Top

news

Stories

 

Will Betsy Butler's Sex Pervert Vote Kill Her Political Career?

In Assembly District 50, underdog Richard Bloom sees daylight

On June 27, far from Los Angeles in the state capital, Assemblywoman Betsy Butler refused to vote on a major reform of the byzantine California laws that give sex-pervert teachers and violent teachers a strong hand in fighting school districts that try to fire them. Butler, under pressure from the California Teachers Association, which has fought to maintain the intricate protections, never dreamed that her abstention from voting — which helped kill the law — would come back to haunt her.

Butler, running on Nov. 6 to represent one of the wealthiest voting districts in America — the Westside's state Assembly District 50 — is in a political fistfight with a fellow Democrat, Santa Monica Mayor Richard Bloom, previously seen as the underdog.

"Betsy has been hurt by the mini-scandal," says Jaime Regalado, a longtime political analyst. "Richard probably has more going for him."

Butler is backed by the Democratic Party machine and its money — $1.3 million so far versus Bloom's $507,000 — and enjoys endorsements from many Democratic honchos. But she's made a series of missteps and found herself in the crosshairs of CNN's Anderson Cooper.

It all started in late June, when she and three other Democrats on the state Assembly Education Committee — Mike Eng, Wilmer Amina Carter and Das Williams — refused to vote on SB 1530. The idea was to let the reform die, as the California Teachers Association wished.

The bill, authored by state senator Alex Padilla, D-L.A., would have allowed school districts to more easily fire teachers for committing physical abuse, sexual abuse or drug-related acts upon their students.

In the wake of the Miramonte Elementary School sex scandal and other revelations about teacher pervert and sex abuse, Padilla and education experts were shocked by the four Democratic abstentions. In a July 19 L.A. Weekly story, "Why California Democrats Protect Sex Abuser Teachers," former state legislator Gloria Romero, now the California director of Democrats for Education Reform, said, "Bills in the Assembly don't die because the members vote no. They die because [Assembly] members are silent. They show no backbone."

Then, in late August, Cooper focused on the abstentions by Sacramento Democrats to kill the sex-pervert bill on Anderson Cooper 360. CNN interviewed Romero and Padilla, while Butler refused their repeated efforts to land an interview.

But even after that nationwide exposure, Butler's role in killing off SB 1530 wasn't well-known among voters until backers of rival candidate Richard Bloom blasted out mass emails of the Cooper video. Former West Hollywood city councilman Steve Martin and other friends who back Bloom each emailed the link to 200 or 300 people.

"I was surprised the Bloom people weren't sending it out," Martin says. "It's a powerful piece. I don't know anyone who's seen [the CNN segment] who doesn't come out against Betsy Butler."

He adds, "It just hits all the wrong notes."

At least two websites — betsybutlerfacts.com and thetruthaboutbetsybutler.com — now feature the video.

With the controversy mushrooming, Butler dedicated a page of her campaign site to her SB 1530 nonvote. She says the Western Growers Association, a powerful lobbying group, is paying for attack mailings about her inaction on the sex-pervert bill as payback for her support of an unrelated bill to require shade and water for farmworkers.

Butler acted as "author" of that law, Assembly Bill 2346. But in fact the United Farmworkers Union ghost-wrote the bill. Many farm groups including WGA fought AB 2346, saying it would unjustifiably place minor offenders on a list of "high hazard industry employers" and open up growers to a new raft of frivolous lawsuits. Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed Butler's bill.

Butler also is lashing out at L.A. Unified School District officials and Padilla, who she claims alerted CNN's Cooper to her abstention on the teacher sex-pervert bill.

It isn't beyond the realm of possibility that Superintendent John Deasy or somebody else at LAUSD headquarters called Cooper to shine a light on the nonvotes by Butler, Eng, Williams and Carter that killed SB 1530 in committee.

After all, Deasy and his core managers spent six months dealing with the anguish caused by accused teacher Mark Berndt, who allegedly fed young students cookies with his own semen on them.

Deasy's office did not respond to the Weekly's requests for comment.

Berndt eventually was paid $40,000 by L.A. Unified to retire — because he was so hard to fire under California's current teacher-protection laws. He's been in jail since last winter, with bail set at $23 million.

In an Oct. 22 WeHo News article, Butler described SB 1530 as "McCarthyism" that threatened teachers' due process rights. She added: "If you want to have a discussion about the merits of this bill, I'm happy to do it, but [LAUSD] and Sen. Padilla got Anderson Cooper out here to shake us around ... [so that] in July all this ridiculousness and sensationalism is happening in the media."

Padilla's spokesman, John Mann, told the Weekly his office didn't lift a finger to get attention. "I'm the press guy," Mann says. "Anderson Cooper's people called us."

Butler sent the Weekly a 333-word email in which she decries the "stripping away" of teacher protections in Padilla's bill. Teachers currently are allowed a prolonged review and appeals process. It can take years to fire a teacher, even in an egregious case. Butler says she'll introduce a law that's more fair to teachers, adding that a child's safety is her "top priority."

1 | 2 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
18 comments
papercut
papercut

The handstands some are doing to justify what Butler did are amazing. The safety of the kids IS paramount.  Butler opposed a sensible bill that would make the kids safer.

 

It ought to be easier to fire teachers accused of serious crimes when a basic investigation shows them to be guilty. Employment terminations are not  a "beyond reasonable doubt" test.  And I don't want to pay teachers to sit in a  room while they collect salaries for not teaching.

 

Butler and the teachers Union thought they'd bury the bill, and no one would be the wiser.  She guessed wrong.  If she can't stand for the kids, she can't get my vote. 

 

MrEguy
MrEguy

She certainly isn't getting my vote.

rpmach4
rpmach4

Some choice you've given us: a political hack vs. the ringleader of the group that sold out Santa Monica to developers leaving us with perpetual gridlock. I'm too nauseous to vote for either of these tools.

abramsrl
abramsrl topcommenter

The issues transcend any single campaign, and I am disappointed that LA Weekly did not focus on the underlying social policy and legal issues.  On the other hand, this is an election year, and LA Weekly is reporting on the furor surrounding this particular election.  One could easily opine that ignoring this hyper-emotional aspect would be irresponsible.  As voters, we need to resist the emotionalism and think about the situation.

 

(1) Once identified as a sexual predatory suspect, is the teacher allowed to remain in the classroom? I do think Not.

 

(2) After an accused teacher is removed, are the students safe from future sexual misconduct by this teacher? I believe the answer is Yes.

 

(3)  Does our society have a stake in Due Process?  Yes.  Once the teacher has been removed, we have the time to employ Due Process. 

 

L.A. should be particularly sensitive to the hysteria which can ruin people's lives  as shown by our world famous McMartin Preschool case.  When it was over, we found out that one disturbed mother, who was known to the district attorney to be mentally ill, made absurd allegations against the McMartin's.  For petty personal and career motives, scores of people in the D.A.'s office horribly abused the McMartin family and utterly destroyed the family and business.  The students were coached to say the most outlandish things and adults took them as true.  For example, the children insisted that Ray Buckey, the grandson of the school's originator, had flown them in a space ship where he molested them. The pre-schoolers insisted that there was a maze of tunnels beneath the school where Ray Buckey allegedly sexually abused the little children.  The authorities dug up the entire property and did not find a single tunnel or any indication that there ever had been a tunnel.  Proof positive that the kids were not telling the truth did not slow the criminal prosecutions.  Ray Buckey was labelled the world's greatest distributor of  kiddy porno, even though no one ever found s single bit of porno associated with Ray Buckey.

 

The horrible history of a corrupt DA's office persecuting innocent people to enhance the careers of a few predatory DA's should tell McDonald that there are valid reasons for Angelenos not to rush forward like angry villagers in a Frankenstein movie out the slay the monster.

 

I call upon McDonald, who is a fine reporter, to take another look at this issue when the election is over and for McDonald to present serious investigative journalism about LAUSD sexual predators and the Due Process which society and the innocent teachers need to protect themselves from liars, schizophrenic mothers, and viciously irresponsible DA's and political hacks.

 

georgebuzzetti
georgebuzzetti like.author.displayName 1 Like

The writer of the article obviously does not understand the law, proper legal procedure, due process or that districts regularily fire teachers with false charges, without the legally required Skelly Hearing and without charges under penalty of perjury.  Let us put this author in that position and watch them scream. 

I had LAUSD audited by the California State Auditor in 1997 on Teachers being falsely accused of child abuse for whistle blowing.  This audit is Oct. 1997, 96121.  I am the only person to ever have LAUSD audited by the State Auditor.  Today, even though the district has a legal agreement with the State tro cease and desist this activity, it is worse now than in 1997.  UTLA is in bed with LAUSD who are all really run by Gates, Broad and the Walton Foundation for their benefit and their friends. 

 

I challenge this reporter to a debate in public on this issue.  I doubt you have the "you know what's"  to defend your position when you can be challenged on your position.  Do you know the child abuse laws?  I do not think so or you would be calling for what I have been calling for and that is prosecution of administrators who break the law concerning notification of the proper authorities and for interferring with investigations.  Each of these misdemeanor criminal violations holds a potential jail time of six months in jail and/or a $1,000 fine.  Now try to defend those real violators such as superintendent Deasy, who by the way has a phony PHD.  Go look it up on Google at John Deasy, University of Louisville.  

 

You have not once mentioned the false accusations nor do you seem to be well thought out enough to care.  The child abuse codes are California penal codes 11164-11174.3.  If you want to talk about the law at least know the basis for our law and what it is.  You sound like a true believer who will jump over the cliff like a cult member.  Since when is due process not a part of our legal system?

jodylax
jodylax

A typical West Side Limousine Liberal CUNT. And I'm a Democrat! 

martaevry
martaevry like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

@jodylax I'm no Butler fan, but that's really uncalled for.

AD50
AD50

Butler had the entire summer to defend her vote (or lack of vote) and has not come up with a compelling argument- just misdirection and falsehoods.  If she didn't buckle to pressure by the CTA why then did she return their money ($7,800)?  

 

 

japhygrant
japhygrant like.author.displayName 1 Like

Wait. Butler sent the L.A. Weekly a 333 word letter to you defending herself and you elected in this article to print 4 words of it? Another impressive work of journalism from the L.A. Weekly.

patrick.range.mcdonald
patrick.range.mcdonald

 @japhygrant Hi Japhy, So good to hear from you, although you seem to be using the kind of "distraction" tactic that Bloom says Butler is doing. The letter was largely filled with the same explanations she has given over the past several months, with many of those positions already in the article. There was no need to duplicate that. Also, she refused to be interviewed, and wrote the letter without allowing any questions to be asked. I most definitely stand by my work. Hope you're well! 

 

Patrick Range McDonald,

LA Weekly

mrariruiz
mrariruiz

 @japhygrant http://www.betsybutler.com/the-facts-about-sb1530 here you go, read the facts about SB1530

 

Also, no word from Bloom's supporters such as the Western Growers Association which has spent $247,972.57 in Independent Expenditures (ie. Super PAC money) to attack Betsy Butler from Malibu to West Hollywood. And you may ask, "What does Richard Bloom have to do with all of this?". While campaign supporters are not legally able to coordinate with the campaigns they support - the timing could not be more perfect. On October 23, Santa Monica Mayor Richard Bloom received $3,900 from the Western Growers Association - do you see the connection now? I hope so. Now together, they are attacking Betsy Butler on a bill that she abstained from voting - SB1530. And by now, you may have seen something in your mailbox and wondered why Betsy would supposedly support protecting teachers that abuse their students? Of course, Betsy does not want dangerous teachers in our classrooms and puts the safety and well being of our students before all else in California's schools to promote a safe and healthy learning environment for our students. http://pacificpalisades.patch.com/blog_posts/the-butler-smear-campaign-20-7d91b2f7

max_the_lagomorph
max_the_lagomorph

Glad to see someone shining a light on this.  Betsy's hoping people will be sufficiently distracted by all the noise she's making (financed by the CTA, btw) to ignore what she did.  Unfortunately for her, voters in the 50th are too smart to fall for her nonsense.

jodylax
jodylax like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @cal92691 FUCK YOU - I'm a union member and Prop 32's only goal is to destroy labor unions. 

 
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city