Top

news

Stories

 

Hollywood's Urban Cleansing

12,878 mostly Latinos are pushed out by City Hall, high rents and hipsters

Garcetti's chief of staff, Yusef Robb, waves off the flight of Latino families and individuals as a sign of their own good fortune, arguing that Hollywood's Latinos did so well during the past decade that they bought homes in "the suburbs."

"We looked into the population shift in Hollywood," Robb says, "and the situation tended to be people making choices to their own advantage."

Ziggy Kruse, waitress-turned-activist, sees Eric Garcetti as a cold figure who supports regular Hollywood folks when it's "politically smart."
Ted Soqui
Ziggy Kruse, waitress-turned-activist, sees Eric Garcetti as a cold figure who supports regular Hollywood folks when it's "politically smart."
Manny Romero, groundskeeper at Blessed Sacrament Church on Sunset Boulevard
Ted Soqui
Manny Romero, groundskeeper at Blessed Sacrament Church on Sunset Boulevard

Robb could not provide L.A. Weekly any data to back up his claim. In fact, it appears that Garcetti and his sizable staff — about 20 full-time personal aides — are unprepared to explain what is unfolding.

The hollowing out of Latinos in Hollywood is particularly dramatic in the dense, L-shaped chunk of six U.S. census tracts at the heart of Hollywood — tracts 1908.01, 1908.02, 1909.01, 1909.02, 1918.10 and 1918.20 — bordered by Western Avenue on the east, Seward Street on the west, Melrose Boulevard on the south and Sunset on the north.

Tracts 1909.01 and 1909.02 between Western, Gower, Sunset and Santa Monica Boulevard saw a net loss of 664 Latinos. Far fewer Latinos moved into than out of the neighborhood's increasingly costly apartments, condos and bungalows, resulting in a steep population decline. The same thing occurred in tracts 1908.01 and 1908.02 between Gower, Seward, Sunset and Santa Monica, where a net loss of 896 Latinos created a sharp overall population drop.

Just south of there, in tracts 1918.10 and 1918.20 bordered by Gower, Seward, Santa Monica and Melrose, a net 1,402 Latinos took off. Having lost 2,962 Latinos, the historically affordable housing in these six flatland census tracts is now a thing of the past, creating ground zero in Hollywood's working-class diaspora.

In 2000, about 80,000 people lived in Hollywood, and L.A.'s Department of Planning announced that 85,489 would live there by 2008. By 2010, only 72,000 did.

What's going on is clear enough to USC demographer Jared Sanchez. He says the data show "significant" gentrification, with wealthier households moving in — which inevitably contain fewer people than working-class households — while others get squeezed out.

Many will cheer this turn of events. Hollywood, the neighborhood, is richer, flashier and more attractive than at any time since its golden era. Hollywood Chamber of Commerce president Leron Gubler says, "We've made significant strides in cleaning up Hollywood, restoring community pride and creating a vibrant economy here in Hollywood."

Longtime Hollywood resident and Garcetti ally Ferris Wehbe says, "There has been big change in the area. Hollywood is going to soar."

The L.A. City Council in 1986 approved a 1,100-acre "redevelopment project area" with the aim of remaking Hollywood into a livable community. The nearly $1 billion Hollywood Redevelopment Plan was one of the most heavily subsidized projects in California, with taxpayers underwriting such items as a $32 million parking garage at the pricey Cinerama Dome and ArcLight Theaters and $98 million for Hollywood & Highland. Los Angeles County transportation officials broke ground in 1986 on the Red Line subway with stops along Hollywood Boulevard, at that time the haunt of heroin dealers and prostitutes.

In 1992, Leron Gubler, a soft-spoken, determined power broker, became president of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, which supervises the Walk of Fame and is one of the most influential champions of redevelopment. Politicians rarely run afoul of the Chamber, which counts among its members top executives from Paramount Pictures, Walt Disney Studios, real estate developer Millennium Partners, The CW television network, the Renaissance Hollywood Hotel and Hollywood & Highland.

At first, Gubler says, "We had a lot of homeless. The sidewalks were dirty. Businesses were closing left and right. ... People had given up on Hollywood."

In 1993, Jackie Goldberg was elected to represent Hollywood on the City Council, and she pushed hard for redevelopment. Gubler told her that first they should focus on "nuts-and-bolts" issues, which Gubler narrowed down to "crime and grime." The Chamber and Goldberg's office launched much-publicized efforts to make Hollywood's streets cleaner and safer.

