-
04/16/2011 5:13:00 PM
Exceptional choice Detroit leaders made during the early-1980s recession, and from which its cultural core seems never to have recovered.
-
01/29/2011 10:24:00 PM
The World can appreciate LA's great library system and the people who run them - It is truly a benefit for all - Its too bad the Mayor and his wanabee replacements - Eric Garcetti, Wendy Greuel, Jan Perry, are infatuated by some weird Phallic Complex of hi rise development.
It was sad to watch the City Council during the week of Jan 24, 2011 break its own rules (and the Brown Act) by going off topic to sing the praises of Redevelopment dollars and the good it does as they approved $52 million for Eli Broad's pet project.
Garcetti is quick to the punch on shutting the likes of Zuma Dogg, Matt Dowd, and John Walsh, he did nothing to stop this love-fest (in fact joining them) of Developer subsidies and gifts to Billionaires while our librarys are shutting down, our Fire Stations are facing Brownouts, and our infrastructure is crumbling.
What Garcetti (the smart one) and his collegues like Tom La Bonge (the dumb one) do is offer the public FALSE CHOICES and only two - Either you support our corrupt implementation of California's Redevelopment Law or you give up jobs and prosperity.
Well guess what?: You aren't required to participate in Redevelopment, but LA did starting in the 40s with the destruction of a Latino Neighborhood in Chavez Ravine. What the smart ones know and what the Dumb Ones (La Bonge, Koretz, etc) should know is that there is never a FREE LUNCH. Property Tax dollars are finite and Redevelopment Tax Increment Spending on Redevelopment Bonds (contributing to massive debts) and gifts to CIM Group and deals with Crooks takes away from schools and critical services.
So when the legislature or even the voters add another assesment to Property Taxes, don't blame Prop 13, blame Redevelopment and other wasteful spending.
The voters need to wake up and exercise their own control and power over these knuckleheads before LA collapses - Vote out the incumbent LA City Councilmembers in the even-numbered seats.
Or just face more of the same corruption.
-
michele 12/06/2010 7:48:00 PM
Wealthy people don't need libraries or their services, they either have their own, or use the ones at their ivy league universities. The mere 97 comments on this article evidences the utter disinterest of most angelenos, we just aren't willing to fight losers like Villaraigosa over the importance of our libraries.. who elected this bird-brain anyway? There's plenty of 'fat' in the mayor's budget, mostly on his own @ss.
-
Christine Trzyna 09/29/2010 4:12:00 AM
I use and blog on Los Angeles Public Library often and will be linking to this article. With no library service on Sundays or Mondays, and Tuesday opening at 12:30 PM, it may not surprise that there are lines waiting outside for the opening. Job seekers and others who use the Internet rush towards the computer terminals. It's competitive! We must face the fact that libraries are now not just repositories of media but social centers, providing senior citizens and latch-key children a place to go.
-
Judith Hallet 09/24/2010 2:46:00 PM
Fabulous report. I can't believe that in these times of economic downturn, they would be closing libraries. The library is the heart of a city. Los Angeles needs its libraries.
-
Terry K 09/23/2010 2:47:00 AM
Our honorable Mayor's priorities are clearly at odds with the needs of the community. This is no secret.
I find it alarming that that some commenters, while claiming they don't trust the Mayor, mindlessly parrot what he says about our own city employees. I would like to set the record straight.
It is true that city employees can retire with 100% of their pay. They have to work 47 years to get this. The city’s early retirement program last year eliminated many of these people. The average pension they got is $39,000 a year.
If $39,000 a year sounds too high, consider that these people are not all street maintenance workers. They include many attorneys, accountants, scientists, and engineers whose pensions are above the $39K. The regular guys you see working hot asphalt in the summer get a lot less than $39K.
Before you criticize these folks, imagine yourself starting city work at age 23, working in the street until you are 70, retiring to the “luxury” of dining on food from the 99-cent store, and reading comments that blame you or your union for the Mayor’s fiscal mismanagement.
-
anonyomous 09/22/2010 4:03:00 AM
Each time I read the comments, I find that they are astray from the main subject and the issue at hand. We all know that libraries play an important role and don't need more confirmation. The problem here is not the lack of funds to keep the libraries open, but rather the misallocation and misuse of funds by the City of LA. There are enough monies to keep the Mayor's staff of over 200+, mostly useless, and most making six figure salaries, and enough moneys to keep the huge Council staff, also useless, and Fire & Police, way more than needed and comprising 70% of the budget. The Mayor lives in a lavish, taxpayer funded mansion and utilizes a security detail of police officers while traveling in a huge gas guzzling SUV, courtesy of taxpayers, all the time claiming to be a "green" Mayor.
In other words, there is enough money to fund the Mayor and Council Offices, the CRA and several equally useless city departments, but little for libraries and parks. The whole intent is for you to cry out in pain and be willing to pay for bonds that will part you from your money. They will never feel the pain. You do, either way.
-
Marie 09/21/2010 2:57:00 AM
oh, that's right, 60% of gang members are Illegal!! and the $$ to fund those programs can't be traced!! so more can be siphoned off for your Mecha homies, right Antonio??!! to fund your 'Reconquista' and get 'whitey' off your land and out of 'Aztlan', right??!! oh, yeah, some us know about you and your Racism!! about your 'Viva la Raza'!! It's your calendar that ends, Antonio, not ours!! wonder what that's supposed to mean??!!
-
Shelly 09/21/2010 2:44:00 AM
One more thing: does it have anything to do w/your failing the Bar exam 4 times, Antonio??!! cause that's pathetic!! what a great role model for other latino students!! not to mention, the way the rest of the world sees you!! get a life you pathetic excuse for a human being!!
-
Shelly 09/21/2010 2:29:00 AM
Villaraigosa's an embarrassment to himself, the City of LA, and his culture!! What a moron!! get rid of the Illegals, Antonio, and there would be plenty of $$ left for the libraries!!! hmm... 'smart' pple or dumb mexicans??!! what a choice!!! Give us back our libraries Now!!!
-
Marilyn 09/20/2010 5:53:00 PM
I work as a volunteer reading to kids at my local library on Tuesdays. All summer long, the library was PACKED with kids and their parents and grandparents and siblings, reading on the rugs, reading on the benches, reading, reading, reading. The computers were full. It was (is) really the "people's university." I wish some idea could have been floated at the time of the proposed cuts for keeping them open--like adding a chance for the populace to support their libraries with a special district levy. I bet if every homeowner paid a few dollars more, we could keep them open. I also like the idea of celebrities here in the City of Angels stepping up to do fundraisers and to raise awareness. A great city has great libraries. When Pasadena's libraries were to close, the citizen's rose up to support, keeping them open with their own additional funding. Our LA citizens would do that too if anyone had asked.
-
Edward Hecker 09/20/2010 4:46:00 PM
It's nice to have public libraries. They are NOT a necessity. For years the only libraries that existed in this country were private. If people want libraries, they will fund a bond issue. They will form an government independent library organization and fund it.
The city has only so much income. People should be thankful that LA is striving to live within it's income, rather practicing unsustainable overspending. Libraries are luxuries, not necessities.
-
09/20/2010 9:54:00 AM
Vote these guys out! Speaking as a New Yorker with lots of experience with Mayor Bloomberg, this was an eye-opening story about your LA Mayor Villaraigosa. He's the highest paid mayor in the nation?! His council votes in lockstep?! Don't despair, don't get numb, good people, get active!
The thing about NY is there's lots of street activity. When the libraries were threatened last year, the librarians en masse rallied the people. We (the voters) voted out council people who didn't support our issues.
GET RID OF 'EM! YOU GOT THE POWER! USE IT!
-
Victoria M. 09/20/2010 8:51:00 AM
It's a shame that the Mayor and Tom LaBonge insist on keeping Billy the Elephant enslaved at the LA Zoo where his postage stamp sized enclosure costs $40 million just to build. The priorities in this City are backwards. The energy used to fight those of us wanting Billy to be sent to a sanctuary in Northern California was amazing. Mr. LaBonge got Big Labor to show up en masse, claiming that they NEEDED those jobs hammering the nails that will eventually become Billy's coffin (other elephants have perished at the LA Zoo due to the lack of care and neglect) as well as having zoo staff speak before Council on how THEY were the experts in elephant care (not the actual veterinarians who testified to the cruelty of keeping such a large creature in such a small space.) Shame on the Mayor and on City Council members who voted to close libraries and continue the abuse and enslavement of Billy for their own pleasure.
-
RobE 09/20/2010 4:24:00 AM
First, this article does talk about impact on library purchasing, so sorry for that mistake on my part.
But all through this article, we see the word, "spokesman" used. How about L.A. official get rid of all the public relations flacks they hire? That by itself would probably keep the libraries open 24/7. And a 50% mandatory cut in their staffs would also be a good idea. Hey L.A. Weekly, tell us how many turd polishers (p.r. spokesliars) the city and county employ.
As for the Villaraigosa'a GRYD program, that is actually cheap when weighed against law enforcement and jail costs for offenders, so it could pay for itself if enough at risk youth are interdicted and put on a more productive track. However, we aren't going to know the effect of that for years and given Tony Showbiz' other failures, I am not optimistic it will be anything more than another one of his vanity projects.
I would also suggest that concerned L.A. citizens get organized and create initiatives that would totally overhaul the city and country's governments. Another good idea is to close the LAUSD and compel teachers to run their campuses with the state education department providing the oversight. Also, fire all the administrators, who are largely useless. By doing that, you get a lot of corruption, incompetence, undeserved fat paychecks, office rental/maintenance costs and per diems out of the funding stream. Plus teachers can then innovate on the ground without interference from the political hustlers on school boards and their Stasi in the principal's offices.
Finally, the MTA, or whatever it is called now (I haven't lived in SoCal in ten years) has been a historical embarrassment. It needs to be completely reorganized and made more efficient.
-
RobE 09/20/2010 3:39:00 AM
Hey Richard, Oklahoma is one of the country's biggest welfare queens. It gets back $1.36 for every $1 it pays in federal taxes.
California, by contrast, gets $0.78 back for every $1 it pays into the treasury.
So no wonder you guys have open libraries. You're parasiting off of California.
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22685.html
-
RobE 09/20/2010 3:21:00 AM
It's not just the library closings, but not mentioned in this article is to what degree library purchasing has been affected.
My family were big library users during my youth and so seeing them being affected this way is really sad to me. I see no way in which this can be good for the community. I'd rather have children hanging out at the library reading than out on the streets.
And Mayor Tony Showbiz, you suck!
-
Jayme Davis 09/20/2010 1:54:00 AM
This article emphasizes the impact on children, but I also worry about the adults, often without homes, who rely on the libraries as a primary source of connection (for finding jobs, contacting friends and family, exploring ideas, etc.).
In the context of Villagroisa's excessive funding of the LAFD, the closing of the libraries is uncannily reminiscent of Fahrenheit 451. We don't have to burn books...just close the libraries, it's more efficient that way.
-
Brad Allen 09/18/2010 10:00:00 PM
This is truly sad. During my time at LA Public Library, I saw so many people who were new to the city get their bearings and start their new lives at the Robertson Branch Library where I worked. They'd be regulars for several weeks, using the free internet access our library offered. They'd get their own computers and internet access at home and be on their way. I loved how we were able to be there to help welcome the city's newest arrivals and get them settled in and connected to their new home. I used to think Villaraigosa was a good guy; I think this no longer. This is a shame and an embarrassment for a terribly misunderstood and literate city. I wish my former colleagues at LAPL the best.
-
Lalady 09/18/2010 9:10:00 PM
Tikkun Olam! Let's start by protesting what our city officials have destroyed. They need to cut the fat; not the money for libraries. I wish the LA WEEKLY had published this article back in June. It is a little late now.
-
Louweegie272 09/18/2010 7:05:00 PM
Great article. The Mayor is an incompetent who was elected twice because he operates like a sock puppet to the DWP and SEIU, so does the council. You think the Teacher's Union would have fought the library closures if their interests were educating the populace. Just disgusting.
-
Denise 09/18/2010 2:57:00 PM
The bitter irony if that the illegal invaders are the cause of this issue. The ENORMOUS fortune (paid by the Dreaded Gringo), for thier housing, feeding, breeding, medical bills, and the costs of their criminal behavior is sucking up every devalued penny Mexifornia has.
-
Chris UP 09/18/2010 12:33:00 PM
This is GREAT! I LOVE IT! YOU, LA, voted twice for this fine man we call mayor. Yeah...we're liberal and embrace diversity here in LA. Gotta have a fine Mexican mayor. Hey...he had great qualifications, right. I mean a panel attorney for the ACLU! What could be better?
Now we spend millions on dubious gang intervention programs. That makes sense. Let's reward those who chose not to follow societies rules at the expense of those who want to learn. GREAT IDEA L.A.!
Maybe the LAPL can save some money by laying off the security guards at the downtown Central Library. They really don't do much anyway but sit at the front counter. I go there and see bums on the internet looking at porn, bums eating in the cubicles, and, this I loved, bums bumming each other in the men's restroom! The wife was trying to study there once, and there was a bum, peering between the bookshelf, whacking his pud! But hey...we're so politically correct around here we won't do anything about it.
GREAT JOB L.A.! The loony left dominates city government, and this is what we get. But hey...you voted for them, you got them, now you ENJOY THEM!!
-
James McCuen 09/18/2010 11:45:00 AM
To anonymous 09/15/2010 6:10:44 PM: Your idea is good, at least symbolically. In Jerry Brown's first term as Governor in the 70s, he lead a humble, almost Monk-like existance forgoing the newly built Governor's mansion for an apartment and using on old State-owned Plymouth.
In fact when then Speaker Willie Brown moved into Jerry Brown's old apartment, he described the furnishings as "Early Goodwill."
-
harkin 09/18/2010 8:21:00 AM
If the teachers and other public workers would agree to pay and benefits equal to the private sector, all the libraries could remain open.
You have your priorities, they have theirs......and they collect millions to get democrats elected, the same democrats who vote for huge pay and benefit packages to the unions. Guess who wins?
-
Felix Racelis 09/18/2010 2:52:00 AM
Thanks for the excellent article and reporting. As the partner and spouse of a LAPL librarian I can vouch for the tremendous toll these draconian cutbacks have had on my significant other's well-being. Library staff are overworked, stressed beyond belief and utterly demoralized.
-
Perkins 09/18/2010 1:44:00 AM
villagairosa is a monumental failure who has lost touch with his city, he should resign due to complete incompetence. Closing the people off from the treasures of Central Library on any day is absolutely inexcuseable. Others like LaBonge and Garcetti know better, talk a good game but lack balls. Idiots like Smith, Perry and Rosendahl can be excused since they can't read but the rest should hang their heads in shame.
-
Aaron Goodell 09/18/2010 1:16:00 AM
Greetings from WLA Regional branch, terminal #2, where the databases beat all. The public library has always been one of the best resources available to help the public to help itself. Anachronism? Hardly. The staff are keeping these media up to date and in repair despite the friends of tyranny. It can come back in a big way. I fear confronting the task of replacing this 70+ branch system with some kind of non-profit, and we might have to one day. I donate materials and I vote.
-
Donna Z 09/17/2010 9:41:00 PM
The LA Weekly article is outstanding. Villaraigosa should be ashamed of himself. He obviously does not want to help those who rely on the services of libraries. A library is much more that a place that holds books.
If he has so many deputy mayors, please tell me what he actually governs himself?
-
Steven C 09/17/2010 9:07:00 PM
It's not just the public libraries that are under attack. Our public elementary school's libraries are also being decimated. We've been fighting to keep our librarian for at least two years. This despite an extremely successful after school "homework club" program, staffed with volunteer parents, but run by the librarian. Our schools parents had to take over paying for much of her salary. We're still fighting now to keep LAUSD funding her part time status.
Are we really in such dire straits that we need to reduce quiet places where are children can not only study, but learn HOW to study?
I just reviewed some of our areas API test scores when they were released on Monday, and our local results were not promising. This after recent budget cuts in our schools. The double hit when we add in our public library budget cuts I think will soon be evident.
-
Sue Kamm 09/17/2010 8:14:00 PM
I work at the Inglewood Public Library. At the beginning of our fiscal year (October 1), we reduced hours at the Main Library and two branches. Our smallest branch is now closed three days a week. We retained our Sunday hours at the Main Library. We open an hour later in the morning and close at 5 p.m. (rather than six) Friday and Saturday. We also eliminated service at the Main Library on Thursday nights. We have reduced staff, laying off all our part-time staff people, while retaining minimum hours our permanent part-time employees work. In our library, we have relied heavily on part-time workers - librarians, clerks, and shelvers - to serve our public.
Reduction of LAPL's services affects all public libraries in the county. I daresay I'm not the only librarian who refers people to LAPL because we don't have the materials or databases they need. In addition, LAPL offers two primary sources for patents and genealogy research. There are specialists who can take researchers through the online patents databases. Yes, there are a number of databases that genealogists can use, Ancestry.com (a subscription service) and Familysearch.org, provided free by the Mormon church.
I didn't vote for Villaraigosa, and my council representative is one of those running for re-election. I just hope voters will consider how candidates stand on revitalizing ALL city services, including libraries, parks, and recreation centers.
-
Bret 09/17/2010 7:57:00 PM
Moving story on a frustrating topic. What was not mentioned—or perhaps I missed it?—is the disparity between neighborhoods: next door to my school in El Monte is lovely Arcadia with library hours still available on Mondays because Arcadia Library is not part of the county system. My local library, Norwood, is closed Mondays. When local cities have the wealth—as Arcadia does—to build it's own large library they create a multi-generational shift in wealth, potential and eventually power...
-
Shannon Salmon 09/17/2010 6:29:00 PM
My worst memory from that day when they sent over 200 of us home, (160 full time positions were cut, but many let go were half time employes - 2 were let go to equal 1 full-time employee) was watching the Mayor on TV in the evening happily cheering on the Lakers as if he hadn't done anything horrible that morning. It made me ill.
-
Shannon Salmon 09/17/2010 6:22:00 PM
Correction: www.savethelibrary.org
-
Kathi Kemp 09/17/2010 5:06:00 PM
This is false economy and false savings. Some of the kids who no longer have a safe environment will get into trouble, and the cost of processing a juvenile through the justice system is exponentially higher than providing libraries in tough neighbor hoods. And more importantly, an opportunity to expose kids (and adults) to educational materials, services and programs is lost. Do we really want to spread ignorance?
-
Lisa Settle 09/17/2010 4:56:00 PM
I rarely read a news article which does not get to the meat of the story until the sixth paragraph. The headline drew me in, but I got bored with the creative writing in the beginning. Very poorly written.
-
PacRim Jim 09/17/2010 11:05:00 AM
Dumb down the populace, making them easy to control and dependent on the government.
-
pete 09/17/2010 9:20:00 AM
One of the worst decisions ever. Let's not forget the other side of this crappy economy, the unemployed who use the library computers to search for jobs and other vital information.
-
Shannon Salmon 09/17/2010 9:08:00 AM
Public Libraries = Free Information = Democracy. Ask Benjamin Franklin. Privatized libraries are bookstores. www.savethelibrary.com.
-
sean 09/17/2010 7:52:00 AM
It is becoming quite clear that our "public servants" are primarily interested in serving themselves. And every other issue becomes an afterthought. Thanks to Villar the public employee unions rule. Their pensions, pay, benefits come first. You get whatever is left over and you will likely have to pay for it.
-
Jill Stewart 09/17/2010 6:51:00 AM
Hi readers, this is LA Weekly News Editor Jill Stewart, responding to Beardface's question at 7:11:55 pm Thursday about our math finding that it would cost the city "65 cents per child" to reopen the libraries as they were back in April.
We did not multiply 15,000 by 365, as you say. Though you are right, it is accurate to say "65 cents per child visit" because many children return to the library again and again, and nobody is able to count that repeat figure.
But to correct your misimpression, here is how we did the math:
Currently all libraries are closed twice weekly, and during the week the open libraries have newly shortened daytime hours.
Last spring, before the closures hit, a study was conducted by the L.A. library system of how many youths use the library after school. It found that 90,000 LA youths per week use the libraries in the hours after school.
The eight big regional libraries and the Central Library (which were open on Sundays and Mondays back in April during the study) are now closed both of those days -- and the kids all turned away. In addition, the 73 branch libraries that were open on Mondays back during the study are now closed Mondays -- all those kids turned away. And all have newly shortened hours on some of the days that they are open -- even more kids turned away.
Based on the patterns of use before the closures, we arrived at about a one-third loss of after-school library hours citywide since the study.
This means that 30,000 youths (about one-third of the 90,000 using the libraries before these cuts) per week can't use the libraries.
Finally, we divided the $10 million that library officials say it would take to reopen and run the libraries for 1 year, by the youths not served over the course of 1 year. The youths not served is a huge figure over the course of a year, 30,000 x 52. That's about 1.6 million children turned away by the closed libraries.
That worked out to a cost of about 65 cents per child to reopen the libraries, which would cost $10 million.
The 1.6 million number represents individual children who go to the library occasionally, and as you said it also represents many children who return time and again -- but now are turned away. Yes, it's a huge figure. The libraries are popular places.
--Jill Stewart, LA Weekly News Editor
-
Kent Ried 09/17/2010 5:32:00 AM
Hey genghis - $10/hr is a living wage? You may find this hard to believe, but most of the world no longer lives with their mom.
-
Beardface 09/17/2010 5:11:00 AM
Come on, Weekly.
I agree with the spirit of this article, but some of your math is shameful. The calculatory contortions required to get that "65 cents per child" figure are ridiculous. You just multiplied 15,000 by 365, which assumes each youth visitor is novel, not just each week, but each YEAR.
That means about 5.5 million different youth visitors each Monday. You're essentially claiming every person in the LA area is school-aged and hangs out at the library on Monday nights.
That's either terrible math or terrible editorial ethics.
Either way, boo.
-
Mister Toldja 09/17/2010 3:12:00 AM
I'm guessing all you folks who voted for Villaraigosa and these city council hucksters are now having some buyers remorse, yes?
Next time, VOTE THEM OUT.
-
richard40 09/17/2010 1:57:00 AM
Talk about the ultimate in incompetance for a city government. They have enough time and money for useless boycots against Arizona, even more usless expenses for various environmental green causes, wasteful mass transit systems, and oversize pensions to please the public employee unions, but can't keep their libraries open.
I'm from Oklahoma City. We dont spend money on useless leftie causes, but we do manage to keep out libraries open. Next time the "cultural elites" on both coasts look down their nozes at the uneducated cultural inferiors in flyover country, they should think about this comparison.
-
Kenneth Simon 09/17/2010 1:44:00 AM
This is such an important article. I tried to articulate just this view in a letter to several city council members, before they were faced with this recent budget decision. Most did not even respond to my message. One wrote and challenged me to come up with an alternative to cutting library budgets. I couldn't decide if the message was smirky or desperate. I wrote back with my best attempt at an answer, including challenging the emphasis on law enforcement (downstream dealing with crime) above crime prevention (upstream prevention of people getting into crime, via schools, libraries, parks, etc.). My reply to the city council member went completely ignored. (I didn't expect a response.)
If only I'd been able to say just what this article said. Right now, Los Angeles has a lot to be ashamed of, including our mayor and what his leadership, or lack thereof, has done to our city's future. It's not too late to set things right -- it's never too late -- but it takes some long-term thinking and a departure from the politically motivated, fast-food policymaking we have right now.
Yes, I say. A clean sweep may be just what we need, but only if the right people are swept in! Who and where are they?
-
observer 09/17/2010 1:34:00 AM
Pantera: you miss the point made by the article. An extremely well done piece, by the way. The question is not do cuts need to be made, the question is where to make the cuts. The Mayor and Garcetti chose to protect their piece of the pie while saying to the rest of us who actually use the libraries: go "eat cake." We in Los Angeles pay for these services that, over time, have had a proven impact on young people and the quality of life in Los Angeles. It is quite simple: the more you give access to reading the more likely people are to read(young and old). The more people read, the better off we all are. The choices made here are a blatant use of taxpayer dollars by the Mayor and Garcetti to fund a social experiment that they can then tout in their political literature. The GRYD is just that, a politically motiviated social experiment that will ultimately collapse because it is not sustainable and does not impact enough young people. AT $5000 PER STUDENT WE WOULD BE BETTER OFF SENDING THESE YOUNG "AT RISK" KIDS TO PRIVATE SCHOOL! $5000 per kid would pay for each of these kids to attend a private parochial school.... No vision results in poor judgment and planning. This Mayor and Garcetti have no idea where to take Los Angeles. I live in Garcetti's District and voted for both. However, on this issue I find myself aligned with someone I never voted for ...Mayor Riordan. Hard to imagine I'd ever say that. I agree with Mayor Riordan when he asks....."What are you doing to this City?" Answer the question Mayor and Mr. Garcetti. What are you doing to this City??? A sad day when every other City in the Country (even Chicago) is better managed. I'm a third generation Angeleno who votged for this Mayor (twice!!) and must say I am dismayed by the actions of possibly the worst Mayor ever. I was willing to forgive his personal flaws, but it is now clear that he governs as he lives: no sense of direction, misinformed, and little to no understading of the consequences of his action(s
-
Renny Day 09/17/2010 1:28:00 AM
During my years as a children's librarian, I had the happy experience of successful college students and professional people seek me out to thank me for some helpful things I did along the way (the pre-med student who was crazy about skeletons; the physicist who was a member of the library stamp club; the member of our creative writing group who became a successful author) and it demonstrates clearly that such daily and often forgotten contacts can influence a person's life.
Thank you, Patrick McDonald for your impassioned and articulate article about how we are short-changing the children of Los Angeles.
-
Pantera 09/17/2010 12:16:00 AM
This is a great example of people who support spending cuts in general, but oppose spending cuts on anything they personally enjoy.
Here's the dirty little secret about spending cuts, THEY'RE PAINFUL. They're not called "decreases" they're called "cuts". They're going to be in something you enjoy. You're not going to like it, but if you want your city to save money, they have to happen. People like to imagine that there's these massive piles of pork hiding somewhere and we only need to get rid of those in order to save money. The amount of money spent on pork every year is nothing compared to the amount spent on the military, social security, or welfare. Frankly, I don't even know why the government sponsors the libraries in the first place. Probably the same reason they run the postal service. The simple fact that that's the way it's always been.
Cuts are painful, deal with it.
-
observer 09/17/2010 12:06:00 AM
As for Mayor Antonio....it should surprise no one that he does not read, ever meet the guy? Antonio has treated the City of Los Angeles in the same manner that he treats all other relationships: A temporary necessity to get through to the next relationship.....unfortunately for those of us who live here, it wll take us years if not generations to recover from this guys choices...just like everyone else who's ever trusted him! just ask those closest to him.
-
S 09/17/2010 12:02:00 AM
After seeing the mayor on America's Next Top Model mugging for the camera, it wasn't hard to know where his priorities lay. I'm still in shock that the staff for the city government is larger than the staff for the White House. That is so clearly wrong, I wonder why it hasn't been broadcast through more news outlets. Anonymous makes a good point. As does the article when it suggests modernizing the billing system for the city. There doesn't seem to be any front on which the current city government is not failing its constituents. I'm also shocked and disgusted at the racism and ignorance evident in these comments. Yet another reason libraries, need to be kept open, unless we want attitudes like melissa's to flourish. It's enough to make you want to stick your head in the sand.
-
observer 09/17/2010 12:01:00 AM
So, Garceti, Parks et. al., what is your answer to the question: Why did you go along with the Mayor's plan to close down libraries (for all) while handing the Mayor his pet project (GRYD). Not to mention the unending cop hiring....Mayor is a word that should never come before your names...none of you have guts. Garcetti, you may have the intellect, but you lack the balls to lead. The Mayor whispered and you fell in line. The good news, is you embraced this legacy and cannot divorce yourself of it: Fewer kids in the libraries, a GRYD program that will collapse, more cops but fewer of them patrolling the streets because they are behind desks, shuttered jails, parks and park programs thrown out with the kids, and, of course, streets no one can be proud of. Yes, there is a recession, but there were choices to be made and you made them.....
-
Lisa 09/16/2010 11:53:00 PM
to genghis khan 09/16/2010 12:58:12 PM, who complains that the problem is overpaid librarians:
Librarians are highly paid professionals, most with a minimum of a master's degree, and they have earned the right to make a decent salary. The problem is not the wages paid to hard-working, dedicated librarians; the problem is waste and mismanagement of city funds. (And no, I'm not a librarian!)
-
curious 09/16/2010 11:47:00 PM
I wonder, where are all of our local STARS, our celebrities who have the business all over the world (Clooney, Jollie, et al.) the ones whose STARS are on the walk of fame??? Maybe now they will wake up and realize that they don't have to leave Hollywood in order to "save the world." Look under your feet and fight for our libraries! Your city is bleeding!
-
donna cassyd 09/16/2010 11:25:00 PM
I think about the organizing activist women did in the 19th & 20th c and how those are the things that are being dismantled--like libraries, social work systems, etc.
-
Lisa K. 09/16/2010 11:20:00 PM
I sincerely hope that the city finds a way to allocate budgeting for the library. It is so important to encourage children as well as others to take an interest in reading, research and the value of educating oneself. I don't understand why we can't cut budgets elsewhere.
-
genghis khan 09/16/2010 10:58:00 PM
How much do the library employes make and for what?
If you paid them $10/ hour, you wouldn't have to cut the hours, but they are probably paid $30+ per and it just costs too bloody much to run them.Swet gig, if you can get it.
-
Kim Cooper 09/16/2010 10:51:00 PM
Thank you for this thorough and disturbing account of the crisis facing our library system. The budget numbers, when laid out so clearly, certainly tell the tale.
Community members who are distressed by what has happened under this administration can visit the SaveLAPL website at the link below and with one click send an email to Mayor Villaraigosa and all members of City Council letting them know that we won't stand for our libraries being shuttered. Visitors to the SaveLAPL website successfully fought off the proposed $1/book interbranch loan fee in 2008, and continue to protest these unconscionable cuts today.
Speak up at http://www.savelapl.org
-
Paula 09/16/2010 10:41:00 PM
As a young adult librarian at LAPL, I applaud the writer for doing such a fantastic job of researching this issue and making it clear why and how our libraries have been butchered. So many patrons complain about why our hours have been cut and why we are no longer open on Mondays, and I will definitely refer them to this article so they will be as enraged as we are at the gross negligence and personal greed of our current mayor and the cowardice of the city council, especially Mr. LaBonge who used to be a supporter of libraries. Please, I urge the public to writer letters and make phone calls to the mayor and the city council members. With enough pressure, maybe it will make an impact and open their eyes to this travesty they are inflicting on the public.
-
Manny 09/16/2010 10:21:00 PM
Some months ago I spent several evenings at the Central Library, in the History section. After 5 PM homeless people began streaming in and setting up shop in the computer cubicles- some watched football games. None that I noticed appeared interested in intellectual pursuits, ie reading. A year ago I visited the Ascot Branch library in South Los Angeles. A gate and an armed guard greeted me - the guard could have searched me but instead opened the gate and let me in. Liberal governance has done little good for Los Angeles.
-
librarian7 09/16/2010 9:07:00 PM
Villaraigosa's and the Council staff is bigger than the White house! 65 cents per child attending library vs $5,245 per youth at risk for a new programm! This and other information in the article screams for a thorough (and long overdue!) investigation on where our money is.
-
Patrick S. 09/16/2010 8:59:00 PM
Just to answer Anonymous @10:57:55 regarding Monday instead of Saturday closures - The hours that were decided for the Libraries to be open either of those days was 10am - 5:30pm. If we closed on Saturdays (in addition to Sundays), many working people wouldn't be able to come to the Library.
While it was Department Heads who decided on the current operating schedule, they were forced to do so by the massive budget cuts to our department. Cutting the hours is a response to the Layoffs they had already decided on, and that went through only weeks after the change.
-
John Calomiris 09/16/2010 8:48:00 PM
A politition who closws libraries and allows hugely wasteful payments to croney activities is an invaluable aide to dumbing down the serious citizens interested in knowledge,public affairs and government.Such polititians should be driven from publuc office
-
Madeleine Kerr 09/16/2010 8:39:00 PM
As a children's librarian at LAPL, I applaud this article and its exposure of how little value our city government places on public institions that provide invaluable support and resources, like our public library. Public libraries have always been providers and guardians of free access to information for all. And information includes, but is not limited to, the discovery of a personal interest, learning about popular culture, including what is on DVDs, works of fiction and non-fiction, blogs, wikis, Internet sites and yes, databases. Databases are an essential part of academic investigation. Understanding how to use and communicate in a digital world using digital materials is an absolute must for students. If you were to work in a library, you'd learn quickly that we spend a tremendous amount of time educating users how to empower themselves through exploring our digital resources--including the basic library catalog. The average library patron doesn't think about information the same way a librarian does--and we help them learn how to find information that is good and reliable. We show them how to download e-books. We help them find books that will guide them through cancer treatment or the film they want to write. We help kids find the books they have to read and the books they want to read. We show parents how to help their kids be better readers. Many walk in to a library thinking that they'll find whatever it is that they are looking for in one book. Mostly, that is not the case. Multiple sources are needed to provide the right information. The book that exists in someone's mind is hardly ever the book that actually exists on the shelf, and librarians are the people who know the materials--both in print and in digital form, that can give that person what they need. A library is not just a building with books. Libraries are also not books stores and nor are they Blockbuster. Libraries work because they have an educated staff who directs the library user to where to find the information they are seeking. Ideally, we want to show the user how to approach any type of investigative process for themselves. It's terrible to read these comments where people have such a limited view of how information is found and communicated, but clearly then, they could not possibly be users of a library. Libraries reflect the current culture and provide books in print, digital and recorded versions, visual materials (and dvds include far more than just entertainment movies--our dvd collection includes Shakespeare plays, documentaries and lots of how-to movies) as well as in-person help to find the information that helps any person be who they want to be--whether that is becoming an American citizen, a filmmaker, a knitter, an armchair explorer of all that is Egyptian, learning to speak Italian, a kitchen scientist or a person with a job. Libraries and librarians and our clerical staff help everyone from everywhere in the city, and it is the most terrible thing that in a city that derives so very, very much from cultural works, that so little is done to support the cultural and public institutions that cost no money for its citizens and give to all.
-
Eva Cox 09/16/2010 8:25:00 PM
One thread of information in the article folks seem to be overlooking is how much back taxes are currently owed to the city. Enough frankly to go a long way to restoring the fiscal stability of the city and the services provided to its citizens. Comments here about raising taxes to keep the library open are off base. There's no need to raise taxes. But there is a definite need to force deadbeat businesses, business owners and others to pay the taxes they owe. If I am required to pay all of my taxes as an individual then why aren't businesses required to pay theirs? More and more we are living in a class-based society thanks in large part to the well-heeled and powerful elite that lobby political leaders on their own behalf so industriously.
-
celine harrington 09/16/2010 8:08:00 PM
this is a real shame for the city. i wonder how the Mayor imagines his legacy....
-
Anonymous 09/16/2010 8:07:00 PM
While the mayor and the city council are to blame for the budget cuts to LA's library system, the library's management is to blame for closing on Mondays and keeping children from visiting the library after school. It would have been a much smarter choice to keep libraries open on Mondays and closed on Saturdays!
-
DC Handgun Info 09/16/2010 8:04:00 PM
Hey, I have an idea: Privatize the libraries. Let people set up nonprofits to run the libraries and sell memberships.
-
Dave 09/16/2010 8:00:00 PM
In a budget crises, the most useful services must be cut first, to blackmail the voters into approving a new tax increase or bond issue.
"The State is a huge organism turned inside out, wearing its blood and bone on the outside to protect its fat." -Doctor Zero
-
Tom 09/16/2010 7:53:00 PM
Maybe they should print the books in Spanish.
-
James C Bennett 09/16/2010 7:46:00 PM
This is how the government fights against it's "subjects" who have the audacity to attempt to reduce its budget: it kills the useful and popular programs first. It starts with parks, museums, and libraries. Then it's streetlights and road repair. Then, police and firefighters. Their own payrolls, benefits, and graft are the last thing the politicians will cut.
-
DENA GOULD 09/16/2010 7:39:00 PM
Great job Mr. McDonald. Thank you !
L.A. resident
-
Eva Mitnick 09/16/2010 7:28:00 PM
Spend money on schools, libraries, and other institutions that allow young children a good start, and save money later when they graduate from school and get jobs instead of dropping out and going to prison. It's been proven over and over. The problem? Politicians hate to delay gratification; the benefits to society will come far too late to re-elect them.
-
Teri Markson 09/16/2010 6:41:00 PM
We too locked the doors to our branch library yesterday just as three families with school-aged children approached, no doubt to get materials for the kids to do their homework or to use the computers to type assignments. I admit I used to be one of those people who didn't realize how many folks out there don't have computers at home. Since I've been working in my current branch, I've had my eyes opened. Note to Alex above: Just because the Internet exists doesn't automatically provide access. The library is the only gateway to the Internet for many people, and with teachers posting assignments online more and more, how are these kids without computers at home going to access the information they need or type up their assignments? The truth is they do it at the library, and that's why our city "leaders" have failed our city. They are denying thousands of children access to the very resources that might propel them in a positive direction. Nice "gang prevention" program you've got there Mr. Mayor.
-
Emerson 09/16/2010 6:27:00 PM
Hey, how 'bout trying something new to get more funds for libraries? Instead of taxing even more the shrinking pool of people who actually work and contribute, remove all tax, welfare and disability cheats from the dole and there will be plenty of money for books. Reject victim culture.
-
Jason 09/16/2010 5:53:00 PM
You tax, over regulate, and mismanage a city into the ground and you are surprised that this happens? Large sections of the productive populace left this city and state a long time ago.
-
DaveP. 09/16/2010 5:51:00 PM
This is what you get when you vote for Democrats: the death of hope for your children and the death of culture in your city. Just ask Detroit.
But hey! You have a swingin' Pride parade and a status as a Sanctuary city! That's enough to get in return, isn't it?
-
Roux 09/16/2010 5:30:00 PM
I love it when liberals complain about failing liberal policies. He's only cutting the things you want to bait you into paying more for the things he wants.
-
lina daukas 09/16/2010 5:30:00 PM
LA's libraries were a proven, positive attraction for everyone whether in gangs or not. It's sad that the LA City Council was quicker to cut library hours than to search for other ways to cut waste. Libraries have run on a lean budget for years while other departments were not as frugal with taxpayers' money. What a tragedy that citizens are losing access to an invaluable resource in its hour of greatest need.
Thanks for this article; it is unique at a time that other press are fawning over Villaraigosa's budget cuts without examining their wisdom or alternatives.
-
John Galt 09/16/2010 5:27:00 PM
Well, look at the bright side. At lease trash collectors can still retire at 50 with 80% pay.
-
melissa 09/16/2010 5:25:00 PM
it's because he's mexican, plain and simple. mexicans in large part have no appreciation for books and education, so helping libraries will never be first on his agenda. elect leaders that hold your values and this stuff won't happen. elect lazy, uneducated mexicans and live with the results...
-
Will Wills 09/16/2010 5:21:00 PM
You elected this guy to make some tough choices. Sounds like his staff helped him make what they thought was the tough choice. If someone runs for Mayor or the City Council and promises to reduce the personal staffs to pay for reopening the libraries then surely the parents of the 15,000 students locked out on Mondays will elect them. Learn how it works. As to that gang program, if that is the Mayor's pet project then hold him accountable.
-
Mary Wynton 09/16/2010 5:19:00 PM
I can only hope that the Mayor reads this report. It says it all. Thank you for this thorough job of investigation. As a former Children's Librarian with the City of Los Angeles, I can attest to the dedication of the staff and the gratitude of patrons for this valuable public resource.
-
Ruta 09/16/2010 5:16:00 PM
It's good that you have reported on this story, however, it should be pointed out that Villaraigosa is not the only one turning his back on books in Los Angeles. Hello Michael Lacey and cohorts! Under its Phoenix-derived "leadership," the LA Weekly's regular book reviews, extensive literary supplements, cover stories about serious writers have been "disappeared" (there once were many) along with the writers who produced them. The truth is that the New Times/LA Weekly is part of the problem. Look at any Lacey rag and there's no book coverage worth mentioning. What does he care about libraries?
-
Chris K 09/16/2010 5:02:00 PM
Wednesday was our first day closing at 5:30pm during this new school year. We had a full house and it was heartbreaking kicking out children being tutored and the kids doing their homework. It was just as painful locking the doors as a father (who had just gotten off of work) and son were walking up to come in. The community really needs to speak up and contact their elected officials to let them know how this is affecting them and their children.
-
Alex 09/16/2010 4:58:00 PM
With the growth of the internet, I hardly think closing down the library system for 2 days every week is the catastrophe this article purports it to be. People will learn to get their information elsewhere and the people that wanted to go to the library on the days it is closed can go to the library on one of the 5 days it is open. LA needs to get a grip.
-
Laura Dwan 09/16/2010 2:57:00 PM
Excellent article. About time this problem got some coverage.
-
Craig Wilson 09/16/2010 1:31:00 PM
I agree with anaonymous. The Mayor used to have 70 asst Mayors, then 93, now he has 200 plus asst Mayors making 100,000 per year or some similar amt. As for Libraries, my mother is 96, taught for years in LA and Buffalo NY. She said years ago she would see any library filled with Asian students, but outside were Hispanic and Black kids skateboarding the steps of the library. Then they wonder why they are porters or working at the car wash. I want all students to succeed, but you have to put your butt in the chair and study. You can build GOLD schools with gold faucets like the 587 million dollar school at the old Ambassador Hotel site. But without parents who value education , you have nothing. Without discipline in the schools or in Life, you have nothing. Craig Wilson Candidate vs Rosendahl in 09 and 2013 CD 11
-
Paul Elliott 09/16/2010 10:07:00 AM
The library is the last place left in our computerized world where a person can step into a million different worlds and lives by just turning a page, where imagination is not drowned out by commercial hype and deafening laugh tracks, where a child can learn what it means to be human, adventurous, loving, inquisitive, and capable of dreaming. Those who work in the library system are the keepers of the keys to all of that. While everyone realizes budgets must be cut... removing support from the library impacts everyone from the lost on the streets to the Ph.D. That's a major impact.
-
Sandy Schuckett 09/16/2010 9:51:00 AM
It is unconscionable that the mayor and the City Council have such a disregard for the people of Los Angeles who need their public libraries to remain open seven days a week. During hard economic times, libraries are the one community institution that serves all people...from the cradle to the grave. From children's story hours to homework help to computer access to job-seeking to just plain enjoyment. The library systems in all of the major cities of the U.S. - Chicago, New York, Boston, etc. have managed to remain open because their city leaders recognize the importance of a strong library system to our democracy. What's wrong with the people who supposedly 'lead' Los Angeles?? It appears to be that 1)they are just short-sighted; or 2) they just don't care.
-
ronnie bartolli 09/16/2010 9:38:00 AM
yeah this guy is a joke. hes a punk. no good piece of crap. i can see maybe closing sunday but not a weekday. my towns mayor has done the same closing days but our mayor has done many many great things for the city.
-
rick 09/16/2010 9:11:00 AM
a quick question for those who know: if popular (non-documentary) dvds/videos/cd's (not books on tape) were removed from a library collection, as well as the internet computers (but not free wifi), what circulation and attendance look like? i think these numbers are undoubtedly accurate, but also inflated because the library tries to do too much. from my perspective, the mission of the library, what it provides, to whom, and for what, is in dire need of revision. take out the free internet computers (when did the library ever grant people the right to free communication?) and the dvd's/cds/videos (the library should not be a blockbuster) and we can fix this funding problem. keep the database, electronic resources, and catalog computers going, strengthen the book collection, and put the free internet computers and dvd's with some other city agency (namely, the mayor's office).
-
Ray N 09/16/2010 8:42:00 AM
This is shameful. The Mayor claims to care about education, but this proves he's a hypocrite. He's nothing more than a social climbing, backroom dealing, ADHD suffering crook. It'd be nice if he cut his bloated staff and stopped giving his developer friends and supposed "green energy" moguls a bunch of tax breaks and sweetheart contracts. As for the City Council, throw the bums out. L.A. deserves real leadership snd not corruption.
-
ann paul 09/16/2010 8:34:00 AM
Now, when more and more people need libraries to search for jobs and educational opportunities, to learn new skills and to keep informed, it is a sin to cut back on their funding. Shame on you Vllargarosa and especially Tom LeBonge. You have always been a help to your constituents, but there is no excuse for your supporting the closing of the library for two days a week. You've lost my vote!
-
anonymous 09/16/2010 4:10:00 AM
Not only should the Mayor reduce his staff by atleast 50%, but also vacate the taxpayer funded Hancock mansion, which costs around $200,000 in yearly maintenance. Living in more humble housing will also help in focusing the Mayor's vision away from the wealthy and to the city's reality of which he seems to be oblivious.