Top

news

Stories

 

Los Angeles CRA Creates Blight

On June 2, Mid-City resident Peter Porte walked into his backyard to greet the morning. From the ridge where his home sits, he looked out on the Hollywood Hills. On June 3, Porte walked into his backyard to greet the morning. He looked out on a towering concrete wall — an ugly surprise from the L.A. Community Redevelopment Agency and private developer CIM Group.

His next-door neighbor on 16th Place, Robert Portillo, says, "The second we saw what was going on, we started making phone calls. Everybody was calling like crazy."

The before-and-after photos, which ran on KCAL 9/CBS 2 and at laweekly.com last week, are shocking — an example of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA/L.A.) creating rather than removing blight in a residential neighborhood.

Ten years ago, the Los Angeles Planning Commission approved protective wording to assure that homes on 16th Place — which looked over the top of the 70-foot-tall Sears below their ridge — still would have sweeping views after a new development rose.

But this month CIM Group, in just hours, installed a "tilt-up" wall — the backside of a Lowe's Home Improvement Center and another big-box store. The wall towers far above the demolished 70-foot-tall Sears.

CIM Group's MidTown Crossing complex doesn't merely wipe out views, it ruins a neighborhood by creating a foreboding, prisonlike backdrop.

Critics who have seen the before-and-after shots say they are among the worst in the annals of L.A.'s density wars.

Robert P. Silverstein, an attorney specializing in land-use litigation against government, says it looks as if the neighborhood is "inside a penitentiary. ... It looks like the Berlin Wall ... obnoxious, offensive." Attorney David Bell, president of the East Hollywood Neighborhood Council, calls it "crazy" and "really something."

Neighbor Denise White says she called Councilman Herb Wesson's office four times with no response. Since the wall appeared, White says, "I really can't stand my neighborhood."

This week, staffers for City Planner Michael LoGrande — LoGrande was unavailable — insisted they do not know what happened. They were still looking into it five days after the controversy was aired on TV.

LoGrande is the former city zoning administrator whose office approved 90 percent of developers' requests for variances and conditional-use permits. His approach allowed many outsized developments in and near residential neighborhoods.

How did it happen this time?

Ten years ago, on April 12, 2001, the L.A. City Planning Commission formally agreed that new development on the Sears site would "not cast shadows on or adversely affect the privacy, views or aesthetics of any residential property" nearby.

At the time, that development was to include a Home Depot and a Costco. It was restricted to 68 feet in height, two feet lower than the old Sears — as measured from the ground level along Pico Boulevard.

Somewhere along the way, that Planning Commission vote was ignored, reinterpreted — or quietly tossed out.

Edward Johnson, assistant chief deputy to Councilman Wesson, confirms to L.A. Weekly that "The correct height limit for the construction project is 68 feet from grade at Pico Boulevard."

Had CIM Group followed the rule, the roof of the Lowe's complex would be, as the Planning Commission agreed in 2001, "at approximately the same elevation" as the ridge of land on which the homes sit. Residents would look out over MidTown Crossing's roofline, just as they looked out over Sears.

That's not what was built on June 2.

The huge tilt-up structure was erected in such a way that it towers over 16th Place, and homeowners say they cannot see over the building's roof, even from their upstairs windows.*

In a twist that nobody at the CRA could explain to the Weekly, CIM Group — a close friend of politicians at City Hall, and a frequent recipient of subsidies from the CRA and City Council — was allowed to change the carefully hammered-out 2001 plan.

Wesson's aide Johnson, approached at City Hall by the Weekly, said he could only comment via a prepared statement. Johnson then sent a response in which he vaguely refers to a "lot line adjustment" granted to CIM Group in June 2006 that was "not appealed" by neighbors.

But a day later Johnson emailed the Weekly to concede that his office didn't know if the "adjustment" was how CIM Group got around the Planning Commission's 2001 vote.

Wesson pushed in May for City Council approval of a $19.2 million loan to help wealthy CIM Group finish MidTown Crossing. Only council members Dennis Zine and Paul Krekorian criticized the loan.

Neighbors all along 16th Place are baffled and furious. None was informed that the original deal, and their quality of living, were in jeopardy. Porte says with disgust: "Why would we appeal when [we believed] there was no problem?"

Redevelopment critic and attorney Christopher Sutton says it's "most likely to be a CRA screwup." He speculates, "Somebody gave the developer permission — and didn't [read] the original agreement."

David Bloom, public affairs consultant to CRA/L.A. chief Christine Essel, huffs, "You're asking the wrong department. This is an issue between the Planning Department and Building & Safety." He adds, "I heard it was only one couple [on 16th Place] that's upset."

1 | 2 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
19 comments
porte
porte

Safety starts with making use of door in our property or in operate place. So we are able to say placing the door in property is basic step of safety. At times your protection is as part of your hand. If you are making use of security

Steve
Steve

Nate Holden is a moron. It's a shame how this deadbeat ex-councilman who never lived in his own district got a great building dedicated to him that the city cannot even afford to use. If this retread had any civic pride or dignity, he would donate a portion of his retirement to help operate and program the Art Center on Washington for the people that he screwed over for years. He has no right to renig on his promise from ten years ago or lie about the Sears building at Midtown to be an obstruction; it never was. That building was an historic art deco icon that was raped repeatedly by his office for multi-faceted swap meet, low-rent retail hoodwinkery until the last bits of it were finally demolished. Midtown Sears, in its glory, was a landmark where you could sit on the roof and overlook most of the entire city, East, North, and West. Neighbors to the South could do the same because IT WAS NOT IN THE WAY of their view to the North. Not at all. You could see clear over it in all directions. Holden is lying through his chipped dentures when he denies this FACT. As was expclaimed in his last election "No more Holden on!" Why would you even quote this liar?? Oh. that's right. You are the LA Weekly.

Ran Fleming
Ran Fleming

The abolition of the CRA is long overdue. The CRA is responsible for most of the development blight proposed for downtown L.A.—such as the billboard buildings, the removal of affordable housing and the "Broken Windows" approach to Skid Row that does nothing but move the problem elsewhere for future over-priced development. Moreover, the blight that surrounds City Hall continues to be allowed.The L.A. Weekly is commended for covering this and related stories (such as the LAPD building land-grab and the L.A. Reflections scandal). Such stories should be widely covered and by every newspaper. If only the developer-friendly downtown "news"paper would have the backbone to investigate the CRA and all its corruption in its very backyard. Too bad Sue Laris & Co. won't dare to upset the CRA, Eli Broad, et al.

David_Barron
David_Barron

Come on Governor Jerry Brown, show some of your dad's spine. Abolish the corrupt CRA ! And, distribute that $1Billion dollars where it was intended; city repairs, Schools, Fire and Police.

David_Barron
David_Barron

Curious? Did John and Ken radio show sell-out--and that's why they didn't promote Walter Moore for Mayor, like they're promoting Craig Huey for Congress? Perhaps by now the CRA would have been exposed and buried. And 'antonio' could have sailed off into the sunset, and we wouldn't be in this mess. Deplorable !

Tony Klein
Tony Klein

I've lived and worked in LA all my life That's 60 years. Nothing creates blight like a lack of jobs. I'm sorry that this small group is having their lifestyle altered. They should be compensated. I agree If they don''t work things out with the developer ...well that's what the courts are for Why is this an issue?

What's important is that the neighborhood is getting serviced by company's that are still willing to risk money at all. . I'm sure you've noticed that things aren't so good right now for all of us.

I would have liked to have seen photos the peoples view of the old Sears building ..I seem to remember that building sat empty and blighted for 10 or 15 years. How come LA Weekly didn't show pictures of that view?. That neighborhood is blue collar working class. Last I noticed, they aren't a prime demographic.Stop bitching and count your blessings. They are getting jobs and development in an area thats been blighted t for years. Nothing to see here .Move along. Let's talk about making more jobs so we can grow out of this hole.

Adrianna Jackson
Adrianna Jackson

I smell major lawsuit. Another perfect example of how our government can waste money on stupidity.

Katy
Katy

You get what you vote for.

Michael Rose
Michael Rose

Great piece. I drove by the wall last week and was shocked. I knew this was another example of redevelopment run amok. Thanks for sorting out the chain of misdeeds and letting the residents' voices be heard.

WALL=BAD
WALL=BAD

I love the first paragraph of this story.

anonymous
anonymous

City Hall politicians; CRA; CIM and Planning Department equal a toxic mix that create blight in neighborhoods.

rickabrams
rickabrams

The people in Hollywood who voted for La Bonge got screwed as he increased the pace of CRA destruction. It looks like the same occurred with Wesson.

The question becomes: If you vote for greedy crooks to represent you, what do you expect?

The Governor and everyone else in Sacramento just screwed the people again with a fraudulent abolition of the CRA's. All the CRA's has to do is bribe Sacramento with $1.7 Billion, which money the CRA has taken from us in the first place, in order to get $5 Billion more dollars this year alone.

The people on 16th Street like the people in The Oaks, whose homes can burn to the ground for lack of adequate fire protection, will do nothing except bitch and moan -- but they won't do anything to stop the CRA's from bribing Sacramento with the homeowners' own money so that the CRA's come back stronger and more destructive than ever.

James Mccuen
James Mccuen

You raise a good point. CRA/LA may come back - Sacramento Republicans fought hard to save it and the Democrats happily supported the compromise.

In LA, despite the budget problems, the Mayor and City Council will have no problem coming up with $70 million the first year and $30 million on years going forward. That is what they have in common with Sacramento Republicans - They want to protect their wealthy developer buddies like CIM Group and AEG.

dcbsky
dcbsky

Yeah James, those Republicans in Sacramento rule the roost. Uh huh, sure....

James McCuen
James McCuen

You will just have to follow the entitlement trail to see when this change in grade measurement was made.

Friend of 16th Street Folks
Friend of 16th Street Folks

This is really terrible. I support the homeowners 200%. CRA should be thinking about the quality of life in a neighborhood and not just commercial interests.

I grew up in that neighborhood and always loved the view from 16th Street. I was a little pocket of the beauty of L.A. in a neighborhood that was turning the wrong way. Now that the neighborhood is back on the path of renovation, this horrible wall certainly won't help things progress.

I think Lowe's or anything else that takes over this space should be boycotted until the wall is lowered and the local politicians should be made to serve the people of the community and not just the whims of some wealthy developer who goes home to some wealthy neighborhood to enjoy his view.

Frawsty
Frawsty

We need to cut the ability for politicians to piss our money away. Abolish the LA-CRA, another way politicians fill their pockets with money, and another huge waste of taxpayer dollars. Take that money and either pay the city debt, or give it back to the people to spend on the necessities of life.

James McCuen
James McCuen

On Friday, July 1, 2011, the LA City Council will be discussing having a study done to consider one of two options proposed by the Governor's Approval of AB1X-26 and AB1X-27.

They City can "opt-in" and keep the CRA (under AB1X-27) or let the CRA die (under AB1X-26). I say opt for 26.

rickabrams
rickabrams

Kill the CRA's. Under AB1X-27, the local CRA's will use $1.7 Billion of our property tax dollars to bribe Sacramento so that the CRA's become stronger and stronger. They have Kelo power of eminent domain which means that take private property and give it to the private real estate developers to construct the garbage like the 16th street people see.

It is ironic that the "16th Street Wall" is constructed with property tax dollars to block the views of the property owners. On the other hand, they supported Wesson so why are they complaining. Did they think that Wesson would only screw the poor people over whose homes they looked as if they did not exist? Kind of ironic justice.

 
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city