$3 Off Saturdays!
Los Angeles, CA 90016
Editor’s note: The first in a series of essays looking back at the films and filmmakers of the past decade.
What happened at the movies in the 2000s?There must be thousands of ways of answering that question, and I’m not sure how many of them are cheerful. On the one hand, there was a retreat from the theatrical experience of film that I hate and regret — yet I know I betray my stance every week, by watching so much on the small screen, at home and nearly always alone. That trend can only accelerate in the next 10 years. As I write, it is being announced that Comcast (a cable provider) is buying what remains of Universal. In 10 years’ time, will new movies go straight to on-demand television?
On the other hand, I have been unable to be anyone but myself in the last 10 years, and as I look back, I recall the occasions on which I have been deeply moved by small, modest, humane, novelistic movies which still had an immense reach. I am ready for that kind of thing, in part because I had promised myself at this age to try to write more fiction. So I rejoice at the last 10 years and especially at the profusion of female characters who seemed to stimulate my own hope of writing. This is very personal, of course, and it has to admit the virtual absence of big mainstream events — great entertainments — that might renew our link with the tradition of the movies. You can’t have everything. So there’s a handful of small movies I want to propose and suggest you see. I find that too few people have seen many of them.
For instance, the other day at a table of film buffs, I was the only one who had seen Jonathan Glazer’s Birth, and thus the only one who believed it is a masterpiece. Yes, of course, I am vulnerable here, for it is a Nicole Kidman film (and she is extraordinary in it) — and, because I wrote a whole book about her, I am sometimes supposed to have gone senile. I can’t rule out the possibility, but senility is more interesting than you think, and Kidman is a great actress (when she settles for that), though in truth, the best female performance in Birth — the most mysterious — is that of Anne Heche. Anyway, see it: It’s about a woman whose husband dies. Ten years later, she agrees to marry another man. But at the engagement party, a 10-year-old boy appears. He tells her he is her husband. Take it from there.
Talking of the debilitated mind, I’d like to recommend Away From Her, the first film by the young Canadian Sarah Polley, in which Julie Christie plays a woman in the early stages of Alzheimer’s. Not a pretty subject and such a pretty woman. This also gives me the chance to say that I think Sarah Polley is one of the best things of the last 10 years. I hope she will continue to direct. But don’t stop acting, when the acting is as good as she manages in My Life Without Me and The Secret Life of Words (both directed by Isabel Coixet, who also did Elegy).
Another actress I have taken to tracking — in the nicest way — is Samantha Morton. I know she has many fans, but one of her best works may have escaped you, because it was an HBO movie. It is Tom Hooper’s Longford, the story of the odd friendship that developed between Lord Longford (Jim Broadbent), an eccentric do-gooder, and Myra Hindley (Morton), one of the most noxious criminals Britain has ever produced. It’s a brilliant, unnerving film, the best thing Peter Morgan has written, and not just for Morton. Andy Serkis is hideous as her partner in crime, Broadbent is painfully human and humane.
Let me celebrate actors, too: There are two men who, it seems to me, have cast aside doubts and mannerisms in the last 10 years and come into richer life and playing. First is Frank Langella, so awkward for so long, but now so brilliant that hardly anyone noticed. I loved his Nixon; I even reveled in his gentleman caller in the very silly The Box. But in Andrew Wagner’s Starting Out in the Evening, he plays an elderly midlist novelist (I’m a sucker for this) who is surprised late in life by a young woman. You want to see more from Mr. Wagner, and you want to see Langella in the great parts his seniority deserves.
The other actor I have only lately come to relish is Tommy Lee Jones. For years, it seemed to me, he settled for being a bit of a bully and a shouter. Well, he has felt the sadness of the world now and he is more hushed. We saw this in No Country for Old Men, but the film I really enjoy is one that Jones also directed, The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, which is a little bit like a Peckinpah film redone by William Trevor. Well, try it.
Your list, while smart and insightful runs the risk of crossing from the quirky to the egregious -- and coming from the man who gave us the film encyclopaedia is a bit thin. And no yit is not a sign of senility to burble over Nicole Kidman, but her best work was in MARGOT AT THE WEDDING. And how could you mention Samantha Orton, without talkling about SYNECDOCHE NEW YORK, which not only had some of her best work but had a female ensemble that included Catherine Keener, Emily watson, Dianne Wiest, Jennifer Jason Leigh, & Hope Davis, all of them in top form?!?!? And Jonathan Demme's excellent RACHEL GETTING MARRIED reminded us how fierce Debra Winger is. And the often annoying Olivier Assayas made three of the most interesting movies of this decade, DEMON LOVER, CLEAN, and BOARDING GATE. I thought THE PIANO TEACHER overrated, while CACHE with Juliette Binoche and TIME OF THE WOLF with Isabelle Huppert managed to be creepy AND rivetting AND emotionally devastating. And two astonishing films from Italy, GOMORRAH and IL DIVO, as good as anything by Hawkes or Coppola; and from Germany GOODBYE LENIN and THE LIVES OF OTHERS. The work from Asian directors in this decade has managed to combine some of the energy and pizazz we used to get from Hollywood (though a long time ago) with adult stories that managed to avoid the squalid...Kar Wai's 2046, Mira Nair's MONSOON WEDDING, Hsiao Hsien's MILLENNIUM MAMBO and FLIGHT OF THE RED BALLOON, Bong Joon Ho's THE HOST, and Ratanuruang's LAST LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE, to name a few. And American directors like Gus Van Sant & Wes Anderson with DARJEELING LTD. and the FANTASTIC MR.FOX, & P. T. Anderson with PUNCH DRUNK LOVE and THERE WILL BE BLOOD, are fulfilling the promise of their earlier work. MILK is amazing, avoiding so many of the biopic & p.c. traps -- and PARANOID PARK was heartbreaking, while capturing the raptures of adolescence. Terrence Malick's THE NEW WORLD a great romantic historic epic. John Hilcoat revived the western by taking it down under with THE PROPOSITION. Martin McDonagh's IN BRUGES and Lumet's BEFORE THE DEVIL KNOWS YOU'RE DEAD showed that noir was alive and well, as did Neil Jordan with THE GOOD THIEF and BREAKFAST ON PLUTO,with Nick Nolte and Cillian Murphy respectively giving great performances. And Cronenberg's A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE and EASTERN PROMISES, with Viggo Mortensen. And such films from Latin American directors, such as Alfonso Cuar� CHILDREN OF MEN, Gonzalez I�tu's 21 GRAMS and BABEL, and Walter Salles THE MOTORCYCLE DIARIES, and Spanish directors Almodovar with BAD EDUCATION and VOLVER, and del Toro with PAN'S LABRYNTH. Two other great noirs, one psychotic and the other historic, were Lynch's INLAND EMPIRE (worth seeing for Jeremy Irons and Laura Dern alone) and Ken Loach's THE WIND THAT SHAKES THE BARLEY. And for comedies there such gems as David Gordon Greek's PINEAPPLE EXPRESS, Spike Jonze' BEING JOHN MALKOVICH and ADAPTATION, Michel Gondry's ETERNAL SUNSHINE OF THE SPOTLESS MIND, and Miranda July's ME & YOU & EVERYONE WE KNOW. And of course, Altman's GOSFORD PARK and TANNER ON TANNER 9made for hbo, but so what). I just came up with these off the top if my head -- if I sat down I could make a real list. and I haven't even mentioned how animated films have finally come of age.
DAVID THOMSON, it's interesting how often my opinions will clash with your reviews, but here we are in total sync. Your thoughts, and the films you mention, move me. As a person who sincerely believes that movies matter, your list of decidedly off-the-beaten-track titles is a pleasing recognition of my own suspicion that one cannot live by blockbuster alone. Watching Julie Christie's memory fade gave me an insight into my own mother's similar decent. The LANGFORD film, too, expresses something about faith, in its most elemental and exquisite form. I am not a religious person, but the film is a gift, brilliantly done; we sit at the table with these two characters and actively evaluate the spiritual consequence of their progressive give and take. Am looking forward to the other films you mention here. Let me add, even though you despair over the change in our viewing experience, from sitting in a theater to watching a DVD at home, the fact remains that many of the films you mention here would not have been readily available to some of us if online rental did not exist. Almost every week I watch movies from other countries that don't even make it to Los Angeles for a limited screening. Believe me, sitting in my own house with only my dog in the room, if a movie gets to me, my response is just as sincere and full as if I was sitting in the Arclight with a thousand people. In fact, I�m more prone to vocalize at home then risk the scorn of other viewers. Your despair, though keenly observed and valid, is the kind of despair we all feel when it seems like something essential is changing. But like so many things, change is inevitable. The films I'm able to watch in my own living room bring me closer to the whole world; there is some good to be had in it.
This list is a bit premature, isn't it, considering the decade isn't over for another year yet?
A deep sigh, seeing you included the Pianist and even made it top of you priority of recommending. Otherwise, you, as most of american moviegoers (even the elite in this) are really missing out on the best moviemaking made right now... or in the last decade. You seem very intelligent and have a good feel for what is good in movies (I don't disagree on ANY of your recommendations, or your notes on them). But where is the non-english language titles? Do you in America have to cater to an American audience when writing critique, or have you simply not seen the movies? Beware.. cause you are read, like your movies are seen, by the whole world now. American critique of movies have long held the highest standard in the world, not the least cause it didn't have to fiddle with the "sensibility" one could aptly apply to the european (or other) critique. The same sensibility, perhaps, that Hollywood always feared of being, in the end, unbankable. But I personally, as a European, is loosing faith in your refreshingly non-arty approach to moviemaking, when i see that real american genius is not even recognized here. I could mention titles/directors, US or abroad, but that would get too long. But ONE non english speaking film in a decade???
Birth, aside from being a very nice homage to Kubrick, was probably the most forgettable film of the 00's. I'm sure some of your friends saw it - they just forgot about it right away.
Congratulations for publishing the most annoying, self-referential, pretentious decade-end criticism (?) or masturbation by Thompson.
Congratulations for publishing the most annoying, self-referential, pretentious decade-end criticism (?) or masturbation by Thompson.
Birth? Are you serious? The film which was booed at its premiere? The only reason to recommend this film to anyone is as a practical joke.
Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...
Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...
More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience
Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info
Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips
Log in or Sign up
Social Connect:Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.
Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:
Sign Up or Log in
Social Connect:Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.
Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:
