-
ChadMichael Morrisette 04/09/2010 7:52:00 PM
Mito Aviles for West Hollywood City Council 2011!
-
Woody McBreairty 04/07/2010 9:02:00 AM
As the $37 million library goes up in West Hollywood, I notice there is another Fortune Teller shop & another Thai Massage Parlor in the area on Santa Monica Blvd, and countless more homeless people literally laying on the sidewalks. The night clubs and condos in Hollywood are also are taking much of the business out of West Hollywood; there is a much stronger night life in Hollywood now than there is on Sunset Strip, for example. Makes me wonder if West Hollywood is trading places and going the way of Hollywood, especially Hollywood Blvd., in the 1980s & 90s.
-
Roy Rogers Oldenkamp 04/07/2010 5:25:00 AM
Yes, Victoria, we need more chain stores to displace the funky shops: let's finish the suburbanization, mall-like atmosphere preferred by the affluent. It's the overbuilding that compels landlords to raise commercial rents and drive out merchants, allowing corporate banality to fill the gap. It's a sad state of affairs.
-
Victoria Joyce 04/06/2010 11:09:00 PM
What glizty development? Go down Santa Monica Blvd and/or Sunset and count the abandoned bldgs AND the vacant new ones.
West Hollywood could use some GLITZ!!
-
Jack Stack 04/05/2010 8:31:00 AM
As a former 15 year resident of West Hollywood - a city I love - I despaired of ever reading an article that would reveal the shenanigans of the WeHo Council. I have relished every word and only hope it's a wake up call to voters to fling the bums out. I recall when Heil John - who reminds me of one of those blonde space aliens kids in Village of the Damned - and others vehemently opposed the creation of a small park from two beautiful residential gardens in Kings Road. They wanted senior housing, which already exists in Kings Road. to create another block of compliant voters. Instead after long, hard campaigning we got the park only to see a sign go up to thank John Heileman for giving us the park! Well, thank you, John! So buy him a gold watch, write him a letter of thanks and send him and his mob od self serving crooks packing.
-
David Weissfeld 04/04/2010 12:16:00 PM
Sorry Morris, I specifically remember James Fuhrman berating John Heilman about some commitment made to build a new library. I used to follow his antics on his public access show and his website. He used these to run for a city council spot. He got a hand full of votes and then just faded away. I worked for a candidate for city council where the candidate quit the election when he did not get an endorsement from the CES (Coalition for Economic Survival). They really pulled the strings in West Hollywood.
-
Morris Speeches 04/04/2010 9:38:00 AM
David W, i remember james fuhrman speaking about the library but he wasn't for or against it. he just felt the city wasn't going to get the grant from the state or the county maybe 5 years ago and he was right they got nothing. i think the city's homeless will benefit most from a new library funded by extortion from the council to developers cause now the homeless will have a great place to spend all their time; and remember weho is so progressive" that we can't throw the homeless out. millions of dollars from city developers that want to evict renters to uild million dollar condos for a libary to entertain the local homeless. what a weho joke.
-
Patrick Crawford 04/04/2010 5:34:00 AM
I just wanted to congratulate you on an excellent piece. I couldn't agree more, all the way down. The city machine is totally ineffective and self-preserving. The representation of renters on rent control issues is particularly bad. You should do some digging on the City Attorney. My only critical comment is to ask why would you expect anything from "liberal/progressives"? I'll take Daley's chicago over that anytime! Have you considered suing to find the donor list for the waste-of-money library? Same with those developer agreements. The city government is a side-show. That's why voter turnout is so low.
Oh and now I know why John was such a grouch when I ran into him at Pavillions the other day!
-
demanik 04/04/2010 3:59:00 AM
David Weissfeld: you make some interesting points. But you get one detail wrong (surprising for someone living in WeHo for 23 years): West Hollywood did not "[break] away from the city of Los Angeles." Prior to cityhood, West Hollywood was unincorporated LA County territory, subject to the whims of the LA County Board of Supervisors and county bureaucrats. It was not and has never been a part of the city of LA.
-
David Weissfeld 04/04/2010 3:39:00 AM
Shemuell - You are wrong. The 1217 Horn Ave project was approved by the PLANNING COMMISSION. I was at the meeting so I know. We failed to stop this project because it was within zoning specifications and there was no basis for a denial. The developers could sue the city if they were denied. But we are going to the city council to ask them to stop it. Hope you show up for the meeting.
-
David Weissfeld 04/04/2010 3:22:00 AM
I have lived in West Hollywood for 23 years and have attended many city council and planning commission meetings. I have seen big money developers stomp out of these meetings because the city council voted to have them resubmit their development designs to better address neighborhood complaints. Of course I have seen the opposite happen. Is the process perfect? NO. But it is a hell of a lot better than if West Hollywood had not broken away from the city of Los Angeles. LA city council meetings are a joke. They basically ignore everyone that speaks and they can not budget their way out of a paper bag. At least West Hollywood is fiscally sound. John Heilman has brought a great deal of needed stability to this city.
Another thing, James Fuhrman dogged city council members with video cameras, checked credit card expenses, and had a website that reveled inside information. On balance we probably benefited from his efforts. But he was a real irritating pain in the butt and often would often come to meetings to demand that a new library be built. He would be ecstatic at this new construction.
-
Shemuell 04/04/2010 1:16:00 AM
The level of corruption in West Hollywood city hall seems criminal and warrants a full criminal investigation. I live in West Hollywood Heights, and a proposed project at 1217 Horn was approved by city council with 200 signatures opposing the design that exceeds height limits and offers no guest off-street parking in our neighborhood with only 20 parking spaces for 500 residents.
The Environmental Impact Report for the Movie Town project on Santa Monica Boulevard near La Brea condemned the design as too tall and dense for the area yet it was approved.
I applaud LA WEEKLY for their investigative journalism, but the level of corruption portrayed only scratches the surface of what goes on behind those closed doors.
Those of us living in West Hollywood know what it's like living in Venezuela, with our own version of Hugo Chavez's regime in office.
I would like to find out more about what can be done to kick out the current Weho officers during the next election to instate politicians who care more about the citizens than their political careers.
-
D.Luxe 04/03/2010 8:54:00 PM
MITO AVILES FOR CITY COUNCIL 2011!
-
Jan L 04/03/2010 8:20:00 PM
I agree with RobE. I shudder at the thought of "parking" on La Cienega everytime I have to go into WEHO. Re: "library" won't the building also hold the brand new offices of the city councilmembers? Believe this must be the "library" that Zev Yarslovsky used his discretionary fund to donate to.
-
Deena 04/03/2010 7:41:00 PM
Lindsey Horvath is a jokc. think of all the residents, volunteers, advisory board members, commissioners that have put in thousands of free or almost free hours for the city, and they all get passed up for a little girl with zero experience. typical of john and abbe heilman. they are married, aren't they? West hollywood is dead. this was the last straw. john heilman doesn't like elections, doesn't like voter turnout so west hollywood gets it's newest puppet Horvath girl. i saw the facebook listings too, all she really cares about is her hair. it's kind of sad. she has no thoughts of her own. but don't blame her, blame John and Abbe for orchestrating this so they could have someone really dumb do their bidding. it's worked like a charm!
-
RobE 04/03/2010 2:14:00 PM
When I used to hang out in Hollywood all the time in the 1970's and 1980's, I remember getting in traffic jams at 3 a.m. after leaving the clubs, but at least there were places to park on both Santa Monica Blvd. and on Sunset Blvd for free after 6 p.m.. However, by the early 1990's, going from Orange County, where I lived at the time, to WEHO became such a hassle that I stopped going. And after reading this and other articles. it seems like things have gotten much worse. I will grant you that there were areas in WEHO that definitely needed cleaning up and redevelopment and it had bigtime law enforcement issues, but with the real estate market in the shitter, especially the condo market, it looks to me like the City Council is playing Russian Roulette with the developers providing the bullets. There is nothing resembling a guarantee that those condos will sell, traffic is so bad now that people are less willing to drive anywhere and parking restrictions and overzealous parking enforcement make life hell for the bars and restaurants that the city depends on for tax money because they chase customers away.
As for the library, what the poster who pooh poohed the objections to how it is being funded did was miss the point. The library deal is clearly a quid pro quo so that the politicians can further bamboozle the electorate by using the warm and fuzzy word "library" to mask "more condos," "clubs" and "traffic."
There is no indication in this article that WEHO has come up with a master plan for transportation that will allow people to go to WEHO from all over SoCal---like in the old days---without being tied up in traffic three hours each way and then pay through the nose and other orifices for parking. So what you will get in the end is epic gridlock and noise that the wealthy they are depending on to buy those condos aren't going to stand for. And when they leave, restaurants are going to start closing. Home values will plummet and those condo developments will either have to be bailed out by the city itself or be turned into low income housing with all the attendant ills that brings with it. It's all about balance and the city council has ignored the concept.
-
Michael 04/03/2010 9:50:00 AM
Having lived in West Hollywood for ten years, this article pretty much sums up my feelings about it.
When I first moved here there were still some old-timers around (people who had lived here since the '70s or '80s). Most have since moved on, but they described to me a West Hollywood that had been fun, creative and diverse - that had people young and old, professional and non, living and working in a really unique place. They lamented how that had passed, and passed primarily due to one major factor: money. (Note that the new City Council member is a 26-year old "advertising executive". Good for her, but how many 26-year olds have "executive" in their job titles?)
Increasingly, unless you're a highly paid professional, you can't afford to live in West Hollywood, at least the Boystown part of it. Prior to the recession, new condos here were selling for $1 - 1.3 million. Older buildings are being razed at a regular pace to make way for these high-priced spaces. In my neighborhood (near Urth Cafe), there has been continuous construction since I moved here. And, as you noted, astronomical rents are pretty typical for area apartments.
I've seen Melrose Place, a once funky area with a lot of charm and some unique stores, as well as the adjacent Melrose Avenue, become Rodeo Drive East. A tailor I used to go to was forced out by skyrocketing rents, as were many other small business I frequented. Sadly, the residents can't seem to stop it.
In my neighborhood, we fought for three years to protect a 1930s courtyard complex — to no avail. The City Council - principally Land - pushed through an overpriced, overly dense condo development over all objections. Increasingly, West Hollywood is white, middle-aged, professional, and rich.
Unfortunately, among those few people who vote are many current Council supporters. Also among them, as evidenced by several letters here, are those who see nothing wrong with the direction the city is headed in. I would submit that if you're a property owner that likes seeing your property value rise and rise, then sure, this Council is doing a great job. However, as middle and lower income residents are increasingly forced out, what will the character of the city be? Perhaps at that point the City Council can cash-out and West Hollywood can be annexed by Beverly Hills?
-
DachsundLover 04/03/2010 8:07:00 AM
i crossed John Heilman one time when i spoke against a project. i was blackballed, taken off a commission he appointed me to, and was a weho outcast. he is ruthless but pretends to be progressive. it's like Tammany Hall. he's been there too long. Oh, the clip was really funny.
-
Roger 04/03/2010 7:36:00 AM
OMG, thanks Jose for that great clip !!! it should be must viewing for any Wehoan. John Heilman supposed to be "mr. cool" totally loses it and can't take the heat. what happened t o that guy furman? that's what Weho needs right now. thanks!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCXDHjAg0g8
-
Jose 04/03/2010 6:23:00 AM
Looks like David below is drinking the KoolAid.
-
David 04/03/2010 6:00:00 AM
As a former resident of WeHo I have to say this article is misleading and very simple-minded. I could go into detail, but while the city is far from perfect, it is the most well-governed and responsive I have experienced in Southern California.
A lot of the concerns addressed by the critics cited are those of traditional NIMBYism which is the least progressive form of neighborhood activism around. In fact, the criticisms that the city is not affordable are directly related to the lack of density in the city. It is simple supply and demand; WeHo is a desirable place to live with a limited supply of housing - the more density the city develops the less the pressures on property prices. No one is advocating free-wheeling development, but the city has one of the most responsible and proactive planning departments around, and the strides it has made in terms of walk-ability and smart growth are an example for the rest of the region.
I understand the value of provocative and critical journalism, but a more balanced perspective would be of even greater value to your readers.
-
Jose 04/03/2010 5:04:00 AM
More City Council Fun:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCXDHjAg0g8
-
Dave Atkins 04/03/2010 1:36:00 AM
I suggested 8 years ago that the city cease electing all 5 council members city-wide and instead make each one answerable to constituents of one area. This would eliminate the benefits to devlopers of contributing to all incumbents and would force each member to work with his/her constituents. It didn't resonate with the City at all. Perhaps it might after I set it out here.
-
Jeremy Peugeot 04/03/2010 1:22:00 AM
Just for the record, the eastside is not all poor Russians, living in apartments. There are million dollar homes and very well educated professionals here as well the westside. I have great neighbors, many people walk their dogs and say hello, we have a real feeling of community. As to who they vote for or whether they vote, I'm not sure but if it is any indication the last election saw many challenger candidate's signs in front yards.
Is the approved Movietown project too tall, yes I think it is, but to have such a large ugly parking lot with vagrants, prostitutes and empty store fronts replaced by a new beautiful structure offering shopping and sidewalk cafes, I say go for it. It will make our area more pedestrian friendly and increase property values. It is unrealistic to think that this area could remain bohemian, stuck in the 60's forever. The town of Sherman and the unincorporated area of LA county had a unique flair and feel to it then and it can today be as vibrant and unique as it was then. We will never see Robert Plant throwing tvs out of hotel rooms on Sunset again. Even if the principles that the city was founded on are no longer first priority, these are different times and require different priorities.
-
Jeremy Peugeot 04/02/2010 10:46:00 PM
Having lived in West Hollywood for 15 years, I can say that while my neighbors two blocks away in LA wait for weeks or months to get replies, I can call about a tree, vacant property, abandoned furniture or a car blocking my driveway and a City official will respond within hours. I am so happy to live in a city where my property value has increased three times what I paid 9 years ago. Our streets are clean and tidy. Anyone who saw the area of La Brea & SMB before the Gateway shopping center will agree that aside from providing needed shopping the blight that was there is now a vibrant gathering space for the entire area including the city of LA.
-
Dante Atkins 04/02/2010 1:19:00 PM
It's very difficult to argue with someone who compares Abbe Land to Brezhnev--simply because there's no basis from which to start a rational conversation.
-
hcat 04/02/2010 10:56:00 AM
I wouldn't mind banning smoking on outdoor patios, if they'd let us drink booze on the sidewalk like they do in England!
-
BP 04/02/2010 8:31:00 AM
Thank you for this article! As a WeHo home owner and resident for over ten years, I cringe every time I see all this "development" around me. I'm all for modernization, but at what price? WeHo has (had?) a unique spirit and sense of community, which has been rapidly disappearing in the last several years. Traffic has become ridiculous. Developers are making their marks even on neighborhood streets, with all these duplicate modern houses popping up everywhere (obviously built by the same - or a few developers) - which keep chipping away at the charm that was West Hollywood. Soon it will be a Manhattan with palm trees - a place you can't wait to escape from on the weekends.
Your article shed light and understanding on why so much developing is going on. What a shame that the City's Council people have been taken over by power and greed and forgotten the people they govern. Funny how history repeats itself, and they themselves are doing to West Hollywood exactly what they didn't want Los Angeles to do to it years ago. Is it too much to ask to have people in charge of our city who care more about the people who live here than their own interests or the interests of non-residents looking to make a quick buck? Perhaps this smoking ban will put out their power. They certainly won't have my vote in the next election - if they allow for one.
-
Morris Speeches 04/02/2010 8:28:00 AM
You can write all you want about the need for "new blood" but the tiny number of voters that keep voting for Heilman and Land are the poorest, the least educated people in the city. mostly living on the eastside. it's a fact. go look up the numbers of people that vote in i think the 8 or 9 voting zones in weho. And i recall there was some scandal in the last election where Heilman and Land provided taxis and limos to get people to and from the voting polls, and free meals and pastries for those that voted. this offer was only made to eastsiders. the poor eastsiders are told if they don't vote for heilmand Land they will lose their cheap apartments. the poor eastsiders, mostly Russian speaking, almost never participate of sit on commissions, speak during city council meetings or participate in any way in anything else going on for the city. none have ever run for city council. Heilman and Land have a tight grip on them, probably as tight as the 1950's Soviet leaders did, maybe even tighter. some have said if there were no rent control, apartments all over would actually get maintained and have good upkeep. and there would then be incentive with rising rents for new apartment buildings to be built but they haven't. it's a lose-lose situation for everyone except Heilman and Land and their cronnies at city hall, and their hack appointees, Lindsey being the latest and most obvious one. The article was really great and as usual, Heilman and Land will laugh it off, and figure out new ways to keep anyone else from voting except their usual group of poor and uneducated and mostly Russian eastsiders. I have tried to get some Russian people more involved and even try to run for city council, but they are too afraid. they think there will be consequences. they trust in Heilman and Land, and maybe they are right to, but the rest of the city suffers with overdevelopment, corruption, insane traffic, no parking, almost no parks, crime, alcohol consumption etc. yet somehow weho gets this reputation as some sort of oasis progressive city. it's all p.r. and it's all lies. weho is no more progressive than anywhere else. it's all the same with cronney politicians and and insular public that doesn't know what's going on and doesn't care.
-
Dante Atkins 04/02/2010 8:22:00 AM
Morris--the only good part about ageists and misogynists is that they always expose their true motives, given enough time. Thank you for doing so more quickly than even I could have expected!
-
Registered VOTER 04/02/2010 8:05:00 AM
THANK YOU L.A. Weekly!!!! The remainder of the 'free world' has term limits, so should West Hollywood. It is time for changing of the guard. I implore anyone that lives in West Hollywood that is not a registered voter, to get registered. If you are lucky enough to live in a rent controlled apartment, you better register and get someone on council that is going to look out for you! If you have some bucks and a decent personality and some business acumen and a little time, then jump into the fray and run for city council. I will vote for you. Since so few people vote, you only need about 2500 votes to get elected. Protect rent contol. Protect senior citizens. That is your platform. Oust Heilman and Land positively, Duran and Prang, in that order! Set them 'on notice' that their reign of terror as ended! Time for new blood.
-
Morris Speeches 04/02/2010 7:55:00 AM
Dante, you are out of touch. There is no need for a library anymore. Have you noticed how almost all bookstores have gone out of business? THere is a big library in Beverly Hills open to Weho residents literally a few blocks away. Also big new libraries in Hollywood for weho eastsiders. If someone can't afford to buy a Kindle, there are lots of places to get inexpensive or free used books. Women now have equal rights by law, i think we all agree that is good. I can't imagine Lindsey can make much more progress than that by being on the advisory commission for Women, which is itself a clearly sexist organization and titled sexist organization group. It would be funny to hear Lindsey explain what "height averaging" is in zoning, and how the slope of a vacant lot is calculated to determine the maximum buildable height on that lot. She's basically just out of childhood, has no accomplishments yet, and is clearly learning on the job. she has hardly expressed opinions on anything because her appointers have probably told her to keep her mouth shut and she obeys. "proven leader"? she went along with the crowd on the 5-0 vote you refer to. they didn't even need her vote for it to pass. they only needed 3 votes. why is that daring or leadership? point to something else perhaps but not that. I agree that Abbe Land and john Heilmans leadership in getting smoking laws passed is a sign of leadership and some people actually taking chances. i admire that but wonder why it's taken this long. John Duran ought to be ashamed of himself for not protecting nonsmokers. I'm not a fan of entrenched lifelong career politicians, but i agree that term limits are not needed cause we do have elections. i saw on Facebook Lindsey's recent comments all about her hairstyle changes. that's clearly what she's really concerned about, she's just too young to know more than that at the moment. but as an appointed puppet i don't have much hope for her to grow into anything more useful than someone who can comment on hairstyles.
-
David Bershad 04/02/2010 7:17:00 AM
Oh no ... how could you let the cat outta the bag exposing WeHo's entrenched City Council members and their unsavoriness in The Creative City? This isn't Vernon, private fiefdom, we're talking about, but a sophisticated city with lackadaisical constituents who have little vested interest in the goings on in their city. Perhaps cigarette smokers and their ilk will have the last word in next year's elections and smoke 'em out. This article dares to touch on the sacrosanct and the inevitable denials and chortlings of the elected-for-life smugsters. Oh ... "La publicité! La publicité!"
-
Pete Moved Away 04/02/2010 7:12:00 AM
We used to live in West Hollywood, and were forced out by new uneducated landlord. Years later the property is still the same, no new buildings. When we asked for help from city services, they failed to respond though finally showed up a day before we moved. Seems like the city where no-one in gov...works. Anyone knows that a regular house keeping is a good idea.
-
Tony Clark 04/02/2010 7:02:00 AM
Land and Heilman are only guilty of being responsible for the success and the future of West Hollywood. The rest of Los Angeles if not the country should pay good money to hear them address issues and how to overcome obstacles to create and run a progressive city. It is they vision and hard work that has been at the stern that had guided this unknown mile plus into one of the best of run parts of Los Angeles County.
Land and Heilman are willing to put their political careers on the line to ban smoking. They are not doing this to promote or popularize themselves. They are doing it for the good of the community. The words you are looking for are "Thank You"
-
Dante Atkins 04/02/2010 6:35:00 AM
Morris, your comments about libraries show just how out of touch you are. Many people can't afford several hundred dollars for a Kindle and a $15 per e-book download. Many children and young adults need the opportunity to have a private space to explore topics of their choice. There is a delicious irony in your comments here trashing the City Council for elitism because of their efforts to raise money for a library for the underprivileged.
And now, for your imbecilic attacks on Lindsey. First, she doesn't just support women's rights and LGBT rights--she is a leader in the movement, as her involvement with NOW, NWPC, and countless other organizations can attest. But for someone with supposedly no issues experience, she sure did seem to do an excellent job helping to secure a 5-0 vote for 9040 Sunset--with a living wage ordinance that will serve as a model for future development.
The fact is, Lindsey is a proven leader who commands the respect of her colleagues despite being half their age. As someone who seems to care about the future of West Hollywood, you should be excited that the community has someone like her, but you're not. You really ought to explain why.
Smart, dedicated people who have their hearts in the right place can accomplish wonders.
-
Morris Speeches 04/02/2010 5:57:00 AM
Re some other posters: libraries are dead in 2010. No need for them with computers, Kindle and the internet. They are now places only for the homeless to hangout. Lindsey Horvath is a lightweight hack appointee. she has no experience in planning issues, zoning issues, employee issues, and on and on. No experience. only experience is she is in favor of women's rights. Wow, how daring of her. John Heilman' doesn't like elections and does whatever he can to keep voting numbers as low as possible. Almost no one on the west side or north areas of weho votes. it's something like 90% of the voters living on the eastside, poorer Russian immigrants who vote to get handouts from the city. these are facts. the wealthier residents don't vote cause they don't care and are pretty content. Good point that someone made that John Heilman pretends to hate the Ellis Act, but used it against renters at that Laurel Drive home donated to the city long ago. i do think smoking should not be allowed in public places as it does harm other people. Generally a really good article and interesting comments here.
-
Zoe Nicholson 04/02/2010 5:11:00 AM
A sweet job for $825 a month? What world do you live in?
You have written a long epistle here on West Hollywood. I can only say that I am glad you are not a politician. Naming women as "feisty" and and using the term "feminist" as a pejorative - that is so yesterday. And most of the article is so yesterday. I weeded through the 7 pages and every time there was a call to not change - I said to myself, "PING." It sounded like a calliope.
Progress with intelligence, advancement with balance - WeHo once might have been more bohemian, 1984 might have taken so many residents with HIV/AIDS but the point being that it is 2010 and finding that balance is not the same as holding the past. Nostalgia is lovely but not earthquake safe.
I am unclear, do you want WeHo to be the smoking capitol of the world? Rents to stay as they were in 1985? but you want the council to change more. Your city council holds a balance of legacy and current understanding. BTW - who on earth would mock a library. Really. It begs the question - what's your agenda. It surely isn't news.
-
Cashmoney 04/02/2010 4:32:00 AM
Dreadful article.
Way too much outrage on the order of "You want A, but I want B, so you're wrong."
If there's real evidence of wrongdoing, let's see it. But carping about the lack of term limits? If you want insiders and other unaccountable interests making decisions, then term limiting politicians is the way to go.
Or WeHo's not remaining faithful to its progressive values of 1980-85 -- huh? During those year WeHo first became seriously gay-friendly, even gay-dominated. You make it sound like it was then a lonely SoCal outpost for Swedish socialists. Gays and Swedish socialists may have overlapping interests/values but not when there's money on the table.
Or your more general gripe that local politicians are too-beholden to real estate developers? Jesus, can you be any more naive? Local politics in America sooner or later comes down to real estate values and real estate development. If you're a businessman without an abiding interest (and talent for) local politics, don't become a developer -- you'll go broke.
Why do I have the impression this article is the opening blast of some insurgent's effort to oust council incumbents in the next election?
-
Dante Atkins 04/02/2010 4:29:00 AM
I find it deeply disturbing that this article derides the selection of Councilmember Horvath without examining her tireless track record of activism on behalf of the less fortunate and most vulnerable in the community--because it is that very record that would permit a recent arrival in her mid-twenties to even be considered for the vacant seat, much less be a unanimous selection.
Horvath has done unbelievable work to advance the causes of social justice in this community and beyond, especially for the LGBT community and low-income women. But rather than recognize that fact, or examine Horvath's accomplishments on the City Council since her appointment, the author instead chooses to attack her and others in an extremely unfair manner just to fit his chosen narrative.
As a young political activist myself, I can attest firsthand that it is shoddy yellow journalism like this that dissuades bright young minds from wanting to enter the field of public service. The author should be ashamed for presenting such a one-sided and deeply biased story.
-
Ed Garren 04/02/2010 4:18:00 AM
I ran for City Council in 2004-5 on these very issues, got 720 (approx.) votes and then sold my house at the top of the market to move here to Portland Oregon.
I wrote the following article for the West Hollywood News, which are prophetic to say the least, you might enjoy them:
The Despot: http://www.edgarren.us/TheDespot.html
Dear Abbe: http://www.edgarren.us/DearAbbe.html
The Trouble with Abbe: http://www.edgarren.us/TheMessOverAbbe.html
John D'Amico is the "young man" mentioned in "Dear Abbe" who told me she was going to run.
Like Alegra Allsion, I thought the city was following a progressive agenda until I had my brush with how things are really run.
Most of the problems with the city come from Mr. Heilman (who I've known since 1984) and his ability to use and craft the law to meet his obsessive/compulsive ego driven vision of the city. Basically, he thinks everyone should live like he does, a VERY frightening thought.
I left because I did not want to be the object of his vicious and vindictive personality. The sad thing is, John once was a genuine visionary, who cared about people. I don't know what happened along the way, but he has turned into an egomaniacal monster who needs to go. Abbe should go with him. The last time they were opposed, they raised over $200, 000 to get those less than 3,000 votes, and had "friends" spend an additional $150, 000 on their behalf. It's the Republican party all over again, in a supposedly "progressive" community.
As a mental health professional, I would say that they are the embodiment of someone who has surrendered any genuine emotional connection to their actions, and are functioning with only a flawed intellect, convinced that they are doing "good" in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are destroying the very ideals they were sworn to uphold. The only difference between them and the Nazi's is that they don't the legal power to actually kill people, but their monolithic exclusion of anyone who disagrees with them is paramount to doing the same thing.
The whole thing is an example of what happens when too many people don't participate in the political process, and is emblematic of the larger mess our country is currently in.
I was an early contributor to the WeHoNews, and offered early capital for it's start up as well. I am glad that Ryan has dedicated his life to the work of sharing the whole truth with the city. It's a tough and dangerous job.
Regards, Ed Garren
former: Eastside Redevelopment Project Area Commissioner
Co-Chair of the Vista Street Watch
City Council candidate (West Hollywood) in 2004-5
-
wehoitaliana 04/02/2010 1:15:00 AM
Ryan Gierach is the real unsung hero of the article for his continuing coverage of all these scandals.
More and more neighborhoods have been organizing to oppose oversized developments in the residential areas - destroying all the unique characteristic historic homes in their wake while leaving the ugly cheap architecture from the 60s-70s that encouraged the city to organize in the first place. Tara is simply the most egregious example.
As "nancy" stated before, Sunset Blvd has become a death trap for the residents who live in the hills above, and it is going to get worse with all the 10+ story high rise hotels and restaurants proposed for every block between Doheny and Laurel Canyon. The smallest project is 7 stories. Santa Monica is about to go through the same thing - the projects are on the verge of being presented. The same things are being planned for up and down La Brea, Fairfax, and even Doheny. The residents of WeHo, LA and BH have no idea what is in store for them.
Loved the mention of the Tower Records developer's 12-foot "pocket park". It was greeted by the area with the cynicism it deserved.
An in-depth article could be devoted just to develoment agreements and how they are used to get around the legal uses for the properties. Every project approved for the past two years has one and they all include kickbacks to the city. And all the "Statements of Overriding Concern"? Whew! Take a close look at that!
-
Roy Rogers Oldenkamp 04/02/2010 12:51:00 AM
The article could have gone much further. As a WEHONA co-chair, we've received endless calls from city staffers and concerned citizens divulging a series of shocking scandals, payoffs, corrupt behavior... and the city using the dreaded Ellis Act to evict tenants at Tara, while decrying said act in public. Heilman's mantra that "voting is in fact term limits" is a joke in an insulated city where the put-upon populace doesn't bother to vote any longer. Those that do are cohorts of a few incumbents and a voting bloc of the Russian Community catered to by the city for the consistency of their votes, still proud of the basic sacred franchise of voting. The irony is, the affordable housing for the Russian community will be the next to be overrun with condo development. Truly sad.
-
04/02/2010 12:00:00 AM
You mean they used corporate money to build a PUBLIC LIBRARY that all of the residents can use? The horror! What a joke of an article, full of vague generalizations but completely lacking in any real substance. Its location between Beverly Hills and Hollywood means West Hollywood will always contain some of the most sought-after real estate in the world, and will always be a target of development. I think the city does an admirable (not perfect, but admirable) job leveraging its prime location for the good of its residents.
-
H 04/01/2010 11:20:00 PM
MORE at La Brea and Santa Monica? I will personally hang them all if they dare try to touch the historic Pickfair Studios (now ''The Lot'', been there since 1919).
LA Weekly please do keep an eye on all this...
-
nancy 04/01/2010 10:19:00 PM
West Hollywood has long relied on over-development for revenue for its social services, in fact from its very inception. It has no other base of revenue but the restaurants, shops and condos.
It does NOT listen to or care about resident concerns, from those who opposed the numerous nightclubs on Sunset with hugely negative impacts on neighborhoods both in WeHo and LA - whose city limits start 50 ft. above Sunset and encompass the whole Hollywood Hills - to those who have long resisted even more huge-scale planned development on Sunset Blvd. which has for decades been gridlocked all day long. When our homeowner group organized against the Sunset Specific Plan over a decade ago, and got out thousands of signatures from LA and WeHo, we were told that the concerns of people in LA were of absolutely no concern to them, even though we take the brunt of the traffic problems, being captive to the whims of WeHo every time we leave our homes because the only access is via Sunset Blvd. Johnny Depp's recent battle with that city over a nightclub just below his home on Sunset/ Crescent Hts that blared music into his home and had parking intrude at all hours, demonstrated their "concern:" they told him to spend more time in France. When I personally asked Land to be more considerate of LA residents in their plans she brushed off my concerns with some casual remark to the effect that they do what they see best for their city and to generate revenue, as the city always has. The city is now repaving Sunset - something the broke LA is deferring on its streets - but this is just prep for lots more development.
They plan to push through high-density retail/residential on Sunset as soon as the economy allows, has plans for the former Tower Records to go high-rise, and a recent report claimed there is "ample room for development" along the already congested La Brea/ Santa Monica Blvd. corner where Target's mall stands - the same corner where across the street, LA activists have fought revamping and adding to a run-down old rent-controlled building and vilified its councilman and the whole city for allowing the property owner to upgrade and better use that space - with LOTS and lots and lots of input from neighbors in WeHo as well.
Such L A homeowner and activist groups have gone to the OTHER extreme here and in WLA in particular, opposing anything that brings in revenue - so LA is broke while WeHo is raking in the bucks. Only private over-development in the hills seems to continue, with no hillside ordinance in place for years to come. Some moderate medium would be needed but exists in neither city.
-
David Ehrenstein 04/01/2010 10:02:00 PM
Teriffic article.
When Imoved to L.A. from New York back in 1976 WeHo was a wonderfully louche place to hang out. The bars and gyms were great fun. Dance events too. But if "success" means "money" then I;d rather have "failure."
-
Joe Mannetti 04/01/2010 9:56:00 PM
"WOW! First, Ricky Martin 'comes out,' then this news on West Hollywood. I don't know if I can stand another shocking revelation!"
- Joe Mannetti
-
WeHoDude 04/01/2010 9:09:00 PM
Fuhrman moved to France. He was awesome. As is the LA Weekly for doing this long overdue exposé on my corrupt city.
Ethics Watchdog Drops Chase in W. Hollywood:
http://articles.latimes.com/2004/sep/21/local/me-ethics21
-
Morris Speeches 04/01/2010 6:42:00 PM
I recall that it was activist James Fuhrman who was the first one to call out the city council and the career politicians who use it in weho for their own egos and power. I don't know what happened to him but he uncovered outrages almost every day; one comes to mind was that Mr. John Heilman listed his city deputy on his USC class assignment sheets as a contact for the students if they had questions. can't get much worse that that. Loved the article! Morris Speeches