But beyond the headlines, Mercedes Cortes and her neighbors were already on the job, creating a successful Neighborhood Watch that teamed up with the Los Angeles Police Department. So were many other Spanish-speaking residents, including Manny Romero, who worked as a youth organizer in unstable El Salvador, escaped that country's violent civil war, which took the lives of his family and friends in the 1980s, and moved to Los Angeles.

Romero eventually became the popular and well-respected groundskeeper at Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church, built in 1928, an important community center for Hollywood's Latino population.

In 1978, Romero moved with his wife and two children into a cheap bungalow on Las Palmas Avenue just south of Sunset. It was a few blocks west of De Longpre Park, which became a notorious cesspool of drug dealers and junkies in the late '80s and early '90s.

Romero suddenly faced a new kind of war. He went to incredible lengths to save his community, joining a neighborhood patrol group called the Hollywood Sentinels, whose members put their lives on the line by running drug dealers and gang members off of street corners. Criminals threatened to kill Romero and his family.

"I was scared of the gang members," Romero recalls, "but it didn't stop me from doing my citizen's duties."

The Chamber's Gubler and many journalists credit the 2001 opening of the concrete elephant–bedecked Hollywood & Highland mall, where the Academy Awards are held, for initiating Hollywood's turnaround. But low-income working folks like Cortes and Romero were key figures in first steadying the community's foundation.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
73 comments
Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

"what we did was to use the nightlife to bring back the day life"

OK. For starters, the above statement by Eric Garcetti is a nightmare. What the out-of-control proliferation of booze laden nightclubs in close proximity to residents has produced is....loud drunks at night, doing various nasty and/or violent things in one's driveway. Drunk drivers everywhere, screeching around corners, shouting, fighting,eliminating, drinking some more, etc.  You get the picture. Nice one, Eric.

As for the gentrification that has driven out the Hispanics: It's not only Hispanics who have fled due to higher rents, but creative artists as well.  Musicians, painters, film crew, struggling actors, artists of all kinds, used to make up the Hollywood neighborhoods.  Then, around the late 70's and early 80's and, in came the waves of Hispanics. It was amazing to watch this place change before my eyes, into a Latino haven.  This brought gang violence with it. We had shootings all the time. We formed a neighborhood watch group and patrolled our neighborhood with the Guardian Angels.    OK. .That said, I think I prefer the old days of the Guardian Angels to the current days of gangs of drunks swinging bottles of booze toward your car while you hold your breath hoping they don't smash your windscreen in.   There are more residents sharing apartments as well; the rents are so high now that a single person can't afford to live there alone. So, there are 2-3 times as many cars and many fewer parking spaces.  Ahh, what improvements, Mr. Garcetti.   

Hipsters have ALWAYS lived in Hollywood. If 'hipsters' means artists and creative types of hip people---not braindead clubbies or yuppies. I'm sad to see my neighborhood transformed from one of real artistic interest, into a boring, yawn-inspiring, corporately driven landscape.  That's not what made Hollywood so cool.  It's the people who make it cool.  This false Hollywood, "vision for the future" is some corporately driven plan that has nothing to do with Hollywood.  It is in the process of erasing everything that Hollywood was about. The 'new residents of Hollywood' who come and live in the tiny cubicle condos in skyscrapers facing the Hollywood Hills, are not Hollywood.  Hollywood is gone, baby, gone.

Damon Devine
Damon Devine

Hipsters are vile elitists. They have destroyed Silverlake and all it once stood for. They are breeding ginger headed vegan babies all over the place, and gutted anything historic. There is absolutely nothing humble left here. Thankfully some of us have rent control, but it's almost painful to have to walk outside and see what their invasion has done to us.

BorninHollywood
BorninHollywood like.author.displayName 1 Like

Latinos are not the only people being forced out of Hollywood. The Developer Accommodating Hollywood Community Plan, pushed through by Viallaraigosa and Garcetti , and their 'vision' for Hollywood was NEVER intended to take into consideration ANY Hollywood residents. As proven by an early Villaraigosa quote (see below) How about an article about all of Hollywood being pushed out by them, in favor of developers and their 'New Golden Age of Hollywood' as Garcetti calls it...
Your article  blows the lid off of 'the elephant in the room'..
Ofcourse Garcetti wont talk about census stats..he won't talk about anything..his poor staff are always thrown to the front line protecting him and enabling him to hide out and sadly they don't know anything.  Fact of the matter is.. one of the Law Suits against Garcetti's Illegal Hollywood Community Plan that he manipulated the passing of, is based on the INACCURATE and FALSE (proven) Hollywood Population Estimates in the HCP....people are leaving Hollywood. Not just Latinos.
Garcetti based the passing of the HCP on misrepresentations about big rise in Hollywood Population..But he cannot get away from the FACTS... The city, acting as accomplices, got away with basing it on False and Inaccurate Population Stats..
All of Garcetti's campaign funders mega developments, accommodated by the HCP, are supposedly for 'accommodating' the Rising Population.. The HCP was based on Falsehoods and Lies and Inaccurate Population Data Reports.... And yet he still got it passed.. Now there are Law Suits..It is an ILLEGAL Community Plan...NO he will NEVER talk about census stats..He knows he and the Villaraigosa appointed City Planning Staff Cooked the Books to get it passed.
And here is Villaraigosa on what his (and Garcettti's) new Higher Density Hollywood, and The Hollywood Community Plan, means for the Homeowners and Residents of Hollywood:

Mayor Villaraigosa jumped on the smart-growth bandwagon soon after his
election, telling business leaders that if the city wants to keep
moving, then freeways and SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL NEED TO BE THINGS OF
THE PAST.

** "ALOT OF US GREW UP WITH THE IDEA OF A THREE BEDROOM HOUSE WITH LARGE
BACKYARDS AND FRONT LOTS. WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT THAT'S NOT GOING TO
BE POSSIBLE“ Villaraigosa said in remarks covered by the Los Angeles
Daily News.
Villaraigosa, who is driven around town in a GMC Yukon, has a hilltop
home in Mount Washington and at least four years of free rent at the
mayoral mansion in Windsor Square, a neighborhood lined with streets
zoned for highly restrictive R-1, or single-family homes.
Shortly after his election, Villaraigosa selected nine people to carry
out his development vision at the Los Angeles City Planning Commission.
Seven of his nine planning commissioners also live in single-family
homes, nearly all on streets that enjoy the most restrictive zoning in
Los Angeles — prohibiting apartments or multifamily housing of any
kind. Even as they try to change the behavior of the city’s residents,
planning commissioners have been loath to alter their own.
(What's Smart About Smart Growth?
City Hall's plan for the future expects you to give up the yard, the
car - and learn to love density
David Zahniser
published: May 31, 2007)

** These are the THE PEOPLE of HOLLYWOOD...who were born here, are raising families here, invest in, and pay taxes here and who Garcetti IGNORED and REFUSED to LISTEN TO.. who were against his High Density Unlimited Height Skyscraper City..The PLAN was never to protect residents or residential neighborhoods at all. "SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WILL NEED TO BE THINGS OF THE PAST" in THEIR Hollywood..
Garcetti/Vilaraigosa sold out Hollywood and it's PEOPLE to their Developer Buddies..Plain and Simple. 

Elle
Elle like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Garcetti is NEVER available for comment. Look up all the other
articles on The Hollywood Community Plan (his payback to his developer
funders) and the Skyscraper developer (his campaign funder) projects
that The HCP accommodates, and read how many times he has not been
available for Comment...He is a COWARD and a FRAUD. At tonight's
debate at a Jewish Center he will quote scripture from the Old
Testament. At an African American Church he quoted from The New
Testament. He is Spanish, he is Italian, he is Jewish. He speaks in
tongues.. The language of the day at City Council meetings he will
speak no matter what group is presenting that day..that is the
language he will speak. He has sold out Hollywood, and Vine St. to his
developer funder and is willing to turn it over to Peruvians to
transform Vine into Peru Village. His middle name is 'pandering'.
He has no shame. His staff NEVER knows anything. A meeting of
Hollywood residents with a staff member about The HCP was useless. He
told everyone he knew nothing about it and could not converse on it.
Only record the group's comments. Was he kidding?? No. They should be
ashamed ..BUT THEY'RE NOT. His ILLEGAL Hollywood Community Plan that
will cost the city tons of money in Law Suits, (that The Hollywood
Chamber has hired their Diamond Level Donor Skyscraper Developer's
Law FIrm to FIGHT), he manipulated the passing of, is a template for
many other cities all over L..A. All of L.A. will be HIS vision
(actually his PAY BACK to his developer funders) if he continues to
get away with this.. ALL of L.A. BE WARNED! ..High Density, Unlimited
Height Skyscrapers, in crowded, congested, more traffic laden, more
smog laden UN livable cities..YOU'RE NEXT! EVERYONE will flee no
matter what their ethnic background.Glad the woman in this article
mentioned how he never spoke to her. He does not care. He constantly
LIES that he does.. Not only has he NEVER engaged the communities OR
listen to them regarding the controversial skyscraper projects, or The
Hollywood Community Plan ..HE WENT INTO HIDING..The only time he spoke
about the HCP was ON CAMERA AT THE COUNCIL MEETING , and he LIED LIED
LIED...
Garcetti and The Hollywood Chamber are funded by the Skyscraper
developer (Diamond Level Donor to the Chamber). The Chamber set up a
PAC supporting Garcetti's campaign. Whatever the Pres. of The Chamber
has to say is more lies.
And if HOLLYWOOD is SO GREAT why doesn't HE LIVE HERE?He could care
less about the Quality of Life here..HE DOES NOT LIVE HERE.
Hollywood is NOT better, No one here has saved it. Nightclubs, drunks
wandering around in the early morning hours that have spilled out from
them, drug dealers, and NOW constant on going shoot outs in our
streets is not a better Hollywood. Who are they kidding??Their PR is
BULL..but they are all getting paid highly to spread their lies and
LIE about WHAT IS GOOD FOR HOLLYWOOD.
More than one person quoted in this article also is paid by the
Skyscraper developer but never discloses this. More lies.
FINALLY THE TRUTH IS SPREADING.. HOW Hollywood was sold out to a
wealthy developer and, HOW, WHY, and BY WHOM.
A Corrupt Politician, and his enablers..He can't HIDE forever.
The only really honest people here were the activists and the poor
woman who got thrown out of her home ..The rest, Garcetti and HIS
SUPPORTERS, are ON THE TAKE, plain and simple..they are despicable
liers, thieves, and thugs.
Many CIty Council members, past and present, and the current Mayor,
and all three Mayoral candidates that are sitting or have sat on City
Council, also have been funded by the skyscraper developer and/or
their Law Firm. The Law Firm The Chamber has hired to try to stop THE
PEOPLE"S LAW SUITS against the HCP.. the Plan that accommodates the
Skyscraper developer's projects.
Garcetti could care less if a woman gets thrown out of her home..He
threw all of Hollywood out with his illegal HCP... Ignored everyone.
Those that live here, grew up here, invested here, raised families
here, PAY TAXES HERE.
Thousands spoke out against it.. HOA's, Neighborhood Councils, Residents..
Garcetti's reply: 'If you don't like living in Hollywood, MOVE"
And THIS wants to become Mayor?
Give me a break!

martaevry
martaevry

I have a question about traffic. In the article, you state traffic in a Hollywood has become "immeasurably worse". I'm curious what data you're using to come to that conclusion. I ask because I've been commuting from the Westside to Hollywood on and off since 1987 -for me it's consistently been a 45-minute drive on surface streets.

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@martaevry Respectfully, you don't need 'data' to support the FACT that traffic since 1987 has radically increased. I live in Hollywood. I drive a car. What took me 10 minutes to drive before, takes 20-30 minutes now.  What took 30 minutes takes an hour.  If I want to go ANYWHERE between 5-7:30 or 8pm, all I can say is 'Good Luck', cause you're in gridlock. It took me 40 minutes (timed it) to drive at 5:30 pm just to 'quickly' pick something up a few blocks away for the dinner I was preparing. In 1987, this was not the case. Traffic since then has increased 10 fold.

Anyone driven down Franklin Avenue lately?  Try driving surface streets to Glendale, taking Franklin to Los Feliz, a once fairly quick 25-30 min drive.  No more.  It's blocked up for miles.

hekebolos
hekebolos

And Patrick Range McDonald continues his crusade against everything good and decent (like the LA Subway) by apparently proclaiming that Hollywood was so much better when it was a low-rent crime-invested neighborhood, instead of once again being a destination known worldwide like its name SHOULD imply. But because McDonald has pet wars that he likes to wage, I'm sure this is the first of many anti-Garcetti articles we'll see from this publication between now and May.

Vince
Vince

@hekebolos this is typical of the Weekly. White people moving into any neighborhood is decried as "gentrification" that is ruining the "character" of the place. Blacks or Latinos move into a neighborhood and it is celebrated as "much needed diversity"

This article reminds me of an article that ran a few years ago in the other alt weekly, The New Times, which complained that skyrocketing rents had driven Latino gang culture out of West Los Angeles because the gangsters were being priced out the neighborhoods. 


Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@Vince @hekebolos Latino gangsters were finally driven/priced out of my neighborhood, and I have to say I like that much better. Less graffiti by young taggers, less intimidation by cars full of gangsters, no more having to walk my dog at night wearing a 'Raiders' knit cap for safety, no more gunshots and you can walk on the street. 

jstewart2
jstewart2 moderator editor

Thanks for the comment, Valleypinoy. Please take a look at our story by Tibby Rothman unveiling Jan Perry's deep involvement in heavily taxpayer subsidized luxury development to  help out rich developers downtown. Her pivotal role on the secretive Grand Avenue Authority, even as she lives in a luxury condo that will benefit from the subsidized plan, is explained in detail in this article. Thanks for asking! http://www.laweekly.com/2009-04-16/news/jan-perry-39-s-grand-avenue-conflict/. --Jill Stewart, Managing Editor, LA Weekly

Valleypinoy
Valleypinoy

An expose like this right before the election?  Still smells a little fishy to me.  I'll eat my humble pie once there is similar "attention" to the other mayoral candidates leading up to the election.  Thanks for clarifying!

Valleypinoy
Valleypinoy

Another LA Weekly article bashing Garcetti?  What does this publication have against him?  Hollywood's gentrification is no different from other neighborhoods in the city (and the nation for that matter).  North Hollywood and Downtown for example has experienced a large amount of gentrification over the past 20 years, but I don't see any articles calling out Wendy Greuel or Jan Perry, who have represented these neighborhoods respectively.  Eric understands and supports the national trend of urban redevelopment, but is adamant about supporting affordable housing in the area as well.  The Hollywood Community Housing Corporation, for example, one of the few affordable housing advocacy groups in the area, states on the website, "Our efforts would have been nearly impossible without the vision and support of Councilman Eric Garcetti..."  Again, another clear example of biased journalism from the LA Weekly. 

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@Valleypinoy Garcetti is a criminal. He doesn't represent the  people that elected him. Developers have 'bought' him.  This is fact. I'm happy to see article that educate people to his antics in politics.

mujeristaorg
mujeristaorg like.author.displayName 1 Like

What I don't undertand is how the landlords could get away with doubling rent or evicting tenants? Hollywood is in the city of Los Angeles, which is under rent control, and rent increases are strictly regulated, as well as things like evictions. My great-aunt is a mom-and-pop landlord in Boyle Heights who didn't treat her property like a business and now has tenants who will most likely never move in her lifetime, paying about half what the units are worth. The only way to move them is to give them a year's notice and pay them close to $15,000 each - money that my aunt certainly does not have since her only sources of income are the below market rents and her Social Security check! My great-aunt is Latina and could lose the home that she bought through years of back-breaking work due to low rents - that's a side of the story we never hear about...

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@mujeristaorg  The over-bloated rents of today are not an honest rental amount, and I'm sure she'll 'survive' on a fair rental amount.  The rents went up during the real estate bubble, making huge profits for landlords who would increase the rent on a unit dramatically, every time a tenant moved out.  It's that turnover of tenants that enables the rents to increase.  What a rental unit is 'worth' is what the market demands, and that market was driven with over bloated prices of a bubble.

mujeristaorg
mujeristaorg

@Suzzie90028 @mujeristaorg That's probably the case for corporate landlords, but not necessarily for mom-and-pop landlords like my great-aunt. Her tenants have lived in their apartments for 25 and 20 years, respectively, and because she did not have the rental turnover you mention, nor raise their rent every year as she was legally allowed to do, they are now paying around $750 for a two-bedroom apartment - FAR, FAR less than the market rate. That means she needs to pay her mortgage, utilities, groceries and extremely expensive prescriptions on an income averaging $2,000 per month. Yup, she's surviving...barely, and thankfully she has caring family members who kick in a little so she doesn't have to skimp on her medications.

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@mujeristaorg @Suzzie90028  Well, why doesn't she raise the rent 3%% per year, as every other landlord does who owns a rent controlled building?  It was 5%% a few years ago, then went back down.  That would help her to keep up, since the 3%% becomes more each time as the rent increases.

jstewart2
jstewart2 moderator editor like.author.displayName 1 Like

@mujeristaorg 

Hi mujeristaorg, this is Managing Editor Jill Stewart answering your interesting question about why 1000s of working families pushed out of Hollywood by LA City Hall policies were not protected under rent control, creating the huge net population loss in Hollywood as city politicians and planners crowed that Hollywood was growing. I believe the law is called the Ellis Act, and yes the landlord must pay a big relocation fee if they are evicting solely to raise the rent. But many landlords come up with another reason to evict, and that forces working families to fight in court. Many simply can't. The resourceful find Legal Aid -- it has many such cases. But this exposes one of the lies told by Los Angeles City Council electeds and planners, that LA is expanding its base of affordable housing via development policies. This is classic misdirection. A lie. Two electeds told the truth, Zev Yaroslavsky and Laura Chick (former controller). They have made clear that the city of LA, has as a matter of policy wiped out thousands of net units of affordable housing by allowing mass teardowns, condo conversion and so on. If you hear any elected leader brag "affordable housing," ask them how much NET was lost in their area due to the same set of policies. They skitter into dark holes. We are working on a story about this phenom.

adambray
adambray like.author.displayName 1 Like

@jstewart2 @mujeristaorg Jill,  I look forward to hearing more about this issue.   There seems to be little to no reporting about landlords like the Boyle Heights owner mentioned above.   The economics of providing 'affordable' housing always means that there is a subsidy of sorts coming from one place or another.   In Los Angeles, that has come to mean that many mom and pop type landlords who did not aggressively raise rents over many years are now stuck with tenants paying far less than market value and left with incentives to displace those tenants.   I am in a similar situation with some of my properties and the lack of true options for the tenants and landlords in the city are really difficult to understand.  

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Did any of you live in Hollywood in the 80s? I grew up there and while it was gloriously shitty, it also wasn't safe, or conducive to thriving. Lower income families were confined to Hollywood because NO one wanted to live there, but had to due to financial hardship. I meant, it gave me my love of diversity and my fantastically hackneyed worldview, and an endless fount of nostalgia, but let's not kid ourselves, save for the douchebags who flock to the bars/clubs, it's a lot cleaner and people-friendly nowadays. I mean, people actually walk in Hollywood past 10 PM, even the shittier parts. 

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@v_rodrigues_lima Just wanted to add something. You say the 'no one wanted to live there', referring to Hollywood in the 80's, and it was only due to financial hardship that anyone lived here.  That's not actually true.  I liked living in Hollywood, even with the gang stuff that plagued our area sometimes. I worked in the entertainment business and it was close to everything connected to my work. Many musicians and artists lived here. The rents were reasonable and the apartments had some architectural character.  Instead of shady characters roaming about, I now have bar/club idiots urinating and vomiting or partying in my driveway or parked on the street in front of my building. Yaay!

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@v_rodrigues_lima Yes, safer, but the residents who've moved in aren't nearly as interesting in an artistic sense, as previous ones. It's a trade-off. Not looking forward to the over development that's planned though, which will make it like living right next to Times Square where I live.

Huckleberry Lain
Huckleberry Lain like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

keep up the good articles! it always frustrates me how there is no weight put onto people who make an investment in a "bad" neighborhood by living there until it turns around - if they are not part of the violence and crime then they are THE reason it be comes livable again.

abramsrl
abramsrl like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

The article describes one facet of corruption and incompetence that infects LA City Hall.  When the State abolished the CRA's effective 2-1-2012, Los Angeles' CRA [CRA/LA] left LA with about a $11 Billion burden.  

Leaving aside whether Mexicans are move up, down, or sideways, everyone is being cheated.  The CRA/LA took billions of tax money and gave it to developers to build financial disasters like the Hollywood Highland Complex with cost $625 M to construct and then was sold to Garcetti's friends at CIM Group for only $201 M.  Then Garcetti gave CIM Group $30 M more of tax payer dollars to rehab the Kodak Theater -- a private theater.  It's not like the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion at the Music Center.  It's more like Garcetti has his boys over to his house and says,  "How'd ya-ll like $20 M?" and they say, "$30 M would be better," and Garcetti responds, "OK, here's $30 M of tax payer dollars." 

We all know that Cir de Soleil has moved out Hollywood Highland --  But Garcetti still gives millions more to CIM Group.  $11.3 M for Hollywood-Western.  $3.5 M for Sunset-Gordon, $42 M for Midtown in Wesson's district.

