livable community.

But in 2002 her apartment building changed hands during the real estate bubble, a particularly frenzied phenomenon in Hollywood, where the taxpayer-subsidized, nearly $1 billion Hollywood Redevelopment Project Area helped fueled a Wild West of land speculation, building flipping, profit-seeking — and skyrocketing rents. In 2003, projects such as the stylish face-lift of the Cinerama Dome were completed. In 2004, Cortes' new landlord told her she had to go.

"I was working and doing good things for my neighborhood and they treated me like that," Cortes says. "For what? They wanted more money."

A gracious, churchgoing woman, Cortes represents a Latino diaspora of working families priced out of Hollywood and East Hollywood, a mass departure that has fueled an unexpected — and, for City Hall, increasingly embarrassing — net population plunge of 12,878 people in those two neighborhoods between 2000 and 2010.

Hollywood, defined here as the huge flatlands roughly bounded by La Brea, Melrose, Western and Franklin avenues, has lost one in every 12 of its residents. Latinos are streaming out, as a much smaller number of higher-income whites takes their place. The Latino population plummeted 17 percent, about 6,000 adults and children gone.

East Hollywood, roughly bounded by Western, Beverly, Hollywood and Hoover, has seen a net loss of more than 5,000 Latinos.

Hollywood-area City Councilman Eric Garcetti, who is running for mayor in the March 5 primary and has for 12 years avidly led the urban renewal in Hollywood, won't discuss the census data, the outflow of Latinos or the area's net population loss, none of which were foreseen by his office. But Larry Gross, executive director of the Coalition for Economic Survival, a tenants' rights advocacy group, says, "It was an economic tsunami that pushed low-income people out. There was massive displacement."

Representing more than 8 percent of Hollywood and East Hollywood's population, the exodus of nearly 13,000 mostly Latinos is believed to be the largest mass departure from an L.A. neighborhood since "black flight," between 1980 and 1990. In that demographic upheaval, 50,000 residents fled the violence and shattered neighborhoods of South Central and South Los Angeles.

Garcetti and other L.A. politicians have insisted that growth is as inevitable as summer tourists, and that City Hall is merely facilitating Hollywood's unavoidable, denser future with smart planning. But census data and the stories of those who have fled suggest that city planners and political leaders are facilitating what some criticize as the urban cleansing of Hollywood.

Father Michael Mandala, who was pastor at the landmark Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church on Sunset Boulevard from 1998 to 2011, repeatedly saw landlords drive out Latino families of three or four in order to rent the same space to one or two white tenants. "I'm wondering if the policymakers are on the mark with fixing Hollywood," Mandala says, "or are they clearing out what they don't want?"

In mid-July, the Los Angeles City Council approved a new Hollywood Community Plan championed by Garcetti, which wipes out height limits in parts of Hollywood to allow skyscrapers, some of which would obscure the Hollywood Sign. At tense public hearings, hundreds of residents decried the plans for a Century City skyline in their community. Business owners, led by the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, were among those who cheered the City Council's decision.

Three neighborhood groups have sued the city over the new skyscraper zoning. Brad Torgan, an attorney at The Silverstein Law Firm, which represents one of the groups, describes the Hollywood Community Plan as Garcetti's personal "vision for Hollywood — good and bad." But, Torgan says, "There's a perception that the plan was created for the development community at the expense of the residents."

Garcetti, the brainy, Ivy League–educated mayoral hopeful, revealed some of his thinking in a 2010 interview with Hollywood Patch: "We staged seminars in which we brought the New York banks to Hollywood and showed them the opportunities," Garcetti said. "Whatever the project's size, my philosophy is to let the creative entrepreneurs in." He added that "what we did was to use the nightlife to bring back the day life" — restaurants such as Beso, 25 Degrees, Cleo and Katsuya and night spots such as the Sayers Club, Drai's, My Studio and Eden.

Garcetti's chief of staff, Yusef Robb, waves off the flight of Latino families and individuals as a sign of their own good fortune, arguing that Hollywood's Latinos did so well during the past decade that they bought homes in "the suburbs."

"We looked into the population shift in Hollywood," Robb says, "and the situation tended to be people making choices to their own advantage."

Robb could not provide L.A. Weekly any data to back up his claim. In fact, it appears that Garcetti and his sizable staff — about 20 full-time personal aides — are unprepared to explain what is unfolding.

The hollowing out of Latinos in Hollywood is particularly dramatic in the dense, L-shaped chunk of six U.S. census tracts at the heart of Hollywood — tracts 1908.01, 1908.02, 1909.01, 1909.02, 1918.10 and 1918.20 — bordered by Western Avenue on the east, Seward Street on the west, Melrose Boulevard on the south and Sunset on the north.

Tracts 1909.01 and 1909.02 between Western, Gower, Sunset and Santa Monica Boulevard saw a net loss of 664 Latinos. Far fewer Latinos moved into than out of the neighborhood's increasingly costly apartments, condos and bungalows, resulting in a steep population decline. The same thing occurred in tracts 1908.01 and 1908.02 between Gower, Seward, Sunset and Santa Monica, where a net loss of 896 Latinos created a sharp overall population drop.

Just south of there, in tracts 1918.10 and 1918.20 bordered by Gower, Seward, Santa Monica and Melrose, a net 1,402 Latinos took off. Having lost 2,962 Latinos, the historically affordable housing in these six flatland census tracts is now a thing of the past, creating ground zero in Hollywood's working-class diaspora.

In 2000, about 80,000 people lived in Hollywood, and L.A.'s Department of Planning announced that 85,489 would live there by 2008. By 2010, only 72,000 did.

What's going on is clear enough to USC demographer Jared Sanchez. He says the data show "significant" gentrification, with wealthier households moving in — which inevitably contain fewer people than working-class households — while others get squeezed out.

Many will cheer this turn of events. Hollywood, the neighborhood, is richer, flashier and more attractive than at any time since its golden era. Hollywood Chamber of Commerce president Leron Gubler says, "We've made significant strides in cleaning up Hollywood, restoring community pride and creating a vibrant economy here in Hollywood."

Longtime Hollywood resident and Garcetti ally Ferris Wehbe says, "There has been big change in the area. Hollywood is going to soar."

The L.A. City Council in 1986 approved a 1,100-acre "redevelopment project area" with the aim of remaking Hollywood into a livable community. The nearly $1 billion Hollywood Redevelopment Plan was one of the most heavily subsidized projects in California, with taxpayers underwriting such items as a $32 million parking garage at the pricey Cinerama Dome and ArcLight Theaters and $98 million for Hollywood & Highland. Los Angeles County transportation officials broke ground in 1986 on the Red Line subway with stops along Hollywood Boulevard, at that time the haunt of heroin dealers and prostitutes.

In 1992, Leron Gubler, a soft-spoken, determined power broker, became president of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, which supervises the Walk of Fame and is one of the most influential champions of redevelopment. Politicians rarely run afoul of the Chamber, which counts among its members top executives from Paramount Pictures, Walt Disney Studios, real estate developer Millennium Partners, The CW television network, the Renaissance Hollywood Hotel and Hollywood & Highland.

At first, Gubler says, "We had a lot of homeless. The sidewalks were dirty. Businesses were closing left and right. ... People had given up on Hollywood."

In 1993, Jackie Goldberg was elected to represent Hollywood on the City Council, and she pushed hard for redevelopment. Gubler told her that first they should focus on "nuts-and-bolts" issues, which Gubler narrowed down to "crime and grime." The Chamber and Goldberg's office launched much-publicized efforts to make Hollywood's streets cleaner and safer.

But beyond the headlines, Mercedes Cortes and her neighbors were already on the job, creating a successful Neighborhood Watch that teamed up with the Los Angeles Police Department. So were many other Spanish-speaking residents, including Manny Romero, who worked as a youth organizer in unstable El Salvador, escaped that country's violent civil war, which took the lives of his family and friends in the 1980s, and moved to Los Angeles.

Romero eventually became the popular and well-respected groundskeeper at Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church, built in 1928, an important community center for Hollywood's Latino population.

In 1978, Romero moved with his wife and two children into a cheap bungalow on Las Palmas Avenue just south of Sunset. It was a few blocks west of De Longpre Park, which became a notorious cesspool of drug dealers and junkies in the late '80s and early '90s.

Romero suddenly faced a new kind of war. He went to incredible lengths to save his community, joining a neighborhood patrol group called the Hollywood Sentinels, whose members put their lives on the line by running drug dealers and gang members off of street corners. Criminals threatened to kill Romero and his family.

"I was scared of the gang members," Romero recalls, "but it didn't stop me from doing my citizen's duties."

The Chamber's Gubler and many journalists credit the 2001 opening of the concrete elephant–bedecked Hollywood & Highland mall, where the Academy Awards are held, for initiating Hollywood's turnaround. But low-income working folks like Cortes and Romero were key figures in first steadying the community's foundation.

Romero was treated like anything but a hero. In 1996, his landlord sold the cluster of bungalows on Las Palmas Avenue, and the new owner doubled Romero's rent from $600 a month to $1,200. Romero was forced to abandon his dramatic but unsung quest to create a livable community. He and his family moved to then-affordable North Hollywood.

Five years later, in 2001, Garcetti took over from Goldberg on the City Council. He was 30, fresh-faced and eager to move forward with a new kind of politics that would put residents, not big-moneyed special interests, first.

Community activist Ferris Wehbe, who spearheaded the unsuccessful Hollywood secession movement in the early 2000s, supported Garcetti then and backs him today. "Eric played a big role" in turning around Hollywood, Wehbe says. "He saw that good changes took place. You need good leaders to make decisions and not try to please everyone."

By the mid-2000s, land speculation in Hollywood turned into a frenzy. In 2003, Ralph Horowitz and developer Larry Worchell bought historic Columbia Square on Sunset Boulevard, the West Coast home of CBS, for a reported $15 million. Three years later, Horowitz and his partner sold the property to Las Vegas–based developer Molasky Pacific for $66 million. That land flipping, and the breathtaking $51 million profit for Horowitz and Worchell, were fed by the widely held belief that Garcetti, now the powerful arbiter of what could and couldn't be built, would let developers ignore the neighborhood's longtime height limit of a few stories to build a skyscraper.

About the same time, Mercedes Cortes' landlord sold her building to Prime West Management chief executive officer Mercedes Anaya. In 2004, when the eviction notice arrived, Cortes was paying $450 a month. Although she had divorced, her three adult sons still lived with her and she enjoyed a vibrant social life as an active member of Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church.

She drove each day to clean houses in West Hollywood or Beverly Hills. At 61, she fought eviction. She eventually won a settlement that paid her some "relocation" expenses, and she and two of her sons found a place far from home, in North Hollywood.

About 20 of her Latino friends and acquaintances were similarly pushed out of Hollywood, she says. A neighbor still living in the flatlands recently told Cortes that her old $450 rental now goes for $1,200.

In the legal battle that ensued, Anaya claimed in 2004 that Cortes' sons were heavy-drinking gang members and nuisances. When that didn't work, says Cortes' lawyer Marty O'Toole, Anaya's lawyers claimed that Cortes didn't respond to a three-day notice that demanded she pay her rent or vacate. The landlord did not respond to emails requesting comment.

During the six-month legal battle to keep her apartment, Cortes formed a prayer group with her friends at Blessed Sacrament. "I was asking for justice," she recalls. "Because if I lost the case, I would've been in the streets."

Her prayers were partly answered. Just before the trial, Anaya's lawyers offered Cortes five months of free rent and several thousand dollars if she moved out. Emotionally drained, she took the deal.

Not long after her battle, several blocks away, Roy Maule and his Latino neighbors faced their own war against eviction on tree-lined Camerford Avenue in a quaint bungalow complex built in 1912 for actors working at Paramount Pictures.

Many of Maule's neighbors — mostly Latino families — had lived on the quiet block, near tony Larchmont Village, for decades. "It was great," says Maule. "Everyone knew each other."

They traditionally closed the street to celebrate Fourth of July, with adults lighting fireworks and kids running around. One day, a young man walked up to Maule's mailbox and snatched a package sticking out of it. Maule's neighbors, he recalls, "gave chase, got the package and beat up the guy. ... The poor guy didn't know he was in a neighborhood like that."

But the property was sold, and around 2006, the landlord made clear he wanted the families gone. Neighbors from Mexico and Central America told Maule that the landlord had threatened to make calls to federal immigration officials. Other tenants were offered money to leave.

But Maule hired a lawyer to fight his eviction and wrote to Garcetti's office for help. He did his own homework, finding in a title search that Santa Monica-based developer Watt Genton Associates owned the property.

Maule says Garcetti "did nothing," and at least 150 people were displaced from the bungalows and adjacent apartment units. In 2007, Maule was paid relocation money to leave, and the city put its political weight behind the developer, with the City Planning Commission and Garcetti backing his demolition of the historic bungalows and newer apartment buildings to create luxury condos for affluent professionals.

Today, the corner property stands barren, a victim of the economic disaster that struck the nation, and the historic bungalows are long destroyed. A new plan calls for a luxury apartment complex with ground-floor retail. Developer Jonathan Genton and Watt Commercial Properties executives declined to take questions from the Weekly.

"Here it is five years later," Maule says. "There's nothing."

Manny Romero says it's a maddening scenario he has seen over and over in Hollywood: "There are many, many people like us."

At 41, having served as Hollywood's councilman and the area's chief land-use visionary and community policymaker for nearly 12 years of his life, Eric Garcetti wants to become the 42nd mayor of Los Angeles. He is clearly proud of Hollywood's turnaround and its bustling nightlife scene. In fact, Garcetti has publicly said that he wants to replicate Hollywood's style of urban renewal across communities in Los Angeles.

Driving out thousands of Latino working and poor families in favor of affluent residents and high-end restaurants is not part of his pitch.

"L.A. is full of bad planning," Garcetti said at a recent mayoral debate in Hollywood with rival candidates Wendy Greuel, Jan Perry and Kevin James. "You look at places where there are four jobs for every one unit of housing, and wonder why they're stuck in traffic. Hollywood has become a template for a new Los Angeles."

Except Hollywood's traffic is immeasurably worse than when Garcetti was elected to represent the area, even though one-twelfth of the population has left. For all their planning, the City Council, Los Angeles Planning Department and Garcetti have brought mass congestion to a residential community that is shrinking, not growing.

Gary Slossberg, a public-interest attorney who represents low-income clients and who ran for City Council against Garcetti in 2009, says, "A lot of his policies don't match what's best for the people in Los Angeles, but a lot of people are getting rich."

Garcetti has raised nearly $3 million for his mayoral bid by promising "bold, new ideas" and calling for the need to create more jobs for working families.

The urban cleansing some see unfolding in Hollywood puts Garcetti in an awkward position with activists like Ziggy Kruse. Kruse became an expert on fighting City Hall when, as a waitress at Hollywood Star Lanes in 2001, she stood up to the Los Angeles Unified School District's eminent-domain plans to destroy the bowling alley where she worked.

Now a well-known whistleblower who tracks the sweetheart deals often granted to developers, Kruse sees Garcetti as a cold figure who is in denial about the high-end development he embraces.

There's palpable resentment among Kruse and other activists toward Garcetti, who was raised in an upper-class household in Encino and whose life has been eased by a bequest of property that provided him thousands of dollars in annual income starting when he was a young man.

Kruse says Garcetti "has gone more times against the community than with the community," backing zoning variances and other exceptions that let developers ignore protective zoning laws, and supporting what Kruse sees as too-generous taxpayer subsidies. "The only time he goes with the community," she says, "is when it's a politically smart move."

Now, Garcetti is wooing Latinos to elect him as mayor, even controversially claiming that he is a Latino candidate. Garcetti is half-Jewish, part Latino and part Italian. His great-grandfather was Italian and immigrated from Europe to Mexico, where Garcetti's paternal grandparents were born and raised. Three great-grandparents on his father's side were Latino. [Editor's note: This paragraph has been corrected. Please see correction at end of story.]

Romero, the groundskeeper at Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church, has found the councilman to be "a nice person to talk to but different when you want to solve a problem."

Such sentiments could pose a problem for Garcetti in the mayoral race. But he still has a deep well of voter support in Hollywood, having been easily re-elected more than once.

Many people welcome the changes Garcetti has pushed through.

"Development has been great for Hollywood," says Laurie Goldman, president of Friends of the Hollywood Central Park, a nonprofit that's pushing an effort to build a park over the 101 Freeway. The neighborhood has improved so much, Goldman says, that she wants to move back to where she once lived, but "it's too expensive. My rent is cheaper in Beverly Hills."

Wehbe, a longtime resident who walked the streets with the Hollywood Sentinels in the early 1990s, is more than happy with Garcetti's policies. Of Hollywood's transformation, he says, "It's day and night. It's amazing. You can walk around at any given time. Back then, you couldn't get out of your house."

Manny Romero chuckles when he hears such talk, repeating an old saying: "El saluda con sombrero ajeno." The church groundskeeper, who faced down violent gang members on Hollywood street corners before Garcetti's time, says the phrase essentially means that "someone else does the job and the person who's the opportunist takes the credit."

Hollywood historian Greg Williams also gives voice to residents who are not pleased with Garcetti's sleek vision. "It's really bad development," says Williams, who was born and raised in the community. "There's no variety. It's the same mixed-use with retail on the bottom floor and condos on top." He's come to see Garcetti as "totally in the developers' pockets. He's not for the preservation of old Hollywood."

Robb, the aide speaking on behalf of the unavailable Garcetti, strongly disputes that notion. "What developers tell us is that community activists have too much of a say" in Garcetti's decision making. Robb says his boss completely supports preserving old Hollywood, while looking to the future. "It's always been about taking what Hollywood offers," Robb says, "and enhancing it."

But when asked by the Weekly, Garcetti's staff could not provide basic figures that might shed light on what their enhancement efforts have produced. Garcetti's team does not know how many "affordable" housing units have been built in Hollywood, or the total amount of housing built or lost, since 2001. Nor could Garcetti's aides, whose salaries and overhead cost L.A. taxpayers about $1.5 million a year, provide the Weekly even a ballpark figure for how much taxpayer money has subsidized Hollywood's makeover since 2001.

Robb says one of Garcetti's top priorities has always been affordable housing. Yet Barbara Schultz, the directing attorney of the housing unit at the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, which helps working-class and poor people in disputes involving housing rights and landlord-tenant disagreements, says Garcetti hasn't stood out. In fact, Schultz says, "There's not any top council member whose top priority is affordable housing."

Dennis Frenchman, a well-regarded professor of urban design and planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says smart policymakers always know how their planning strategies are playing out in communities. "They should have a sense of demographic changes and what's been happening," says Frenchman, one of the world's leading experts on building and maintaining a sustainable city. "They should know if people have been pushed out."

Father Mandala knows what is happening at the neighborhood level. He has seen his mostly Latino parishioners leave Hollywood, while the Latino population grew in the rest of the city. He has seen parents take their kids out of Blessed Sacrament Elementary School. Between 2000 and 2010, student enrollment at that grade school plummeted from 250 to 100.

Contrary to Yusef Robb's claim, Mandala says these people did not want to leave. "If they could have bought a home in Hollywood," says the priest, "they would have. ... It's bad for Hollywood because if your goal is to have a mixed-income community, you're losing tax-paying citizens. These are the teachers, the contractors, the furniture makers of the community."

Wehbe argues that Garcetti is very connected to what's happening, declaring, "I bet you anything there isn't a single councilmember who walks the neighborhoods every month and knocks on doors like Eric. To me, that's saying something."

But Dowell Myers, a demographer and urban planning professor at the USC Sol Price School of Public Policy, who researched Los Angeles County's shrinking youth population, predicts that Hollywood's schools will drop in enrollment and Hollywood will become less family-oriented, with more of an emphasis on nightlife. That means fewer families will be around to keep an eye on the neighborhood. "They help to keep streets safer," Myers says.

Garcetti aide Robb said in a recent L.A. Weekly story reporting on the rise of Koreatown that Garcetti is not necessarily interested in duplicating Hollywood's urban-renewal template in Koreatown. Robb warned, "A robust nightlife is good for the economy, but too many night spots in a neighborhood can create dead spots during the day" and community "balance" is needed.

Myers says L.A. political leaders and planners have already gone too far to draw a high-end crowd to Hollywood. "We don't need more condos," he says. "We need more rentals. Rentals are where you house lower-income and poor people."

Frenchman has a similar message for Los Angeles' leaders: "Diversity is the key to long-term sustainability. ... Density without diversity makes things worse."

Mercedes Cortes sits in a back room of Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church on Sunset while trumpets in a mariachi band sound off for a mass celebrating the feast day of Our Lady of Guadalupe. Like some parishioners, Cortes still drives in from the Valley to Hollywood to worship, and the church is jammed with Latino parents and children.

But not everyone returns to Hollywood. "That's why we lost so many members of the church," Cortes says. "They moved to Palmdale, North Hollywood and Burbank" — but not because they were better off. Instead, many doubled up with relatives as the recession bore down.

Hollywood's business community often says that the catalyst that really set off development in Hollywood was Councilwoman Jackie Goldberg's pet project, the Hollywood & Highland mall, which houses the Kodak Theatre (now Dolby Theater), home to the Academy Awards show.

But Cortes says the glitzy, architecturally unloved mall has had a more complex long-term effect on the bigger neighborhood around it: "Once the Kodak Theatre was built," Cortes says, "we started seeing the rents going higher and higher."

Cortes generally likes Eric Garcetti, but she noticed a difference between him and his predecessor, Goldberg. Goldberg at least got involved in the community without prodding or protest, she recalls.

Garcetti, according to Cortes, did not seek out members of her activist group but waited for them to complain.

As if talking directly to Garcetti, the grandmother and retired house cleaner delivers up one of their complaints, still unanswered after all these years: "When they start to build something, why does the middle class have to suffer for that?"

Reach the writer at pmcdonald@laweekly.com.

[Correction: The original version of this story erroneously stated that Eric Garcetti has no Latino ancestry. His father, Gil Garcetti, is Latino and a number of his father's ancestors were Latino. Further, Garcetti's great-grandfather moved from Italy to Mexico alone, not with family members as originally reported.]

Show Pages
 
My Voice Nation Help
73 comments
Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

"what we did was to use the nightlife to bring back the day life"

OK. For starters, the above statement by Eric Garcetti is a nightmare. What the out-of-control proliferation of booze laden nightclubs in close proximity to residents has produced is....loud drunks at night, doing various nasty and/or violent things in one's driveway. Drunk drivers everywhere, screeching around corners, shouting, fighting,eliminating, drinking some more, etc.  You get the picture. Nice one, Eric.

As for the gentrification that has driven out the Hispanics: It's not only Hispanics who have fled due to higher rents, but creative artists as well.  Musicians, painters, film crew, struggling actors, artists of all kinds, used to make up the Hollywood neighborhoods.  Then, around the late 70's and early 80's and, in came the waves of Hispanics. It was amazing to watch this place change before my eyes, into a Latino haven.  This brought gang violence with it. We had shootings all the time. We formed a neighborhood watch group and patrolled our neighborhood with the Guardian Angels.    OK. .That said, I think I prefer the old days of the Guardian Angels to the current days of gangs of drunks swinging bottles of booze toward your car while you hold your breath hoping they don't smash your windscreen in.   There are more residents sharing apartments as well; the rents are so high now that a single person can't afford to live there alone. So, there are 2-3 times as many cars and many fewer parking spaces.  Ahh, what improvements, Mr. Garcetti.   

Hipsters have ALWAYS lived in Hollywood. If 'hipsters' means artists and creative types of hip people---not braindead clubbies or yuppies. I'm sad to see my neighborhood transformed from one of real artistic interest, into a boring, yawn-inspiring, corporately driven landscape.  That's not what made Hollywood so cool.  It's the people who make it cool.  This false Hollywood, "vision for the future" is some corporately driven plan that has nothing to do with Hollywood.  It is in the process of erasing everything that Hollywood was about. The 'new residents of Hollywood' who come and live in the tiny cubicle condos in skyscrapers facing the Hollywood Hills, are not Hollywood.  Hollywood is gone, baby, gone.

Damon Devine
Damon Devine

Hipsters are vile elitists. They have destroyed Silverlake and all it once stood for. They are breeding ginger headed vegan babies all over the place, and gutted anything historic. There is absolutely nothing humble left here. Thankfully some of us have rent control, but it's almost painful to have to walk outside and see what their invasion has done to us.

BorninHollywood
BorninHollywood like.author.displayName 1 Like

Latinos are not the only people being forced out of Hollywood. The Developer Accommodating Hollywood Community Plan, pushed through by Viallaraigosa and Garcetti , and their 'vision' for Hollywood was NEVER intended to take into consideration ANY Hollywood residents. As proven by an early Villaraigosa quote (see below) How about an article about all of Hollywood being pushed out by them, in favor of developers and their 'New Golden Age of Hollywood' as Garcetti calls it...
Your article  blows the lid off of 'the elephant in the room'..
Ofcourse Garcetti wont talk about census stats..he won't talk about anything..his poor staff are always thrown to the front line protecting him and enabling him to hide out and sadly they don't know anything.  Fact of the matter is.. one of the Law Suits against Garcetti's Illegal Hollywood Community Plan that he manipulated the passing of, is based on the INACCURATE and FALSE (proven) Hollywood Population Estimates in the HCP....people are leaving Hollywood. Not just Latinos.
Garcetti based the passing of the HCP on misrepresentations about big rise in Hollywood Population..But he cannot get away from the FACTS... The city, acting as accomplices, got away with basing it on False and Inaccurate Population Stats..
All of Garcetti's campaign funders mega developments, accommodated by the HCP, are supposedly for 'accommodating' the Rising Population.. The HCP was based on Falsehoods and Lies and Inaccurate Population Data Reports.... And yet he still got it passed.. Now there are Law Suits..It is an ILLEGAL Community Plan...NO he will NEVER talk about census stats..He knows he and the Villaraigosa appointed City Planning Staff Cooked the Books to get it passed.
And here is Villaraigosa on what his (and Garcettti's) new Higher Density Hollywood, and The Hollywood Community Plan, means for the Homeowners and Residents of Hollywood:

Mayor Villaraigosa jumped on the smart-growth bandwagon soon after his
election, telling business leaders that if the city wants to keep
moving, then freeways and SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL NEED TO BE THINGS OF
THE PAST.

** "ALOT OF US GREW UP WITH THE IDEA OF A THREE BEDROOM HOUSE WITH LARGE
BACKYARDS AND FRONT LOTS. WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT THAT'S NOT GOING TO
BE POSSIBLE“ Villaraigosa said in remarks covered by the Los Angeles
Daily News.
Villaraigosa, who is driven around town in a GMC Yukon, has a hilltop
home in Mount Washington and at least four years of free rent at the
mayoral mansion in Windsor Square, a neighborhood lined with streets
zoned for highly restrictive R-1, or single-family homes.
Shortly after his election, Villaraigosa selected nine people to carry
out his development vision at the Los Angeles City Planning Commission.
Seven of his nine planning commissioners also live in single-family
homes, nearly all on streets that enjoy the most restrictive zoning in
Los Angeles — prohibiting apartments or multifamily housing of any
kind. Even as they try to change the behavior of the city’s residents,
planning commissioners have been loath to alter their own.
(What's Smart About Smart Growth?
City Hall's plan for the future expects you to give up the yard, the
car - and learn to love density
David Zahniser
published: May 31, 2007)

** These are the THE PEOPLE of HOLLYWOOD...who were born here, are raising families here, invest in, and pay taxes here and who Garcetti IGNORED and REFUSED to LISTEN TO.. who were against his High Density Unlimited Height Skyscraper City..The PLAN was never to protect residents or residential neighborhoods at all. "SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL NEED TO BE THINGS OF THE PAST" in THEIR Hollywood..
Garcetti/Vilaraigosa sold out Hollywood and it's PEOPLE to their Developer Buddies..Plain and Simple. 

Elle
Elle like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Garcetti is NEVER available for comment. Look up all the other
articles on The Hollywood Community Plan (his payback to his developer
funders) and the Skyscraper developer (his campaign funder) projects
that The HCP accommodates, and read how many times he has not been
available for Comment...He is a COWARD and a FRAUD. At tonight's
debate at a Jewish Center he will quote scripture from the Old
Testament. At an African American Church he quoted from The New
Testament. He is Spanish, he is Italian, he is Jewish. He speaks in
tongues.. The language of the day at City Council meetings he will
speak no matter what group is presenting that day..that is the
language he will speak. He has sold out Hollywood, and Vine St. to his
developer funder and is willing to turn it over to Peruvians to
transform Vine into Peru Village. His middle name is 'pandering'.
He has no shame. His staff NEVER knows anything. A meeting of
Hollywood residents with a staff member about The HCP was useless. He
told everyone he knew nothing about it and could not converse on it.
Only record the group's comments. Was he kidding?? No. They should be
ashamed ..BUT THEY'RE NOT. His ILLEGAL Hollywood Community Plan that
will cost the city tons of money in Law Suits, (that The Hollywood
Chamber has hired their Diamond Level Donor Skyscraper Developer's
Law FIrm to FIGHT), he manipulated the passing of, is a template for
many other cities all over L..A. All of L.A. will be HIS vision
(actually his PAY BACK to his developer funders) if he continues to
get away with this.. ALL of L.A. BE WARNED! ..High Density, Unlimited
Height Skyscrapers, in crowded, congested, more traffic laden, more
smog laden UN livable cities..YOU'RE NEXT! EVERYONE will flee no
matter what their ethnic background.Glad the woman in this article
mentioned how he never spoke to her. He does not care. He constantly
LIES that he does.. Not only has he NEVER engaged the communities OR
listen to them regarding the controversial skyscraper projects, or The
Hollywood Community Plan ..HE WENT INTO HIDING..The only time he spoke
about the HCP was ON CAMERA AT THE COUNCIL MEETING , and he LIED LIED
LIED...
Garcetti and The Hollywood Chamber are funded by the Skyscraper
developer (Diamond Level Donor to the Chamber). The Chamber set up a
PAC supporting Garcetti's campaign. Whatever the Pres. of The Chamber
has to say is more lies.
And if HOLLYWOOD is SO GREAT why doesn't HE LIVE HERE?He could care
less about the Quality of Life here..HE DOES NOT LIVE HERE.
Hollywood is NOT better, No one here has saved it. Nightclubs, drunks
wandering around in the early morning hours that have spilled out from
them, drug dealers, and NOW constant on going shoot outs in our
streets is not a better Hollywood. Who are they kidding??Their PR is
BULL..but they are all getting paid highly to spread their lies and
LIE about WHAT IS GOOD FOR HOLLYWOOD.
More than one person quoted in this article also is paid by the
Skyscraper developer but never discloses this. More lies.
FINALLY THE TRUTH IS SPREADING.. HOW Hollywood was sold out to a
wealthy developer and, HOW, WHY, and BY WHOM.
A Corrupt Politician, and his enablers..He can't HIDE forever.
The only really honest people here were the activists and the poor
woman who got thrown out of her home ..The rest, Garcetti and HIS
SUPPORTERS, are ON THE TAKE, plain and simple..they are despicable
liers, thieves, and thugs.
Many CIty Council members, past and present, and the current Mayor,
and all three Mayoral candidates that are sitting or have sat on City
Council, also have been funded by the skyscraper developer and/or
their Law Firm. The Law Firm The Chamber has hired to try to stop THE
PEOPLE"S LAW SUITS against the HCP.. the Plan that accommodates the
Skyscraper developer's projects.
Garcetti could care less if a woman gets thrown out of her home..He
threw all of Hollywood out with his illegal HCP... Ignored everyone.
Those that live here, grew up here, invested here, raised families
here, PAY TAXES HERE.
Thousands spoke out against it.. HOA's, Neighborhood Councils, Residents..
Garcetti's reply: 'If you don't like living in Hollywood, MOVE"
And THIS wants to become Mayor?
Give me a break!

martaevry
martaevry

I have a question about traffic. In the article, you state traffic in a Hollywood has become "immeasurably worse". I'm curious what data you're using to come to that conclusion. I ask because I've been commuting from the Westside to Hollywood on and off since 1987 -for me it's consistently been a 45-minute drive on surface streets.

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@martaevry Respectfully, you don't need 'data' to support the FACT that traffic since 1987 has radically increased. I live in Hollywood. I drive a car. What took me 10 minutes to drive before, takes 20-30 minutes now.  What took 30 minutes takes an hour.  If I want to go ANYWHERE between 5-7:30 or 8pm, all I can say is 'Good Luck', cause you're in gridlock. It took me 40 minutes (timed it) to drive at 5:30 pm just to 'quickly' pick something up a few blocks away for the dinner I was preparing. In 1987, this was not the case. Traffic since then has increased 10 fold.

Anyone driven down Franklin Avenue lately?  Try driving surface streets to Glendale, taking Franklin to Los Feliz, a once fairly quick 25-30 min drive.  No more.  It's blocked up for miles.

hekebolos
hekebolos

And Patrick Range McDonald continues his crusade against everything good and decent (like the LA Subway) by apparently proclaiming that Hollywood was so much better when it was a low-rent crime-invested neighborhood, instead of once again being a destination known worldwide like its name SHOULD imply. But because McDonald has pet wars that he likes to wage, I'm sure this is the first of many anti-Garcetti articles we'll see from this publication between now and May.

Vince
Vince

@hekebolos this is typical of the Weekly. White people moving into any neighborhood is decried as "gentrification" that is ruining the "character" of the place. Blacks or Latinos move into a neighborhood and it is celebrated as "much needed diversity"

This article reminds me of an article that ran a few years ago in the other alt weekly, The New Times, which complained that skyrocketing rents had driven Latino gang culture out of West Los Angeles because the gangsters were being priced out the neighborhoods. 


Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@Vince @hekebolos Latino gangsters were finally driven/priced out of my neighborhood, and I have to say I like that much better. Less graffiti by young taggers, less intimidation by cars full of gangsters, no more having to walk my dog at night wearing a 'Raiders' knit cap for safety, no more gunshots and you can walk on the street. 

jstewart2
jstewart2 moderator editor

Thanks for the comment, Valleypinoy. Please take a look at our story by Tibby Rothman unveiling Jan Perry's deep involvement in heavily taxpayer subsidized luxury development to  help out rich developers downtown. Her pivotal role on the secretive Grand Avenue Authority, even as she lives in a luxury condo that will benefit from the subsidized plan, is explained in detail in this article. Thanks for asking! http://www.laweekly.com/2009-04-16/news/jan-perry-39-s-grand-avenue-conflict/. --Jill Stewart, Managing Editor, LA Weekly

Valleypinoy
Valleypinoy

An expose like this right before the election?  Still smells a little fishy to me.  I'll eat my humble pie once there is similar "attention" to the other mayoral candidates leading up to the election.  Thanks for clarifying!

Valleypinoy
Valleypinoy

Another LA Weekly article bashing Garcetti?  What does this publication have against him?  Hollywood's gentrification is no different from other neighborhoods in the city (and the nation for that matter).  North Hollywood and Downtown for example has experienced a large amount of gentrification over the past 20 years, but I don't see any articles calling out Wendy Greuel or Jan Perry, who have represented these neighborhoods respectively.  Eric understands and supports the national trend of urban redevelopment, but is adamant about supporting affordable housing in the area as well.  The Hollywood Community Housing Corporation, for example, one of the few affordable housing advocacy groups in the area, states on the website, "Our efforts would have been nearly impossible without the vision and support of Councilman Eric Garcetti..."  Again, another clear example of biased journalism from the LA Weekly. 

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@Valleypinoy Garcetti is a criminal. He doesn't represent the  people that elected him. Developers have 'bought' him.  This is fact. I'm happy to see article that educate people to his antics in politics.

mujeristaorg
mujeristaorg like.author.displayName 1 Like

What I don't undertand is how the landlords could get away with doubling rent or evicting tenants? Hollywood is in the city of Los Angeles, which is under rent control, and rent increases are strictly regulated, as well as things like evictions. My great-aunt is a mom-and-pop landlord in Boyle Heights who didn't treat her property like a business and now has tenants who will most likely never move in her lifetime, paying about half what the units are worth. The only way to move them is to give them a year's notice and pay them close to $15,000 each - money that my aunt certainly does not have since her only sources of income are the below market rents and her Social Security check! My great-aunt is Latina and could lose the home that she bought through years of back-breaking work due to low rents - that's a side of the story we never hear about...

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@mujeristaorg  The over-bloated rents of today are not an honest rental amount, and I'm sure she'll 'survive' on a fair rental amount.  The rents went up during the real estate bubble, making huge profits for landlords who would increase the rent on a unit dramatically, every time a tenant moved out.  It's that turnover of tenants that enables the rents to increase.  What a rental unit is 'worth' is what the market demands, and that market was driven with over bloated prices of a bubble.

mujeristaorg
mujeristaorg

@Suzzie90028 @mujeristaorg That's probably the case for corporate landlords, but not necessarily for mom-and-pop landlords like my great-aunt. Her tenants have lived in their apartments for 25 and 20 years, respectively, and because she did not have the rental turnover you mention, nor raise their rent every year as she was legally allowed to do, they are now paying around $750 for a two-bedroom apartment - FAR, FAR less than the market rate. That means she needs to pay her mortgage, utilities, groceries and extremely expensive prescriptions on an income averaging $2,000 per month. Yup, she's surviving...barely, and thankfully she has caring family members who kick in a little so she doesn't have to skimp on her medications.

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@mujeristaorg @Suzzie90028  Well, why doesn't she raise the rent 3%% per year, as every other landlord does who owns a rent controlled building?  It was 5%% a few years ago, then went back down.  That would help her to keep up, since the 3%% becomes more each time as the rent increases.

jstewart2
jstewart2 moderator editor like.author.displayName 1 Like

@mujeristaorg 

Hi mujeristaorg, this is Managing Editor Jill Stewart answering your interesting question about why 1000s of working families pushed out of Hollywood by LA City Hall policies were not protected under rent control, creating the huge net population loss in Hollywood as city politicians and planners crowed that Hollywood was growing. I believe the law is called the Ellis Act, and yes the landlord must pay a big relocation fee if they are evicting solely to raise the rent. But many landlords come up with another reason to evict, and that forces working families to fight in court. Many simply can't. The resourceful find Legal Aid -- it has many such cases. But this exposes one of the lies told by Los Angeles City Council electeds and planners, that LA is expanding its base of affordable housing via development policies. This is classic misdirection. A lie. Two electeds told the truth, Zev Yaroslavsky and Laura Chick (former controller). They have made clear that the city of LA, has as a matter of policy wiped out thousands of net units of affordable housing by allowing mass teardowns, condo conversion and so on. If you hear any elected leader brag "affordable housing," ask them how much NET was lost in their area due to the same set of policies. They skitter into dark holes. We are working on a story about this phenom.

adambray
adambray like.author.displayName 1 Like

@jstewart2 @mujeristaorg Jill,  I look forward to hearing more about this issue.   There seems to be little to no reporting about landlords like the Boyle Heights owner mentioned above.   The economics of providing 'affordable' housing always means that there is a subsidy of sorts coming from one place or another.   In Los Angeles, that has come to mean that many mom and pop type landlords who did not aggressively raise rents over many years are now stuck with tenants paying far less than market value and left with incentives to displace those tenants.   I am in a similar situation with some of my properties and the lack of true options for the tenants and landlords in the city are really difficult to understand.  

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Did any of you live in Hollywood in the 80s? I grew up there and while it was gloriously shitty, it also wasn't safe, or conducive to thriving. Lower income families were confined to Hollywood because NO one wanted to live there, but had to due to financial hardship. I meant, it gave me my love of diversity and my fantastically hackneyed worldview, and an endless fount of nostalgia, but let's not kid ourselves, save for the douchebags who flock to the bars/clubs, it's a lot cleaner and people-friendly nowadays. I mean, people actually walk in Hollywood past 10 PM, even the shittier parts. 

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@v_rodrigues_lima Just wanted to add something. You say the 'no one wanted to live there', referring to Hollywood in the 80's, and it was only due to financial hardship that anyone lived here.  That's not actually true.  I liked living in Hollywood, even with the gang stuff that plagued our area sometimes. I worked in the entertainment business and it was close to everything connected to my work. Many musicians and artists lived here. The rents were reasonable and the apartments had some architectural character.  Instead of shady characters roaming about, I now have bar/club idiots urinating and vomiting or partying in my driveway or parked on the street in front of my building. Yaay!

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@v_rodrigues_lima Yes, safer, but the residents who've moved in aren't nearly as interesting in an artistic sense, as previous ones. It's a trade-off. Not looking forward to the over development that's planned though, which will make it like living right next to Times Square where I live.

Huckleberry Lain
Huckleberry Lain like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

keep up the good articles! it always frustrates me how there is no weight put onto people who make an investment in a "bad" neighborhood by living there until it turns around - if they are not part of the violence and crime then they are THE reason it be comes livable again.

abramsrl
abramsrl like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

The article describes one facet of corruption and incompetence that infects LA City Hall.  When the State abolished the CRA's effective 2-1-2012, Los Angeles' CRA [CRA/LA] left LA with about a $11 Billion burden.  

Leaving aside whether Mexicans are move up, down, or sideways, everyone is being cheated.  The CRA/LA took billions of tax money and gave it to developers to build financial disasters like the Hollywood Highland Complex with cost $625 M to construct and then was sold to Garcetti's friends at CIM Group for only $201 M.  Then Garcetti gave CIM Group $30 M more of tax payer dollars to rehab the Kodak Theater -- a private theater.  It's not like the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion at the Music Center.  It's more like Garcetti has his boys over to his house and says,  "How'd ya-ll like $20 M?" and they say, "$30 M would be better," and Garcetti responds, "OK, here's $30 M of tax payer dollars." 

We all know that Cir de Soleil has moved out Hollywood Highland --  But Garcetti still gives millions more to CIM Group.  $11.3 M for Hollywood-Western.  $3.5 M for Sunset-Gordon, $42 M for Midtown in Wesson's district.

 Have you seen Garcetti's latest love affair, Millennium Project planned for Hollywood? It's modeled after Biff's Casino in Back The The Future II.

 The theft of BILLIONS of tax payer dollars is the real story.  In order to make certain he would have the loot to continue to give to his developer buddies, Garcetti used the false 1-12-2011 LAFD deployment report to take $200 Million from paramedics and firemen -- $52 M of the money, which was supposed to save your live in an emergency, went to build a parking lot for billionaire Eli Broad -- That's the real story -- billions in tax dollars stolen and given to corrupt developers.


rcohen009
rcohen009 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Garcetti is intent on creating an urbanized sh/thole in Hollywood.  He has allowed "redevelopment" subsidies go to his real estate developer cheerleaders even though those selfish and greedy pricks refuse to put even one unit of affordable housing in their "luxury" ghettos.  

Patrick McDonald failed to mention how many of the overpriced condos that Garcetti subsidized with massive redevelopment agency tax dollars have gone unsold. So what is his solution?  Oh, yes, build more luxury apartments instead of condos. And in order to help out his developer buddies, Garcetti supports massive reductions in required parking which is just like putting a few cool million dollars into the pockets of the developers.  Meanwhile, residents find their streets parked up with cars that ought to be accommodated in these "luxury" ghettos.  Everyone hates the Councilman for these piss poor planning policies that he earnestly pushes with a straight face.


I find it particularly telling that Garcetti himself does not have the guts to be interviewed for this article. It demonstrates that he lacks what it takes to be a mayor or anything else beyond his current position. It is his strategy to "float" above the people he represents instead of listening to his constituents.  He, more than anyone, is responsible for driving persons of color out of Hollywood.  Anyone who votes for him, is casting a vote for a vision of a racially sanitized Los Angeles -- you know -- like say, Encino where he grew up. Yuck.

Liliana Vasquez-Duran
Liliana Vasquez-Duran like.author.displayName 1 Like

The viciousness of our attitude towards the poor, sick, feeble, mentally ill will be match and met with the same viciousness when we too suffer such a faith. Hang Em All!!! Castrate the Ugly!! Eat the fat ones!!! Rape and plunder!!!! Grab a gun cowboy live up too Travis Bickle and let the smell of shot and vile turned you into a heartless and cold spawn from hell. Dont forget to wear you Christian Audigier while at it...you can always tap out bitches!!!

Mel-v Coyoy
Mel-v Coyoy

Article for the blind masses... hipsters are RECYCLEd from the 30's ...

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima like.author.displayName 1 Like

Unfortunately, this story is old hat. Anyone who's lived in Los Angeles long enough knows it's a city in constant flux, and always has been. Demographics move in, others move out, then 25 years later, it reverses. Neighborhoods in decline come up, then go down, some surge in popularity for a while, then decrease in popularity, then it happens all over again. It's what makes our city interesting, relax. Is it shitty that people are momentarily displaced? Yes, definitely. Will those people be priced out of every region in the L.A. Basin? Likely not. Displacement and sprawl forces new areas to diversify, and our multicultural tapestry is further woven. We're not a town of rigid cultural segregation, and it's what makes this place so special, IMO. 

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima

Also, as a lifetime resident of East Hollywood, one whose parents emigrated to the area in the 1960s, I can GUARANTEE that East Hollywood has NEVER been as overwhelmingly Latino as everyone paints it out to be. There's a huge Russian, Armenian, Ukrainian, Thai, Vietnamese contingency in these parts, and that mix makes it all the more fascinating. 

TODOSSOMOSPUTOS
TODOSSOMOSPUTOS like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Replace "Hollywood" with "Downtown Los Angeles" and the Weekly can re-publish this story at any time. 

Danielle Morrison
Danielle Morrison

I hate hipster foo's with a passion, But I am all for cleaning up the city and the trash thats there.

patrick.range.mcdonald
patrick.range.mcdonald like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@Danielle Morrison Hi Danielle, Much thanks for reading the story and leaving a comment. I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "cleaning up the city and the trash that's there." As I write in the article, many of the people who were pushed out of Hollywood actually cleaned up their neighborhoods and made it safer--and they were working class people. 

Patrick Range McDonald, LA Weekly

hwood4ever
hwood4ever

@patrick.range.mcdonald Good article, Patrick.  I think it's great when people who live in a community care enough to clean up their neighborhoods, but that doesn't entitle them to stay there even if they can no longer afford the rent.  Property owners have a right to charge what the market can command. Unfortunately, this is the downside of being the renter and not the owner.  When prices go up at the supermarket, I find the supermarket with the lower prices and shop there.  When I buy a car, I buy the car I can afford, not necessarily the car that I want.  And when I can no longer afford my rent, I find a new place to live.  And regardless of where I live, I keep my house clean, do my best to keep my street safe, perform neighborhood watch, report crime, and care about where I live.  That's called pride.  Hollywood is a jewel and known worldwide.  Shame on the city of Los Angeles for ever allowing it to decay and become seedy and unsafe.  Good for the city for redeveloping it and revitalizing it.  Shame on our entitlement society.     

smm94
smm94 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@patrick.range.mcdonald Patrick, I really enjoyed the article, but in my opinion it's holding together by a thread. If your argument (of course this article is more of a well-researched editorial) rests upon the sporadic misdeeds of unscrupulous landlords, then that is hardly enough to poop on an entire neighborhood's recovery. What you need to argue, more forcefully, is that gentrification in itself is bad, which you never do, because that is a much more difficult argument to make.

Family relocations are painful, but are you going to argue against investment in Hollywood? Or do you want the city to freeze residential development in that neighborhood, but somehow keep other investments coming in. It's easy to complain about gentrification, but stone-throwers never present an alternative, as most of the more obvious safeguards are already in place, if not always enforced.

It seems to me that you made a poor editorial decision in framing this story as one about race, when it really is one about class. I applaud the tradition of holding candidates feet to the fire before the election, but next time you criticize Garcetti, find something that you can actually criticize explicitly, and please find something that sticks.

patrick.range.mcdonald
patrick.range.mcdonald like.author.displayName 1 Like

@hwood4ever @patrick.range.mcdonald Valid point, but in many cases, landlords were using questionable, if not illegal or unethical, methods to push people out of their homes. In at least one case involving Roy Maule, Eric Garcetti's office did nothing when informed about it. Be sure to reread the things that happened to Mercedes Cortes, Manny Romero, and Roy Maule. Thanks for reading!

Patrick Range McDonald, LA Weekly

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima

@Danielle Morrison Hipsters don't live in Hollywood, just saying. 

thesoftkillsinger
thesoftkillsinger

Its funny to see comments from future never gonna be's /our new homeless junkies askin if latinos cant find other parts in los Angeles lol....you don't have clue


Tammy Ryan
Tammy Ryan like.author.displayName 1 Like

Ah the sweet blissful ignorance of self-important, pompous youth. Don't worry kids, someday they'll come for you and those Latinos you're bagging on will be the ones changing your adult diapers after your self-important kids dump your sorry asses in the state facility.

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@Tammy Ryan  No, probably it will be Filipino doing that work. Statistically proven. I get your point though.

Douglas Argetta
Douglas Argetta

What's gonna end up happening just like before people who want to make it big and think they're talented are gonna wash up or get junked out,the porn industry being their last hope of makin it is almost non existant....no use stayin round here ...I got no problems with what people are labeling hipsters in fact i prefer that than to gettin caught in a drive by but alas seen it all before

Liliana Vasquez-Duran
Liliana Vasquez-Duran like.author.displayName 1 Like

That's great and one day all the hipsters that mo ed here for the Industry will find that even they can't afford rent on their own. Soon find they are sharing every sq. ft of space is subleased to other hipsters. Making hipsters the new poor in L.A. Then one day they themselves discover they can't afford the Hollywood rent so they either turn tricks, slang drugs, or just become homeless. There will be the few that move to places like South L.A where rent is cheaper but survival is harder. Yeah suck it up hipster life is tough!

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Wow, since when has my fair city been overrun by racist assholes?  LightFragment and darrellnelson23, Simi Valley/the Santa Clarita Valley/the Inland Empire called; they want you back. 

NicholasPell
NicholasPell like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

Wow. "Never read the comments" indeed. Anyone who actively applauds gentrification is a seriously gross human being. Kudos to Patrick on an excellent article. 

Herbert Galván-Gallegos
Herbert Galván-Gallegos like.author.displayName 1 Like

My parent's apartments are sky high now...SWEET!! I for one love those "hipsters"...the higher the rent the better for my folks...and I wouldn't live in Hollywood even if ya paid me to...

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city