Top

news

Stories

 

Can an Activist Crack L.A. City Hall's Machine?

In the riled-up S.F. Valley, a struggle pits regular folk against big money

A few years ago, when folks on the sleepy outskirts of the San Fernando Valley rallied to stop Home Depot from building one of its monoliths in their anticorporate hood, they did the unlikely: They drove the Depot away.

“They basically won a David-and-Goliath battle,” says Greg Nelson, former chief of the city’s Department of Neighborhood Empowerment. “They changed the course of [a development approval], which normally would have happened automatically.”

The victory proved that a united front of Valley political activists could defeat the powers that be and their special interests.

“We got a lot of help from other neighborhoods,” says Dan McManus, who heads the neighborhood council in Sunland-Tujunga, where Home Depot was planning to drop its orange bomb of a building.

Now, a fast-approaching special election will fill the Valley seat left vacant by City Controller–elect Wendy Greuel. And these same community members are trying to beat back heavily funded, government-friendly candidates who hope to waltz into the powerful $178,798-per-year City Council slot, which comes with 20 personal staffers and eight taxpayer-provided cars.

“All the local neighborhood councils are talking to each other right now,” McManus says. “Where’s a common candidate we can all support? Who can serve all our interests?”

Ten candidates have qualified for the Council District 2 (CD 2) September 22 special election, which will likely result in a December runoff.

Veteran political observers say that only two or three of the candidates have the bucks and special-interest backing to squeeze out the others. But CD 2, which includes the strip malls of North Hollywood and the horse trails of Sun Valley, is not a district that sits on its ass while the big dogs run rampant.

The district fought bitterly to break away from Los Angeles during the Valley secession movement. Voters here helped Carmen Trutanich defeat mayoral ally Jack Weiss, who, veteran political observers wrongly believed, would easily win the City Attorney race. CD 2 voters helped defeat Measure B, a failed power grab by the council, mayor and a labor union.

And when CD 2 hometown hero Louis Pugliese ran for school board last March with almost no funds, he came within 527 votes (out of 28,641 cast) of beating the mayor’s big-money candidate, Nury Martinez — even though veteran political observers wrongly insisted Pugliese’s chances were nil.

If ever there were a time and place when a cash-poor candidate could capitalize on anti–City Hall anger and sweep into a seat at the municipal roundtable, it’s CD 2 in 2009.

“This is the best chance for the ‘little seven,’ ” says candidate Pete Sanchez, referring to himself and candidates Mary Benson, August Bisani, Josef Essavi, Michael McCue, Zuma Dogg (David Saltsburg) and Frank Sheftel. “Those top three have a bigger hurdle to get over: Will they really be different?”

Christine Essel will have a tough time selling herself as a pot-stirrer. She’s a former chairwoman of both the Community Redevelopment Agency and downtown’s ultimate insider club, the Central City Association — two groups roundly distrusted in the Valley. She can hardly claim to be a defender of neighborhood interests, an inability that will hurt her in an area fed up with overbuilding. Having collected much of her nearly $200,000 war chest on the Westside before moving to the Valley, Essel projects the image of a wealthy, well-connected carpetbagger.

“She kicked off her campaign on the other side of the Hollywood Hills before she even filed here,” says Paul Hatfield, a Valley Village accountant. He says Essel’s big campaign chest “won’t do her any good.”

Another establishment candidate, Paul Krekorian, the assistant majority leader for the Democrats in the extremely unpopular California State Assembly, will have to wave a magic wand to make voters forget his fumbling in Sacramento, where he and other legislators helped to create a budget crisis even worse than the city’s.

Then there’s Tamar Galatzan, who falls somewhere between the two moneyed insiders and the seven hard-line activists. Though Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa marshaled $2 million to get Galatzan elected to the school board, she has defied him on a few issues — including a union pay hike she feared was a budget-breaker. “She’s not afraid to say no,” says Sunland-Tujunga Neighborhood Council board member Tomi Lyn Bowling.

But grass-roots candidates don’t consider Galatzan one of their own. CD 2 candidate Mary Benson notes that Galatzan has two years left on the L.A. school board but is already trying to leave. “I wonder if this race is just a stepping stone to another office.”

It doesn’t help that Galatzan’s husband is the former head of the Valley Industry & Commerce Association, a business group that defended Home Depot in the infamous battle. “She’s gone out of her way to try to separate herself from her husband, saying she didn’t agree with him back then,” says Joe Barrett, who organized the alliance against Home Depot. “I think I believe her.”

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Rachel 09/04/2009 4:09:00 AM

    I wish the community activists from CD2 would rally around one or two grassroots candidates and then put out the word to those of us in other parts of the City. Those of us in the other communities know people who live in CD2. We can help a grassroots candidate get known to our friends and those who respect our opinion. The Measure B and Carmen Trutanich activists must rally around and assure that at least one grassroots activist is in the runoff election! Then we can rachet up the voter education effort from our desktops. Glossy mailers are rapidly becoming obsolete! This puts the power back in the people. We have the status quo at City Hall on the run. Let's keep it up until we have some elected officials who have grassroots credentials in office.

  • Aaron Epstein 09/03/2009 8:44:00 PM

    As for Chris Essel. The word carpetbagger applies without equivocation. Yesterday I went to the L.A. Ethics Commission website & downloaded the list of contributors and contributions. It appears that less than 10% of contributions come from persons in CD2, and that 90% come from the non-valley side of the hill. Her mailer states that she will represent the people of the Valley and not City Hall, but her resume consists of one City Hall appointment after another. Aside from carpet bagging, in the late 1990's she was head of the Los Angeles CRA commission at the time when the CRA almost went out of business from financial losses and mis-management. Her way of solving the problem was by unexpectedly resigning from the CRA Board.

  • d. bene tleilax 08/31/2009 11:04:00 AM

    I went to one of the forums and from one I can tell, I would have any of the 7 smaller candidates over any of the 3 funded ones. Their commitment and honesty is obvious, whereas the 3 biggies just seem like they're following the standard, slickster process of telling people what they want to hear without any concern as to accurately representing their interests once elected. I have some ideas for campaign reform: Candidates must put their specific promises down in legal CONTRACTS and take solemn oaths under penalty of perjury that guarantee they will fight to accomplish them if elected. If they violate these contracts, their constituents can file a class action suit to recover the official's entire salaries, benefits, and lobbying gifts as damages, followed by a punitive award equal to their salaries, benefits, and lobbying gifts. These monetary awards would then be distributed equally between everybody in their district, and the official prohibited from running for any public office for 7 years.

  • Zuma Dogg 08/28/2009 4:42:00 AM

    Nick, I am very disappointed that you would use the word, "only" in your comment. How do YOU know Tamar is the only one if you didn't ask me? So it looks like Nick is spinning for Tamar here, unless I forgot to return Nick's call that he didn't make to me. Nick recently ran for Controller and came in third out of three candidates.

  • Mort Allen 08/28/2009 2:01:00 AM

    Forget about CHris Essel. The City Charter specifically says you must have residency (domicile) in the District 30 days before the date to file your notice of intention to run. Residentcy means you address you previously regestered to vote, your address on your DMV records, on your retirement benefits account, your bank accounts, etc. I also is the residence of your family and your dog. Unless you just fell off a turnip truck, she cannot live in an apartment on Laurel Canyon while her husband and dog live in CD5. It is time foir Steve Cooley to make a look-see

  • nick patsaouras 08/27/2009 9:51:00 AM

    From all the candidates Tamara is the only one with a concrete , SPECIFIC commitment; that is to fight for an IG/Ratepayer Advocate at the LADWP. Tired of platitudes such as, I am for efficient government,I have business experience , I will fight for NCs , I have been a Valley resident for most of my adult life etc etc;The scandalous,continually escalating utility rates are unsustainable, unless the waste,fraud and abuse are checked on a day to day basis.I hope the NCs take notice.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy