15% off In-Line fans
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
A film built around ticking clocks, perhaps it's fitting that Quentin Tarantino's Jackie Brown today plays as a time capsule — but of which time? Dialogue indicates it's set in 1995, a date with which the lax LAX airport security, baroque beeper dialing instructions and scene set in Sam Goody would seem to be of a piece. But within the confines of relative realism (this may be the least cartoonish film to which Tarantino has signed his name), the writer/director plays with temporal and factual detail. The shopping complex that serves as the stage for the film's central action is introduced with a title card: "Del Amo Mall — the largest indoor mall in the world." In reality, the Del Amo Fashion Center (it was renamed in 1981) surrendered its bragging rights to the Mall of America in 1992. With this overstatement, Jackie's food-court chain smoking (which would have been outlawed by the statewide smoking ban of January 1995) and the invention of a department store called Billingsley to house the central caper, the filmmaker incorporates this real L.A. location into his own unmistakable body of myth.
As Jackie Brown hops and skips around rarely filmed parts of Los Angeles, creating a sort of cracked star map of highly specific, less-than-starry locales — Carson, Compton, Hawthorne, "two blocks up from Hollywood and Western" — the Del Amo Fashion Center is transformed into a bright and gleaming blank screen for Tarantino's projections. Friday night, the parking lot of the nearby Proud Bird restaurant will play host to a literal blank screen, for a Tarantino-introed projection of Jackie Brown. It's the first stop on this year's Rolling Roadshow Tour, a traveling production organized by the folks behind Austin's Alamo Drafthouse, which mounts outdoor screenings of modern classic films at the locations where they were made. (On Sunday, the tour moves to the Kern County Museum in Bakersfield for a screening of There Will Be Blood.)
Released on the final weekend of 1997, Jackie Brown was so hotly anticipated, it was all but destined to underwhelm. Making the world wait three years for his feature-length directorial follow-up to the phenomenally successful Pulp Fiction, Tarantino spent the interim trying even the truest fan's patience with talk-show and tabloid antics ("I scrutinized photos of Tarantino and Mira Sorvino and decided that he didn't deserve a woman so completely adorable," admitted critic David Edelstein in Slate), and vanity misfires (in his one-star review of Destiny Turns on the Radio, Roger Ebert pejoratively dismissed director-turned-actor Tarantino as the "Flavor of the Year"). Released during the same holiday (and Oscar) season as Titanic, even a give-'em-what-they-want Pulp sequel would have had a tough time fighting the end of the century's designated mass movie phenomenon for pop culture supremacy.
And Jackie Brown hardly qualified as fan service. Tarantino's adaptation of Elmore Leonard's Rum Punch superficially scanned as a nod to '70s blaxploitation, most blatantly in source cues like Bobby Womack's "Across 110th Street," and the transformation of the titular Jackie from Leonard's blonde into Pam Grier — Foxy Brown herself — as a "44-year-old black woman" (as though that repeatedly used five-word phrase tells us everything about where she's been and where she's going). But Tarantino used his trademark pastiche to smuggle something much less sexy to the screen: a deliberate, withholding, bittersweet film about age.
Down on her luck after a divorce and previous run-ins with the law, Grier's Jackie supplements her paltry stewardess income by smuggling cash from the Mexican stash of Samuel L. Jackson's Ordell, a drug dealer–turned-gunrunner saving up a nut so he can retire early and "spend the rest of my life spending." Nabbed by the feds carrying Ordell's cash, Jackie sees a last shot to use her natural assets to her advantage, and seizes it, easily coercing smitten bail bondsman Max Cherry (Robert Forster, Oscar-nominated for the role) into helping her play both the cops and the crooks for fools. "I wasn't using you," Jackie tells Max in the end. He seems happy to have been useful.
In Jackie Brown, the old "one last score" banality is recharged by the ugly truth of ordinary mortality. Movie gangsters die young and spectacularly, frozen forever with flat bellies and perfect, wrinkle-free faces. These ne'er-do-wells — Jackie, Ordell and Robert DeNiro's stony ex-con Louis — managed to outlive that end, only to be faced with something much scarier: Instead of dying before they get old, they might have to get old before they die. "What the fuck happened to you, man?" Ordell asks Louis after an epic fuckup. "Your ass used to be beautiful." Jackie's ass, by all accounts, still is beautiful (Max even approves of its expanding size: "Ain't nothing wrong with that!"), but her anxiety over time infects her every thought, word and move. Even something as simple as serving Max coffee turns into a loaded lament: "The milk went bad when I was in jail." Criticized by critics for its pace and paucity of one-liners ("Each scene is staged methodically, overdeliberately, as if it concealed some payoff zinger," complained Entertainment Weekly's Owen Gleiberman, "but the zingers don't arrive."), Jackie Brown replaces the snappy sound-bite quotability of Tarantino's earlier efforts with an urgent anxiety. Almost every scene is charged with each character's awareness of their impending expiration date, which creates high stakes — in this world, tête-à-têtes usually come down to, as Ordell puts it after murdering a colleague, "a clear-cut case of him or me."
While this was a terrifically written article/review (though I don't agree with it), I don't understand its relevance, or why this thirteen-year-old movie has suddenly come under scrutiny. I'm not familiar with Karina Longworth, or LA Weekly, so maybe this is just typical but I find this review strange and out-of-place. In regards to "Jackie Brown" though, I thought it a repugnant cheap shot that critics called Tarantino's "life experience" into question, as it effectively just tries to mock him personally for being such a student of film. After all, it's this love of film that is responsible for his unique and brilliant perspective as a storyteller to tell a story only according to the rules of movies. That is his leitmotif, and critics who try and rob him of that are jealous, stupid or just plain mean-spirited. I don't doubt for one minute Tarantino's life experience or capacity to empathize, if that's in fact what we're talking about. If anything, his love of movies is a clear indicator that he, like most who enjoy film, prefer the second-hand experience, the imagining of these situations and to be enlightened about the varieties of experience through the narration of a protagonist or director.
Of all the movies Tarantino made, this one is probably my least favorite. I just don't have as much interest in it as his other work. However, I respect what he was doing by trying to break that 'Smoking hot young sexy female on a mission' cliche and yet have that fun 70's background mood. What bothers me is how some people call this Tarantino's most mature movie because then you'd be implying that it's the violence that makes his other movies immature. I'll argue that all of Tarantino's movies have well structured plots (Pulp Fiction had 3 since it was made up of 3 stories - to those who say Pulp Fiction had no plot) and the genius is in his dialogue, which I don't think anyone can do better than him. If he pays so much care and devotion to the plot and dialogue, then how can you call any of his movies immature? They're not, there's so much maturity shown in his movies as a storyteller; it's just that some have a much more sick, twisted, fun tone than others. I just happen to enjoy that tone when I see it in the movies I watch.
Great read. Thanks Karina.
This was QT's most mature film. By far a better film than the sock antics of Reservoir and Pulp Fiction.
this is the one movie where tarantino got everything right. it will remain his single outstanding piece of work. nearly perfect.
I could be mistaken but I thought the title card said something like "Del Amo Mall - Largest indoor mall on the West Coast"...and not in the WORLD
I thought the movie was plodding and boring. When it runs on cable I watch for the fun moments, but always get bored soon after and switch channels. That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
it was the story and the pacing that made this movie the best of QT. it's a literary movie. remember them? and not just because it was adapted from a literary book. such movies have to stand on their own, like 'Night Of The Iquana' and this one does. this will be Tarantino's 'Casablanca' don't equate lack of longevity with lack of life insight. all artists obtain of wisdom before their time. it's arguably the defining characteristic of an artist.
Thanks for the citation but I want to add that I liked the movie when it came out and like it better--in fact, absolutely love it--now. I think it's a great stoner hang-out pulp movie with a rhythm all its own (possible comparisons are not just Elmore Leonard but Charles Willeford). The violence is largely offscreen or seen from a distance, sans gore, and is all the more shocking for it. And Mira turned out to be... a handful.
I agree that this is a really interesting examination of what is easily my favourite Tarantino movie. I hadn't spotted previously, but the comment about it being his least cartoonish film absolutely rings true, and that quiet honesty is a large part of why it's the only Tarantino movie I can keep coming back to, where even Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction I haven't had an inclination to watch for years. As Mark Kermode has pointed out in the past however, the poor performance of Jackie Brown in the box office means Tarantino probably learnt to avoid any of what made it so good.
Here on planet Earth, the rest of us found this to be an excellent analysis.
A pitiful attempt to ape the tossed-off-clever, allusive, cultural-historical stylings of J. Hoberman.
Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...
Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...
More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience
Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info
Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips
Log in or Sign up
Social Connect:Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.
Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:
Sign Up or Log in
Social Connect:Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.
Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:
