Top

news

Stories

 

Parent Trigger Gets Gibson Law Firm

Powerful firms offer parents free help taking over a Compton School

If the Parent Trigger battle in Compton gets much uglier, attorneys for Compton Unified School District will face two powerhouse law firms in court: Kirkland & Ellis and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, which American Lawyer magazine named 2010 Litigation Department of the Year, jumped into the fray this week, agreeing to work pro bono for Parent Revolution, which organized Compton parents to gather enough signatures to take over McKinley Elementary School under a new California law.

Kirkland & Ellis, one of the largest law firms in the U.S., also is lending its considerable power to the reformers' side, agreeing to work pro bono for McKinley Parents for Change, a group of parents who signed the Parent Trigger petition. Those parents are furious that Compton officials are challenging their signatures and trying to stop them from launching a makeover at substandard McKinley Elementary.

The parents have opted to turn McKinley into a charter school. Compton officials vociferously oppose charters, and no charter has ever been allowed inside Compton.

Jay Lefkowitz, senior partner at Kirkland & Ellis, says the firm decided to represent McKinley Parents for Change because "this is a historic moment in American education reform. ... This is about giving parents the power to fight for their children for a better education."

The two firms join other seasoned political figures who are taking on the Compton school leaders. "We're ready to go all the way to the [California] Supreme Court," says Parent Revolution Executive Director Ben Austin, a former aide to President Bill Clinton.

The Parent Trigger law was authored by former Democratic state Sen. Gloria Romero, who fought her own party in Sacramento for months to pass it. The law lets parents demand — and then launch — major changes at chronically failing schools if they can gather signatures from 51 percent of the school's parents.

In Compton, organizers collected 60 percent of McKinley parents' signatures. Compton School Board President Satra D. Zurita, Vice President Margie Garrett, acting superintendent Karen Frison and others reacted by playing political hardball.

They are trying to force McKinley Elementary parents — many of whom are immigrants and may fear deportation — to meet Compton school authorities in person, bringing "photo identification" to prove they signed the petition. The highly unusual demand is being denounced as invasive and unconstitutional.

Attorney Lefkowitz says, "[Compton Unified officials] appear to be inventing a whole new law, something very different from what the elected officials voted on. ... I hope they will back down from these activities because it's incumbent on them to obey the law. It's time for education reform to take a natural route. Unfortunately, Compton Unified may force this into the courts."

On Monday, Romero said Compton officials are making it far harder for parents' signatures to be honored than it is to prove eligibility to vote for the president of the United States. She declared: "It's not about verification! It is purely about disenfranchisement."

Romero joined six Compton Latino and black mothers at a press conference where they attacked Compton Unified leaders, who are being led by Frison and Zurita.

Theresa Theus, a black mother, said, "I'm very angry, upset and frustrated. I don't know what kind of trick this is."

Lorena Bautista, a Latino mother, added, "What the district is doing is very wrong. They're violating our rights."

Romero warned that California Gov. Jerry Brown and the state Board of Education should "honor the spirit and intent of the law."

But Brown's controversial new school board might not agree. Days ago, Brown removed from the California Board of Education several outspoken reformers who strongly backed the Parent Trigger law and charter schools, including Austin.

It's unknown whether Brown's much safer appointees to the state school board will stand up to the California Teachers Association, which nearly stopped the Parent Trigger law from being approved and has fought for years against charter schools.

 
My Voice Nation Help
8 comments
Bob
Bob

So the latest check from Bill Gates and the Walton family cleared, eh Patrick?

When do you officially go to work as Parent Revolution's PR?

Awkt2002
Awkt2002

if the students at this school were doing so poorly for so long. it"s not just the school's fault. maybe it will be better to let someone else have a chance at it. maybe these parents will finally show some kind of accountability.

mwalimu
mwalimu

Patrick Range MacDonald conveniently forgets Miller's law. "The success of a charter school is directly proportional to the number of students it rejects and the length of its waiting list." According to the law, McKinley Avenue Charter will have to accept everyone. Therefore, it will only be a matter of time before people realize that their "charter" school is just a public school with a fancy name - except that teachers get lousy salaries and no fringe benefits.

This prospect, of course, opens up all sorts of possibilities. If a charter school gets ADA money from the state, if it pays its teachers miserable wages - what happens to the extra money, the money that was intended for teachers' salaries? Supposing the charter decides to submit embellished enrollment or to open on-line schools with phantom students? Who gets the money? Remember, charter schools have no obligations for transparency. If you have hundreds of charter schools and a slashed state budget, you will not be able to pay many auditors. Furthermore, if what happens if you stack the state school board with charter school operators and operatives?

L A Weekly definitely needs to read the article "School for Scoundrels" by Stephanie Mencimer, published both in the Huffington Post and Mother Jones Magazine. They should read the back files of their own publications, which features an exposé on a charter school by Howard Blume. And bear in mind, we are talking Compton, which is famous , or should I say, infamous for bribery and corruption. (I should know, I grew up in that area.)

Maybe CTA has a good reason to oppose charter schools, especially in places like Compton.

Bob
Bob

Actually, the new charter school only has to guarantee acceptance of CURRENT students. They can reject any new students they (don't) like.

CarolineSF
CarolineSF

Why would these law firms work pro bono on behalf of an organization funded by some of the world's wealthiest individuals, including Bill Gates, Eli Broad and the Walton family of Wal-mart fame? What an interesting concept, serving pro bono to attack a struggling, impoverished school district on behalf of a privatization drive funded by billionaires.

Suemago2
Suemago2

Charter schools are not private they are public.

La_teacher_guy
La_teacher_guy

Sue,

I keep hearing that mantra, "Charter schools are public schools. They're just a different kind of public school."

What a bunch o' baloney.

1) "Public" means accountable to the "public".

2) "Public" means transparent to the "public."

3) "Public" means ultimately controlled by the "public"---i.e. via democratically elected school boards, who can be voted in, voted out, or recalled if they "public" no longer believes they are doing what the public wills it to do.

Charters schools---particularly the chains---do none of these three.

CarolineSF
CarolineSF

No. Charter schools are private operations funded with public money.

 
©2013 LA Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Los Angeles

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city