Top

news

Stories

 

Wrinkles in Runkle Canyon

50 Years After a Santa Susana Nuclear Accident Holds Up Land Development

All hell was about to break looseat the Sodium Reactor Experiment on July 23, 1959. The reactor, tucked into a corner of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory in the Simi Hills 30 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles, was constructed without a radiation-containment dome and was in the 10th day of partial meltdown.

On top of the reactor core, a worker operating a 30-foot-high, lead-lined “coffin,” used to extract uranium fuel rods, came across a fuel rod that wouldn’t budge. He started rocking the coffin back and forth, when something went terribly wrong.

“The guy was pulling on the thing real hard, and it was stuck in the reactor,” says John Pace, 70, the last known surviving lab worker present during the meltdown. A chemical known as Tetralin “made a bunch of goo in the bottom of a pool and the rods were damaged. Then the goo freed up and they went, ‘What the hell happened there?’ ”

Looking into the coffin’s “window,” the Atomics International mechanic realized that the fuel rod had broken off and now was exposing the whole building to severe radiation. That radiation threatened to contaminate the 2,850-acre field lab. The reactor stood on the federal Department of Energy’s 90-acre portion of the property.

“All he could think to do is run and, and as he was running, he was pulling alarms,” Pace today tells L.A. Weekly. “They were realizing radiation was leaking out in the atmosphere. Somebody volunteered to go back in and put the fuel rod back down in the reactor.”

Radiation flooded the building and contaminated everything in it. Pace helped seal off the control room with tape and ended up cleaning the floors and walls with sponges and mops until he realized that the best way to clean up the contaminated reactor was with Kotex pads. Pace sneaked in his Polaroid camera and took photos of frantic attempts to bring the reactor under control.

The Sodium Reactor Experiment meltdown damaged 13 of the reactor’s 49 fuel rods. Although the exact amount of radiation released is not known, by some estimates, it amounted to 260 to 459 times more radiation than the famous meltdown at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania 20 years later in 1979.

Where the nuclear fallout blew is under dispute, and is fueling a controversy today over whether KB Homes should proceed with a plan to develop the adjacent lands known as Runkle Canyon.

In later years, the subsequent owners of the Santa Susana lab, Boeing Co., said it didn’t have the wind data from that day 50 years ago — and even if the company did, they considered it proprietary information and wouldn’t part with it.

But Pace says he knew which way the wind was blowing during the meltdown because he was the designated weatherman. During that period, he says, the prevailing wind was traveling from the Simi Hills directly toward the highly populated San Fernando Valley.

Pace says, “At the time of the meltdown, it went ... toward Los Angeles and the Valley. I know it went exactly over L.A. It was just a normal westerly wind blowing over the San Fernando Valley and beyond.”

A California state study in 2006 estimated that hundreds of people in a 62-mile radius around the lab contracted cancer from the meltdown, but researchers were hampered by Boeing’s refusal to hand over the data on wind direction. Local outrage led Boeing to finally release the information, confirming Pace’s account that it was moving toward the Valley.

It was 1959, and coverup of the meltdown had begun almost immediately. Three weeks after the reactor was finally shut down July 26 of 1959, the Valley Green Sheet, forerunner to the Los Angeles Daily News, ran an article saying that “a parted fuel element” was observed and that “no release of radioactive materials to the plant or its environs occurred, and operating personnel were not exposed to harmful conditions.”

But Pace alleges that radiation readings were so high, workers’ radiation-exposure badges were confiscated and stored in a safe. Pace blames the radiation for a diagnosis of temporary sterility in 1966 after failing to conceive children with his wife Geneva, who subsequently had five miscarriages before giving birth to their three children.

In 1998, L.A. Weekly began its coverage of contamination coming from the huge field-lab facility. In that coverage, former employee Dan Parks revealed that reactor core gases were vented — or allowed to escape into the atmosphere — all the time, before and after the meltdown (see “Total Recall,” Dec. 17, 1998.) At the time, Parks said that all 10 of the nuclear reactors followed that practice.

Earlier in 1998, Boeing’s public-relations flack Dan Beck slid a copy of the 1959 Valley Green Sheet article across a table to this reporter in a meeting in Canoga Park as proof that the meltdown incident was not covered up.

Today, a cleanup effort arising from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s signing of Senate Bill 990 in late 2007 is under way. The cleanup is intended to ensure that the entire acreage is returned to the highest environmental standards possible and that parkland is created.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • James Christie 08/01/2010 5:32:00 PM

    Wow...I worked for Southern Pacfic Millings Crushing facility in the 70's. Unbeknownst to the dozer operators (contractors not employees) they had crossed the property on to the neighboring property and were feeding that material in to the crusher to be made in to building material used all over So Cal. Runkle Canyon facility produced the aggregate for all of SP Millings batch plants, may make me want to take a closer look at my health problems!

  • Laurel Davidson 08/28/2009 9:46:00 PM

    I taught at Collins Street School 5717 Rudnick Avenue in Woodland Hills from 1961-1969. After that several of the teachers were stricken with various forms of cancer. I am lucky so far and do not have any signs of cancer. The teachers that I mention also taught there in the early 1960's Could any of their health problems be related to Rockedyne?

  • kathy Lerner 08/08/2009 7:48:00 AM

    I am so happy to finally find the a reason, that may have causee of my fifty years problems and illness. In In summer 1959 I a resident teenager of the San Fernndo Valley had a full term still born child a terrible thing at the time, no relief from the psychological trauma, and for ten years after, I was sterile, and wondering why I couldn't get pregnant again. And I have many illness' over the many years, due to body pain, osteoarthritis, and on and on. reading your articles made me think perhaps there is a real reason for my health hell. And that the docotrs who said I was a hypochorndriac were probably wrong and mis-informed. thanks for the reporting, keep it going,

  • Patrick Collins 08/01/2009 9:09:00 PM

    Boeing and its defense industry pals take the Reckless Irresponsibility crown back from banking industry. Bankers don't care if people starve; Boeing's willing to irradiate 'em before they have the chance to starve.

  • John Southwick 07/27/2009 9:25:00 PM

    On behalf of all the Radiation Rangers, I want to thank Michael Collins for another great job of reporting. One of the most difficult jobs we have as "Rangers" is keeping all this information public. Thanks again Michael for helping us achieve our most important goal.

  • Margery Brown 07/26/2009 7:25:00 AM

    I really like the way this article combines the important information about the SSFL partial meltdown with issues having to do with potential home building in Runkle Canyon. I have never previously seen an article written in quite this way. However, it certainly does seem to be really important to understand the SSFL meltdown, in order to comprehend the contamination risks in building homes in Runkle Canyon. Understanding these risks of radioactive and toxic chemical contamination to Runkle Canyon, immediately causes the reader to question the high probability of the same kind of contamination in other potential residential building areas, such as Dayton Canyon. Since the mountain has been steadily leaking down all of the above mentioned deadly substances into surrounding communities for 50 years,I even feel that a complete moratorium needs to be called regarding building in any of the surrounding areas, until the SSFL can finally be cleaned up. There would be no point to cleaning up areas like Runkle Canyon only to have more contamination migrate down into the area, all over again. We really need an SB 990 for the surrounding communities in order to assure that they are cleaned up to the highest standards. So far, the builders seem to be doing a fine job of manipulating the testing results in order to decare that there is no problem. There is a problem-----a giant sized one! Thaks again for giving the readers a complete background to the Runkle canyon conflict, and in so doing, clarifying the whole building-on-contaminted soil issue.

  • christina Walsh 07/25/2009 12:55:00 AM

    Great article, it's really amazing that it takes fifty years for the details of the truth to finally start to trickle out. Thanks for keeping this important subject in the news and in the minds of the people below

  • Michael Rose 07/24/2009 8:12:00 AM

    Great reporting. How can the companies claim there is no problem if they aren't going to do the testing or take the claims of people who worked there seriously? Just saying, "trust us," isn't enough.

  • Margery Brown 07/24/2009 2:50:00 AM

    A fantastic article, Michael, and a particularily clear, understandable explanation of what happened, and why the aftermath of this nuclear meltdown is still a giant-sized problem in the whole affected area. What could possibly be a bigger problem than builders wanting to build on contaminated land.....and Boeing still denying that there is a problem.? And, 50 years later, this drama is still going on with new cancer cases continuing unabated. We keep hearing from people who grew up around the nuked area and are developing cancer in their 40's and 50's....having already buried their parents, who were clearly made terminally ill by living near the Field Laboratory. The newspaper articles you have written about this (partial) nuclear meltdown, down thru the years, have been a real link to the enlightment of people living in the area surrounding this sodium reactor experiment. A devastating and failed experiment. Please keep up the good work...you are totally needed!

  • Michael Collins 07/23/2009 9:29:00 AM

    There are a couple of typos in the piece. 13 of 43 rods experienced melting. It's also KB Home. As noted at the end of our article, additional information, John Pace's photographs, interviews and films about the 1959 Sodium Reactor Experiment meltdown are at http://www.enviroreporter.com/ which will be online later this evening with a robust new website.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy