Top

news

Stories

 

Meg Whitman's Uphill Battle

She's fashionable as an outsider, but that guarantees nothing against Jerry Brown

It will all come down to math. Former eBay chief executive officer Meg Whitman, the Republican nominee for California governor, cannot beat Attorney General Jerry Brown, the Democratic nominee for governor, in a state where only 31 percent of voters are registered as Republicans.

Unless.

Brown is clearly the favorite going into the November General Election. But Democratic, Republican and independent analysts agree that this doesn't give Brown any guarantee in a state where voters chew up Democratic gubernatorial candidates who fail to heed voters' concerns, as happened in the disastrous race mounted four years ago by too-liberal Phil Angelides against centrist Arnold Schwarzenegger.

To win, as California Target Book co-publisher Tony Quinn notes, Whitman must get a whopping 60 to 65 percent of the independent voters — those "decline to states" who dislike both parties. She must also attract, despite her strong opposition to amnesty for illegal immigrants, 30 to 35 percent of Latinos — by tapping the fiscally conservative small-business owners and moderates who have no love lost for the Democrats.

Black voters in California have made themselves irrelevant by voting for decades as a monolithic bloc behind the Democratic gubernatorial nominee, no matter how bad the candidate. As a result, black voters, more than any other group, are taken for granted and will not play a role this year.

That doesn't mean the reliable voters won't be wooed, or that ethnic pandering and ethnic controversies won't play major roles.

The Republican base for Whitman pencils out at 35 percent to 38 percent of the electorate (registration in the party is 31 percent, but they are more avid voters than Democrats, so their numbers are bigger at the polls). Whether Republicans in November make up just 35 percent, or give Whitman a slightly bigger but very crucial 38 percent, depends on how fired up Whitman can get them, how far they try to push her beyond her conservative-moderate views on immigration (she opposes the Arizona law but also opposes amnesty), and how much the far right fears Brown.

Democrats make up a far larger base, with 44.5 percent of registered voters, and within that demographic is a big, highly liberal Democratic core. That immovable bloc, which voted for the hapless Angelides in 2006 and even for the unprepared Cruz Bustamante before that, makes up 40 percent of California's electorate. Brown can rely on those voters completely.

That leaves about 20 to 25 percent of voters up for grabs, including the most open-minded citizens willing to listen to all sides, as well as the most disgruntled and disgusted residents sick of politics, who hate the two key parties.

As of now, the two candidates are locked in a race for the middle to woo this disparate bunch, and some hints of that were clear at the parties held by the victors on Election Night in Los Angeles.

Brown's camp selected Club Nokia near Staples Center for his venue, an apparent nod to younger voters who don't remember former Governor Jerry Brown, but the tiny crowd that showed up, roughly 250 subdued supporters and spinmeisters, was no match for a Lakers championship run in Boston, which many political journalists watched on TV instead of election returns.

Then there was an awkward moment when Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa sent his handlers to repeatedly urge reporters to tape interviews with the mayor. Few were interested, with one finally asking, "Isn't he just going to say it again in 20 minutes onstage?"

Despite those hiccups, an ebullient Brown finally arrived to a modest cheer, cracking jokes and looking relaxed. He introduced his wife, Anne Gust, saying that trying to keep up with her "has gotten me in the mood" to run hard for governor.

While his supporters in the audience called Whitman "the auction-house woman," Brown never said her name. But he did make clear that he plans to paint her as monied and divisive, saying "we're not scapegoating anybody" not even "the guy who cleans bedpans."

Ten miles away, Whitman's victory party at the Hilton Hotel in Universal City officially began at 8:45 p.m., when the Associated Press named her the Republican nominee by virtue of her win over California Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner.

In her victory speech, Whitman hammered at Brown, calling him the candidate of "glitz, glamour and glibness," while describing herself as the candidate of "guts."

Only once did she reach beyond her conservative base.

"I ask all Californians — Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Asians, African-Americans and Latinos — to all join my campaign," she said.

Mostly, she stuck to red meat. After saying that Brown owes favors to every special-interest power broker in the state, Whitman added a line that was not in her prepared remarks: "The really good news is I don't owe anyone anything," she said, to thunderous applause.

Now, it gets down to the war to hang onto their hard-core voters while grabbing the coveted swing voters, who will choose the next governor.

And close watchers of that swing crowd say Californians are in for some real surprises, and a riveting battle.

Pat Caddell, a Democratic analyst for FOX News, sums up a consensus that Whitman and Brown will not win based on traditional election-year issues, such as illegal immigration, crappy schools or even California's abysmal unemployment rate but will grab the governor's mansion because of this uberconcern: Which one is seen by swing voters as least likely to do damage to them, their loved ones and their community?

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • recycling cell phones 02/17/2011 7:14:00 AM

    But perhaps I am just envious: I have to pay for my own pension and health benefits and cannot retire even now at age 58.

  • Linda 09/13/2010 11:10:00 AM

    I will not vote for someone who throws money like it grows off of trees. It goes to show that she believes she can "buy" this election, and she clearly doesn't have a respect or understanding of those who are struggling in this horrific economy of ours. Unemployment is at an all time high, the middle class is faltering and it's time to put someone in charge who isn't out to protect themselves (the highest of earners) While I agree that it's horrible to raise taxes, it should be done on those who in this climate can still purchase yachts and other high ticket goods....rather than take away safety nets that are holding the recently jobless afloat in addition to laying off those who earn a very modest living!

  • dirtfarm 06/27/2010 5:24:00 AM

    You took the easy road with a single-source to support claims about overpaid state workers and their pensions. Be more specific, and pick a juicy target like state legislator salaries. You're blowing the same smoke CA Legislators do every election with their favored whipping-post. It's true for you as a convenient source, but you need two others to make it journalism. I've already found them, how about you?

  • Jan 06/21/2010 11:44:00 AM

    I would have loved to have known the basis for Wilcox's prediction that Brown will get the public unions to agree to reign in their massive benefits. I assume it's not just speculation. Also, where can I sign up for Mandler's class?

  • Jill Stewart 06/16/2010 12:45:00 AM

    This is News Editor Jill Stewart responding to Myron Fielder. First, thanks to all of you for the fascinating debate and ideas. As to Myron's claim, I would like to quote Ken Mandler, the ranking expert in California on pay and benefits given to California state workers before and during retirement. Remember, state workers do not have to wait until they are old, like all the rest of us, to retire. They can begin taking pensions much earlier than 65. They get major benefits beyond that. As I wrote in 2005 in the Sacramento News and Review (at this url: http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/content?oid=33509 ) Ken Mandler, editor of Capitol Weekly, a newspaper that specializes in coverage of state-worker salaries and benefits, says that because of huge state matching benefits, “the average state employee working as a secretary will have a pension worth nearly $1 million when they retire after 20 years.” Think of it. Middle-class California taxpayers, struggling to save modest 401(k)s, are forced to help state workers build up cool $1 million pension chests. Mandler says state workers get matching funds “equal to more than 10 times what IBM just offered its employees” this month. Mandler even teaches classes on how to land cushy state jobs.

  • myron fielder 06/15/2010 4:11:00 AM

    Does the Weekly fact-check anymore or can Stewart write whatever she wants without any fear of retribution? I am a state worker for 18 years, and I guarantee you my pension is nothing like what Whitman states. Sure, those who are making $100,000 or more will yield a lot of bounty, but for us $40,000 a year types with 18 years in, we are looking to receive, if we work til we are 65 and have 25 years in, $2200 a month, a far cry from the million dollar figure Stewart throws around.

  • Ounce of Prevention 06/14/2010 8:38:00 PM

    Jerry Brown has passed his prime, and the little gray cells just aren't working all that well. Speaking at a meeting of the CTA this past weekend, he lost the opportunity to warn educators that there might be a major pay reduction in their future, for the sake of fiscal responsibility. The 'Cadillac-budgeted/Edsel results' educators listened eagerly as Brown opined that "it wasn't necessary to reinvent the wheel" or make any changes to ed policy. As AG, he's done as much as any state officer to drive jobs from the state, because of his strict enforcement of "green" laws. His re-election as governor would be calamitous for Californians, and a signal of support for the greedy public service unions that have bled the state dry.

  • N Antonicello 06/14/2010 6:18:00 AM

    Jill Stewart's ignorant analysis that Meg Whitman cannot win ignores about 50 years of political past practice here in California. Since 1958, only three Democrats have been able to win as Democrats and that includes Pat Brown, Jerry Brown and Gray Davis. Democratic candidates have lost for governor in 1958, 1966, 1970, 1982, 1986, 1990, 1994, 2003 & 2006. Since 1958, a Republican has been in charge 31 of the last 52 years. Meg Whitman is not Michael Huffington. Her personal brand is attached to one of the most significant companies ever to change America's buying & selling habits from brick & mortar to online sales. Like it or not, Meg Whitman is the clear frontrunner in a race where Jerry Brown seems rudderless and without a clue on how to appeal to a very disenchanted electorate. More importantly, no Democrat has captured more than 50% of the vote statewide for governor since 1998! To ignore these political realities and crown Brown the winner is just naive.

  • Fish Oil 06/12/2010 12:21:00 PM

    It doesnt matter who you vote for, California is f****d. Brown will tax and spend this this state further into bankruptcy, there will be no border between mexico and california, LA will sink further into the Tiajuana cesspool it is becoming. Whitman is polished and spits out all the right answers, only when she gets into office she will go no where... the unions and special interests will see to that. Arnold tried and quickly learned his place. The next governor will be another useless hack. So, while you trash the other sides candidate with rehashed political ad sound bytes (like sheep)... just know that CA is f*****. We are broke. The party is over. Neither candidate will change anything... it doesn't matter who you vote for.

  • Rachel 06/12/2010 3:12:00 AM

    Why anyone would want to be governor of California right now is beyond me, but the person who can best lead us out of this mess is Jerry Brown. Meg Whitman has no experience. As the article pointed out, we already tried giving someone on-the-job experience and it didn't work. I think Arnold really tried, but he just couldn't do it and Meg won't be able to either. I'm voting Jerry Brown.

  • freedom 06/12/2010 1:09:00 AM

    Meg Whitman will not win because we don't want another unexperienced GOP Governor like Arnold. Whitman's experience is running an internet swapmeet and selling Mr. Potato Head. Sorry, but if she wants to be in government she should learn the job from the ground up. She won't debate brown because she knows she's unqualified. GO away Meg! And take Pete Wilson with you!

  • Jerry 06/11/2010 11:53:00 PM

    So far, Brown has failed to present any practical solutions to the many problems the public service unions and pensions, illegal aliens, and a bought-&-paid for legislature provide. By contrast, Whitman has enumerated several objectives, but it remains to be seen if she can successfully enact any of her reforms, given the democratic majority she's likely to confront. One thing is sure, taxes will go UP if Brown is elected.

  • Jeff 06/11/2010 9:14:00 PM

    I see the Black vote coming out strong against illegal immigration. They will come out and vote for Meg because of her stance on no amnesty.

  • sal 06/10/2010 11:09:00 PM

    how could any consider voting for Meg, when herself hasn't voted until very very recently

  • bubbles 06/10/2010 7:05:00 AM

    Re: "Black voters in California have made themselves irrelevant by voting for decades as a monolithic bloc behind the Democratic gubernatorial nominee, no matter how bad the candidate. As a result, black voters, more than any other group, are taken for granted and will not play a role this year." I'm not black, but I don't agree with that. All of these elections come down to EVERY vote. All voters are important in every election.

  • Earl Richards 06/10/2010 4:22:00 AM

    Meg Whitman is too close to the corrupt and fraudulent investment banker, Goldman Sachs.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy