Top

news

Stories

 

Tim Leiweke's Green NFL Stadium

EIR says fans would forsake cars

On Christmas Eve 1994, both the Rams and the Raiders played their last football games in L.A. The Rams left for St. Louis, while the Raiders returned to Oakland. Since then, a generation of Angelenos has grown up without the NFL in its backyard.

ILLUSTRATION BY KYLE WEBSTER

Location Info

Map

Staples Center

1111 S. Figueroa St.
Los Angeles, CA 90015

Category: Community Venues

Region: Out of Town

20 user reviews
Write A Review
Save to foursquare
Powered by Voice Places

Related Content

More About

If Tim Leiweke, president of AEG, which owns Staples Center, L.A. Live and the J.W. Marriott/Ritz-Carlton tower, gets his way, the next generation won't have to.

No sooner had AEG released its 10,000-plus-page Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Farmers Field on April 5 than lawyers, bloggers and environmental activists began poring over the document, eight times longer than War and Peace.

Transportation blogger Damien Newton stayed up until 1 a.m., getting through about 1,000 pages. "If there's something terrible buried in there, I want to be the one to find it!" he said. But after days of perusal, he found it a pretty impressive effort.

"AEG is very good at this game" after building many big downtown projects, he says. "You get documents that make sense and are well thought-out."

The draft EIR analyzes the environmental and quality-of-life impacts of the stadium, whose 72,000 seats also will host concerts, rodeos and other events. The plan calls for demolishing and rebuilding part of the L.A. Convention Center and building parking structures. The report addresses noise, pollution, aesthetics and, above all, traffic.

The study looked at 177 street intersections in a big radius projecting out from downtown. It found that 72 crossings will suffer "significant, unavoidable impacts" due to weekday events at Farmers Field.

The phrase "unavoidable impacts," which comes up a lot, irks environmental attorney Doug Carstens, who says AEG has some real work left. "Does it really mean unavoidable? Or does it mean, 'not yet avoided'? Are there ways they could fix these things but they haven't found them yet?"

Despite its heft, the EIR omits in-depth study of alternatives to building the stadium downtown. Carstens calls this "shortchanging the public on the EIR." A single page is devoted to a rival stadium proposed in Industry. That wasn't fully analyzed because it doesn't meet objectives such as renovating L.A.'s Convention Center.

Becky Dennison, of the Los Angeles Community Action Network, is disappointed that the EIR fails to delve into potential effects on nearby housing — a big quality-of-life issue in L.A. "They keep claiming that they should not have to analyze impacts" such as rising values possibly pricing residents out of the area, she says.

The public has only 45 days to comment, and some people say that isn't enough time. "This stadium's gonna be there for 40 to 50 years," Carstens says. "They're giving the public 45 days?"

A major new poll shows Angelenos' unease toward Farmers Field, with a tepid 49 percent in favor and 39 percent opposed.

One group wants public comment extended to 90 days, which the City Council Ad Hoc Committee on Farmers Field could grant. Once the comment period ends, AEG will create a final EIR, which is expected to breeze through city approvals. After that, if anyone sues AEG, the courts have just 175 days to rule or to work out a settlement — such as concessions from AEG to lessen the impact on nearby residents.

That short, 175-day lawsuit deadline was created by Senate Bill 292, a special exemption to environmental law approved by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Jerry Brown solely for AEG. Before it spent $27 million creating this Environmental Impact Report, AEG wanted to know the stadium couldn't be mired in court for years.

AEG got the exemption only after making two key promises to the Natural Resources Defense Council and Democratic legislators, who together hammered out the environmental exemption law for AEG.

First, Farmers Field must be 100 percent carbon-neutral. For every car arriving at the stadium, AEG must spend funds, known as "carbon offsets," somewhere else to offset those new greenhouse gas emissions. AEG might be required to retrofit old factories with green technology, or to plant trees.

The second concession requires that, five years after it opens, Farmers Field must have the lowest annual ratio of "cars to spectators" of any NFL stadium — bettering the next-best by 10 percent.

According to transportation planner Michael Bates, the lead author of the EIR's transportation section, if AEG fails on its promises, "The city of L.A. at that point can require additional mitigation measures."

But AEG's special state law didn't specify what that mitigation could be.

Carstens laughs at the vagueness of this clause in SB 292, saying, "Once the project is approved, there's really not much leverage the city of Los Angeles has."

Leiweke insists he is fully committed to following through — and even charged up about it. "This process has been completely driven by changing the habits of Southern California," he tells L.A. Weekly. "Farmers Field is one of the first major facilities in this community built specifically around light rail and public transportation. That to me is the best part of this entire process."

The EIR says AEG would spend $1.5 million to upgrade freeway ramp traffic-light meters; $2.5 million in seed money toward an extra lane on the northbound 101 (the expected cost is 10 times that); and $10 million to upgrade the Blue Line station at 11th and Hope streets.

1 | 2 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
7 comments
Mark Yale
Mark Yale

I Agree with all who have been sharing thoughts in positive ways about the MTA and the Train system, what everyone also needs to remember.. is that LA CITY is at fault YEARS AGO Way before this because they trimed back the buses and NEVER Implemented a Rail system early enough when they could have... remember when they killed the Red Car (when is possibly comming back) i live near a blue line station... and if i have money for a game and all i would try hard to use the blue line... i have no car at the same time (disabled)... the rose bowl city of industry, even the coliseum for many YEARS never had any of this... if a stadium is in idestry and i went to a game i have to find a RIDE BY CAR i could careless for tailgating i dont buy a game ticket to stand outside yacking about a game or players... i buy a ticket TO WATCH A GAME IN PERSON!!!! there is Car pooling as well.... if someone lives near a rail station no matter what area, and fellow friends who are fans are going to a game goto gether then that is even better.... why because that 1 or 2 friends meeting the other can PARK At that friends house/apt area and not have to waste Gas or driving time.... no one has really mentioned how much easier it would be to goto Farmers field FOR DISABLED PEOPLE Who are fans.. this includes older and military vets who are fans!! what AEG is attempting to do NO ONE ELSE HAS DONE BEFORE!!!! with all the Other new stadiums...I am a Rams Fan.. i may not have all the gear or signed autographs or be super diehard but i have memories still be to both the coliseum (with a friend who drove 1 time and my dad the other time, i also saw a rams and raiders game in Anahiem.... BIG Difference. I applaud AEG, i also aplaud those looking at the EIR Making some valid concerns... think about this... i know in the mornings for like 2 hours straight the Blue line has trains running EVERY 10 MINUTES that should be workable for all Home Games for ALL Rails and that is a positive impact... (sorry about the rambling i DO WANT MY RAMS BACK!!!!!!)

Hars Harper
Hars Harper

It's amazing to me that readers of the Weekly, a typically forward-thinking group, would be so obtuse when it comes to the transit projections. Anyone who's attended a sporting event, pro football included, in another city (Seattle, San Francisco, San Diego) knows that the public transit option often makes the most sense for fans.

Why would it be any different here?

Yes, I realize there is still a dominant car culture in Los Angeles, but the EIR projection is only 18-20% ridership on game days. If 80% of fans arrive by car, traffic is significantly mitigated. One-hundred percent of fans have been arriving at the Coliseum (less than 2 miles south of the proposed stadium) by car for decades -- and, by God, the city still functions fine on game days.

People have been complaining about the lack of pragmatic public transit in this city for years, yet just when the city starts to get its act together in that regard, the naysayers begin making unfounded claims that no one will bother to ride it to sporting events. The contrary is already true. I've attended games at Staples Center where the metro trains are full of fans coming and going. With the opening of the first phase of the Expo Line, our long awaited rail system to the west side has finally arrived, and I expect more people to arrive via public transit to South Park. To adamantly insist that 18-20% of football fans won't willingly leave their cars at home for the ease of public transit is myopic and defeatist.

SZwartz, where do you get your numbers? Subways aren't the only means of getting to a game. There are both light and heavy rail options (Metrolink, Gold Line, Expo Line, Blue Line) not to mention busses.

Is this project a mark of corruption or progress? I guess the lines have been drawn.

Anthony Costa
Anthony Costa

I support this stadium. The number of people coming for events isn't going to be that large. The rail can handle it. The worse traffic gets,the more it will be an incentive for people to take metrolink into DT and walk around. Hope we can get the Raiders back here and continue the revitalization of DT.

SZwartz
SZwartz

The entire AEG Plan like the entire Hollywood Community Plan is a fraud. The most glaring misrepresentation concerns mass transit, especially the subways.

LA has virtually no subways. They cover about 5% of LA and the Stadium will draw from the entire LA-OC area. It is known that people will not use a subway where the station is more than 1/2 mile from where they embark or disembark. That means about 30% of the fans have to live within 1/2 mile of a subway station. Thus, the subways would have to expand by 600%, from serving 5% to serving 30%. We do not even have plans to build that many subways.

And who will pay for the subways, if they were built? The taxpayers. By the time LA expanded its subways in order to satisfy AEG's EIR, it will cost the tax payers cost to $1 Trillion. Is that disclosed in the EIR?

However, it is doubtful AEG cares about transportation. It's about TV rights and all they need is a Stadium and a team to secure TV rights. They have zero concern what happens to the City or whether people can get to the games or the horrendous mess that make of the city on game day. Hollywoodians have seen who corrupt developers have made the area around Hollywood-Highland into a dead-zone for residents.

Also people need to be realistic about financing. When the stadium is approved, then Asshuts will hit up the City for a direct subsidy to bring an NFL team to LA. Let's face it, no team will move to LA without bundles of tax dollars. If we are so stupid and corrupt as to approve this scam, the tax payers will be subsidizing Asshutz for the rest of their lives.

El Barto
El Barto

uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh................ LA has subways sonny and they work pretty decent in conjunction with a bicycle. This might not work to well for obese suv driving 50 aging NFL fans but the good news is that they are a dieing breed. Big question is whether Farmer's field can host MLS soccer games.

SZwartz
SZwartz

You're living in a land of delusion if you're seeing a lot of subways. LA has almost no subways. Read the 1915 Los Angeles Transit Study (on-line) and learn about the math and the finances of subways, and you will understand why we have so few subways, and why the Hollywood Subway deteriorated rather than revitalized Hollywood. Math and the finances of corruption have not changed in the lat 100 years.

ddbear
ddbear

It's such a scam. I read much of the draft EIR and AEG skips addressing the biggest problems with car traffic and spillover tailgating due to the lack of tailgating at the stadium.

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city