 Have you seen Garcetti's latest love affair, Millennium Project planned for Hollywood? It's modeled after Biff's Casino in Back The The Future II.

 The theft of BILLIONS of tax payer dollars is the real story.  In order to make certain he would have the loot to continue to give to his developer buddies, Garcetti used the false 1-12-2011 LAFD deployment report to take $200 Million from paramedics and firemen -- $52 M of the money, which was supposed to save your live in an emergency, went to build a parking lot for billionaire Eli Broad -- That's the real story -- billions in tax dollars stolen and given to corrupt developers.


rcohen009
rcohen009 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Garcetti is intent on creating an urbanized sh/thole in Hollywood.  He has allowed "redevelopment" subsidies go to his real estate developer cheerleaders even though those selfish and greedy pricks refuse to put even one unit of affordable housing in their "luxury" ghettos.  

Patrick McDonald failed to mention how many of the overpriced condos that Garcetti subsidized with massive redevelopment agency tax dollars have gone unsold. So what is his solution?  Oh, yes, build more luxury apartments instead of condos. And in order to help out his developer buddies, Garcetti supports massive reductions in required parking which is just like putting a few cool million dollars into the pockets of the developers.  Meanwhile, residents find their streets parked up with cars that ought to be accommodated in these "luxury" ghettos.  Everyone hates the Councilman for these piss poor planning policies that he earnestly pushes with a straight face.


I find it particularly telling that Garcetti himself does not have the guts to be interviewed for this article. It demonstrates that he lacks what it takes to be a mayor or anything else beyond his current position. It is his strategy to "float" above the people he represents instead of listening to his constituents.  He, more than anyone, is responsible for driving persons of color out of Hollywood.  Anyone who votes for him, is casting a vote for a vision of a racially sanitized Los Angeles -- you know -- like say, Encino where he grew up. Yuck.

Liliana Vasquez-Duran
Liliana Vasquez-Duran like.author.displayName 1 Like

The viciousness of our attitude towards the poor, sick, feeble, mentally ill will be match and met with the same viciousness when we too suffer such a faith. Hang Em All!!! Castrate the Ugly!! Eat the fat ones!!! Rape and plunder!!!! Grab a gun cowboy live up too Travis Bickle and let the smell of shot and vile turned you into a heartless and cold spawn from hell. Dont forget to wear you Christian Audigier while at it...you can always tap out bitches!!!

Mel-v Coyoy
Mel-v Coyoy

Article for the blind masses... hipsters are RECYCLEd from the 30's ...

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima like.author.displayName 1 Like

Unfortunately, this story is old hat. Anyone who's lived in Los Angeles long enough knows it's a city in constant flux, and always has been. Demographics move in, others move out, then 25 years later, it reverses. Neighborhoods in decline come up, then go down, some surge in popularity for a while, then decrease in popularity, then it happens all over again. It's what makes our city interesting, relax. Is it shitty that people are momentarily displaced? Yes, definitely. Will those people be priced out of every region in the L.A. Basin? Likely not. Displacement and sprawl forces new areas to diversify, and our multicultural tapestry is further woven. We're not a town of rigid cultural segregation, and it's what makes this place so special, IMO. 

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima

Also, as a lifetime resident of East Hollywood, one whose parents emigrated to the area in the 1960s, I can GUARANTEE that East Hollywood has NEVER been as overwhelmingly Latino as everyone paints it out to be. There's a huge Russian, Armenian, Ukrainian, Thai, Vietnamese contingency in these parts, and that mix makes it all the more fascinating. 

TODOSSOMOSPUTOS
TODOSSOMOSPUTOS like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Replace "Hollywood" with "Downtown Los Angeles" and the Weekly can re-publish this story at any time. 

Danielle Morrison
Danielle Morrison

I hate hipster foo's with a passion, But I am all for cleaning up the city and the trash thats there.

patrick.range.mcdonald
patrick.range.mcdonald like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@Danielle Morrison Hi Danielle, Much thanks for reading the story and leaving a comment. I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "cleaning up the city and the trash that's there." As I write in the article, many of the people who were pushed out of Hollywood actually cleaned up their neighborhoods and made it safer--and they were working class people. 

Patrick Range McDonald, LA Weekly

hwood4ever
hwood4ever

@patrick.range.mcdonald Good article, Patrick.  I think it's great when people who live in a community care enough to clean up their neighborhoods, but that doesn't entitle them to stay there even if they can no longer afford the rent.  Property owners have a right to charge what the market can command. Unfortunately, this is the downside of being the renter and not the owner.  When prices go up at the supermarket, I find the supermarket with the lower prices and shop there.  When I buy a car, I buy the car I can afford, not necessarily the car that I want.  And when I can no longer afford my rent, I find a new place to live.  And regardless of where I live, I keep my house clean, do my best to keep my street safe, perform neighborhood watch, report crime, and care about where I live.  That's called pride.  Hollywood is a jewel and known worldwide.  Shame on the city of Los Angeles for ever allowing it to decay and become seedy and unsafe.  Good for the city for redeveloping it and revitalizing it.  Shame on our entitlement society.     

smm94
smm94 like.author.displayName 1 Like

@patrick.range.mcdonald Patrick, I really enjoyed the article, but in my opinion it's holding together by a thread. If your argument (of course this article is more of a well-researched editorial) rests upon the sporadic misdeeds of unscrupulous landlords, then that is hardly enough to poop on an entire neighborhood's recovery. What you need to argue, more forcefully, is that gentrification in itself is bad, which you never do, because that is a much more difficult argument to make.

Family relocations are painful, but are you going to argue against investment in Hollywood? Or do you want the city to freeze residential development in that neighborhood, but somehow keep other investments coming in. It's easy to complain about gentrification, but stone-throwers never present an alternative, as most of the more obvious safeguards are already in place, if not always enforced.

It seems to me that you made a poor editorial decision in framing this story as one about race, when it really is one about class. I applaud the tradition of holding candidates feet to the fire before the election, but next time you criticize Garcetti, find something that you can actually criticize explicitly, and please find something that sticks.

patrick.range.mcdonald
patrick.range.mcdonald like.author.displayName 1 Like

@hwood4ever @patrick.range.mcdonald Valid point, but in many cases, landlords were using questionable, if not illegal or unethical, methods to push people out of their homes. In at least one case involving Roy Maule, Eric Garcetti's office did nothing when informed about it. Be sure to reread the things that happened to Mercedes Cortes, Manny Romero, and Roy Maule. Thanks for reading!

Patrick Range McDonald, LA Weekly

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima

@Danielle Morrison Hipsters don't live in Hollywood, just saying. 

thesoftkillsinger
thesoftkillsinger

Its funny to see comments from future never gonna be's /our new homeless junkies askin if latinos cant find other parts in los Angeles lol....you don't have clue


Tammy Ryan
Tammy Ryan like.author.displayName 1 Like

Ah the sweet blissful ignorance of self-important, pompous youth. Don't worry kids, someday they'll come for you and those Latinos you're bagging on will be the ones changing your adult diapers after your self-important kids dump your sorry asses in the state facility.

Suzzie90028
Suzzie90028

@Tammy Ryan  No, probably it will be Filipino doing that work. Statistically proven. I get your point though.

Douglas Argetta
Douglas Argetta

What's gonna end up happening just like before people who want to make it big and think they're talented are gonna wash up or get junked out,the porn industry being their last hope of makin it is almost non existant....no use stayin round here ...I got no problems with what people are labeling hipsters in fact i prefer that than to gettin caught in a drive by but alas seen it all before

Liliana Vasquez-Duran
Liliana Vasquez-Duran like.author.displayName 1 Like

That's great and one day all the hipsters that mo ed here for the Industry will find that even they can't afford rent on their own. Soon find they are sharing every sq. ft of space is subleased to other hipsters. Making hipsters the new poor in L.A. Then one day they themselves discover they can't afford the Hollywood rent so they either turn tricks, slang drugs, or just become homeless. There will be the few that move to places like South L.A where rent is cheaper but survival is harder. Yeah suck it up hipster life is tough!

v_rodrigues_lima
v_rodrigues_lima like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Wow, since when has my fair city been overrun by racist assholes?  LightFragment and darrellnelson23, Simi Valley/the Santa Clarita Valley/the Inland Empire called; they want you back. 

NicholasPell
NicholasPell like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

Wow. "Never read the comments" indeed. Anyone who actively applauds gentrification is a seriously gross human being. Kudos to Patrick on an excellent article. 

Herbert Galván-Gallegos
Herbert Galván-Gallegos like.author.displayName 1 Like

My parent's apartments are sky high now...SWEET!! I for one love those "hipsters"...the higher the rent the better for my folks...and I wouldn't live in Hollywood even if ya paid me to...

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city