Top

news

Stories

 

L.A.'s top cop, Marshal Francis Baker, was new to the job. Baker testified before the coroner's inquest that he arrived at the scene just as Thompson was shot. He deputized an ad hoc collection of men to surround the Coronel Building.

His purpose, he said, was to prevent the escape of those involved in the shooting. But it goes without saying that recruiting guards from among the rabble who frequented the Alley was a questionable decision.

Baker's next action was even stranger. With gunfire ringing out behind him, he went home to bed, leaving the mob in charge.

Police did little, as was evident by the actions of the two officers with probably the most experience, Emil Harris and George Gard. Both had proved their bravery during the Mexican bandit wars. Harris helped capture the dashing Tiburcio Vasquez, and the Star said he and Gard were "hard to beat on either a warm or cold trail."

But on this night, these brave officers loitered near hay scales at the corner of Los Angeles and Arcadia streets, a half-block from the trouble. Harris took custody of one fleeing Chinese man. But when he was surrounded and the victim wrenched from him by the mob, Harris simply returned to his post, later saying he was unaware that any Chinese people had been hanged.

Harris and Gard said they eventually worked their way to Yuen's store, where they stood guard for much of the night. Even this was a wasted effort, because the mob had already looted the store and Yuen's trunk.

As they stood their pointless vigil, it is likely they had one thing on their minds: reward. Both men were allied with Yuen. Just days before the riot, one newspaper reported they had received nice presents from him.

Historians have argued that no one could expect poorly trained police to stand up to an armed mob of hundreds. It's more likely, however, that police, fatally compromised by their secret deals with Chinese companies and accustomed to letting vigilantes do their deeds, simply stood aside and let the mob do its customary work.

The argument that police were powerless that night was put to the lie by Robert Widney, a former schoolteacher who helped found the University of Southern California. His technique, he wrote years later in papers preserved at the Huntington Library, was to sidle up to a mobster, yank him by the collar, shove the barrel of his pistol into the man's throat and whisper: "Get out or I'll kill you." Widney managed to save four or five Chinese people.

As the mob did its vile work, a crowd of observers gathered along the route of execution to watch. According to later accounts, some of the city's leading citizens were seen cheering on the killers.

Among them was H.M. Mitchell, a reporter for the Star. A future leader in Democratic party politics, Mitchell would serve a term as sheriff before marrying into the wealthy Glassell family and becoming a gentleman farmer and collector of Western antiquities.

A member of the crowd heard Mitchell yelling, "Hang him."

Harris Newmark, one of the most respected members of the business community, wrote years later that he heard a shot as he left work that night. Walking over to Los Angeles Street, he learned that Thompson had been killed.

Newmark said he went home to supper "expecting no further trouble."

The statement strains belief. By the time the mob learned Thompson had died, its blood was up. Given L.A.'s record of vigilantism, it didn't require much imagination to foresee what would come next.

The mood of the city, from the best to the worst, was that it was time for the Chinese to learn their lesson. As one survivor of the massacre said, according to news accounts: "When Melican man gettee mad, he damned fool. [He] killee good Chinaman allee same bad Chinaman."

The massacre finally was brought to an end by Sheriff James Burns, a colorful figure known as "Daddy" to the gamblers and whores. He pleaded that if just 25 volunteers from the crowd of onlookers stood with him, he could stop the mob. He soon was hoisted on the shoulders of the crowd and carried into the alley — and the murderers faded into the night.

By 11 p.m., the bars were going great guns as the mob slaked its thirst. At J.H. Weldon's, a man with blood on his hands and shirt bellied up to the bar with a boast: "Well, I am satisfied now. I have killed three Chinamen."

In the aftermath of the massacre, expressions of horror and disgust rained down on the city from around the world.

It was a public relations disaster for a town that was desperate to attract a rail link that was expected to, and did, bring thousands of Anglos to Southern California to sweep away what was left of the Spanish Californio culture.

City fathers believed nothing must discourage those passengers from coming. So they had very good reason to downplay the massacre as a spontaneous outbreak of rage against a hated minority.

<< Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | All | Next Page >>
 
My Voice Nation Help
30 comments
KV
KV

Thank you very much for the article, which I just happened to stumble across. Being an Old West reseaercher, Los Angeles history for some reason always excaped me. Police corruption is sad but also fascinating. Coincidentally my latest project was gathering info about Adolfo de Celis - aka Adolfo Celis. Internet led me to this article, which mentions him at age 20 involved with police, and the massacre. Question: Please help me understand how Gard might want Celis dead, a dozen years after the fact?Best regards, K.V.

ShameTrain
ShameTrain

being a bit of a historian of this sad collision of 60 towns in search of a city, I greatly appreciated this article.

What I could not appreciate was the subtle white-washing of the name of the street in which so much forgotten history occurred. It is a bad habit which is indicative of the boosterism (a characteristic which Morrow May, in his 1933 book "Los Angeles" described as "[L.A.] is, and has been since 1888, a commodity; something to be advertised and sold to the people of the United States like automobiles, cigarettes and mouth wash") that defines L.A. in misnaming a street that needs to be known for what it was despite the pain it may recall. Calle de Los Negros was not called "Negro Alley." It was called Nigger Alley.

zqxz
zqxz

Finally (48 hours) time limit to buy.

LV Muffler $ 5.99LV Bags $ 19.9 LV Wallet $ 6.55Armani Glasses $ 5.99LV Belt $ 6.9

Buy addresses---- tntn.usTips (48 hours after the special product is invalid)

ChrisL
ChrisL

People say Mao was bad, but he only killed 40,000,000 Chinese (give or take five million).

John Johnson Jr.
John Johnson Jr.

The broad outlines of the massacre have certainly been written about, at most length by Paul De Falla in 1959. It's a historical event. Of course it's been written about. Much of the description of the day of the massacre in our article is based on original newspaper accounts of the day. It's possible to go to the library, as I did, and spend months re-reading those accounts and putting the narrative together. De Falla is the only one I know who also did this and subsequently published his account. Over the years, the LA Times did several pieces, but they were general and in no depth. De Falla's article appeared in a historical quarterly, not a general interest publication, so the vast majority of readers would not have had access to even the bare facts of the event. Additionally, no book had ever been written about the massacre. So bringing these events to light for the general public would have been a service, I contend, even if that's all we did. But we went much further. No publication that I've seen, and I've seen them all, went to the lengths we did in researching both the primary actors involved and the events that led up to the massacre and followed it. Bilderrain's reputation for mischief, Yo Hing's subsequent revenge murder, Celis' and Mitchell's strange deaths, the testimony at the civil trial, the use of an important civic building to debate the fate of Lachenais, to name a few details, had never been written about before. Additionally, we turned up documents long thought to be lost, from the civil court trial testimony to the original indictments, from Judge Widney's remembrances to those of Sheriff Burns, which were only recently donated to the Huntington. The indictments are key because they show that not one important person was indicted for their role in the massacre. I researched DA Cameron Thom's papers to put together a portrait of a man so dedicated to the southern cause that he left his law practice and volunteered for the South. This was key to our assessment that the most powerful people in Los Angeles were united in their attitudes and beliefs, key to any effort to let the most guilty go free. We also added material about the woman at the heart of the incident that was only recently discovered by historian Scott Zesch. Finally, we took it a step further and made the most convincing case yet that the best citizens were involved. While there had been rumors and speculation about this in the aftermath of the riot, no one marshaled the evidence we did. Additionally, we had the remarks from Doyce Nunis, considered the best expert on the Massacre. He, at least, was so impressed with what we found (I sent him an early copy) that he consented to an interview, after first declining, despite being very ill. In fact, he recently died.

LA History Buff
LA History Buff

If you want to know more about this incident read the essay about it in The Blackwell Companion to Los Angeles. This recent collection was edited by William Deverell, a history prof at USC. The essay to read is "The Anti Chinese Massacre and Its Strange Career" by Victor Jew. It's pretty sophisticated and it's the most recent scholarly essay about the mass killing. Victor Jew has a Ph.D. in U.S. history and he grew up in L.A.'s Chinatown so he brings some interesting insights to this story. You can also access it on the web. Just Google "Anti Chinese Massacre and its Strange Career" Victor Jew.

Angela Garcia as NeonMosfet
Angela Garcia as NeonMosfet

Given the time frame, none of these events is remarkable. Most of the guilty were probably good Christians. They would have to be. In 1871, they could look forward to a lifespan of 40 years, an improvement of the 30, allotted them, during the revolution. God was good; God was great. Even so, death was all about. In 1871, the maternal mortality rate was still at 35%. Most surgery was a death sentence. They didn't know that by washing their hands, they could eliminate a lot of fatal disease. Apparently, they did make the connection, that they could wash their hands of the lynch mob.

But if God were great and God were good, why were all the good people struck down by, pneumonia, mumps, measles, malaria, yellow fever,TB, and typhoid? Because there were devils. Darwin was new and dangerous. Freud, they had not yet met. All those suffragettes turning the heart of Satan. Oh mother, the End of the World was at hand. The rocking of the cradle of the Anti Christ had begun. The world was about to stop spinning.

For all of it to have validity, they had to have their devils. Because, they could not pray any harder. They could not behave any more saintly. And they were still dying of the common colds.Their children were born with cleft palates, and suffered from rickets, and tuberculosis, and died in their cribs, from fevers that sucked their breath as they slept. There had to be some sort of Satanic force. The Appocolypse was at hand. They might have accused the native population, except, they vanquished that population, often in the name of their Savior. Their children continued to die. They rarely saw old age.

The Chinese were new. I can not believe they were lynched because it was convenient. That's too modern.That's friendly fire. That's collateral damage. That's somebody-fucked-up-and-no one-can-figure-out-how-to-pass-the-buck.They still didn't know what a micro-organism was. It would be too much to expect them to make the quantum leap, that persons not of their racial group, were simply that. Persons who were born and died for their own reasons, rather than to balance the life and death equation of the ruling class. It would be twenty years before Sigmund Freud would say, " A woman is a woman, but a cigar is a good smoke." As bad as that was, it was an improvement over the lynch mob.

That all this made the front page of the New York Times is remarkable. In 18 years, a monster would be born, spreading his carnage well into the twentieth century, along side, the human race's first attempts to open the door to Earth and take a walk out side amongst the stars. Perhaps, that made him a bigger monster than even he could have imagined. He emerged at a time when the human race was supposed to know better. He eliminated eleven million and that would be upstaged by an event so horrific, it would happen only once. Right now, we pray the Tsunami did not reawaken it.

What is the point? Just look at yourself, and tell yourself that you were born for your own reason. You are no one's god, nor any one's devil. No one hates you and you never caused any of the shit to fall from the sky. It just happened.

Angela Garcia as NeonMosfet

Kevin
Kevin

This story is reckless, hysterical, driven by histrionics, just plain bad...40 murders in a 6-month stretch represents the worst homicide rate in American history, for the same period of time? Are you kidding? That's a typical weekend's worth of murders, right? Doesn't make sense. The whole thing is beyond ludicrous - I mean, sure, this happened, but that's about all that's true here. The rest is bad writing and worse editing, an embarrassment. Seriously.

CanuckBuck
CanuckBuck

Read these books:

Jean Pfaelzer, Driven OutJohn Kuo WeiTchen, New York Before ChinatownIrish Chang, The Chinese In AmericaErika Lee, At America's Gate

DHeikes
DHeikes

Rob, you are correct about Harris. The sentence should have said that "Harris later helped capture...." The point wasn't to provide a chronology. It was to give Harris his due as a brave man, which he demonstrated before the Massacre and after. Drex HeikesEditorLA Weekly

rob
rob

I researched this period extensively and wrote a story about it for Los Angeles magazine many years ago. Some of the facts are just wrong. One that leapt out: the author said Harris developed had reputation based on having captured the bandit Vasquez, but that happened in 1874, three years after the massacre.

There are also many accounts of Harris acting heroically during the massacre until he was overwhelmed by the mob. Don't forget, he at least grabbed his gun and went to confront them-- the sheriff did not.

Flykuni
Flykuni

Negro Alley is actually the nicer name, the location was commonly called "N----- Alley."

Rob -- "...Interesting yarn, though I know nothing of this case. With the problems cited by apparently more knowledgeable commenters I'll have to suspend judgment until something definitive is written. Of course, history is elucidated by t he victors/survivors and so we will never hear the accounts of the Chinese killed in this incident and just what happened to each individually."

Not a yarn, it's history -- like you we won't know the other side because we can't. Have to believe the other side's POV was be horrific. Uncounted numbers of Chinese men were killed in the 1800s throughout the West.

Basic fact is that there was a race riot. And there may have been more victims than the 18 mentioned.

RobE
RobE

"The bloodlust was not only in the men. A woman who ran a boardinghouse across the street from Goller's shop volunteered clothesline to be cut up for nooses.

"Hang them," she screamed.

A boy came running from a dry goods shop. "Here's a rope," he called helpfully."

Ah, the gentility of the 19th century.

Interesting yarn, though I know nothing of this case. With the problems cited by apparently more knowledgeable commenters I'll have to suspend judgment until something definitive is written. Of course, history is elucidated by t he victors/survivors and so we will never hear the accounts of the Chinese killed in this incident and just what happened to each individually.

JamesW
JamesW

Well John, after reading your story a second time, I can see most of your 'new facts' are merely conjecture, and you have left out some very critical facts that are relevant to the impetus of the riot. According to Dorland's account, "One old man when told to get inside the house, pulled his pistol and emptied its contents at the crowd indiscriminately." Referring to a Chinese man on the porch of the Colonel Adobe. And "After some twenty-five or thirty shots had been fired, it was discovered that Bilderrain was shot in the shoulder, a boy named Juan Jose Mendible was shot in the leg, and a man by the name of Joe was shot in the hip." And the New York Times reported on November 4, 1871, 'It was in fact known that a number of Chinamen had arrived by the last steamers from San Francisco, for the purpose of taking an active part in a great fight to come off between the parties. And it is also stated that they had purchased all the small arms they could find in the city. The officers at once endeavored to make arrests; but one party of the Chinese immediately turned upon the officers, discharged their weapons point blank at them, then fled into their dens."

manny miles
manny miles

"Negro Ally"? I think a closer translation would be "dark street" or "Streets of darkness" for "Calle de los negros." The word 'negro' in Spanish means a color - black, and 'negroe' is an English word if I'm not mistaking. I don't think the street had the name 'negros' not 'negroes' in it. I'm sure there's plenty of other wrong, and left out, facts on this story. And yeah, most Spaniards are 'white' Europeans, just as dark Italians and Portuguese are...

gustavoarellano
gustavoarellano

Explain "negrito" then...and "negro" comes from Spanish, via Latin--read my column!

bradywestwater
bradywestwater

I'm not certain how much new information there is in this article since much of it repeats past conjectures and conflicting claims that date back to this incident, but I would love to see some documentation on what is supposed to be the newly discovered information. And the photograph that claims to be of LA at the time of the 1871 incident needs to be retitled. It is at least 30, maybe even 40 years later as can be told by the telephone poles, the clothes the man is wearing and the fact that the Upper Room MIssion in the building did not exist until the 20th Century.

JamesW
JamesW

I agree. I am in the middle of researching this subject and I only see a few new trivial facts here. I also disagree that Bilderrain rode a horse, since horse were'nt in normal use for law men until 1875. And the only reference to Belderrain being mounted was a 1999 article in the LA Times that was more fiction than fact.

Brandon
Brandon

My Name is Brandon Bilderrain and Jesus Bilderrain was my Great Great Great uncle and his brother Ygnacio in the story is my great great great Grandfather. I would love to just know the truth on what REALLY happened. Still would like to know what happened to Jesus. This Column doesnt speak too highly of the Bilderrains but i guess they were mixed up into some bad stuff.

Guest
Guest

I am a Chinese American living in LA. This story just makes me sick to my stomach! I feel the City of LA should formally apologize to the Chinese community, and establish a memorial for the 18 Chinese murdered. That's the minimum that should be done -- so future generation will remember the incredible anti-Chinese racism that once existed in the City of LA.

mbcao17
mbcao17

Humanity Fail. We should all kill ourselves to make homo-sapiens extinct. Hopefully, another species of animals would evolve into better stewards of this rare and precious gift called life. Obviously it is not just the White race, Black race or Chinese race but the human race that is at fault. Do the universe a favor and neuter/spay yourself!

Bdennis44
Bdennis44

This is absurd. Spaniards are not "dark-skinned". Spain is in western europe and spaniards are whiter than most americans today. This reporting sucks. Spaniards are as dark-skinned as germans are. This is just one detail, but the entire report suffers from a complete lack of logic an accuracy on basic facts. Too bad, since the story deserves to be told, and told at least decently.

gustavoarellano
gustavoarellano

You obviously never saw a picture of Pio Pico...

oss.jodi.org
oss.jodi.org

Dear Goober, Pio Pico was of European, Indian and African descent.

Dark Spanierd
Dark Spanierd

Some Spanierds are dark because they have North African blood since The Moors reigned in that region for a very long time. Javier Bardem and Monica Cruz are hardly German or Aryan looking... before you judge, do your research.

 
Loading...