Top

news

Stories

 

Jimmy On the Edge of Town

A Homeless Christian-Muslim From Palestine Pitches a Tent Behind Bed Bath & Beyond in Northridge. Then Come the Railroad Men and Feral Cat Activists.

Seven days after his court hearing for trespassing on railroad property, Naser Nasralla, a Palestinian immigrant from Jordan known as “Jimmy” by his friends, is once again feeding the stray, skinny cats that roam his neighborhood in Northridge, a tree-lined Los Angeles suburb in the San Fernando Valley made famous by a devastating 1994 earthquake.

“Cats have no reason to be hungry,” explains Jimmy, who speaks fluent English. “Cats love life like people do.”

Only a few hours ago, just as the hot sun was setting for the night, Jimmy sat inside his tent near a lonely stretch of railroad tracks and listened to KNX 1070 — a news station that’s always blaring from his small, transistor radio — for the latest developments about Michael Jackson’s death. They were both born in 1958.

“It was too sad,” he says about Jackson’s memorial service. “It almost made me cry.”

But now, in the cool darkness, his confusing legal troubles and the passing of a favorite pop star are behind him. Jimmy, a wiry and soft-spoken man who bicycles around Los Angeles to stay fit, happily tends to his cats.

Jimmy usually walks his red mountain bike, loaded with three or four small, plastic bags of cat food, along the main thoroughfares and back streets of Northridge — a cat-feeding chore that takes six or seven hours to complete. But on this night, he’s asked me to drive him around his suburban haunts.

“It’s much easier,” he says.

Jimmy sits in the passenger’s seat of my silver Chevy HHR still dressed in the light clothes he wore during the day: blue mesh gym shorts; gray running sneakers; gray “USA” socks that come up slightly over his ankles; and a tight-fitting, purple, L.A. Lakers jersey with an “8” on the back — Kobe Bryant’s number. He wears on top of his shaved head a baseball cap designed with the stars and stripes of the American flag. Around his neck, hangs a necklace he designed and never takes off: a gold-plated chain with a crucifix and green shamrock that are fused together with Krazy Glue.

“I mix the good luck with the religious,” Jimmy explains.

After one stop, sometime around 10 p.m., we return to the car and I decide to turn on the car stereo. Bruce Springsteen’s album Darkness on the Edge of Town just happens to be in the CD player. As the song “Badlands” takes off, Jimmy stares straight ahead, listening intently. He likes Springsteen.

“Lights out tonight/Trouble in the heartland/ Got a head-on collision/Smashin’ in my guts, man/ I’m caught in a crossfire/That I don’t understand ...”

Soon after the song ends, Jimmy appears shocked and disappointed.

“Why have I never heard that song before?” he asks defiantly. “I’ve never heard it on the radio. Why is that? I’ve heard ‘Pink Cadillac.’ That’s good. ‘Born in the U.S.A.’ That’s good, too. And what’s that song? ‘Dancing in the Dark.’ But I’ve never heard that song before. Why doesn’t the radio play it?”

He’s inquisitive on the little stuff in life, but for now much bigger questions loom about his own circumstances as a homeless and unemployed man in a complex legal fight with the city of Los Angeles and the Union Pacific Railroad company, who want to kick him out of his makeshift home.

“Badlands, you gotta live it every day/ Let the broken hearts stand/ As the price you’ve gotta pay ...”

As you drive north on Tampa Avenue, toward a giant mall called the Northridge Fashion Center and the sun-scorched hills of the Santa Susana mountain range, the strip malls and shopping centers change from mom-and-pop businesses, like the Tampa Market and J & J Liquor to shiny, corporate-chain stores such as Costco and Bed Bath & Beyond, located a half block south of Nordhoff Avenue. That avenue has been a longtime demarcation between the affluent and not-so-affluent in Northridge. Jimmy lives behind Bed Bath & Beyond in the slightly more blue-collar part of the community. His neighborhood, though, looks and feels as if it’s going through an upgrade.

