-
concerned teacher 04/26/2012 10:23:00 AM
OMG< I totally agree with how dysfuctioal LAUSD is! The world needs to know this. There is no due proess of law you are guility w/o being proven innocent. LAUSD as its own court and they have their own agenda before they ever meet you! You are guilty and have no chance to tell your side of whatever minor,no nothing thing that you are falslely accused of. They have their own agenda before you even arrive in their office. The world needs to know just how corrupt LAUSD really is !!
-
roque burio jr 10/06/2011 11:09:00 PM
The underperforming and ineffective teachers are made by vindictive administrators. Here is how they do it: assigned to targeted teachers students that misbehaved a lot, assigned students with very unreasonably demanding parents, assigned to them students that are difficult to teach and unwilling to learn, evaluate the said teachers in one day and look for things that are not found in their lessons and never come back for follow up to see those things the next day, give vindictive, false and biased evaluations to fail the said teachers, compile in their record those false and vindictive evaluations in preparations of their dismissal after a while, refuse to deliver to the said teachers sufficient text books and other supplies on time, then blame the said teachers for failure to deliver the lesson without textbooks and specimen, and ignore the legitimate reasons of the said teachers of the inefficiency of the school in helping the said teachers and students. An d many more…
-
Burio2sch 09/20/2011 6:16:00 AM
e truth is after the LAUSD lawyers falsely accused and falsely charged Roque Burio (real name Roque A. Burio Jr.), the latter immediately asked for a hearing before the administrative Court. The LAUSD lawyers knowing that it would be difficult for them to proved any of those false and uncertified accusations and charges in Court immediately offered Roque Burio a Settlement of $50,000. Roque Burio at that time was poisoned with drug and suffered lost of balance and visual difficulty in court. The LAUSD lawyers refused him any extension of the process of dismissal and threatened him with suspension or dismissal from LAUSD and revocation or suspension of his teaching credential. He knew that the Law was not in favor with the teachers because the LAUSD could suspend him for more than 10 days and his credential would be automatically suspended or even revoked. Furthermore his would be lawyer withdrew from the hearing for some unknown reason after talking with the LAUSD lawyers. The explanation of the said lawyer was that the district wanted Roque Burio to be left alone. The LAUSD lawyers also called his lawyer a rat. Thus being sick, and without a lawyer or support of the union he had no choice but to accept the offered settlement of the LAUSD. Why the LAUSD did offer him money and settlement of accusations and charges if they were not false? It seems I am very tempted to ask the new General Counsel to reopen the cases against me.
Later on, the General Counsel Holmquist told him on the phone that he could never come back to the LAUSD unless he would sue the LAUSD in Court and all of Homquist’s lawyers would see him in court.
The truth is that under the Law, only the LAUSD could file complaints against the teachers before the said Administrative Court and never vice versa. So it seems to appear to me that Holmquist must only be bragging but really unwilling and he seems to be scared to see Burio in the said Administrative Court
If indeed Holmquist really wants to see me in Court to show that the LAUSD were right, then he should reopen the charges against me in the said Administrative Court and I will obligingly but very gladly see him and his bunch of lawyers to prove that that LAUSD falsely charged and falsely accused me. It seems to me that Holmquist was removed as General Counsel because he could never prove in the Court that LAUSD was right in charging and accusing me and branding me as underperforming or ineffective teacher. It seems to appear to me that I am only a scapegoat like other teachers for the failure of the entire LAUSD.
-
Burio2sch 09/19/2011 7:08:00 PM
Roque Burio is a licensed physician from the Philippines and nas Profesional Clear Credential to teach cnemistry in California. He graduated with Bachelor of Science in Preparatory Medicine and Bachelor of Laws from the Uniiversity of the Philippines. He graduated with Doctor of Medicine from the University of the East Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Medical Center in the Philippines. He graduated with his Clear teaching credential in chemistry from California State University in Northridge.It seemed that he was a victim of administrative menopausal syndromes, so he has forgiven all of those who offended him with their false and uncertified charges and wrong evaluations.
-
Rendied69 05/21/2011 1:00:00 AM
You are my kind of dude.
fellow ADHD bad student and Iconoclast being exploited and violated by UTLA AND LAUSD
-
02/19/2011 4:59:00 AM
A rant in honor of my run-on champion hero of snide: Dennis Miller:
Teacher UNION LEADERS: Is the answer to the upcoming question, simply the dark supporting buttress-(other crucial facet of the unions human creativity/resourcefulness litigator/mitigatory) the ACLU? Or, is there an entire educational culture...Sound asleep!!!! Please take part with me in a word salad designed to keep your head off your desk, imparting run-on solutions for the demise of American child education that are curiously,....curiously, readily available.
Read the dumb-arse simple solution below- to current educational problems and tell me either WHY it is not attainable, OR at least, describe the opaque neurological state of such a group of unfortunate dolts-on-the-dole as it pertains to a powerful educational associations' inability to inculcate further a Lemon teacher through Teacher-Skills 201-Continuing-Education-Program, and why, unlike children with tutors, it would all just bead up and roll off a lemons' scull like water off a ducks back, affording the system a net positive effect of zero?
QUESTION?
How on Gods Green Earth has leadership in the educational industrial complex
managed to sustain wholesale prevention of implementing changes in the union by-laws, so that motionless, full-salaried sequestered lemons might NEVER BE be required to attend 5 day 5 hour a week, highly effective teaching-skills/people-skills/vocal skills courses replete with graphical, dynamic, metaphorical, repetitive, colorful, synonym laden, slathered with luxurious, melodious mood assistance... gasp! (The $529.00 Rosetta monster.big screen WII DVD-pak teaching method that will replace all of you if you don't soon open the creative resource files you have hidden from one another other through protracted and layered, enabler institutional guarantees (gray ideological flavored brain fogg.)
---(easily constructed by the way - mufti curriculum program done and delivered voluntarily in 6 weeks by mail (shipping $137.00 USPS) by the finest, typically more than willing, outside-the socialist box, bright light teachers nationwide..and handed off to the best free thinking video graphics geeks...
Ohhhh noooooo!! A civil righ t s issue:~~~.....mandatory testing and individual grading of government employees DAILY on each crucial section,
wHY NOT?....LET us ELABORATE...I know you leaders are maxed out and pressured and distracted and smug and insanely overly confident....... having handed each other circular rhetoric for so long............... so........... read on. It's stuff for the sleepy.........IT'S A TEACHING METHOD....Let ME BE A BIT INTERESTING, AND dynamic.
WHY NOT advise, catechize, coach, communicate, cram, demonstrate, develop, direct, discipline, drill, edify, enlighten, exercise, explain, expound, fit, form, give instruction, give lessons, give the facts, ground, guide, illustrate, imbue, impart, GET IT?
implant, improve mind, inculcate, indoctrinate, inform, initiate, instruct, interpret, lecture, nurture, open eyes, polish up, pound into, prepare, profess, rear, school, sharpen, show, show the ropes, train,............... tutor the lemon flavored resources YOU ALREADY PAY!!!
They are being paid. pAY THEM TO LEARN THEIR CRAFT.
Synonyms: ~~~~breed, cultivate, develop, discipline, educate, feed, form, foster, nourish, nurture, provide for, rear, school, support, teach , train.
WWWAAAAKE UP!!!! beloved, sLEEEPY UNION leaders... .. Teach the teachers. Make it mandatory for continuing employment. Schools not so bad. They may enjoy it.
Or.........Is the menace mentioned in the first run-on sentence in this rant, the reason dimwitted failure continues in American child education as legally fueled, protected normalcy.
Sincerely,
A brilliant, largely rehabilitated D+ high-school ADD grad. Successful businessman, father, lecturer, artist, musician, financial professional.
-
Aavery6801 02/19/2011 4:13:00 AM
A rant in honor of my run-on champion hero of snide: Dennis Miller:
Teacher UNION LEADERS: Is the answer to the upcoming question, simply the dark supporting buttress-(other crucial facet of the unions human creativity/resourcefulness litigator/mitigatory) the ACLU? Or, is there an entire educational culture...Sound asleep!!!! Please take part with me in a word salad designed to keep your head off your desk, imparting run-on solutions for the demise of American child education that are curiously,....curiously, readily available.
Read the dumb-arse simple solution below- to current educational problems and tell me either WHY it is not attainable, OR at least, describe the opaque neurological state of such a group of unfortunate dolts-on-the-dole as it pertains to a powerful educational associations' inability to inculcate further a Lemon teacher through Teacher-Skills 201-Continuing-Education-Program, and why, unlike children with tutors, it would all just bead up and roll off a lemons' scull like water off a ducks back, affording the system a net positive effect of zero?
QUESTION?
How on Gods Green Earth has leadership in the educational industrial complex
managed to sustain wholesale prevention of implementing changes in the union by-laws, so that motionless, full-salaried sequestered lemons might NEVER BE be required to attend 5 day 5 hour a week, highly effective teaching-skills/people-skills/vocal skills courses replete with graphical, dynamic, metaphorical, repetitive, colorful, synonym laden, slathered with luxurious, melodious mood assistance... gasp! (The $529.00 Rosetta monster.big screen WII DVD-pak teaching method that will replace all of you if you don't soon open the creative resource files you have hidden from one another other through protracted and layered, enabler institutional guarantees (gray ideological flavored brain fogg.)
---(easily constructed by the way - mufti curriculum program done and delivered voluntarily in 6 weeks by mail (shipping $137.00 USPS) by the finest, typically more than willing, outside-the socialist box, bright light teachers nationwide..and handed off to the best free thinking video graphics geeks...
Ohhhh noooooo!! A civil righ t s issue:~~~.....mandatory testing and individual grading of government employees DAILY on each crucial section,
wHY NOT?....LET us ELABORATE...I know you leaders are maxed out and pressured and distracted and smug and insanely overly confident....... having handed each other circular rhetoric for so long............... so........... read on. It's stuff for the sleepy.........IT'S A TEACHING METHOD....Let ME BE A BIT INTERESTING, AND dynamic.
WHY NOT advise, catechize, coach, communicate, cram, demonstrate, develop, direct, discipline, drill, edify, enlighten, exercise, explain, expound, fit, form, give instruction, give lessons, give the facts, ground, guide, illustrate, imbue, impart, GET IT?
implant, improve mind, inculcate, indoctrinate, inform, initiate, instruct, interpret, lecture, nurture, open eyes, polish up, pound into, prepare, profess, rear, school, sharpen, show, show the ropes, train,............... tutor the lemon flavored resources YOU ALREADY PAY!!!
They are being paid. pAY THEM TO LEARN THEIR CRAFT.
Synonyms: ~~~~breed, cultivate, develop, discipline, educate, feed, form, foster, nourish, nurture, provide for, rear, school, support, teach , train.
WWWAAAAKE UP!!!! beloved, sLEEEPY UNION leaders... .. Teach the teachers. Make it mandatory for continuing employment. Schools not so bad. They may enjoy it.
Or.........Is the menace mentioned in the first run-on sentence in this rant, the reason dimwitted failure continues in American child education as legally fueled, protected normalcy.
Sincerely,
A brilliant, largely rehabilitated D+ high-school ADD grad. Successful businessman, father, lecturer, artist, musician, financial professional.
-
Pjac492311 01/26/2011 7:43:00 PM
Dr. Myers,
I have experience something similar; however, I have fought and I continue to fight--LAUSD has a very corrupt system. I am a special education teacher. I came to this state with a Life-time Teaching Credential. I received my administrative credential by taking the national exam and just received a master's in Education Administration and one more class before receiving another master's in Special Education. I am from the midwest where grammar, sentence structure (the art of writing and comprehending) were valued. What I discovered, was quite the opposite of the propaganda that is being carefully placed in the media. I was harassed by a principal who was not qualified to be principal and she has single-handedly destroyed the middle school and she is still in place. She did not have a clue as to what is going on and when she became principal she did not have a credential and she did not have her CLAD. She accused me of not having one two years straight and continuously placed it on my evaluations despite the fact that the information is on the California State Website. She further lied and wrote derogatory statements and once she found that I had my administrative credential she became livid. The school has had a teacher turnover--of anywhere from 10 to 22 teachers per year. According to Great Schools-- the School has maintained a rating of 2 for the last 3 years. Great Schools bases its ratings on CST Scores--she was supposedly sent there to turn the school around with no experience, but support of eveyone she has managed to deceive. This principal got the job in July 2005 on the Westside of Los Angeles and as of March 2007 did not have a CLad--GO FIGURE. HOPE YOU HAD SUCCESS WITH YOUR HEARING-
I currently have a case before the Court of Appeals as well as an administrative hearing coming up in March. It's unfortunate that the newspapers only tell one side of the story and have not uncovered the level of corruption that exist within the hierarchy of the District--hiring friends and family members. LAUSD has been spending money like drunken sailors for years. Nevertheless, the media, parents, and state officials have failed to look at poor administrators. A school can only be as good as the leader--that is why you have so many failing schools in the state and in the country at large. Yet, they continue to throw good money after these inept administrators.
P. Jackson
-
Radaxis7 01/11/2011 4:55:00 AM
Emma--we need your penetrating perception and passion to make what you and I know public. Please check out NAPTA and Perdaily.com then talk at me. RADaxis7@aol.com
-
Radaxis7 01/11/2011 3:44:00 AM
Dr. Meyers, please contact me ASAP at radaxis7@aol.com and visit perdaily.com as well as NAPTA. We can help you and we need your voice to be heard.
-
Cheyenne 10/23/2010 4:12:00 AM
All I can say is, "Do they get it?" How terrible must a situation become before we can oust over-the-hill and out-of-control teachers. I AM a teacher and I completely agree and sympathize with this poor principal. Shame on the forces that would argue to retain a lame duck at the expense of her students.She got a job training teachers? Isn't that like giving a cripple a job training marathon runners? Sad sad sad Thank God this teacher
can no longer waste taxpayers' money and more importantly, young children's minds. Good riddance!!!!!
-
Dr. Patricia Myers 10/23/2010 3:56:00 AM
I have taught for 22 years in Calif. I have credentials to teach Government, Foreign Language (Spanish), Special Education, and a Ph.D. in Education with emphasis on Special Education. I have NEVER had a negative performance review or evaluation. But, apparently I have committed the cardinal sin of veteran teachers because I have been suspended without pay since last July for not getting a certificate to teach English Learners. I have a hearing before an Administrative Judge on Nov. 22. The allegations are for being "unfit" and unprofessional conduct. My conviction is that the current EL programs are a "one-size-fits-all" approach to EL literacy and are ineffective. The average EL take 6 years in the state of Calif. to reach proficiency in English. This is not acceptable. I believe our state education system is exploiting the English Learner because the majority of the people benefiting from the mandated programs are NOT EL. Time and money is being taken from these students and directed into teaching programs for teachers. The money should be put into language labs and directed teaching of English, not theory and learning long lists of acronyms.
Dr. Patricia Myers
La Mirada
-
cheap mac makeup 08/18/2010 8:25:00 AM
top quality mac makeup wholesale at mac cosmetics outlet.
-
cheap designer clothes 08/18/2010 8:24:00 AM
just to do designer clothes wholesale with fashion designer clothes store.
-
mac cosmetics wholesale 08/18/2010 8:23:00 AM
there are many discount mac cosmetics on sale!
-
jef 07/17/2010 6:47:00 PM
After years and years of, how shall I say this, people who are not leftists screaming about the state of the teachers union, NOW you people are waking up? The conservatives were 100% correct on this issue, and the Dems and lefties wrong. One more reason why I would never left a Democrat run fudge shop. Shame on you all, this is simply another form of child abuse. Next to implode is Hussein Obamacare, and the cult of global warming.
-
Mongoose 07/03/2010 5:31:00 AM
The reporter has not done her homework. This particular LAUSD principal, Irene Hinojosa, was not only outed by the staff at Fries Elementary in Wilmington, but also at her previous school at 20th St. Elementary School in L.A. for incompetence and general stupidity. "Dance of the lemons"? Right song, wrong target.
-
charmie 07/02/2010 3:24:00 PM
I too am a teacher. Sadly, the above can be said for some of our teachers but thankfully, they are few and far between. I find the system to be imperfect but the alternative is worse yet. Who can say what is good and what is bad arbitrarily? So many of the LAUSD administrators I have met in my 37 years of teaching, are truly under qualified for their positions as curriculum leaders let alone managers of schools. Many have not served as educators long enough to know what the standards are and how to meet them. The Stull Evaluation is useless at best. I would prefer to have a teacher who is highly regarded in a particular academic area, evaluate me and help me to improve, not a professional administrator who lacks the ability to judge. I am sure this lawyer in the article has seen the very worst of this system and the fact that this teacher's poor teaching style was not "caught" and nipped in the bud. What I have seen over the years are lazy admins who would rather "pass" a teacher than get involved. I commend Ms. Hinojosa for documenting. I have seen this process work with the help of teachers. Having someone go over a "standard" over and over again is not a very efficient nor effective way to help "improve" or motivate a "burnout". It is more likely a futile attempt by a poorly qualified administrator. It is important to have "due process" to protect people who "are" doing their job, from being singled out and pushed out of their jobs. The unions should support this process as a means to improve the quality of education. They do need to protect all of our rights. I am sure that "rights" are going to be misinterpreted by a reader who may see this as an "excuse" for poor teaching. Trust me, it is not. It is easy to judge, but I have seen administrators use many means to intimidate teachers including outrageous sexual harassment. When this occurred in my career, I called upon the liaison for LAUSD for Title IX. She told me that I should not file on him because it would make it difficult for me to move up if I chose to take a different path. As a mentor teacher and a union rep, I did, however, participate in "helping" two burnout teachers try and restart their passion with the help of a very qualified and skilled administrator. One of the teachers finally retired early in frustration while the other made amazing improvement which lasted until her retirement 2 years later. If an administrator does his/her job correctly, it is not as hard as they say to move a person along. If that person takes extreme measures then that is what rarely, if ever happens, as in this case. We should not throw the baby out with the bathwater. It would be a huge step backwards and victimize not only the teachers who are doing their jobs, but all of the children will be affected. As it is, over the years, I have watched administrators take portages under their wings who are far from qualified but are either family, friend or relative of friend. For me, this nepotism seems to be an LAUSD problem. The brightest and the best are NOT being wooed nor groomed form moving up the administrative ladder. I was once told, while a young teacher, that I should consider going into administration because, as he put it, "...that's where the money is..." I did not get into education for the "money" job. Evidently, he did. He as well as at least 4 other administrators I have worked with over the last 33 years, have been lead to leave the district rather than be fired, as they should have been, for gross negligence and extremely poor money management in which funds just went missing. Yet, these former LAUSD administrators, who were encouraged to leave the district, with references, are now working in other school districts making top salaries. One should look into THAT history if you want to see ludicrous behavior by a school district. Prisons are filled with people who have done less than these folks, yet if the district were to actually fire them, they might "looK" bad.
-
Louis vuitton 06/21/2010 8:16:00 AM
louis vuitton outlet
louis vuitton wallet
louis vuitton replica
louis vuitton backpack
louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton handbags on sale
discount louis vuitton handbags
replica louis vuitton handbags
louis vuitton bags
louis vuitton multicolore
prada 2m0513 wallet
-
DH 06/12/2010 8:48:00 AM
I've taught in LAUSD for over 20 years --tenured for the last 17 years. The root of all these problems is that we give teachers the power both 1) to teach, and 2) to evaluate the success of their teaching (in the grating of credits to their students). The Stull process is 95% BS. Teachers the administrators like (not surprisingly because they don't cause any extra work for the admins), sail through it. Teachers who have "caused trouble" (sending too many students down for discipline, complaining about this or that) are scrutinized with a fine tooth comb, and lapses are found. Sure there are terrible teachers, but the Stull process (where teachers are told precisely where and when they will be viewed) is a "just going through the motions" legalistic kind of thing. Why not just have a disinterested 3rd party (let's call them "Quality Control") test the students at various stages throughout the course, and SEE one way or the other if the teacher is effective. A nice side bonus of this is that you can enforce standards very effectively this way. That is, if teachers know their students will be tested on a given body of material, you can be sure that's what the teacher will cover in the class. A third nice side bonus of this is that it puts the students and their teacher ON THE SAME SIDE. The students need their teacher to learn the stuff. No more "teacher's pets", but mainly, no more teachers covering their butts by letting the credits and grades flow freely. Alas, admins will not welcome this that much because they too benefit from the free flowing of credits. It makes the school --and hence them-- look good. But that's the beginning of reform: teacher's are not the ones to decide if a student has mastered the course. Teacher's teach. Trust me, it's enough to keep a person busy.
-
Rene Diedrich 06/11/2010 6:30:00 AM
I was recently put on leave after 7 years with LAUSD for reporting a teacher who was emotionally and verbally abusing our students. She has been violating district policy and recently broke state laws by forcing a girl in labor to take her final exam or fail the class, which meant she wouldn't graduate this year. As it turns out, the teacher failed her anyway (probably because word got back to me about what happened) and the student dropped out despite a solid GPA, which only this teacher compromised. The student, an illegal, will not risk her residency or her family's safety by seeking justice for herself; she's busy with her new baby, better off taking the GED and putting the ugliness behind her. She is one of many students who have been victimized by this teacher, who has not had to answer for her actions since our school was commandeered by the present administration. Unfortunately, the teacher is in the small circle of those teachers the principal keeps close to him---students and parents who complain are ignored, even punished for doing so. While other teachers are routinely written up for merely disciplining students and/or failing too many, this teacher is consistantly permitted to fail seniors on a whim, deny special education students IEP accomodations, to sell school supples (district paid for) to students and to treat students and other teachers with public contempt, including calling one scholarly young woman a "a hooker"in her class and having me investigated for calling her a name on three occassions that proved I'd done nothing of the sort until the AP decided to help her and the principal by suggesting students had suddenly said I had said something in March, though none of them are quoted and the details of these allegations are limited to allusions to a conflict between us that the other teacher alone wallowed (I have no time for this nonsense) in and the administrators indulged by interrogating students we shared for the last two years. She accused me of threatening her after I followed protocol by warning her in a private e-mail that I'd report future violations on her part to the officials downtown if the abuse continued. It was a scathing missive, but I never made any threats, never physically intimidated her at a meeting full of teachers, who saw nothing like this happen,as the AP said I did with such conviction you'd think she'd caught it on video, nor did I threaten her life; all accusations are without substance, but administration cultivated them as they conspired to have me removed before any case could be made against her or them for their unethical, often illegal antics, which included white collar crime, harassment, slander and subversion of due process, which protected this notoriously cruel colleague from fall out for her dirty deeds while denying me basic civil rights and the proper protocol for discipline in our contract. With this fascist ironically teaching the principals of Democracy, failing seniors with arbitrary grading practices that she employed to gleefully enforce her grudges while maintaining her repuation and power--a proccupation she made no aplogies about indulging-- and an administration that was obsessed with filling teachers' files with trumped up nonsense, it was clear to many of us that both the district and the union (who is so busy defending RIFs, it cannot find time to protect teachers who have paid their dues)were not interested in protecting us or the best interests of the students. Soon my colleagues and I realized tenure (an issue I myself have questioned because of teachers who DO show movies daily to avoid the exhausting demands of their duties, who DO mistreat students and who DO NOT model the kind of pedagogy or character one expects from an earnest professional) would not protect us from this principal's mendacity or malicious motives when he went after anyone who dared to speak up or take a stand for students and each other instead of teachers who didn't do their jobs or follow rules. Most of us close the doors to our classrooms,keep our mouths shut, holding on to hope as we wait out this principal's "promotion"(administrators are promoted for failure at LAUSD)and endured the constant chaos created by the people in charge who were clueless about how to create a viable schedule, how to keep our campus clean and safe and how to defer to their most valuable resources: teachers, who know the school, the students, and the community they are committed to. With a crushing workload created from kids crammed into the classrooms and the lack of planning for tests and other urgent matters on our leaders' part, few of us had time or energy to fight back anyway.
My friends joke that I suffer from a Joan of Arc Complex because I refused to back down, believing the district would see how detrimental the administration was to our community's children and the devoted staff who still worked tirelessly to serve them. The questions about our budget, which included a grant to improve instruction that our principal failed to use accordingly for keeping down class size and facillitating meaninful professional development to squander on $1000 PDAs for the APs and deans, to create overpaid out-of-classroom positions (we do not need these costly concessions to cronyism) to reward his accomplices and for many other expenses the faculty never had a say in (he even refused to explain what anything under $5000 was spent on!). Despite the teacher-driven paradigms we were supposed to be operating under and a budget committee he greeted with hostile deflections, blaming the union reps for his failure to fill us in on details about the money we'd won before he was at the school and will lose because he did not meet the requirements to facillitate future funding, this principal remains arrogantly immune to any accountability for his actions. Indeed, he was allowed to manufacture an ammended series of allegations against me after deliberately tampering with my file, depriving me of access to it so I could grieve his unjust disciplinary harassment and ultimately constructed in a blatent fraud that is felonious because he hid evidence, embellished the accusations against me and ultimately betrayed himself and the AP in an effort to interfere with an investigation that would reveal my efforts to protect students were the real motive for this disciplinary excess. Contrary to what this article suggests, I was taken out of my classroom despite my solid teaching practices, positive impact on student success and often unpaid efforts to develop interventions, tutoring and the development of small learning communities which offered personalization and potential our current principal unilaterially negated, making them into a prop to appease the QUIA Grant officers while he had his way iwth our school structure.
I have a very close rapport with students, who have have expressed vehement outrage at losing their teacher. They know I am their advocate, that they were learning in my class and that my abrupt removal was an absolute betrayal of their best interests, especially AP students preparing for their exam and seniors I'd been helping through the transition from HS to college or vocational schools. However, of the close to 200 students I had, the sophomores were the most upset because I represented one of the few teachers they have who facillitated Socratic discourse, kept the lessons lively and relevant, always forgiving their hormonal lunacy without hesitation because I have such sincere affection for them, even the bad kids, especially the bad kids, because they teach me so much as they give my life meaning, purpose it never had before. When these kids tried to circulate a petition in my behalf, it was confiscated. When they rejected the sub, demanding THIER teacher be returned, the principal asked, "What difference does it make who teaches your English class?" When the older students dared to ask questions, he dodged them, lied to them and blamed the situation on the district--his typical tactic for coping with his errors, which I had addressed on many occasions because these errors usually had a negative impact of our instruction or serving students' needs. I have been harassed for over two years as this principal, a petty, punintive personality disorder who is so paranoid he walks around with an amplifier in his ear to eavesdrop on conversations, on classes in session and on meetings; he saw me (and others) as a threat to his tenuous leadership, which tore our thriving school culture and usurped an exceptional staff with his divide and conquer tactics. We soon learned he'd replaced a qualified, credentialed principal we'd hired to replace our former principal (a formidable and fair man) because he'd been in so much hot water at another high school for his wanton attacks on female staff who filed complaints against him. Without a proper credential or experience, he was promoted to principal of my school for reasons that expose just how corrupt the district is. Referring to his close relationship with high ranking district officials, abusing grant funding to create jobs for the greedy, unethical and typically incompetent cronies in his corner while displacing teachers and counselours we need while intimidating staff with his unchecked power, this principal has the district and the law behind him because he cannot be prosecuted or liable for his administrative practices, even if they are illegal and acted upon with intentional malice.
This is clearly the motive in my situation, which was set up to deny me any credibility after I'd reported non-compliance in our special education department that interfered with our students' rights to proper accomodations, expected resource teachers to write illegal IEPs, violated ADA protection for teachers and students and put one student with serious health issues in grave danger while depriving him of his right to take the AP exam. The fact that the principal and an AP protected this teacher, who denied a pregnant student her civil rights, breaking state laws by doing so, by minimizing her accountability and the ramifications of her other "harsh" policies was also an issue I was not going to drop; they knew this could become a serious problem unless they got rid of me and made an example of me to discourage other teachers from whistleblowing. So one day in late April the AP interuptted my class to say I had a serious problem, stirring my students' concerns and assuring me that my escalating, often debilitating panic attacks were a response to the real threats these people posed to me personally and professionally. I was removed from my post because I alledgedly told a senile old social studies teacher weeks before that I wanted this other teacher dead (when I finally got a copy of the reports a month later he quoted me as saying: "I wouldn't mind if Mrs. X were dead"--hardly a death threat, though I never said it). A campus officer was present at this impromptu meeting that took place a week after i was supposed to have made the threat, but my union rep was convienently unavailable as he was in class, and, according to the AP this issue was urgent. She refused to share any informatioon with me and when I requested a copy of the police report, she turned on me with an implied threat: "It hasn't come to that. Yet." Knowing this woman and the others were willing to commit perjury to serve their treacherous careerist agendas, I knew better than to push my luck and end up in jail for terrorist threats or worse. I went home, called the union and my attorney.
I spent a few days in district jail, which was populated by teachers who included a few odd but apparently benign older women, a black gentleman who admitted he'd chased kids around a middle school classroom with a belt, a teacher accused of protecting himself from a known gang member who threatened to "put a cap in his ass" (the kid was not punished despite witness statements that sided with the teacher, but he had still not had a hearing 6 months after the incident) and a guy who was accused of molesting small children, a case police dropped, but the district wisely refused to, refusing to return the guy to his post as guilty or not, the community knew what he was accused of doing and it was dangerous to take the risk for his sake and the kids'. I felt a few of these teachers might indeed be unfit for the classroom, but I knew my evaluations, along with the avalanche of student support I still recieve proved that I was an asset at my school but a liability to those who were having their way with power and money at its expense.
In a way, I felt I was making a sacrafice for the sake of my school because when the truth came out, these administrators would be removed and we could actually consider reforms that cut away the malignant growth of educrats, who are not essential, who are, in fact, often counter-productive, lawless and so incompetent, they can't stop squandering our money even as class size doubles and our students' success becomes more unlikely than ever. Why are teachers being cut but no one in the offices are facing lay offs or pay cuts?
Surely the state needs to audit LAUSD, and the president has to impose more sophisticated scrutiny of the real culprits in the downfall of public education instead of accepting this anti-teacher propoganda. But until teachers have a plan in place and the courage to unify with parents to reform schools in urban communities like mine, we will never be able to answer our calling or realize a society that is educated thus equitable and evolving towards an enlightened state. I am willing to burn at the stake for this crusade, and I suggest L.A. Weekly dig a little deeper into what is going on with LAUSD before joining this anti-teacher smear campaign. Why not go d while hard working downtown to headquarters and get a long hard look at how much dead weight is draining our county's resources, making our work close to impossible with an incredible workload yet constantly cutting our pay and corroding our contracts. Other teachers reading this should be wary and vigilent as they assemble a new order or face the wrath of our oppressive employers, who want to pay us less to do more while keeping us at the mercy of snakes in suits who could not handel the demands of being in the classroom, much less last in the private sector despite thier assertions that education is a "business." Please check out Perdaily.com to discover the origin of what could and should be a revolution for those of us who teach for numinous reasons these educrats will ultimately undermine unless we all take a stand.
-
jr 05/06/2010 9:18:00 AM
I have for the past five years have had access to multiple LAUSD classrooms on a daily basis. I am not employed directly by LAUSD. I have had some amazing experiences with teachers who truly are gifted and joyful in their endeavors. However, just recently, I had to report a LAUSD special ed teacher for slapping a child repeatedly, having the children sing "Shame on you " songs to each other, saying "you suck" and "You will never read" and "I don't like you" to students in her room. This teacher also spent hours a day on a computer while a district aide worked with the children.
Another year, there was a kindergarten teacher who repeatedly tried to give dairy products to a child despite the parents and a doctor stating this child could not ingest dairy. The teacher's reasoning? "No kids are allergic to dairy." I had to actually take dairy products out of this child's hand.
In the first situation, this teacher was reported and spend a total of one afternoon out of the classroom. The parent was informed an investigation took place three weeks later, despite the parent calling the school. She is still allowed to be teaching and this really concerns me. How is this teacher at least no on probation?
-
Emma Rosenthal 03/11/2010 1:05:00 AM
The Attack on Tenure and Teachers' Job Security
Emma Rosenthal
emmarosenthal@earthlink.net
Los Angeles, CA
As someone who retired from LAUSD with disability retirement after trying to get the most minimal of accommodations for my dis-ability and facing incredible harassment for such a request;
As someone who requested basic accommodations, found ways to make the whole proposal cost free for the District while offering to fill high need hard to staff areas of education, (bilingual special ed) and fully aware that if I had merely kept my mouth shut, showed Disney movies, gave out busy work, and gave all my students C's, then I would have had no problem with the same administration, but only had a problem when requesting the resources to do my job well.
As someone who NEVER had a bad evaluation, had several outstanding evaluations, and wrote and received several grants and coordinated several school wide programs;
As someone who filed and won approx 30 grievances against the district for collective and individual violations of the contract, never observing any consequences, reassignments, discipline etc against these principals for such wanton rights violations;
As someone who observed and confronted gross misuse of school funds and a crony system that favored mediocrity and obedience over dedication and commitment to teaching;
As someone who used tenure to defend and advocate for students and the community and teachers, against the will of the administration;
As someone who ONLY KNEW ONE ADMINISTRATOR who went after bad teachers-- with the full support of the highly unionized faculty. (I consider her the best administrator I worked with);
As someone who observed administrators go after activists, whistle blowers, community, educator, worker and student advocates while perpetuating or ignoring sexual harassment, sexual abuse, hate speech, racism, sexism, dis-ability discrimination etc. both by staff and students;
As someone who graduated magna cum laude, is bilingual in English and Spanish, continues to study and to teach, is a life long activist and writer;
I find it hard to believe that:
1. Michael Kim, a man with cerebral palsy, who neurologically can't control his hands, is the best example of the district trying to defend the rights of staff and students against sexual harassment and gropping!
More to point, the District doesn't WANT dis-abled teachers. This whole case was totally offensive and outrageous, and should be transparent; a perfect example of how dis-ability discrimination is used to take us all down, to set a pretext for greater rights violations.
2. the present administration is able to select the appropriate teachers for dismissal-- which of course would explain why it is so hard to fire the teachers the district is trying to fire. It is quite possible that very few of these people should be fired and the ones that need to go are comfortably doing the principal's bidding!!!
3 given that the City of Los Angeles decided NOT to fire a single cop for beating up press and community members for the May Day demonstration a few years back, wonders what city employees ARE doing that warrants (“the easy” removal from their positions.
4. there are only bad teachers and not bad administrators, who also need to be removed from their positions which the district can do, and doesn’t. It seems that a lot of bad teaching might be resolved by creating acceptable working conditions, starting with a supportive administration.
5. that the grievance process is the problem, The grievance process is a three step process: 1.A meeting with the principal, 2. A meeting with the area supt. And 3. Binding arbitration with an arbitrator chosen by both the union and the district. A principal looses a grievance against a teacher when either the District or the arbitrator chosen by the district says a violation of that teacher’s rights has occurred. In such a situation is it right to assume that it is the teacher that is failing to perform basic assigned duties?
6.that settlements of 40-100 thousand dollars for the removal of teachers the District wants to fire, are excessive and against whom no evidence exists, other than district say so, that these teachers deserve to lose their careers, which includes 5 years of university study, and often thousands of dollars each year for materials the District fails to provide and in a District that has bought out the contracts of several of its superintendants for over half a million dollars.
The entire premise of the Weekly article is that the District can't fire the teachers it wants to fire because of the Union and tenure, and not that these constructs actually protect the academic freedom of teachers who should not have been brought under scrutiny in the first place.
There is no evidence IN THE ARTICLE, except the District's say so, that the District is actually trying to fire the BAD teachers. That is an essential missing element of the article. Sure there are bad teachers. But if the district isn't going after bad teachers, but is going after teachers who demand their rights or the rights of others, then the waste of resources is even more outrageous.
http://inbedwithfridakahlo.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/the-attack-on-tenure-and-teachers-job-security/
-
Tex 03/09/2010 6:15:00 AM
I live and teach in El Paso, Texas. Our schools are not perfect, but they are clearly better than LA's schools. The majority of our kids enter school speaking no English and have parents with lower levels of education, 30 percent are recent immigrants and 95 percent are minority. 90% are Hispanic. El Paso is much poorer than LA. But we do better.
Here are some reasons our schools are doing better: Class sizes are limited at the lower grades to 17 students and class sizes are limited to 25 in high school. The majority of our teachers are Latinos from El Paso and they are good role models. (In Mexico and the rest of Latin America, teachers are highly respected.) Our bilingual education programs are not controversial, have broad community support, and produce results. Everyone agrees that bilingual education is very important. Yes, as Grapevine says, we pay high property taxes directly to our school districts, so even after our children are no longer in public schools, we pay attention. We do not have "white flight" suburban school districts that cream our best teachers and our most stable families.
Do we have some bad administrators and teachers? Of course, who doesn't. I once substituted for my daughter's Spanish teacher who my daughter had complained couldn't speak Spanish. It was true. Her fourth grade teacher was marginal as well, as was my son's third grade teacher. They survived and so did I because I had some lousy teachers too and made up for it with other, much better teachers. The last thing we do here is pull our child out of school--the charter schools are so much worse and there are no other alternatives. So we stay and push our schools to do better.
-
sasa 03/04/2010 11:59:00 PM
Hey aj, I did do the math. 500/33000 is 1.5%, not 0.015%. I guess you're a teacher at LAUSD?
-
aj 02/26/2010 5:08:00 AM
Want to do some math to see how biased this article is? By the numbers in the article figure 500 "bad" teachers out of 33,000 teachers. That comes out to .015 percent. How does that compare with other large school districts or large corporations? Stop reaching for the shock material and give us some real perspective.
-
tom wycherly 02/26/2010 2:57:00 AM
"74 year old teacher" says it all.
-
ct 02/25/2010 10:09:00 AM
Why is it so hard to believe that some people cannot teach? Why do we continue to defend those in our own profession who shouldn't be defended? It would be much better if we as teachers "policed" our own, provided support when needed and knew when someone should be let go.
-
gary 02/24/2010 7:50:00 PM
you all in LA deserve what you get because you all in LA need to stay in LA and not infect the rest of us in the state. oh and SF you and LA need to be under the same cone like the one dropped on springfield in the simpsons movie. good lick 10 years from now when there is NO money to pay you people for your retirement and 80% of the budget goes into retirement and health costs. you are greedier than wall street and at least wall street produces a functioning product.
-
Alice Long 02/24/2010 9:32:00 AM
Can't LAUSD assign assistants to troubled teachers to help control classes and enrich those teachers' effectiveness? Or would we have to call this "lemon aid"? I'm sure "Dance of the Lemons" thoroughly encouraged all L.A. area educators! Where's Trini Lopez when you need him?
Lemons? You're insulting not only educators, but anyone who works for a living. "Desk-sleepers, burnouts and hotheads" are terms that might describe us all. No matter how you earn your keep, if you've never worked a day when you were so ill or tired that you felt like napping on your desk when nobody's around, consider yourself blessed. If your temper has never been riled, or if you've never wondered how you'll get through a week, you're not human.
Physicians suffer burnout. So do police officers, nurses, and pilots. In teachers, it's a problem. Among those in the other professions I've listed, life or death is on the line. Burnout is . . . well, burnout. It happens, and it hurts. It's not, however, an irreversible morph into a lemon.
Failing as a teacher usually results from having been instructed HOW to teach rather than WHAT to teach. I teach college. I get what your public school systems pass along. Don't get me started.
Calling teachers lemons sidesteps the horrible truth: How many public school students can't read, write, or spell by the time they get their high school diplomas? No, you "can't get fourth grade back," but you certainly should want to get beyond it. I've even taught a former high school honor student who misspelled her own last name. Heck, maybe it's "Jame's" instead of "James" on her diploma. How about her birth certificate? At least one report card?
So be careful whom you call a lemon. From my side of the desk, it looks like your lemons are homegrown.
-
Myron 02/23/2010 7:13:00 PM
Unions were created to protect the workers from being fired because of abuse from company officials. Sadly it evolved into somerthing less desirable like holding on to teachers that are unfit to teach. The American citizen can make the necessary changes needed to change the process. The Union and the Government uses the oldest trick in the world devide and conquer. We the people need to come together as one to bring about change in the school system and get rid of the people who keep unfit teachers because of losing money (union dues). Our children comes first.
-
Rhubarb 02/21/2010 8:14:00 PM
A couple of comments:
During my first year of teaching, I was struggling. A mentor teacher was assigned to me and she told me I was a good teacher but that my problem was I was disorganized. She showed me how to organize, structure, set out materials, etc. It was a godsend. I ended the year with a top evaluation. Eventually I went on to become a training teacher five years later.
So I would say for people who have the potential, the energy, and the desire, the mentor program can be a good idea.
But there are definitely the problem teachers. In every school, we know who he/she is/are. To counter the accusation of favoritism, cronyism, the teaching of a teacher who is in trouble should be done by an uninvolved outside committee, just as is done when selecting training teachers.
Yes, you can walk in a classroom and within an hour determine if the teacher can teach--even if he or she is having a bad day (everyone has them), you can still tell that learning is going on, teachers and students respect each other, and the teacher knows what he/she is doing.
What has happened in LAUSD needs fixing, but not by wholesale slaughter. Give the evaluation and legal sections the tools and the funding and the guidance of education experts to do the job right.
-
Karoline Steavenson 02/20/2010 7:38:00 PM
One more thing: when LAUSD plays these games with people's lives, they harm not only the individual involved but entire families. I was supporting my two children and giving money to my mom when I worked for LAUSD from 2000-2002. But none of that mattered to my administrators. What mattered more to them was having the opportunity to wrestle for power and control as I, the novice teacher, became the center of their petty, adolescent, corrupt battles.
My mother died in 2008 still hoping her daughter would get a chance to redeem her teaching career by teaching at a nice school run by sane people. I hoped for that too for many years until I finally gave up on that notion, realizing that my two naïve forays into full-time teaching pretty much killed those hopes. I spent about a year after leaving LAUSD in a daze, in emotional shock, running through my time there in my mind over and over again to try to gain some understanding of the cruelty of my fellow Angelenos.
LAUSD leaders portray themselves as oh so progressive and oh so concerned about children and employees and oh so liberal. My goodness, they even give health insurance to their cafeteria workers. That is very liberal, right? I guess that is why the reality of how they really work hurts so deeply. I did not know I had to be a politician and gather votes for myself if I wanted to work there. I did not know I had to focus on getting myself reelected every day. I thought they just wanted good teachers. Oh by the way, for my final Stull Evaluation, the one in which I got my nail-in-the-coffin negative mark, neither of my principals ever showed up. They gave me an evaluation without being in the room for the observation.
I am not a bad teacher. I know I am not and my mother always knew I was not either. But I am an absolutely terrible politician.
-
Karoline Steavenson 02/20/2010 7:36:00 PM
One more thing: when LAUSD plays these games with people's lives, they harm not only the individual involved but entire families. I was supporting my two children and giving money to my mom when I worked for LAUSD from 2000-2002. But none of that mattered to my administrators. What mattered more to them was having the opportunity to wrestle for power and control as I, the novice teacher, became the center of their petty, adolescent, corrupt battles.
My mother died in 2008 still hoping her daughter would get a chance to redeem her teaching career by teaching at a nice school run by sane people. I hoped for that too for many years until I finally gave up on that notion, realizing that my two naïve forays into full-time teaching pretty much killed those hopes. I spent about a year after leaving LAUSD in a daze, in emotional shock, running through my time there in my mind repeatedly to try to gain some understanding of the cruelty of my fellow Angelenos.
LAUSD leaders portray themselves as oh so progressive and oh so concerned about children and employees and oh so liberal. My goodness, they even give health insurance to their cafeteria workers. That is very liberal, right? I guess that is why the reality of how it really works hurt so deeply. I did not know I had to be a politician and gather votes for myself if I wanted to work there. I did not know I had to focus on getting myself reelected every day. I thought they just wanted good teachers. And for for my final Stull Evaluation, the one in which I got my nail-in-the-coffin negative mark, neither of my principals ever showed up. They gave me an evaluation without being in the room for the observation.
I am not a bad teacher. I know I am not and my mother always knew I was not either. But I am an absolutely terrible politician, as you can see from these postings.
-
melinda 02/20/2010 9:27:00 AM
what underperforming execs paid you to write this article?
-
Jerry 02/19/2010 10:27:00 AM
The lady was 74 years old for God's sake, and she had to deal with ten year olds, who I'm sure were not the most respectful young scholars!! Give me a break. Some kids can be major pains in the asses , so imagine a group of ten or twenty. Is it any surprise she was "burnned out"? I'm sure Principals have unions that protect their "lemons" even more vigorously than your article even cares to mention.
-
John Holmes 02/19/2010 10:11:00 AM
You should investigate Principal Irene Hinojosa and her history at Fries Elementary in Wilmington (the school after she left Dominguez Elementary), where she was ousted by parents and staff for incompetence. There's always at least two sides to every story.
-
Rebecca 02/18/2010 5:37:00 AM
You can not believe everything you read. Duffy did not defend this woman. As a matter of fact I am sure that Mario Vasquez must be turning over in his grave. Yslas did not have this woman terminated, nor did UTLA pay for the attorney. The Union does not pay for representation. Each person pays their own attorney fees. Out of their own pocket. If the District had down their documentation from the onset there would not have been such an outrageous expenditure. Same thing with each of the teachers referred to in this article. If they were guilty of wrong doing why then doesnt the district have documentation to back up their allegations? I believe half of the accused are not guilty and maybe, maybe the other half is guilty of something. I dont believe for a second that parents do not express their feelings. I do know that for the most part,none of the mini districts listen to parents. You can not even speak to the high and mighty. They ignore any telephone call that is not from one of their own. That is the real way the District gets into trouble. The administrators think they are better than anyone eles. Too good to speak to anyone they think are beneath them. This is an area where the Board Members need to step in and find out why the cases are so complicated and can not be won without spending a fortune. Maybe then they will find that some of the accused are on the hit list of the principal. Many principals are so busy focused on the person they dont like that they do not even look at the terrible teachers. I have seen that behavior over and over again.
-
teacher 02/18/2010 3:38:00 AM
I am a teacher in LAUSD, and this article has--sadly--hit the nail on the head. I have taught at three different high schools and the majority of teachers do their jobs and take their work seriously. Aside from hurting the students, lousy teachers make it harder for all competent teachers to do their job. Duffy should be ashamed of his dishonesty! I know I am ashamed of him. Why does the union protect these bums?
-
Todd Krainin 02/18/2010 3:08:00 AM
This is a devastating exposé of corruption and incompetence in the Los Angeles public school system. LA might even be worse than New York City public schools, where I had the misfortune of being educated.
Whatever initial outrage this article may stir will be quickly forgotten. LAUSD, like its counterpart in New York, is an ossified bureaucracy that has no incentive to change. And the public, numbed by decades of stalled efforts at reform, has learned that "you can't fight the system". This isn't the first news story about profound corruption in our school system, and it won't be the last.
When will California be ready for vouchers and school choice? How bad do things have to get before we take power away from fraudulent unions and indifferent government school boards?
-
munner 02/18/2010 1:05:00 AM
Unions breed mediocrity. Is this no surprise to anyone? Union welfare continues to suck the life out of our educational system, city coffers, etc..........
-
Rebecca 02/17/2010 8:06:00 AM
I read this article quickly and need to go back and absorb it. Aida Munoz-Yslas was interview. What a joke!! She is taking credit for getting Kolter fired. No way! She arrived at Pinewood when Kolter was already on her way out by the previous Principal and VP not Munoz-Yslas. She herself was put out of Pinewood. She was not a "seasoned" Principal..Oh my how she lied. She does like the limelight. All she wanted at Pinewood, "give me gifts and I wont write you up". Parents hated her. Five days at VanNuys elementary and someone went into the office with a gun. Wow what does that tell you? She told the new principal to follow up with what she started. Write up the teachers she didnt like and so that is the case. There are bad teachers and there are bad Principals. There are great teachers being written up because yes, as Duffy stated they speak up in meetings or report wrong doing by the District. If the District is spending so much money on getting rid of teachers maybe they should do it the right way and it wouldnt cost them so much. Those teachers who are doing great will be left alone to continue good works. Lately everything is DRAMA! Documentation (real documentation) should be used instead of phoney allegations which are supported by air. The reporter should have gone to Pinewood and asked the teachers instead of a Principal who only wants fame! Or why didnt they contact the previous Principal or the previous VP. Would have gotten a better story -the truth perhaps?
-
Karoline Steavenson 02/16/2010 10:16:00 PM
Other factors that can mess up a classroom, a school, a city or a state that teachers have no control
over:
I have worked at two schools full-time---one in LAUSD and one was an inner city charter school outside of LAUSD. The charter school decided to not retain me for a second year because they said I was "not a good fit for the school." That's just a way to say, "We don't like you." It was at-will employment. They can do that.
At each school the principals had complete control over which children went into which teacher’s classroom. At the Boyle Heights school the children’s cards had notes on them as to whether or not the child had been a behavior problem in the past. The principals would try to make sure every classroom got one to three children with known problems, plus one to three children who were on IEPs, in each classroom. That was fair and that is what educational experts say is the best way to do things. It’s called heterogeneous grouping of students.
However, even in that fair system, a principal can intentionally give a teacher they don’t like and are trying to get rid of the most difficult students. Typically the kids with the biggest behavior problems are the children who are also lacking serious, involved parental support at home. So, administrators can and do stack the deck against teachers they dislike by setting them up with the most challenging children.
At my school I saw one 25-year veteran teacher decide to retire in the first year because of these issues and other matters. I also saw one 30-year veteran, a man who had been at that same school for most of his career, almost quit that year. He told me he was trying to help a known behavior issue child in his classroom who was dealing with abuse at home and the administrators ignored his pleas for help.
Why ignore him? Because those veteran teachers get higher salaries. The administrators would be happy to get rid of those $75,000 a year teachers.
At the charter school the principals there did not even have administrative credentials. They had teaching credentials and that was all. The charter school practiced homogeneous grouping. That means my neighbor teacher got all the “smart” kids--- the ones who scored well on state tests---and my peer teachers and I got all of the children who had scored below basic and far below basic on the state tests.
Why is that bad for students? Because students learn from each other, not just from the teacher. If every child in your 3rd grade classroom cannot add two-digit numbers yet, then who can the students look up to among their friends to show them what goal it is they are trying to reach? A teacher can tell them daily how and why to do something, but when their buddies can do it that is a
much more powerful reinforcement tool.
Ninety-nine percent of the articles I read in all the local papers never discuss how management mistakes can and do hurt our children in L.A. It’s about time someone wrote about it so that’s why I
am.
And do you think parents at that charter school had any idea that their administrators did NOT have administrative credentials? Of course not. They are blue collar people, they’ve not gone to college; they don’t even know why such a thing would make a difference at their child’s school.
Another money waster: Consultants. We had a great consultant at the charter school. She gave the director some wonderful advice and listened to us, the teachers. Why was she a waste of money? Because the faux-principals and director of the school refused to implement the good advice she gave them!
That makes a lot of sense, doesn't it? Pay people a lot of money to tell you how to do things better, then ignore them.
This insanity I witnessed is what helped me decide NOT to go get an MS in Education. Why spend more money and time to get an advanced degree that so many leaders in our schools may very well ignore?
-
annoyedman 02/16/2010 9:14:00 PM
I am not currently living in California, but recently (2006) transplanted to Grapevine, Texas, in the area of the DFW metroplex. My son attended his first 2 years of high school in Pasadena, and last 2 years of high school here in Grapevine. I grew up in southern California, and experienced both public and private schools in the greater Los Angeles area. I have to say that the closest thing to a private school education that I have seen in public schools has been my son's experience in Grapevine.
The single biggest visible difference, at least to my perception, is that in Pasadena, the question for graduating seniors at Blair High School was IF they would go on to college; whereas at Grapevine High School, it was WHERE they would go to college. For the uninitiated, Grapevine would compare demographically to Pasadena/South Pasadena.
There are a lot of different factors in play, but it seems to me that the single biggest one is where the school funding comes from. In Texas, we have no state income tax. ALL funding of the schools come from property taxes. My annual property tax bill in Texas is over $5,200 per year on a home valued at roughly the same valuation as the home I sold in California which generated a roughly $2,100 property tax bill. The net amount paid in taxes is nearly the same when California state income tax is factored in, but the manner of distribution is vastly different. My $5,200 tax bill is paid in two separate bills, to two separate entities. Of that total amount, $3,800 is paid directly to the Grapevine ISD, while the rest is paid separately to Tarrant County. The reason this is important is that, when a home owner has to pay 2/3 of the property tax owed DIRECTLY to his/her local school district, the taxpayer will demand accountability and expect performance... ...and they GET exactly that — because if they don't get it, political heads will roll.
There is no such direct accountability to the taxpayer in California when it comes to how their hard earned wages are spent to educate the community's children. The twisted and obscure path their taxes take from their bank accounts to their local school districts so insulates California politicians from personal responsibility for their voting decisions that they never have to be held personally politically accountable for bad policy. The result is a dysfunctional educational system in which the crazies are running the asylum.
I hate like hell to continue paying a huge tax bill to the local ISD now that my son is no longer a student in the system (having graduated in 2008), but I continue to do so without protest because I understand that my local schools are continuing to produce a superior educational product, and that makes my little corner of Texas a much better place to live.
Until California revamps its tax collecting structure, local politicians will never feel accountable to local taxpayers, and California public schools will continue to be typified by the problems plaguing the LAUSD, thanks to the state's teachers' unions. Understand that the union is NOT accountable to the taxpayer. They are accountable to their membership, first and foremost. Their products are job retention and gains in salary and benefits. The school districts' products are educated students. These are often conflicting goals. It really has to be looked at as an economics problem. When teachers - qualified or unqualified - are required to join the union in order to work, the union then holds a monopoly over the labor market. Any organization which holds a monopoly is immune from accountability for the quality of its product.
The difference between teachers' unions in California and teachers' unions in Texas (yes, we have them too) is that Texas voters only continue to support huge tax payments to their local districts so long as a quality product is produced. Californians do not have the leverage to force such accountability because the economic relationship between taxpayer and the quality of the product has been deliberately obscured by political forces whose best interests are served by keeping it that way.
It is not going to get any better in California until the taxpayers who foot the bill force accountability. As long as liberal spendthrifts in California's legislature remain in office, that will never happen. So at the end of the day, Californians are getting exactly the quality of education they deserve. It will never change, which is why many lifelong Californians have fled the state, and the net numbers indicate that California is hemorrhaging taxpayers (and jobs) faster than it can replace them.
You all are in deep, deep trouble.
-
Debra J 02/16/2010 6:50:00 AM
Your article, "Dance of the Lemons" is just more of the same we have heard over and over. If you want to do some REAL investigated journalism, don't just write what we have already read in the LA Times. While there are bad teachers in LAUSD, as there are incompetent practitioners in every field, these minority of teachers are small part of why test scores are low.
You might find other influences such as losing instructional time for district mandated periodic assessments that do not count, do not align to the CST, and take hundreds of hours of instructional time for preparation and implementation. Or it might be the growing number of inexperienced administrators who do not lead, but merely implement policies from the district office, regardless of whether or not they are appropriate for their school. Or it might be parents who are overwhelmed by the bureaucracy and intimidated and cannot advocated for their children in the ways they need to; particularly the parents in the larger immigrant neighborhoods.
Regarding teacher dismissals, principals must observe and document for that to happen and they don't do it. I began teaching in LAUSD in 1989, it that time I have never had an administrator observe me more than two times in a year, never longer than 10 minutes and only one time was it a principal. Teachers are as upset by incompetent educators as everyone else. But it is not only teachers. I am aware of a high school in LAUSD where parents have demanded that the principal be replaced, but this has been disregarded by the district. Why have administrators been given a pass on failing schools? Why has the superintendent been given a pass?
Nothing will change until everyone is accountable, teachers, administrators and parents. If we don't work together for the students LA will continue to be a failing school district.
-
Ed Barkett 02/16/2010 6:10:00 AM
How could 104 students have been in a science class to have heard Howard supposedly call a female student a "ho" ? The fact is that the signatures were falsified by four students. Students names were misspelled. The powers to be at Local District 4 attempted to have this allegation removed against Howard after the irregularities in the signatures had been pointed out to them, but his UTLA representative insisted to have them remain as part of the accusations to show that the accusations were in fact fabricated by a small number of students. 104 students in one science class does not make sense at all, but when the District ( i.e. principal )wants you gone they will use the shotgun blast of anything in your file and any accusations against the teacher in an attempt for something to stick. He was continiously harassed by various functionaries at Local District 4. Leftout in the article was the fact that Howard had to go court to defend himself on the false allegation of supposedly stealing his school-issued laptop computer. Even though the principal at Berendo had never asked for its return. The case was thrown out by the judge and the District was admonished for wasting taxpayer monies. Howard was railroaded for questioning and challenging various adminstrators at Fairfax and Berendo for their apparent lack of support of teachers at those two schools. I hope Howard is enjoying himself. Teachers are held accountable to a double standard. Administrators and their favorites are allowed tremendous leeway. An assistant principal at my school was recently promoted to principal at a local elementary school. Even though at the buy back day in late August she had referred to a few difficult students in a counseling group as " death row inmates " several times. This was said in front of our principal and other administrators. Our principal laughed and laughed. If it had been a comment by a teacher, a head would have rolled into the basket of disciplinary action.
-
matt stacey 02/16/2010 12:55:00 AM
I noticed all the back and forth resulting from this article (as well as the 'Layoff Roulette' and the '89 Neighborhood Council' articles)have finally introduced two 'new' facets of debate in LA : Logic and Tough Love. And not a moment too soon. You're flat broke, California. Time to think smart, be honest, and get grounded. The entire LAUSD needs an overhaul with a weed whacker. Let the blood flow. (And while you're at it, please untie that brick around your neck called Political Correctness) When its over, you'll have a much more efficient, educational machine. You wanna help kids in California? Then do what is best for them and use a little foresight. Hell, a few years from now, you may stop being the joke of those US NEWS 'Top US High Schools'reports.
-
Anne Mere 02/15/2010 9:01:00 PM
I started teaching in my late 50's after years of diverse & responsible careers in business. Teaching is the most difficult and challenging career I have ever had. And I will lose 50% of my Social Security when I retire, if ever. I am an extremely good teacher, and my students progress excellently. I resent your charicature of older teachers as being senile and unable to perform. Try stop generalizing negatively about older teachers. They need to be judged on a case by case basis. Also most teachers improve the longer they teach. Young teachers lack wisdom and experience, which are very important. Young teachers should be judged on a case by case basis as well, especially given the fact (not opinion) that 50% of new teachers wash out by the 7th year. Teachers are not blue collar workers, but professionals in the highest sense of diligently training and teaching many generations throughout their careers. Teachers are also as a group the most highly educated and trained, with continual education, masters degrees & ph.d's.
-
predux 02/15/2010 8:28:00 PM
Let's get all these teacher bashers to walk a day in our shoes and see the real side of teaching. Hey, how about you, the so-called researcher of this article. Perhaps you could do what all good journalists do and present a balanced article on the problems at LAUSD. Instead of getting all your info from Cortines and the district, maybe you could do some old-fashioned investigation and reporting on your own. This would help me and others seriously consider your work as informative instead of a chop job for LAUSD.
-
DavidN 02/15/2010 8:32:00 AM
This sort of thing has been going on for decades. The teachers unions control the debate to such an extent that most people don't even know that the National Education Association *isn't* a Federal institution with their child's best interests at heart--it's the larger of the two teacher's unions. Some years ago, the largest group of union members at the Democratic National Convention was from the NEA. This means that contradictions like Bill Clinton opposing school choice, and sending his own child to a pricey private school, were never brought up with enough impact to actually change anything.
Something's got to give. The school system is already vastly over-funded. Yes, there's a shortage of money in the classroom, and yes, good teachers are underpaid. Per student, though, we spend an incredibly exorbitant amount of money to get what at best is a mediocre education for kids, and what's often just a warehousing for a few years, until they drop out. Money isn't the solution. Accountability might be, though the latest word from Washington is that the Obama people are looking at gutting No Child Left Behind, because so many administrators and teachers think that standardized testing is incredibly unfair. Would we get the money they use to administer the system back? Of course not, they have junkets to Vegas to pay for!
-
Elroy Jetson 02/15/2010 5:50:00 AM
The only solution is cameras in the classroom. Then we all get to see whose version of the story is correct.
-
stevieray 02/15/2010 5:43:00 AM
Fascinating article... and really fascinating comments! And by "fascinating", I mean deeply disturbing, yet compelling nonetheless.
Whenever an article like this appears, it is inevitably followed by a flood of comments by teachers and their swivel-eyed champions, defending the indefensible and flinging great, stinking glob of blame at anyone and everyone... except themselves, of course. It has become tiresome.
It is time for a change. At least two things must be done soon, before another generation of Americans are sacrificed to the twin bloodgods NEA and AFT.
1. Elimination of both tenure and the union. There are absolutely no good reasons for teachers to be coddled the way they are. The majority of Americans manage to find and keep jobs by their own wits and skills... teachers can do the same.
Will you sometimes come face-to-face with a bad boss? Yep. You can do what we do -- learn to live with it, or move on. Its not that hard. In the real world, we call that "adulthood"... try and enter it sometime.
2. Vouchers, vouchers, and more vouchers. Let the money follow the child. Not only will this force the addled public school systems up and off their couches, it will also change the academic culture of the schools. Teachers will suddenly find themselves teaching toward the ends the parents want, moving the agendas of the education theoriticians out of the lead position. (And we all know that is the biggest obstacle to vouchers -- you will have to please the parents, and that makes it difficult to re-engineer society according to this year's fabulous Big Idea.)
Got all of that?
Do your job or move on along.
Put your customers (the children) first.
Listen to your bosses (the parents).
Most of all, grow up.
We are not asking you to do anything we, the taxpayers, don't do.
-
Anne Mere 02/15/2010 2:55:00 AM
Very interesting article, but the ELEPHANT is still in the room, and no one has had the courage to talk about it. The Elephant is that immigrant children from Mexico and South America frequently hear NO English at home, their parents commonly have no more than a 4th grade education and are not fluent in English, Spanish or a native language and cannot help their children with homework.
Teachers cannot be expected to turn students from a lower educational background into college graduates in one generation without parent also becoming educated and involved with the education of their children.
This parental involvement is rarely happening in the Hispanic community.
Before you categorically say that I am wrong, please tell what your background is and field of expertise. I teach primarily Hispanic students.
-
michael reed 02/15/2010 2:46:00 AM
SOP for unions and the very reason that teachers have lost the respect of everyone who deals with them today. Their professional reputation is now equal to any Teamster or UAW worker, not the doctors and lawyers they would have us compare them too.
8 years serving on our local board, two as part of the Negotiated Agreement team, taught me that a large majority of modern teachers and 100% of union reps care nothing for students, standards, outcomes or even their peers. They care only for the benefits of seniority and how much cash they can squeeze out of the taxpayers. It is well past time when politicians stopped taking the dirty money of unions in exchange for granting them carte blanche to destroy our childrens futures with their heads buried in the trough of public money.
There are some fine, dedicated teachers; but you play heck finding them in this hog wallow we call public education. Like politicians, we need to throw them all out, then start over.
-
steven 02/15/2010 2:17:00 AM
Okay, you win. We have bad teachers. Let's get rid of them. Done. Now what. All our problems are solved. The media's focus on this one note just shows a lack of understanding the press has about all the many problems that keep the educational system from working. I am surprised by your laziness. That you don't take the time to explore the rest of the story. You must be from LA. Your children have learned from you. This generation of kids is the laziest ever.
-
S. Patrick 02/14/2010 11:52:00 PM
All the arguing back and forth here illustrates one undeniable truth - state (meaning government) controlled education is broken. You can blame it on teachers, or administrators, or poor rules/regulations. Personally, I think unions play a significant role, and for LAUSD the hordes of illegal immigrants flooding the system. But in the end, that is irrelevant.
The only way even begin fixing the problem is to break the public monopoly on primary education. Yes, retain a limited public education system. And continue with educational tax levys on the populace. But allow people to opt out. If you are a taxpayer and you wish to take your children out of poorly performing public schools, you should be able to take those tax dollars and give them to a private school. In the end, it was your money to begin with. Why should you have to spend all that money on a failed school?
The only reason any teacher or administrator can have for resisting a properly done voucher type system is the fear that they won't be able to get a job if faced with competing in a truly competitive job market. Too bad, because the rest of us aren't going to pay for poor performance any more. So either get ready to adapt, or find a new career. Things will change.
-
Rob 02/14/2010 11:29:00 PM
Excellent article.
I took my children out of the LAUSD some time ago, even though it costs me a great deal of money.The same is true of a fairly high percentage of public school teachers and administrators nationwide, if you do the research.
The difference between the two makes the cure pretty self-evident, although it's unlikely to be implemented because of the politics...which of course, are much more important than the kids and their education, no?
The rot, I think, comes from several places:
1)a top heavy and expensive Administration, with a huge ratio of non-teachers for every teacher.
2) The whole concept of teacher 'tenure' - there's no reason teachers should have a 'right' not to be fired, as no one else does.
3)A total abrogation by the LAUSD of part of what the public schools were originally created for, to socialize young children and teach them basic morality and citizenship, and a PC disinclination to punish and correct discipline cases and segregate them as necessary.
4)The embrace and forced implementation by the LAUSD of every bizarre or well-connected theory in education that comes along, which handcuffs even good teachers in the classroom and forces them to teach without any regard to pacing or the children's needs.
5) The belief that more of other people's money is the solution to everything. The private school my kids go to spends about 2/3 of the amount per pupil the LAUSD does, but delivers vastly superior results.
The solution? Vouchers of course, so working parents can vote with their feet and choose their kids' schools. Once the LAUSD starts losing the government stipends per pupil based on the head count, you'll see them clean up their act.
-
John Gotti 02/14/2010 10:56:00 PM
You know, for about $25K the LAUSD could have just paid to have Loftis whacked.
-
RKV 02/14/2010 10:46:00 PM
Wow, these comments completely miss the point, and in fact, appear to be deliberately misleading. Let's sample of few and see if I can put the lie to them.
'Why didn't you write an article about all the good teachers who have left LAUSD and how they can't keep quality teachers?"
Times are tight and we've got to eliminate waste - and keeping underperforming teachers on the public payroll is a waste, all other things accounted for.
"If an egomaniac principal feels that a teacher who works unpaid overtime in the classroom (weekends etc) does not devote enough time to servicing the insatiable ego appetite of that principal, he can simply lable the teacher inadequate, designated 'not to be rehired', ever, anywhere in LAUSD."
This happens in the private sector too. Don't expect special protections because you are paid by the government.
'No mention of the bloated galleries of overpaid administrators or the number of incompetent bad administrators shifted around in the district."
There are administrators because the education code requires certain things of schools, and someone needs to do them. Dump the Ed. Code, and maybe we'd have half a chance to educate our kids. No Ed. Code, and no reason to staff the district office with administrators at any pay rate.
"Parents are voters (theoretically, since our voter turnout rates are insanely low, especially for things such as school board elections) and have done very little to get state bureaucrats to fully fund education or devise a comprehensive state system that would ensure a first class education for each child."
California spends (on average) $8,500+ per pupil, how much of that is too little? Catholic schools regularly get better educational results than public schools and they spend less per pupil than public schools do. More money is not what is needed. What is needed is parents ability to take their money and their child where they want to go. That will put bad schools out of business. Reward success and punish failure.
"In the past three years, not one parent has volunteered to help in my classroom." Not one customer has volunteered to do my private sector job for me either.
"The vast majority of teachers are doing a good, if not great job under difficult circumstances. "
Test results say otherwise.
"[If] kids in poverty receive three teachers in a row who cannot help them reach grade level, the statistics suggest that they won't graduate and will not be able to obtain a living wage."
Sadly true, and why all the crocodile tears from government employees don't move me in the slightest. If I was cynical I'd say that as it is now constructed the fraud known as public education is a deliberate effort to destroy the poor and middle class who can't opt out of the failed system because they are taxed out of the alternative.
-
LA Teacher 02/14/2010 9:50:00 PM
Ms. Barrett, Why didn't you write an article about all the good teachers who have left LAUSD and how they can't keep quality teachers? Because that is the real story here. But I guess you wouldn't sell as much advertising with the headline "Competent Teachers Leaving LAUSD in Droves." And why doesn't LAUSD shift all those "good teachers" from high API schools in LAUSD to low -performing ones? Because those teachers would quit rather than teach the poverty stricken and sometimes gang members we have to teach. Your article should have focused on making LAUSD schools teachable enough to attract teachers and to hold students and their parents accountable for tagging, stealing and the other assorted things we have to deal with here. But that article will never be published.
-
paula hurdle 02/14/2010 8:31:00 PM
This article was so biased against teachers its hard to respond to it all. First, the dance of the lemons takes place in all fields of employ at LAUSD and other districts. There is incompetence and its acceptance in administration, classified and upper echelons of this district. To attribute all evils and lack of achievement to bad teaching is like atributing validity to badly researched reporting. There is always other sides to a story. Yes, there are bad teachers but there are bad administrators, superintendents and bad district poliicies. Duffy is right about the subjectivity of evaluations and the politics involved. You have administrators evaluating subjects they know nothing about and biases relating to age, sex and ethnicity. You have appeals from bad evaluations taking anywhere from a year to a year and a half to be heard. You have PAR, a really good evaluative body with a limited mission that could be expanded so that all evaluations are done by them. Finally, a body with content knowledge doing evaluations. Finally, why is everyone always talking about teacher tenure? As soon as other professional tenures are questioned as teachers are then this issue should be explored.
-
I Know 02/14/2010 1:53:00 PM
Caprice Young is not the Founder of the California Charter School Asssociation. That is a ridiculous assertion and completely incaccurate. An otherwise great article. I hope Caprice is not going around saying this. Reality: she was hired by a board that recruited her and paid for her.
-
MDH 02/14/2010 10:48:00 AM
I was deeply disturbed by the article from the LA Weekly," Dance of the Lemons." The terminology alone was a seemingly purposeful and plagiarized corruption of the terms traditionally used by teachers to characterize the redistribution of "BAD" administrators within the LAUSD. Shamefully, the Weekly should know this and yet lets one of its own apparently ignorant editorialists twist words repeatedly. No mention of the bloated galleries of overpaid administrators or the number of incompetent bad administrators shifted around in the district. Note too, that although I'm no fan of AJ Duffy, I still feel offended by the circumstantial and intentional arrangement of any of his defenses for teachers to suggest that he is some sort of crank who defends teachers no matter what. The fact is that the article portrayed teachers as entirely to blame for the failures of the feds, the state, the district and parents to serve their populations and children instead of trying to blame those who do all the work and all the teaching. This makes even issues like securing benefits and salaries seem minor in contrast to the reconstruction of the work environment away from something in which no teacher will never cease to be threatened and no substitute will ever be free of the constant fear of being used as a scapegoat some administrator. This all goes without even mentioning that the LAUSD has done an marvelously efficient job of purposely concealing the amount of crime and violence purpetrated by their student bodies against their fellow students and teachers daily. And then they have the unmitigated gall to demand dedication from that same staff. It must be some sort of watermark in achievement for them that they can even con the LA Weekly into buying into their corruption.
-
Herb 02/14/2010 4:11:00 AM
The things you described probably actually happened but unfortunately your story will contribute to the steady drumbeat of teacher scapegoating. It is highly simplistic to assume that improvement of schools will result from firing allegedly incompetent teachers. The basic problem is one of definition: I could be incompetent because I refuse to hop on each of the district's fads, such as the latest, cooperative learning. On the other hand, my classes are inteeractive, I am enthusiastic, students learn. The biggest obstacle is the district's bizarre 2003 decision that every child would take and pass traditional academics starting with algebra 1AB. As a teacher of algebra one and two, I can tell you that for some students, this is not teaching, it is miracle work. Universal mandatory algebra is a social experiment on the order of Prohibition or communism--beautiful in the abstract and a fiasco in reality. It's a huge social experiment being tried on the students of Los Angeles, and the only reason you don't hear more complaints is that most parents can't speak English. That would be a great expose for you. Any teacher will tell you that students won't succeed if the parents don't prepare them for the school experience, and because LAUSD resolutely refuses to track, the grossly underperforming pull everyone else down with them.
-
Anonymous 02/14/2010 3:38:00 AM
Granted, it can be difficult to get rid of bad teachers, and they don't deserve a big payment to leave.
However, there is a flip side to that coin.
Within a teacher's first three years of employment (as a full time teacher), one rotten principal and his corrupt political allies in LAUSD bureaucracy can have a great teacher banished like a leper, never to teach in LAUSD again, for no good reason, due to California's 'hired at will' policy.
If an egomaniac principal feels that a teacher who works unpaid overtime in the classroom (weekends etc)
does not devote enough time to servicing the insatiable ego appetite of that principal, he can simply lable the teacher inadequate, designated 'not to be rehired', ever, anywhere in LAUSD.
This can happen despite that teacher having twenty letters of glowing recommendation -- from administrators at various other LAUSD schools (where he taught for several years as a dedicated long term substitute teacher), and from the parents of his current students.
This teacher might even somehow be so fortunate as to persuade the UTLA president Duffy to make a personal phone call to the irrationally hostile principal, but then that principal may refuse to take the call, refusing to speak to Mr. Duffy, thus demonstrating the principal's indifference to fairness and his determination to inflict great damage on someone who just did not kiss his ass enough for his insatiable ego needs.
The teacher will be sent to plead his case to the bureaucratic supervisors of the rotten principal.
The supervisors and the principal are political allies who are in a position to help and/or hurt each other, so the supervisors have a powerful incentive to support the principal's transparent fiction that the teacher is inadequate. This one principal's vague condemnation will be allowed to outweigh and overshadow the glowing recommendation of several administrators and parents at several schools, spanning several years of excellent teacher job performance history.
Highly qualified attorneys, consulted about possibly suing for wrongful termination, will tell the teacher that California's 'hired at will' policy and other LAUSD firewalls make it too unlikely to win such a suit.
They won't take the case on contigency, which is all that the now unemployed teacher could afford.
So the result is that a man who was a highly praised teacher for eight years (never a sick day, not even late to work, got along great with everyone, all those years) is now unemployed, without health insurance, no more retirement plan, etc. Nothing. Out on the street.
Essentially the rotten principal got away with shooting the teacher in the back, in broad daylight with many witnesses, then walking away with total impunity, to continue enjoying all the benefits of his career as a principal for as long as he likes.
LAUSD has blood on its hands.
I don't know how some people can sleep at night, knowing what they have done to others.
--------------------------------------------------------
-
Jeff 02/14/2010 2:50:00 AM
Sad, disheartening, and shameful. We can do better than this. We need a statewide proposition on this.
-
nathana.schooler@gmail.com 02/14/2010 1:07:00 AM
Check this out.
-
Karoline Steavenson 02/13/2010 4:15:00 PM
Dear Weekly,
Thank you for all the reporting that went into “The Dance of the Lemons”. It made me see that when I was a teacher with LAUSD from 2000 to 2002 I wasn’t crazy when I imagined secrets being whispered about me as I became the unintentional center of controversy at the Boyle Heights school where I was employed.
What you left out of this article are some of the crazy ways in which the district makes its hiring decisions. In my case I was hired by a LEARN committee that consisted of the Vice Principal, teachers and parents. The principal of my school did not hire me. When I showed up at my first staff meeting my principal refused to greet me. After a few months I figured out I was a political pawn. The LEARN committee sought to undermine the unpopular principal’s power with its hiring decisions. The principal fought back by trying to destroy any teacher they hired that she did not like.
That, of course, was my first mistake. I never should have gone to work at any school in which my principal, the one who has all the power to make my life wonderful or miserable, did not hire me.
I have been told it is this is a terrible management practice. The boss should make the hiring decisions because the boss is the one whose head is on the chopping block if his or her teachers can’t bring up test scores.
I was given a mentor but she was the complete opposite of me in teaching style and personality. At first my mentor seemed kind and helpful, but I also got the impression she was only doing it because she wanted the stipend the district pays. She didn’t mentor because she sincerely cared about novice teachers. As the months passed and I had problems, her attitude changed. She was distant and cold, as if she just wished I’d go away, and she offered minimal advice to help me solve my teaching issues. After a few months I knew she was not someone I could ask for help.
I used to go to the teacher’s lounge for lunch but as time passed, some bilingual teachers I used to sit with started speaking Spanish only whenever I was at their table. This alienated me from having any kind of a friendship with them. I stopped going to the teacher’s lounge and always ate lunch alone in my room after that.
Educators say that teachers should be measured by her students’ test scores. I’m proud to say that my students did well on the state tests. My first half-year at that school many of my first graders scored very well. As a matter of fact, the entire first grade was congratulated at a staff meeting. The vice principal said, “We would not have reached our API goal without the first graders.”
My second year I recommended four or five of my students be tested for the Gifted and Talented program LAUSD offers. We didn’t have a GATE program at our school, but nonetheless I had some very sharp kids in my class and they deserved to be tested. I didn’t see my students’ state test scores the second year because I resigned, but I know from the Open Court assessments that my students covered the full gamut of abilities. Some were doing fantastically in all subjects and a few others I recommended for RSP testing.
I left my position because there was so much fighting on the playground between the kids that I couldn’t take it anymore. Combine that with how I was shunned in the lunchroom and how I was never wanted by my boss, and I got the hint.
Another thing I noticed about being a teacher---when you are a teacher your employers and colleagues don’t make an effort to get to know you as a person they way they do in other professions.
When I was teaching at LAUSD I was a single mom of three children with two still at home. My middle child was in her senior year of high school and my youngest was 11. My elderly mother also needed my attention because she was suffering from several health problems and recovering from quintuple bypass surgery.
To the best of my knowledge my colleagues never knew any of this about me because they didn’t ask. I also never got the opportunity to know my coworkers because we simply never had those kinds of conversations.
Many teachers were unhappy at that school. Many of them vehemently disliked the working conditions but found they were powerless to do anything about the school culture. They got used to the kids fighting. They got used to a few of the kids cussing out the teachers every once in a while without suffering consequences. The principal generally refused to suspend a student no matter what they did.
There was no overarching discipline plan at the school. We all had discipline plans in our classrooms but once a student got to that red level on the chart for serious offenses, could we call in some back-up help from administration? No. We could call parents at home but we were all instructed to keep students out of the office no matter what they did wrong.
I’ve had some people tell me I should have stayed at that school and fought it out with my principal with the help of UTLA. I used to drive home every night thinking about my students, worrying about them, trying to think of new ways to reach those who were struggling and better ways to keep them all engaged 100% of the time. To this day I wonder how my former students are doing. But in the end I knew that if I fought for better working conditions it would be me against this huge, faceless, cold system with deep pockets and a long history of internal corruption. I did not know how to fight such a beast and with so many other things going on in my life, how could I add fighting such a system to my “To Do” list?
I do not think I am the best teacher in the world. I have my strengths and weaknesses. I know for certain that I can never teach in the inner city again because the social and familial issues there overwhelm me. But LAUSD seems to believe that if they just hire the best teachers in the world that will solve all its problems. Good teachers can help a school district, no doubt about it, but if you have a group of good teachers who are being governed by bad management, then won’t that destroy some of them? We all know that bad bosses can and do hurt good employees.
I look at my efforts to be a teacher and my ignorance of all the unwritten rituals and rules that accompany that profession as a huge tragedy in my life. I am currently a college student again, training for new career goals.
-
RobE 02/13/2010 1:53:00 AM
As someone born and raised in SoCal and having watched the fiasco that is the LAUSD for decades, the faults inherent in that organization lie not just with a small portion of incompetent teachers, but with the state of California, parents, the LAUSD board and each school administrator.
Here's why:
Parents are voters (theoretically, since our voter turnout rates are insanely low, especially for things such as school board elections) and have done very little to get state bureaucrats to fully fund education or devise a comprehensive state system that would ensure a first class education for each child. Americans talk a great game at election time about education and then when the last bit of confetti hits the ground on election night everyone returns to the inertia that has gotten us to this godforsaken point.
Then parents sit silently while the governor's go to tactic for cutting spending when the budge is in the red is to reduce money available to schools (and raise college tuition---the upward mobility tax). Way to support your local school, folks!
That is before you get to the fact that too many parents have not prepared their child for school or for even learning anything, either at home or on a campus, because they are either lazy, have no respect for school because they hated it when they were growing up, or they want to be their kid's friend and not their parent, meaning no discipline is exerted if a child misbehaves in school.
The problem with tenure has been going on, as this article illustrates, for at least 30 years. Yet, administrators continue to hand out tenure as if it was nickel candy. School boards appoint principals who are often in that position because they are more adept at kissing school board member ass than actually guiding teachers to create a productive learning environment for several hundred kids. Voters totally ignore this.
In my experience, I can tell you that the fish does indeed stink from the head and that starts, in this case, with parents, but then extends to the offices of the LAUSD and principals and the latter pair of those entities are more likely to be hindrances to the educational process than a help.
Yet, while addressing incompetent or burned out teachers is vitally necessary, NOTHING, and I mean a big ZERO (!!!) is ever proposed to deal with idiots or corruption on school boards or principals who no sane person would allow to walk their dog, let alone be in charge of inculcating skills and knowledge to their offspring.
I would personally start with abolishing all school districts, allow kids to attend any school their parents want them to, and using five or seven person teacher committees to operate each school, thereby making teachers own the education outcomes seen on their campuses and make it easier to expel disruptive or criminal students. But as the system stands right now, we have rank amateurs playing that the education game overseeing instruction, something that would not be allowed at any private company on the planet. So why are we permitting it with something as important as education?
Indeed, had there been competent administration to begin with, this problem wouldn't haven been allowed to snowball. And as we all sit here bitching and moaning about this article, nothing is going to put a brake on the LAUSD continuing to churn out an inferior educational process for schoolchildren. Instead, all we have right now is a lot of moaning.
So parents, the ball is in your court. Either organize or shut up. You enabled this farce and now you must act to clean it up. If you don't, you have no right to complain.
Oh, and those LAUSD attorneys? Where did they get those winners? Most eight person law firms handle dozens of cases at any one time, yet that lot retained by the LAUSD is handcuffed by one or two? Really? Fire them and get competent lawyers. I want to know how the decision to hire this particular group of shysters was made. I'm sure there is a juicy story there for the L.A. Weekly to pursue.
-
Mathew 02/13/2010 1:19:00 AM
California teachers are required to have three years of additional education beyond their bachelor's degree (a 5th year of college and then two years of BTSA to clear their credential). I do agree that it should be easier to dismiss incompetent teachers but to compare teachers to garbage workers and other civil servants who may not have equivalent levels of education is not fair.
-
My Wallet Face 02/13/2010 12:58:00 AM
I'm a teacher, but not for LAUSD (I subbed for them in the 90s). I agree that there are lemons in there, but it is a tiny number- I imagine there are lemons at the Weekly and in every other office around the world. The Stull is a game principals play in my district: if they don't like the teacher, they cross every t and dot every i to get the teacher out. I (humbly) am pretty damn good so I don't have to worry that much- test scores and administrator opinion attest to this. I have tenure and I deserve it.
At another school in our district, the principal is systematically trying to get rid of teachers who stand up to him/her (no clues, sorry) by changing meeting protocols, transfers, brow-beating- and this is a principal who (I just deleted a variety of charges)...let's say that he or she is open to criminal and civil charges and not for the sake of the school, students or staff. Too often, principals come into a school and want to bring in people from their past, friends of their kids, kids of their friends...Tenure is a way to protect us from that dance.
In the end, if you want better schools? And you're a parent? CARE.
In the past three years, not one parent has volunteered to help in my classroom. For Christmas, I asked for 2 things: paper towels and Kleenex- for the kids to use. No donations. I call parents about their kids not bringing books, not doing work, falling asleep in class and I almost never get a response.
If you want better schools, be aware and care. It's not a poster. It's the way it should be.
-
N/A 02/12/2010 11:08:00 PM
I am a teacher in LAUSD. I teach music to 4 different schools in a variety of neighborhoods. I have seen exactly what is being described in this article. There are many disgruntled, horrible teachers with students all day, every day. I would not want my kids in these classrooms. But I need to make everyone aware of something just as alarming. I struggle to get a tissue...I know it sounds crazy but there is not enough support, supplies or parental involvement in schools. The parents drive their kids to school in Mercedes but when the kids get there they have no tissues. This is crazy! I think parents need to wake up and start helping their schools. Start donating time, money and supplies to make the school run. Stop expecting teachers to teach your kids to use the bathroom. Yes this is what is expected of teachers. Parents are no longer taking the responsibility for their kids. They expect one person to teach 30 5yr olds to use the bathroom, tie their shoes, read, write, do math and speak. This is unrealistic. Have you been in a room with 30 5 yr olds, including 5-6 kids with autism or other special needs? Until you have, you have no idea what it's like. I love my job and yes there are bad eggs in this district but there are many more parents who just aren't stepping up to bat. Take responsibility for your kids! or don't have any!
-
tattleteaching 02/12/2010 11:45:00 AM
I teach at an LAUSD school where we most definitely have some lemons I wish would retire or leave. I neither trust Duffy (an egocentric dandy blowhard) nor Cortines (he of the $150,000/year Scholastic contract over and above his $250,000/year district salary). But when I see statements like the following in your reporting (plus your ridiculous, campy photos), I don't trust your reporting either:
"Allegations include that she failed to teach first-grade fundamentals like the difference between levers and wheels..." Really? That's a first grade FUNDAMENTAL? I've taught first grade, and I'm sorry but the fundamental first grade fundamentals are learning how to read and learning how to do basic arithmetic.
And then there's this lovely statement of woe about the poor LAUSD legal dept.: "But in Los Angeles, under Romer, Brewer and now Cortines, because LAUSD pays just a handful of attorneys to work only part-time on such cases, the small legal unit was nearly overwhelmed by pursuing Kolter at Pinewood Elementary while handling Schonberger's dismissal. As attorney Collins explains, because of Kolter's decision to wage an extensive battle to keep her job, and LAUSD's equally passionate determination to prevent that, "we were completely swamped. We would have had [to pay] outside counsel, our fees, [Schonberger's] salary — and then there was our normal caseload." Really? Five full-time attorneys can't handle a few dismissal proceedings without hiring expensive outside consultants? As a full-time teacher with 33 students with varying degrees of English proficiency, behavior, and special ed issues, I'm completely swamped on a daily basis at a much lower salary, and no excuses are allowed. It's called work. Deal with it. Do you know how much teacher's lives are constrained by multi-page memos re: liability issues from this legal department?
There are many good stories to be written about the mess that is public education today, but this story is not one of them. It's cheap, copycat reporting. Come on, LA Weekly. You ought to serve the citizens of this city better.
www. tattleteaching.com
-
Nancy Weems 02/12/2010 10:43:00 AM
My heart sank when I saw your "Dance of the Lemons" cover. Burnt out teachers are not a joke and neither is the broken system that produces them. I have taught at USC, for the LAUSD and at charters for some years. Yes, I've seen teachers who are burnt out but the elephant in the room is that public schools are crazy houses and the great teachers I know are leaving the profession. The conditions for teachers and students in the average LAUSD classroom are stressful to put it mildly. The charters I've taught for start out with progressive goals and then turn into work houses for the teachers and the students. They live and die on test scores that are manipulated and are able to weed out kids that lower those scores. Yes, the lemons have to go but the bigger question is how are you going to stop the good teachers from leaving? Baby Boomer teachers are beginning to retire in great numbers. Fifty percent of new teachers leave teaching within five years. This is the bigger story.
-
avalonsensei 02/12/2010 6:50:00 AM
Chris, of course incompetent teachers must go. But writing this extensive article about such a small percentage of teachers is misleading. There are 48,000 teachers and health and human services professionals in LAUSD. The number of teachers like those highlighted in the article represents less than 1% of the teaching force. The vast majority of teachers are doing a good, if not great job under difficult circumstances. As for the 1%, I have to say poor oversight allowed them to earn permanent status (not to be confused with tenure, which CA teachers do not have). The Superintendent seems to be taking steps to prevent this from happening any longer. In my experience, too many administrators want to be liked by those they supervise, or be popular. This presents a conflict when trying to manage employees and increase achievement. The administrators in the article admitted not wanting to "fight a bitter battle". L.A. City seems to know how to fire employees quickly, and fair contracts are not an impediment for them. Maybe they can train our principals. A strongly written write up of your child's teacher should be enough to reverse the disturbing events you shared. But is her boss willing to do this? Finally, wouldn't it make more sense to invest in better teacher preparation for pre-service teachers, offer them intense support in their first 5 years of teaching rather than wait until they struggle and/or burnout? When I say poor teachers are the least of what is wrong with education today, this is what I am referring to: backward priorities. Why not invest in reducing class size, increasing support at struggling schools, funding schools at a greater level than prisons or war? Maybe we would not be having this discussion today.
-
Andrea Axelman 02/12/2010 6:22:00 AM
I don't understand the constant referral to expensive coaches. We are on the UTLA teacher's salary scale, and work endless hours.
-
ML 02/12/2010 4:37:00 AM
The biggest reason that students go on year after year not learning or catching up with their peers is because the state of CA, for mostly financial reasons, opposes retaining children that don't pass with basic skills in the same grade. The children are just passed along no matter what. Administrators are constantly quoting "studies" that they say prove that same grade retention doesn't work. (When questioned, most have not even read these so called "studies".) However, passing underperforming students along also doesn't work, so why do that? If, after repeating the same grade, a student is still behind his peers, an automatic pysch assessment should be required to check for learning disabilities. I believe the primary reason for the "pass along at all costs" philosophy is monetary: the state doesn't want to pay for the extra year of schooling, or the special education costs associated with assessments and services for qualified students.
-
Chris 02/12/2010 2:36:00 AM
WOW Ms.Infante. So sorry teachers are the least of the problems in education today??!!!?!?!? WTF!! That affects our children EVERYDAY. Its disgusting that incompetent teachers get to keep working with our children or get put on paid leave while its decided what to do with them. I am in the process of moving my child out of a classroom where the teacher has checked out and crosses the line in the way she speaks to the kids in class and NO Adama it is not the fault of my child who was born in Santa Monica & speaks perfect english as do her friends & classmates. It should in no way be this difficult to protect our children from incompetent teachers.
-
Greg 02/12/2010 1:01:00 AM
Thanks, Beth, for such an in-depth comprehensive article. This issue may seem byzantine, but if kids in poverty receive three teachers in a row who cannot help them reach grade level, the statistics suggest that they won't graduate and will not be able to obtain a living wage.
It seems in both parties' interest - UTLA and LAUSD - to make evaluations more meaningful, frequent, and comprehensive, and I hope that LAUSD is truly committed to doing so. The vast majority of teachers will receive average or positive ratings. Teachers such as those chronicled in this article are perpetuating a crime on society, though, and need to pursue another career. The union has to recognize that it's in their best interest as a PROFESSIONAL union to help counsel these people out, rather than defending them tooth-and-nail. If they are unwilling to change their posture, they can only pat themselves on the back as charters slowly push out conventional schools in LA.
Finally, we clearly need a change in law at the state level to shift the burden of proof in the appeals panels to preventing harm to KIDS rather than ensuring that there was no iota of subjectivity in the process of documenting underperforming teachers. I'm pessimistic about the possibilities of this.
-
grimjack 02/12/2010 12:46:00 AM
As a survivor of LAUSD I feel that I have a dog in this hunt. I loath both parties, LAUSD first because they are all piss poor administrators who have had no true leadership in as long as I can remember. The are the foxes guarding the hen house. They have fail my and every following generation by failing to identify how students learn and helping them along to LEARN. I can't find the words to express how much I loath this bastion of failure and those who have perpetuated it for my life(I am 35). Lets move on to their accomplices UTLA, I can't for the life of me comprehend how these [Profanity] can sleep at night, I am currious do the failures just stack up to the point that it just becomes numbing? Can you sleep at night? And for those failed teachers that occupy space and steal a paycheck do the ends justify the mean? If you want to find out why Gen-X and beyond have no feeling at all and a lack of direction I would point to the failures that taught them and expemplify that mediocraty and failure are the new rule of the day. Both the LAUSD and UTLA are at fault for failing to instill pride in learning and accomplishment. Lets hold them accountable. I do, but I feel that the rest of you just don't care.
-
Leonard Isenberg 02/11/2010 11:43:00 PM
While nobody questions the presence of incompetent/burned out teachers, one hears very little about longstanding LAUSD administrative fraud and just good old fashion incompetence. If you are interested in the other side of the coin, go to www.perdaily.com to follow my odyssey of harassment that started after a 23 year teaching career with excellent performance evaluations and service above and beyong the call of duty. When I reported that my school had graduated and given valid diplomas to 79 students with reading abilities as low as 2nd grade, the punishment began.
Yesterday, my principal's immediate superior Janice Davis came to Local District 6 today where I am being interred- think Manzanar with compensation- to tell me that my new assignment is my home. I have to get up at 7:30am, call her and then spend the day at home and call her again at 3pm- for this I will receive my regular salary at the top of the LAUSD pay scale until LAUSD tells me otherwise. My best guess is that they will either move to dismiss me as quickly as possible- not easy- or leave me to write my blog, given that they have more pressing problems, like filling the projected $680 million budget shortfall or finding the $200 million in payroll that they seem to have misplaced. Gives a whole new meaning to the concept of home school doesn't it? I feel like a part-time Aung San Suu Kyi being confined by the junta that runs LAUSD. Check out www.perdaily.com to see why LAUSD wants me gone.
-
Ms. Infante 02/11/2010 10:35:00 PM
Truthteller, you are right. For too many years, teachers just cared about teaching, their students, and then going home to their families. We can't afford to do that anymore. Teachers must now be active politically and make sure our voices are heard in the ed reform debate. Reluctantly, many will siphon time away from lesson planning and room preparation and do the job we elected our leaders to do--to lead righteously and ethically. From Sacramento to Beaudry, this has not been done. As for UTLA, you present a simple argument. However, voter turnout for UTLA president is significantly low, because many times there is not much of a difference between candidates. AJ Duffy doesn't come off well in media articles, especially when the article is already slanted to begin with. Of course Duffy will come off as even more of an @$$. But his point is valid when he says few administrators are doing thorough evaluations in the first place. As a 16 year vet, my Stulls have been overwhelmingly drive-by. I can think of only 1 in 16 years that was thorough and meaningful. People will be shocked to know how very little power teachers have, to begin with. We have no say over our curriculum, and in most cases we are being told exactly how to teach it. Newer teachers in the profession don't even know how to write a lesson plan, let alone a rigorous and creative one. All they have to do is follow the infamous "Instructional Guide". It is a sorry state of affairs. My point is, don't believe the media hype that this article perpetuates. Yes, there are sorry teachers. There are sorry people in every professions. That is the least of the problems in education today. www.dontforgetsouthcentral.blogspot.com
-
Anna 02/11/2010 10:04:00 PM
Adama-
Wow, great argument. Let's place the responsibility of learning fundamental concepts like reading and math on the shoulders of the children. Yeah, those kids have been living on easy street for too long! Why, when I was their age, I was doing my mama's taxes and writing opeds for the Wall Street Journal!
P.S.
4th graders ARE 10 years old, dumbass.
-
quik lube on slauson 02/11/2010 9:13:00 PM
Changing the way LAUSD teachers are hired or fired to improve school performance? Aromatherapy for a broken leg.
-
TruthTeller 02/11/2010 9:10:00 PM
Dear Ms Infante,
If the largest portion of LAUSD employees care about the students and consider their career more than a job but a calling. Then why do YOU ALL keep electing A.J. Duffy as YOUR union president?
Why have you not demanded that UTLA join with the LAUSD in developing a fair but honest system to remove incompetent teachers. You may be a positive influence on the children in your classroom but everytime you or your peers either votes for A.J. Duffy or keeps silent at a UTLA meeting YOU are flushing the lives and futures of hundreds of LAUSD students in other classromms down the toilet of LAUSD incompetency.
-
TruthTeller 02/11/2010 9:08:00 PM
Dear Ms Infante,
If the largest portion of LAUSD employees care about the students and consider their career more than a job but a calling. Then why do YOU ALL keep electing A.J. Duffy as YOUR union president?
Why have you not demanded that UTLA join with the LAUSD in developing a fair but honest system to remove incompetent teachers. You may be a positive influence on the children in your classroom but everytime you or your peers either votes for A.J. Duffy or keeps silent at a UTLA meeting YOU are flushing the lives and futures of hundreds of LAUSD students in other classromms down the toilet of LAUSD incompetency.
-
TruthTeller 02/11/2010 8:58:00 PM
Duffy, the president of UTLA, is ELECTED by the UTLA membership, all LAUSD teachers. So a majority of teachers with the LAUSD SUPPORT & APPROVE of the current system. The current climate of incompetency, of poor results, of putting the students last is supported & approved of by most LAUSD teachers.
The overwhelming responsibility for the failures of the LAUSD us with the TEACHERS at each and every school, the good ones & the bad ones.
They are the ones that keep electing Duffy, that keep supporting the UTLA in its efforts to keep incompetency in the classroom.
-
adama 02/11/2010 8:39:00 PM
Are sure it is the teachers that can not teach? Or do these immigrant students come to the U.S. with almost no skills? And why are 10 year olds still in the 4th grade? They are supposed to be in the 5th grade. Is the LA Gang Member mentality that is present in the classroom, also that of the PTA encouraging their kids to band together with that mentality? No work, just hang...
-
Ms. Infante 02/11/2010 9:56:00 AM
Very thorough article on the issue of firing teachers. You have covered almost all angles: the Superintendent, retired administrators, current administrators, the arbitration panel, UTLA president, and the sub-par teachers themselves.
Did you consider interviewing successful, career teachers who may offer a different insight than the people on which you focused? We are the people who work in the building on a daily basis, we care about our students and are concerned about the negative effect of both poor teachers and poor administrators. Sadly, I must say I was expecting more from your reporting than what I have seen in the LA Times. The public has a right to fair and balanced reporting. This piece, although admirably thorough, is missing the input from the largest portion of LAUSD employees: the teachers who have their nose to the grindstone and to whom this career is more than just a job; it is a calling.