Top

news

Stories

 

What's in Pepper Spray?

In California, the toxin TCE

W hen seated Occupy UC Davis protesters turned their backs on Lt. John Pike and his UC Davis police squad clad in riot gear on Nov. 18, he had had enough.

Pike aimed a large can of First Defense aerosolized Oleoresin Capsicum at two-dozen occupiers, including student David Buscho and his girlfriend.

"The police officer came up to us and said, 'If you guys don't move, we're going to shoot you,' so we turned around," Buscho said to a crowd of several hundred occupiers three days later in the same quad where he was sprayed.

"Then it happened," Buscho continued as the angry crowd listened transfixed. "At that point I entered a world of pain. It felt like hot glass was entering my eyes. I couldn't see anything. I wanted to open my eyes, but every time I did the pain got worse."

But in one way, Buscho got off easy. Police in California generally do not use pepper spray that contains as its main ingredients the mainstays of several popular pepper sprays sold in Los Angeles and California retail outlets — the dry cleaning solvent and toxin tetrachloroethylene, or PCE, and its distillate, the once-common degreaser and toxin trichloroethylene, or TCE.

California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, better known as Proposition 65, requires that the governor publish an annual list of chemicals known to the state to cause reproductive toxicity or cancer. Both PCE and TCE made the list in April 1988 as chemicals that cause cancer.

Yet no law is on the books in California to prevent PCE's or TCE's use in products meant to be sprayed directly into somebody's face.

"California has banned other uses of TCE in consumer products, including spray paints and other aerosols," says Sarah Janssen of the Natural Resources Defense Council in San Francisco. "It's not a stretch of the imagination to think that significant exposures are occurring in the vicinity of pepper spray fumes."

TCE-based pepper spray is being sold in California through the Internet by Fox Labs International and Personal Safety Corporation, according to the companies' websites. And two of Personal Safety Corporation's Pepper Defense products with PCE but without Proposition 65 warnings were being sold at True Value and Do It Best stores that L.A. Weekly visited earlier this month in Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Eagle Rock, Florence-Graham, Hollywood, Venice and North Hollywood.

Seven Fox Labs International pepper spray products are sold locally through Galls, a large police and public safety equipment and apparel company, with local stores in Los Angeles, Long Beach, Orange and Riverside. On the stores' websites, No Proposition 65 warnings are indicated on these items.

"PCE and TCE are known carcinogens on California's Proposition 65 list, which means products containing them should by law carry the Proposition 65 warning label," says Ana Mascareñas, policy coordinator for Physicians for Social Responsibility–Los Angeles, a public health and environmental group.

"It is almost inconceivable that these pepper sprays are being sold in California without labels warning consumers of the cancer risks," she adds.

Ed Ferguson, president of Michigan-based Fox Labs International, boasts: "First Defense has been described as ketchup to my Tabasco. You won't find anyone hit with ... Fox that wouldn't rather be hit with a Taser."

Fox Lab's pepper spray is, by weight, 98 percent "volatiles" — meaning a liquid that is easily vaporized. And that volatile is TCE.

Ferguson takes umbrage at California regulators calling TCE a carcinogen.

"California's the only people that say it," Ferguson says. "Why is that? California don't have their shit together and yet they're saying a lot of stuff for a lot of people that puts them into bankruptcy."

At Personal Safety Corporation, the producer of pepper spray containing PCE, president and founder Dick Olson tells the Weekly, "California probably has some of the most stringent interpretations of what's carcinogenic and at what levels."

Olson says Pepper Enforcement is made with TCE but that the "amount of that chemical is so minute as to not cause harm to humans. It's a very minute amount."

But publicly available Material Safety Data Sheets reveal a different story.

Material Safety Data Sheets contain data regarding the official known properties of a specific substance. The figures on the sheets regarding Personal Safety Corporation pepper sprays sold at True Value stores in California show that two of them come in formulas with PCE (volatiles) levels at 95 percent by weight.

Do It Best was quick to defend its California handling of Personal Safety Corporation products.

Do It Best communications director Randy Rusk says in an email, "Do it Best Corp. takes safety and compliance issues seriously, and we are looking into the labeling situation to affirm the products we carry and that our vendors are in compliance with state law."

"True Value is a cooperative," says True Value spokeswoman Marsha Burton. "That means our members created us. We can't tell a member what they can and can't sell. A lot of members could have bought [the Personal Safety Corporation pepper spray] from Do It Best."

Burton subsequently supplied the Weekly with Material Safety Data Sheets showing that True Value does sell Personal Safety Corporation pepper sprays with 95 percent PCE.

Mascareñas fumes upon hearing the retailers' remarks.

"It's a public-health outrage if this kind of pepper spray contains 95 percent PCE or 98 percent TCE by [weight]," Mascareñas says. "Consumers have a right to know what toxic chemicals are in pepper spray and decide if they want to take the everyday risk of being exposed to another known carcinogen."

But trichloroethylene is up to 5,000 times cheaper than the safe 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane, or HFA, which is used as the base inert ingredient in TCE-free pepper sprays. HFA costs about $500 a pound, while the same amount of TCE can be had for a dime.

Lenny Siegel of the Mountain View–based Center for Public Environmental Oversight, who last year was named by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as its Superfund "Citizen of the Year," says, "Leakage from spray cans may pose a continuing hazard to those who carry them."

While you can get it on many retail store shelves, several police agencies the Weekly contacted do not use pepper spray containing PCE or TCE.

The Santa Monica and Simi Valley police departments said they carry Sabre Red brand 10 percent capsaicin pepper spray. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department also uses Sabre Red, while the Los Angeles Police Department's website indicates that it uses First Defense.

But who will protect consumers who are urged to buy pepper spray available on store shelves for personal safety but may be getting something more dangerous than they ever imagined?

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health says PCE is a potential human carcinogen and causes "depression of the central nervous system; damage to the liver and kidneys; impaired memory; confusion; dizziness; headache; drowsiness; and eye, nose and throat irritation."

The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research reported in a February 2010 study that PCE increases the risk of Parkinson's by a multiple of nine. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Sept. 30, 2011, found TCE causes liver and kidney cancer, lymphoma and other illnesses.

"There is a perception that a cancer-causing substance doesn't belong in such a product, even if its intent is to irritate and/or disable," Siegel says of TCE in pepper spray.

Contact the writer and view additional materials at EnviroReporter.com.

Show Pages
 
My Voice Nation Help
27 comments
dabu
dabu

Interesting.  However, if defense sprays are used properly who cares?  Only when abused like the UC Davis case is this an issue.  Defense sprays are supposed to be seriously nasty stuff.  My wife and daughters carry the nastiest stuff available.  They will not abuse it, but I suppose an innocent could catch a whiff of it (most likely themselves).  But that is a small potential hazard relative to the very real present hazard during an attack.  Again, this is only concerning when authorities abuse their power, which is not a fault of the manufacturers of the sprays.  If it were up to me cops like that would go to jail and we'd just shoot and kill rapists and thugs instead of spraying them.  But I suppose I'm just an idealist.

Mike Braddock
Mike Braddock

Not believing in punishment equating to Justice, pepper spray is a defensive weapon and should be used as such. There shouldn't really be any reason why everyone hasn't switched to OC Spray by now. This probably shouldn't be an issue.

Jnorvet
Jnorvet

The issue here is not about who deserves what, but truth in packaging. Trichloroetylene is listed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a class 2A "probable carcinogen".Proposition 65 (passed by the voters of this state, just like Proposition 13) requires that any product or workplace that potentially contains carcinogens, mutagens or teratogens be clearly identified; these products aren't.We're free to use things that are potentially hazardous to ourselves, and we may do it every day, but in California we're also allowed to make a more informed choice.

HarperJoel
HarperJoel

my classmate's sister-in-law makes $84 hourly on the laptop. She has been fired for 7 months but last month her income was $9078 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Go to this site[N][u][t][t][y][R][i][c][h].[c][o][m]

Jcook
Jcook

While some criminals may deserve the severe repercussions of TCE and PCE, it goes beyond the intended use and effect of pepper spray. If I were under attack I would not hesitate to defend myself with pepper spray, but what if I accidentally sprayed a friend that had sneaked up on me? I wouldn't mind too terribly the friend being in pain as punishment for trying to scare the crap out of me, but I would be mortified to think that they had been exposed to carcinogens as well. Potentially sentencing someone to a painful death seems disproportionate to many of the offenses or perceived offenses that would warrant the use of pepper spray.

beercrabs
beercrabs

They should start bathing convicted pedophiles in the stuff.

Info
Info

Some comments from Occupy Portland regarding pepper-spray use against us at protests and rallies. Still waiting to hear from the police department about which kind of pepper spray they use on us. Will comment later when we know. Thanks to Michael for writing the article.

Punching someone in the stomach, breaking their leg, and even hitting them in the head with a night stick are all potentially non-lethal, yet still unacceptable. Using a product with known carcinogens is actually potentially lethal. Even the ones that use capsicum are potentially lethal for some folks with allergies and those with respiratory issues. While some pepper spray streams are somewhat directional the particulate dispersal is still extreme indoors or out. Sure it's better than shooting people, but should that be the measure by which we judge lethal vs non-lethal? James Layton

The use of pepper spray for crowd control is an act of misuse of the public police force who is hired to keep the crowd safe, not intimidate. This act of violence against the peaceful protestors scares the elderly, physically challenged and those with children NOT to participate because they do not feel safe at the non violent demonstrations because of the police, not the people.Heide StrangeSky Lambert

I believe that the use of pepper-spray by police against the citizens of the US is an attempt, probably by Homeland Security ops, to prevent Occupy as a whole from using our 1st amendment rights to assemble. My thoughts are that they, HS and the nation's Police Bureaus, believe that if they attack us, but don't get blamed for shooting us, that we will decide from fear not come out to the streets to protest wrong from right. The fact that the police can and do use carcinogenic pepper-spray on us without telling us that it's carcinogenic, means that they are aware that they are trying to kill us through the tactics of undercover operations. There would be insufficient proof that future cancers would be able to tie to the use of pepper spray used at an action. Please continue to report on the law suit by the two students at USDavis. I hope they win and the win would be a huge victory against the police. We are Occupy. Expect Us! Miriam

Info
Info

More from Occupy Portland:

Non-violent protesters may sue police and the municipality of county that employs them under this Federal law, 42 United States Code Section 1983 if they have been pepper sprayed while peacefully protesting, whether or not the protesters were arrested.

Here’s the language of the law in question:

§ 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

***

The use of pepper spay by law enforcement against non-violent protestors has been found to be a violation of of the 4th amendment rights of the protesters in the case of Lundberg v. Humboldt, which is the controlling precedent in the 9th Circuit, which has jurisdiction over any cases brought against the police for their actions in Seattle and Oakland. In its 2001 opinion regarding the Lundberg case, the 9th Circuit held that non-violent protestors who did not present a threat to the safety of the public or to law enforcement officials, even though they had committed the misdemeanor offense of trespass, could sue the governmental authorities and law enforcement officials who had pepper sprayed them, reversing the trial court’s decision to dismiss the case on the basis that the authorities had “limited immunity” to violate the civil rights of individuals engaged in non-violent civil disobedience. The use of pepper spray against non-violent protestors who pose no threat to police or to the public, has been deemed grounds for legal action against the police under Section 1983 for a violation of your 4th amendment rights. It seems clear to me that the 9th Circuit precedent would allow lawsuits against the authorities who used pepper spray and other “pain compliance techniques” used against OWS protesters and bystanders to proceed without any argument by the authorities of qualified immunity from litigation based on their brutal acts of unnecessary violence

Joe
Joe

Info...you're comments are well written and you are obviously trained in the rule of law. While the plaintiffs in the Humbolt case were allowed to sue and won the verdict, they were only awarded $1.

Sage Advice
Sage Advice

Ludicrous. Does any idiot really think that a one-time use of these products is going to cause the violent attacker on the receiving end cancer? These are for self-defense and control of rapists, thieves, psychotics, thugs, gang-members, and anarchists. You want them to be as strong as they can be, which the guy from First Defense admits his product is weaker.

People that purchase and carry these products for self-defense are not putting it on their hamburgers, smoking the stuff, or using them to clear their sinuses on a daily basis. They may carry these products for several months or years without use; and this article lays claim that these cans may leak? What a joke; if a can of these products were leaking, you'll know instantly. And it is highly unlikely those on the receiving end are getting hit with this stuff on a daily basis - only when they deserve it.

(And I am willing to bet a good percentage of those complaining about the potential of cancer from these products smoke a pack a day.)

So some might say "oh, but what about when they discard the can?" People rarely discard these things until they actually use them. The amount in these products is minute compared to the amount found in degreasing and cleaning products in other states which are dispersed regularly into the environment by the intent of their use, not from these self-defense products.

From the article: "It is almost inconceivable that these pepper sprays are being sold in California without labels warning consumers of the cancer risks,"

Risks to whom? A rapist? By the way, lead is known to cause cancer as well. I carry a product on me on a daily basis that disperses high volumes of lead and I have no worries I may get cancer from carrying all that lead. No Prop 65 warning needed. Sure, it may pose a cancer risk to those on the receiving end, however, I don't think that dying from cancer is going to be their biggest worry; they'll likely have a bigger problem preventing death by excessive instantaneous blood-loss and detachment of body parts from all that lead. Picking up their balls off the ground might be a bigger worry.

And soon, many others like myself will be carrying plenty of cancer-causing lead with them wherever they go, as pending lawsuits for California to become a Shall-Issue CCW state succeed, merely because the same kind of immature, pussy-fied and ignorant perennial victims full of self-loathing and fear-mongering, those who harbor an irrational fear of firearms and prefer to be baby-sat and helpless on a daily basis, all felt the need to ban open-carry; WELL! THAT BACKFIRED ON YOU NOW DIDN'T IT? - AND THANK YOU TOO, because it was all tactfully played. Your foolish endeavor and defeating to your emotional immaturity will usher in Shall-Issue CCW for CA faster than it would take to get a bill processed through the legislature in Sacramento. Me and thousands of others will be more than obliged to dispense cancer causing lead for any rapists, thieves, thugs, psychotics, gang-members, and anarchists that are opposed to getting hit with TCE or PCE based pepper-spray. And it sounds like we would be doing them a favor, easing their fears of potentially dying from cancer. A woman of 4'11" is 10 feet tall against her 6"4" attacker when back by her two good friends; those cancer-causing buddies Smith and Wesson.

----

Steve B.
Steve B.

Sage...you are missing the point. These products do not list the ingredient TCE as required by law. California is not the only state that requires this. These companies are breaking the law. There are plenty of sprays that are just as, if not more effective than these products, and they do not use carcinogens.

Sbi3
Sbi3

Sorry, but in California, you can't carry lead bullets, only copper. Might make a buzzard sick, you know.

Cindi
Cindi

Officer John Pike had "had enough," huh. God forbid someone turn their back on him. Definitely a reason to assault kids with pepper spray!! I almost didn't read the rest of this very good story because of the forgiving portrayal of John Pike. He should be in jail for what he did, along with all the other officers who assaulted and beat and pepper-sprayed peaceful protesters. These protesters are not, and were not, criminals, I don't give a rat's what the Cable TV j@ck@$$es said about them. Protesting is a guaranteed First Amendment right, and if corporations are allowed to say money is free speech, then protesters damn well ought to be able to use camping at City Hall as free speech. There is no excuse for what Pike did. And for the author, there's no excuse for excusing, in any sense at all, the brutality brought upon soldiers, old ladies, and young college kids who are simply speaking up because WE ARE NOT BEING REPRESENTED BY OUR REPRESENTATIVES. It's that simple, despite the fact that the yahoos on TV are still scratching their heads about "what was the point of the protests".....You're obviously not a dumb@ss like they are, so don't write like one, please. Saying these protesters "got off easy" is revolting. Turn off the TV. It's the drug that rots your brain far beyond what actual drugs can do.

Guest
Guest

Thanks for the article. Sound science has led us to ban these carcinogens from drinking water, yet it's OK to spray someone in the face with them?!

Sage Advice
Sage Advice

Yes, it's OK to spray a rapist in the face with them. It is HIGHLY unlikely the rapist will get cancer from that one time delivery, rightfully deserved, and justified use of TCE and PCE, as it won't cause permanent damage or death (even if you are really worried about death in your defense for the rapist who is trying to rape or KILL YOU).

Even the guy from First Defense admits his product is inferior and only cites Prop 65 to defend his weaker product? Is he kidding? When I am hitting a mugger in the face with Pepper Spray, do you really think I'm worried about Prop 65 at that point? No, I want the strongest possible solution I can get.

However in my case, I don't waist my time with PCE or TCE - I defer to another cancer-causing toxin; lead. Lots of it, out of the barrel of a SIG SAUER 220 in .45ACP. There, now the mugger has a lot more to worry about than cancer-causing PCE, TCE or lead combined. I am sure Prop 65 will be the furthest thing from his mind at that point - other than his body, after his head is blown OFF and the worrying-portion of his brain-matter is laying on the ground 8 feet way!

---

Mark Matson
Mark Matson

Ah yes, another internet tough guy.

In reality, only cowards feel the need to carry guns everywhere. While the rest of us get along just fine without them, some people are just born cowards, I guess.

Joe Dixon
Joe Dixon

In my country the police are too poor to use such politically and environmentally correct pepper sprays. Our police use good old battery acid! Clears the crowds really quick!

PersonalSafetyExpert
PersonalSafetyExpert

Sabre Red and First Defense do not contain carcinogens. In fact, Security Equipment Corporation which manufacturers Sabre Red is both an Environmental Protection Agency Establishment and Health Canada Establishment.

musimann
musimann

I say spray the pigs........ see how they like it.

Cindi
Cindi

I have never heard this before. Glad to be educated. Thank you.

Marie
Marie

Thanks for informing us on this issue. TCE is very dangerous and at the very least it should be on the label.

Marge Brown
Marge Brown

Thanks for letting everyone know about this, Mike. This product containing TCE is dangerous and should never be used by anyone, in any form.

William Preston Bowling
William Preston Bowling

Thank You Michael Collins for bringing this and many other issues involving TCE to the light of day where the public can be armed with information like this

Bonnie Klea
Bonnie Klea

Great article Michael. Guess I should check my pepper spray that I keep by the front door. Those poor people who got sprayed in their eyes!

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city