Top

news

Stories

 

L.A. Bike Plan Troubles

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, if he is still alive, will be 93 years old by the time the new 2010 Bike Plan is supposed to be finished. Some 1,300 of the 1,684 promised miles are still incomplete, and the city is limping along, completing 40 miles of bike lanes per year.

L.A. should be a great biking city in about 35 years. Probably not a good chance Villaraigosa will be able to ride down any of his proposed bike lanes in 2046.

The plan was celebrated as a "milestone" by Los Angeles politicians after its ratification on March 2, and media skepticism about that claim has been absent. News outlets have fallen in line with City Hall's message of triumph.

But progress has been slow thanks to multiple obstacles. Since Villaraigosa took office in 2005, about 58 miles of bike lanes, paths and bike-friendly streets have been painted. That's about the same pace of 10 miles of bike lanes per year the city had under his predecessors James Hahn, Richard Riordan and Tom Bradley.

About 334 miles of bike lanes have been created since 1977, during a time when 678 miles were promised. That pace has increased in the past 12 months as city crews installed about 30 miles — well under the touted goal of 40 miles per year, but a jump from previous years.

Villaraigosa claimed recently in an op-ed in the Daily News that "we are putting Angelenos to work by ... adding 1,600 miles of new bike paths." Yet his big office with 207 personal aides is not really paying attention to that project. When the Mayor's Office was contacted by L.A. Weekly, nobody knew how many bike lanes had been installed during the last year. They had to scramble to come up with the 30-mile count.

While the recent improvement is a bright spot, the Bike Plan faces multiple problems. Don Ward of the Midnight Ridazz cycling group fought hard to make the section of Wilbur Avenue in Northridge where he lives safer for pedestrians and cyclists after several people were killed in car accidents. But the L.A. Department of Transportation (LADOT) almost comically botched the safety plan in June 2010 when it reduced Wilbur Avenue from four car lanes to three and added bike lanes and street parking — without notifying area residents.

Even Ward found out about the new bike lanes only by spotting preliminary spray-painted marks on the road.

Susan Hammarlund, board member of the Porter Ranch Neighborhood Council, sa commuters from Porter Ranch were very upset about losing a busy car lane. So LADOT decided to reconfigure the road — yet again, without getting needed input.

This time, the bike lanes were moved into the gutter — and the speed limit was increased.

"LADOT spent $50,000 to repave the roads and paint lines again, which were just repaved and painted for the addition of bike lanes," Ward says. "That money could have fixed 9,000 potholes. The road is now more dangerous — even the LADOT engineer admitted that."  

In a press release three months before the Wilbur Avenue fiasco, City Councilman Bill Rosendahl called the new Bike Plan an acknowledgment that bicycles deserve "the same consideration and accommodation that we give to automobiles on our roadways."

But Ward says the twice-reconfigured bike lanes on Wilbur are unusable because pine needles and cones flood them. "LADOT prioritizes the automobile. That is starting to change, but only because we have gotten so involved politically."

On July 1, the mayor issued Executive Directive No. 20, which "ensures all City departments and agencies coordinate on bike-related matters to meet the City's ambitious alternative-transportation goals."

But, in a stark illustration of Villaraigosa's disjointed management style, he tweeted his directive in a reply to Lance Armstrong, rather than announcing it to the city departments that would have to alter their operations and attitudes to comply.

"I don't have time to focus on the political B.S.," says Ron Durgin, president of Sustainable Streets, a nonprofit group that educates the public on bicycling. "The politicians should be making it easy and transparent for us to follow them."

When the Weekly contacted Borja Leon, deputy mayor of transportation, he replied with a prepared statement three days later sent from an aide's email address. It was a reworded version of Villaraigosa's directive.

Stephen Box, a bike activist featured in the Weekly's cover story "The Bikeroots," says the lack of follow-through is rampant at City Hall. "What happened to 'million trees' or the green roof initiative? What happened to everything?" Box asks. "This is a city of plans, but if we are not going to implement them, then what does it matter?"

The list of failed initiatives is long, including the mayor's Clean Tech corridor, his vow to usher in a "transparent" administration and his ethics-in-government initiative. His ethics promise floundered when Villaraigosa was caught accepting $50,000 in unreported free tickets. Charged with violating the city's code of ethics, he now is drumming up $123,500 (easily covering the $42,000 in fines he owed) from wealthy friends to pay off his lawyers.

Box says comprehensive implementation of the Bike Plan looks just as implausible.

During an April Bike Plan meeting, made up of city staffers who design and create bike lanes, 10 major lanes and paths were proposed. Since then, just 2.61 miles have been completed, according to the LADOT bike blog.

1 | 2 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
19 comments
jasporia
jasporia

LA needs a benevolent dictator. Even if the mayor was on the ball rich people can throw environmental reviews up all over the place and nothing will get done anyway.

MatRiggs
MatRiggs

I got an iPad 2-32GB for $ 23.87 and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $ 38.76 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $ 657 which only cost me $ 62.81 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, http://x.co/ZBpb

Barron4citycouncil
Barron4citycouncil

Bike Path delayed? Yeah, no surprise. Look at NOHO, CRA; 32 years in the process, and that's all they've built? Look at Victory and Laurel Canyon. Abolish CRA, and redirect those funds where they were intended, schools, public safety, and to fix our roads for everybody's use; autos, cyclist and horse- and-buggy too.

Barron4citycouncil
Barron4citycouncil

Way-2-go on your comment Rocket J. Summer of the late 60's we rode our 10-speeds from Brooklyn and Soto to the beach without bike lanes, and just watched out for traffic.And, regorous enforcement? Yup, about as rigorous enforcement that they do on removing the illegal street vendors. And how do we cite cyclists who don't stop at stop signs? There was the cyclist on Thursday evening, who caused me to drive slowly behind him, because he chose not to use the bike parth along the Orange Line near Victory and Haskell. Then as I and other vehicles came to a red light at Victory headed northbound, he changed over to the south bound lanes and went thru the red light, and turned left, westbound, onto Victory, because eastbound traffic on Victory, also had a red light. He maneuvered thru the on-coming southbound traffic which were making right turns and left turns onto Victory Bl. Yeah, I silently called him a 'jerk' because, if he got involved in a bike-auto accident it would have ruined both their days.But every group has their 'bad-apples.'

anonymous
anonymous

Can someone tell me how much fees a cyclist pays vs vehicle owners?

John Huan Vu
John Huan Vu

The same, since nearly all cyclists own and drive cars in L.A.

El Barto
El Barto

In all fairness, 4000lb motor vehicles destroy pavement and wear on infrastructure with every single trip while bicycles cause little or no damage per trip.Therefore, the road users who cause the most wear and tear should pay the most for upkeep. Unfortunately motor vehicle registration and gas tax does not actually pay for the roads. Money for roads and infrastructure comes from the general fund which everyone contributes to through sales and property tax.

Vehicle registration fees should reflect the proportionality of the damage they cause. To be fair, the heaviest vehicles should pay the heaviest taxes. Registration fees based on this fair system should be something in the range of $1500 / year. This would reduce the burden on the general fund and reduce state and federal income tax for those who choose to pull up their boot straps and use their own two feet for transportation.

Escapebail
Escapebail

Hello, A very insightful post. Thanks for the info. Its great that if our default settings are giving us messy or stringy builds, this dialog can probably help.Thanks for the information.

bail bonds van nuys

DJ Wheels
DJ Wheels

Please rewrite the last paragraph of the article. The ordinance recently passed did NOT make anything a "crime." It made a CIVIL right of action against harassment.

Jstewart
Jstewart

Hi DJ Wheels. News Editor Jill Stewart here, correcting your suggested correction about the story. You've got only half of the information about the new Los Angeles law against harassing bicyclists. It is indeed a new crime, not merely a way to seek civil action as you state. Under the new law the City Council stipulated that it is a crime for drivers to threaten cyclists verbally or physically. The law additionally allows victims of harassment to sue in civil court without waiting to for the city to decide whether to press criminal charges.

El Barto
El Barto

DJWheels is a LAWYER. If anyone should know, it's him. CORRECT your article lame. The ordinance states that it is a crime to threaten anyone including cyclists already BUT in practical terms, and over worked police force and City Attorney won't prosecute unless severe bodily harm is inflicted. This new ordinance gives people the ability to pursue CIVIL cases whereas a case would not meet the threshold to trigger a CRIMINAL case. IDIOTS at the LA weekly Runnin they mouths!!

Chris Kidd
Chris Kidd

Controversy without context: The LA Weakly way.

Rocket J
Rocket J

As a regular bicycle commuter let me say we do not need bike lanes or sharrows, we do not need a three foot law. We do need continuous education and public service messages informing the public that bicycles have the same rights to use the roads as motor vehicles and cyclists have to follow the same laws as do drivers of motor vehicles. We need rigorous enforcement of existing laws on drivers of motor vehicles and cyclists. Lastly we all need to get over the feeling we are somehow more entitled and our wants trump others peoples rights.

Frank McCourt
Frank McCourt

Cyclists and pededtrians have a legal right to use the roads. Driving is a priviledge. Drivers need to remember that. Unfortunately the issue is that the traffic grid as it is designed now, is designed to facilitate car travel. That needs to change. We need to facilitate peoples right to walk and bike and regulate those people who are priviledged to drive. Drivers need to follow the speed limit above all.

Daniel Edwards
Daniel Edwards

Politicians have learned they just need to talk, talk about making plans, pass some plans... and then pass the reality of DOING ANYTHING on to the next guy. Even at the top of government the image associated with the promises of goals, a new committee, a new draft of a new whatever is what's needed to keep the job. Then the committees aren't funded, the drafts are ignored and the people get nothing, the media over it an onto the Kardashians, lol. There's never going to be a bike plan unless the next guy does it. So umm... bring on the next guy, and the one after, and maybe, maybe we'll get lucky and something will happen by accident.

CarltonGlub
CarltonGlub

I'm all for holding the city's feet to the fire on bike issues, but what is this article even about? The author tries to tackle too many subjects in one piece that it's hard to parse any one of them. It just comes off as another generic LA Weekly Everything-The-City-Does-Is-Bad pieces. At least it should if you're paying attention to the issues.

drops1
drops1

I saw someone get hit by a car today,only to see the driver get out of the car and try and beat up the bike rider.

#thisWouldOfNeverHappenIf there where bike lanes

Philip
Philip

probably find a different source of fuel by the time this is done. it will b obsolete before its done

El Barto
El Barto

The best fuel that could be used is human energy. Not only is it cheap, it's healthy for the environment AND for the body itself. Obesity would not be a problem for Americans if they simply worked for their transportation. Studies are saying that the obesity epidemic will reach 40% in the near future. Can you imagine the cost of healthcare for all the tubbo's being carted around in giant SUV's? This country is seriously screwed. Lots of fat people plaguing the healthcare system. Done. over.

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city