On another 90-degree-plus day, KNX 1070 blares from his transistor. Jimmy says that he’s already fed the seagulls and pigeons — something he does twice a day. He turns off the news and offers me cookies and fruit juice, which, as a self-described vegetarian, are his daily staples. It’s also an economical diet — Jimmy receives a monthly welfare check of $220 and a monthly food-stamps stipend of $200. “That’s what I’m living on until I find a job,” he says.

Jimmy then grabs a green plastic chair so I can stay out of the sun and sit with him inside the tent that he bought at a local Target for $130. A gray tarp spreads over the tent, which reflects the harsh brunt of the Valley’s intense summertime sun and gives him some relief. The odd little piece of land he has selected is cement in every direction, and situated close to a railroad spur used to supply goods to local businesses. There are no trees nearby to provide him shade.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>
 
  • Leslie 07/30/2010 3:35:00 AM

    I too feed homeless cats. Thankyou Jimmy, you are blessed.

  • M.X. Palidan 10/22/2009 10:05:00 PM

    Hey, L.A. Weekly Editors and Staff, It's been close to 3 months since this story was published and there's been NO update!! I'm sure as hell that alot has occured in this situation since July 29th of this year. What is the latest? Where's this Jimmy now? You keep running this story on the front page of your Web Edition every day, so don't you think it's about time to give your readers the full story as of the last week or so in October?

  • alisa 10/08/2009 11:10:00 PM

    I am not homeless but I empathize with Jimmy more than can be imaginable. I am being harrassed by the LAPD and the prosecutors for over a year now on a case where my innocence is very obvious. There has been non stop fraud and malice and the judges(all appointed by the Governor btw) are committing non stop and even public ex partes. It's a case that will show that Jimmy is not alone. Someone please look at my case in the Clara Folz building. There is a completely insane competency hearing(granted with no basia and ex parte and the minutes are fudged-- many witnesses) Two prosecutors left for reasons unknown and now the hatchet man, Martin Boags, son of another corrupt judge has come to drown me. My word has become crap since this false prosecution- but the record will show the severe fishiness. Lavely and Singer are involved as well and this could be the watershed case that exposes why this city is broke- both fiscally and morally. 8CA10541

  • aiman 09/20/2009 5:57:00 AM

    this guy jimmy is my uncle all jokes aside. i need to know how can i reach him or reach someone who knows how to reach him he been gone for the past 6 years and didnt call my mom which is his sister

  • Ed 08/06/2009 9:33:00 AM

    Many people are stopping by to help Jimmy. Two to three sets of visitors a day. He has two cats living in his tent, and another 20 in the area. Right now Northridge is overrun with kittens and rescuers are overrun. If Jimmy were relocated, I am sure there are people who could feed his cats. Relocating Jimmy and the cats would be a problem because there is nowhere to go that a homeless person in a tent is not under a gun. For further info, my blog has details including contact info. http://laanimalwatch.blogspot.com I am trying to get Jimmy get contact info for everyone who visits him.

  • Monica 08/05/2009 9:31:00 PM

    Ed, Is it possible for any of the organizations that help Jimmy with his cats to set up a fund for spaying and neutering them, and to provide for or relocate them should Jimmy be evicted? I run a TNR organization in Illinois and would like to help.

  • Jane 08/05/2009 2:10:00 AM

    I think Union Pacific does not own that property which Metrolink/MTA owns it.

  • Alyssa 08/04/2009 8:03:00 AM

    Poster 22, you missed the point of the story. The story is about a sane homeless man in LA not bothering anyone. Instead of being offered help they want to run him out of town. They charged him with criminal trespass onto private property. He is not on private property but public property. They threatened him with arrest and jail time. They're trying to railroad him by making up nonexistent laws, telling him he must plead guilty and not providing him with a public defender initially. Something is very wrong here. If it weren't for Muzika and Patrick's article, they would have run him out of town, made him move his tent to some other piece of public property. Why not help him? He has two cats. Shelters won't take pets. He can't go to a shelter and there is no room anyway. Why not just leave him alone. He keeps things clean, is nice to everyone. Why is the City doing this? To satisfy one complainant, to meet quotas for guilty pleas, to move their problem hopefully to another City, to not have to help the man. Our system is messed up and Jimmy is a prime example of the system failing the people they are supposed to help.

  • Tim 08/04/2009 1:15:00 AM

    This article is everything that's wrong with LA Weekly, emphasis on prose not content. If you're going to provide a 1000 trivial details at least tell us what the point of the story is. Jesus, I'm on page 3 and I still have no idea what this story is about. So Jimmy got a ticket for trespassing and he feeds cats? There are 100,000 homeless people in this city and you're profiling one of them? That's just lazy journalism. What did the editors say, "I got an idea for a story! Walk down the road and interview a random homeless person."

  • Ed Muzika 08/02/2009 12:02:00 AM

    An Unsettling Development. I talked to Jimmy last night. Jimmy was "visited" yesterday by two County Sheriff squad cars who parked about 75 ft from his tent, and just sat there for 10 minutes in plain sight. Jimmy went over to them and asked whether there was a problem. Guess who was driving one of the squad cars? Alan Shinn, the Union Pacific Railroad cop! Apparently Shinn works both as an LA County Sheriff's Deputy and moonlights as a Union Pacific cop. At least this is what Jimmy told me that Shinn told him during their first visit. This time Shinn said there was no problem, that they just happened to be in the area, and were just "observing." To me this seems an ominous development. Is Shinn about to give Jimmy a ticket for being on County property? Once again with the railroad prevail because a Sherif's Deputy also works as a cop for the railroad? Is there a conspiracy developing with the City Attorney's Office?

  • Ronald Vaughan 08/01/2009 11:03:00 PM

    Dear Patrick Range McDonald: Just read your fine article in the L.A. Weekly. I side entirely with the guy "Jimmy" (btw,his surname seems familiar---didn't a Mr. N.--a possible relative?--once own the long-gone "Starwood" club?) I personally don't like "poverty pimps" (homeless outreach organizations) with their 20-Century non-solutions,based on religion,psychiatry or some other misguided boondoggle....The only organization I favor is "Food,Not Bombs". They once tried to extend that idea into "Homes,Not Jails" but the available (vacant) homes just weren't sufficient in number. Here in Beverly Hills there's a homeless problem....but,we never had any homeless facilities. But,same "no-camping" hassles....Recently,never-before "rules and regulations" signs were put up...and policing changed from reactive to proactive in the parks. I know I'm being blamed for (unknown-to-me) problems caused by other homeless people....who are probably long-gone. I got cited three times for "camping". Even though I just have minimum belongings (no sleeping bag,no tent) and did naps during the day. Someone needs to sue Beverly Hills and I want to claim tort damages for suffering and humiliation. I heard that there's only about 2 dozen of us,but only 3 have the guts to come forward. Unlike some dispossessed,I don't have any bad habits..just bad luck,and no family. So I don't appreciate the police here,trying to force me to leave town! The ACLU seems to be too busy to help us yet,but the major precedent has been set. Santa Monica,of course,was sued just days ago (July 14). Homelessness can't be criminalized. Somebody once said, 'No bed = no crime". Sincerely, R. Vaughan Beverly Hills,CA.

  • BJensen 08/01/2009 12:30:00 PM

    What is it about this man and the life he's currently living that society finds so offensive? Is there nothing else that matters more?

  • Patrick Range McDonald 08/01/2009 10:36:00 AM

    Thanks for everyone's comments. I'll be following up the article with a report about the court hearing on August 3. It will appear on the LA Weekly web site the same day. Take care, Patrick Range McDonald

  • Melissa 08/01/2009 8:49:00 AM

    The article isn't about feral cats. It's about Jimmy and being homeless in LA. The police just bully some nice sane homeless people out of their campsites. Jimmy is not hurting anyone. He is clean and neat, isn't a criminal, doesn't bother people. No one is using that area. It's an abandoned bridge over a flood control zone. The city has no jurisdiction because it's county land yet they are trying to force him off the property. Why can't anyone help him instead?

  • Kerima Reed 08/01/2009 8:44:00 AM

    I wonder why people have such difficulty accepting a person who lives very simply in a tent, which means he is not really homeless, and takes care of animals. Jimmy doesn't beg or steal and he takes care of himself and these harmless animals who have no one to take care of them. Why do people find that so difficult to understand and why do they want so badly to displace him from his "home"? How are he and the cats dangerous to anyone (as mentioned several times in the article)? These feral or "homeless" cats have been living around the area for years, starving to death, being run over by cars or eaten by coyotes. This generous, kind man came along and saw a problem, so he tried to rectify it even though he has almost nothing of his own. He spends most of what he receives on taking care of other living beings who are even more unfortunate than him. It seems very clear to me that this man is being a kind of Mother Teresa to cats. He saw a need and, instead of turning a blind eye like most of us do, he filled it and this is the gratitude he gets. It is a sad fact that people who feed homeless animals are maligned and treated like criminals when the real criminals are those who have abandoned or neglected their own animals and thus left them to die or be taken care of by others. Or they don't spay or neuter their animals, so they multiply to the point that the owners can't afford to feed all the hungry little mouths. Shame on them for not being responsible owners; they should be given tickets and fined, not Jimmy!

  • Ed Muzika 08/01/2009 4:33:00 AM

    Jeff, Are you saying not feeding the cats as Jimmy is doing ends their misery because they die of starvation, illness, disease and being eaten by coyotes? Is that your solution? Most of these cats have their misery decreased because they are no longer hungry, have relatively safe places to sleep, get medical attention when they can be caught and care provided. The misery is not getting cared for. Yes, many get killed by coyotes and even more by cars, but they would be killed even more quickly if they were hungry and always searching for food, water, or got ill or were injured without care. They do not multiply if they are being sterilized; most of these cats are sterilized. About defecating and urinating, the same problem holds with squirrels, rabbits, raccoons, coyotes, opossum, gulls, pigeons, crows and other birds who also defecate and urinate wherever they please. What do you propose we do about them? In any event, it is estimated about 5% of housed cats �leak� into the outside homeless cat world each year. Since the big recession, that percentage has increased threefold. Even if every lost and feral cat were rounded up now and killed, each year there would be about 55,000 new homeless cats on the streets in LA. Doing nothing is not an option. Most of those who tend colonies do capture and place some of those ferals in homes leach year. What is your solution? You offer none other than your opinion that people who help feral cats are miscreants, such as the neighbor you apparently despise. Do you want the County to round them up so they don�t pee on your property, or do you want them to starve and end their suffering (and yours apparently)?

  • Jeff 08/01/2009 3:54:00 AM

    Jimmy not being equipped to spay and neuter animals is not the issue. Feeding feral cats only increases their misery by creating more homeless animals...plain and simple Ed. You also failed to realize the very real public health hazard created having these animals deficating and urinating wherever they please. I've put with a neighbor for years who feeds feral cats in the Northridge area on a nightly basis and has a complete disregard for those who want these animals treated humanely. She, just like you sir, completely misses the point.

  • Ed Muzika 08/01/2009 2:37:00 AM

    Jeff, Jimmy is part of a network of people in the area that tend colonies and do get the cats spayed and neutered. To name just a few, there are Helene, Monica, Rebecca, Marie and myself. We do periodically trap and get the animals fixed. We help each other in terms of medications and food and trapping as needed. The real problem is that there are already lots of cats on the street all over the Valley, fixed and not fixed, and your options are to do nothing, as you seem to propose,or you can help keep them alive, or even place them. Jimmy is in no position of provide vet care or get the cats fixed as he is confined to bicycle transportation. So each of us does as he or she can. But to criticize Jimmy for not being a full service "feral cat placement service" sort of misses the point of the article. Jimmy does build coyote-proof houses for them out of heavy lumber donated to him. The cats stay in these shelters which he has erected all over Northridge at various feeding stations until people steal them. The other cats living near him have escape ledges underneath the bridge that no animal larger than a cat can get onto. He has also built sort of guard rails so the cats don't fall into the riverbed below. I assume your "solution" is to stop feeding the cats, let them starve or be eaten by coyotes right way rather than later?

  • Jenna 08/01/2009 2:30:00 AM

    "I think Jimmy would most appreciate canned cat food. He never has enough." Jimmy needs many things- cat food to feed more feral cats is not one of them.

  • Jeff 08/01/2009 1:43:00 AM

    What hasn't been addressed here is that feeding feral cats only compounds a very serious problem. If Jimmy and his "activist" ilk actually cared for the welfare of these animals he would assist in getting these animals spayed/neutered. Feeding them only enables the unchecked breeding of more homeless cats. During the summer months in Northridge/Chatsworth (I'm a lifelong resident of the area), coyotes march down from the Porter Ranch hills and feed on said feral cats. So in the end, (and I know this first hand as I live next door to a similar militant feral cat feeder), all Mr.Nasralla is doing is providing easy pickings for the coyotes and more animals to be subjugated to the inhumane practices of L.A. county animal shelters.

  • Mikael H 07/31/2009 5:00:00 AM

    This is really sad. I do hope that the UP comes to their senses and drop everything. And as a city in a civilized sociey, I agree with the former comment - that the City ought to do what it can to help this man.

  • Emil Manx 07/31/2009 1:44:00 AM

    Patrick did an excellent job of writing the article. I hope this will be a major Malox moment for the City Attorney who is handling the case, the Railroad and the rest of the lynch mob. Maybe the prosecution will fold up their tent and dismiss the case on Monday. This is some good ink for Jimmy. He should receive a lot of empathy from all over the map. Good show!

  • Rebekah Berger 07/31/2009 12:37:00 AM

    Thank you for publishing the uproar over Jimmy, his tent and his cats. What is disturbing in all of this is the refusal of public officials to state anything but officialese gibberish in this situation. If Jimmy N. is indeed on county land, what is the hassle with Union Pacific? As for the help given by Gregg Smith's office, I can only say that as someone who has called his "office helpers" for aid, they no doubt gave Jimmy the same list of recycled and outdated resources that they regularly give the rest of us. Oh yeah, help big time. Then there's the police that dismiss the alleged assaults on a homeless man but worry about vague complaints over feral cats (which they of course refuse to expand upon). Right. Ferals are obviously much more dangerous than wandering thugs. And finally we have the anonymous owners of the Nordhoff Plaza, whose shopkeepers and customers have no problems with Jimmy while these folks do. Again with the caveat that they are just doing this "in the public good." I would like to know just who the public is for them or any other of these folks. More power to Jimmy N who has kept his compassion in the face of hardship and more power to Ed Muzika, Mary Cummins and the rest of the folks who are there on their own time when needed.

  • Kate Woodviolet 07/31/2009 12:26:00 AM

    There are a number of very disturbing issues being brought to the fore by this well-written article. First, why is any private company like Union Pacific being allowed to create a police force that the city or county then empowers to harass people at will? How is this constitutional, particularly since the actual ownership of the land is in dispute? If Union Pacific owns the land they should prove it in court. Until they do, they should stop harassing this man. Second, why is there, as Mr. Muzika has pointed out on his blog repeatedly, seemingly a vendetta in this city against feral or stray cats and the people who care for them? (I think it's a good idea to distinguish between the two because feral cats aren't simply homeless, which implies all they need is to be adopted. They are essentially wild, and are often pretty uncomfortable around people. It takes a special person to care for them). I'm sure this case reminds many in the humane community of the baseless arrest of Ron Mason in Northridge a year or so ago. Instead of prosecuting dogfighters, abusers and killers of animals, the joint LAPD-Animal Services "Animal Cruelty Task Force" instead focused our time and money on a nice guy with very little money who looked after stray and homeless cats dumped in his neighborhood, including spaying/neutering them. He went to the local shelter for help and soon found himself arrested, for the benefit of TV cameras and the Daily News, which never printed a retraction when it became clear Mason was NOT an abuser, despite reporter Dana Bartholomew's promise that he would do so. Interestingly, Mason's vet, days after his arrest, suddenly went to work for L.A. Animal Services, under now-ex General Manager Ed Boks -- which is a pretty ugly instance of conflict of interest. Ed Muzika has reported that an Officer Munez, a member of the Animal Cruelty Task Force, told him that the ACTF's biggest issue was "people who have too many cats." Does any resident of L.A. believe that's the biggest issue facing animals in this city? And 65 year-old Katherine Varjian is also facing prosecution for feeding and spay/neutering homeless and feral cats in Beverly Hills. Why? Why do we persecute people for sharing what little they have with those who have less -- cats who just need a little food and water? It's becoming increasingly clear that this world-class city is focusing its wrath on those who are too poor and too old to fight back, all in the name of denying cats a little kindness and sustenance. It's incomprehensible that we would do this. It's not worthy of what should be a humane city and an example to the rest of the nation.

  • Marc Madow 07/30/2009 2:23:00 PM

    Rugged individualists like Jimmy scare government-types because he doesn't need them. Jimmy lives free compared to the people who committed perjury getting a stated income mortgage that they are now finding impossible to pay. He doesn't need public housing. He doesn't live on credit granted by banks. He doesn't ask permission to have a close relationship with feral cats. What does he need from the dog catcher? Absolutely nothing is the answer. Jimmy shows pathways to freedom which scares the daylight out of those who seek to control us all. Even Jimmy's religious values threaten the divide and conquor system we live under as his Christian and Muslim values get along just fine within the same body. Peaceful, smiling, happy, easy going Jimmy and his cats are bad news for those who want us to goose-step to the we need government mantra. It's the government who should fold up some of their tents and go away not Jimmy.

  • Pat Hartman 07/30/2009 9:21:00 AM

    That anyone can raise a question of public safely issues over this is ludicrous. That so many bureaucrats can waste so much time on this is beyond belief. I'd like to see Jimmy change places with any one of his persecutors for a month, and see who functions better in the other guy's job. That anyone can spare the time or energy to pick on this man is a sign of something terribly wrong with the city, the surrounding businesses, the legal system, and the entire society. Jesus wept.

  • Kay 07/30/2009 8:59:00 AM

    It sounds like Smith and the City Attorney just want Jimmy out and any excuse will do, legal or not. Sounds like the new stores complained to Smith and he decided Jimmy was homeless and helpless. Why oh why on earth are they going after him? When is the trial?

  • Edward Muzika 07/30/2009 8:51:00 AM

    I think Jimmy would most appreciate canned cat food. He never has enough. Also, if he is forced out, there are four cats that live with him in and about the tent. They would need a home. I know he loves meeting people that love animals.

  • David R. 07/30/2009 8:40:00 AM

    Jimmy sounds like a wonderful soul. Even with his tough upbringing and life's challenges he's remained a caring man toward animals and others. Amazing story. I hope your article is read by someone who can help him. God bless you for writing it. Does he need food? Would he be upset if I brought him some?

  • Sasha 07/30/2009 8:33:00 AM

    What a sad story. The City and County are wasting all their time and money trying to evict him when they should reach out to him. They could help find him a place or get him a job. That is what the City is supposed to do.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy