Top

news

Stories

 

L.A.'s Reefer Revolution

City Hall's yawning loophole for pot dispensaries spawns a Woodstock economy

The skinny, redheaded teenager looks skittishas he approaches a 21-year-old homeless youth we will call Ricky. The pale boy is looking for weed, and passes Ricky $14. This illegal scene unfolds at the corner of Hollywood Boulevard and Western Avenue at the entrance to a busy subway station, and under the watchful eyes of a motley crew of homeless youth.

Right across the street is Los Angeles City Council President Eric Garcetti’s Hollywood field office. If he and his staff were to peer out, they could easily see what a failed enterprise the city’s mangled regulation of medical marijuana has been.

Ricky leads the gangly redhead across Western. Allowing the Weekly to tag along, Ricky commands the boy: “Stand over there and wait.” Even though there’s a marijuana dispensary just 10 feet from the bus stop, right next door to Garcetti’s building, Ricky disappears around the corner, planning to do business with a different one.

He has his choice. By his count there are 15 dispensaries within walking distance of Western and Hollywood. Recreational pot is still illegal, but the law no longer applies for the street kids and hipsters who file in and out of the many marijuana stores.

In 2005, every city in California was busy adopting ordinances to allow for medical-marijuana storefronts while keeping out the bad actors and illegal peddlers.

But the Los Angeles City Council — the highest-paid in America at nearly $180,000 per year — couldn’t get it done. Led by laid-back Council President Eric Garcetti, its dithering was epic. No other major city proved so incapable. On May 3, 2005, Councilman Dennis Zine moved to regulate dispensaries, but City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo and the City Council’s Planning and Land Use Management (PLUM) Committee — Jose Huizar, Ed Reyes and the recently departed Jack Weiss — went to war over how to word the regulation.

They wasted well over a year. While other California cities easily put regulations in place, L.A. weed dispensaries exploded in number, attracting extensive criminal activity and drawing protests from neighborhoods.

Pot-friendly Berkeley, where more people wear hemp than denim, has allowed three medical-marijuana dispensaries, or one for every 35,000 Berkeley-ites. Compare that to Los Angeles, with one dispensary for every 6,000 people.

“A marijuana dispensary can’t open without a permit,” says Wendy Cosin, Berkeley’s deputy planning director for its Medical Cannabis Commission. When told about L.A.’s runaway situation, she replies: “Oh my God! I didn’t realize L.A. was the Wild West.”

Zine, a former cop, in 2007 drafted a new motion demanding the Planning Department and City Attorney create an “immediate” temporary moratorium. But Delgadillo and the three members of PLUM, Huizar, Reyes and Weiss, spent nine months on the “immediate” ban. The moratorium, finally approved by the City Council, was so incompetently worded that it created a massive loophole — and legal nightmare.

In 2006, L.A.’s four dispensaries jumped to 98. In 2007, there were 187. Then came the inept “moratorium.” Pot dispensaries soared to more than 600. Zine today says, “It’s like you get the first whiff of smoke and then there is an explosion.”

The debacle was unmatched in California, pointing up L.A.’s reputation as being run by an overpaid, disinterested City Council and a distracted, ineffective mayor who have repeatedly failed when it comes to quality-of-life issues, ranging from their inability to control illegal billboards to their illegal interpretation of state housing density laws.

One of the more popular dispensaries in Garcetti’s district is located in what critics say is a dubiously self-described religious center, the Liberty Bell Temple II. Standing near a mural of pothead heroes Bob Marley and Haile Selassie, in an alley leading to the barred entrance of his store, the red-eyed, dreadlocked owner, Ed “Weedman” Forchion, takes a moment to celebrate the fact that City Hall’s bumbling has turned Los Angeles into the storefront pot capital of the United States.

“It’s like 1933 all over again, weed prohibition is over,” Forchion says. “We have won the reefer revolution.”

Forchion is a marketing machine. He openly admits to the Weekly that he pays medical-marijuana cardholders in weed to drive around in his van, the Weedmobile. His wants to use Twitter to tell followers where the Weedmobile is so that he or his minions can hand out free grams of grass — just a taste, to give Forchion the edge in the battle for pot-market share.

Just down the street at a small Hollywood Boulevard dispensary called Kush Mart, Forchion alleges, the owners gave two pounds of weed and $2,000 to rapper Snoop Dogg to have his photo taken among the dispensary’s rows of potent bud. The owners of Kush Mart did not return repeated calls made by L.A. Weekly, and Snoop Dogg’s attorney, Donald Etra, said “I have no knowledge of that.”

“Kush Mart — now that is a good name,” Forchion says wistfully. “It’s like the Kmart of weed.”

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Heavyrunner 12/03/2009 9:06:00 PM

    The name "Kush" means "death" in Urdu, the language of the people of Pakistan and Afghanistan. The mountain range, the Hindu Kush, gets it name because if people from India, Hindus, try to cross it they often die because of the harsh conditions in the 25,000 foot plus high desert mountains.

  • Bound4Glory 08/21/2009 8:36:00 AM

    The agenda of the dispensaries is to limit competition so they can raise prices. They've been successful at this in other cities, but not in L.A. They also want to give profit participation to politicians in the form of taxation -- never mind that prescription medications are supposed to be tax free. The taxes proposed by the dispensaries are really taxes on migraines, taxes on HIV, etc. If we're going to tax one medication, why not tax them all -- antibiotics, Viagra, lithium, Prozac, and so on? The owners of LA like captalism when it puts money in their pockets, but when it doesn't they have no problem turning to a command economy. The end result of all this will be a sharp rise in underground pot dealing and yet more destruction of our environment by the Mexican drug cartels.

  • maricontrarili 08/14/2009 8:44:00 PM

    I would like to put my two cents in. First of all, where would a homeless guy get the money to get a valid prescription for medical marijuana in the first place? They're not exactly cheap. Second off, $14 to buy weed? Not if it was coming from a dispensary. Third, while you state that "Ricky" invited Weekly to follow him, you then state that he disappeared around the corner. You do not tell us where he did eventually obtain the weed from, and how are you going to just blithely take the word of a homeless person that there are 15 dispensaries within walking distance? And what kind of walking distance are we talking about, anyways? Also, you inaccurately state that 533 "pot stores" filed for hardship exemption. 533 hardship exemptions have been submitted--there is a difference. I very, very, very seriously doubt that there are over 600 dispensaries operating in Los Angeles--well, possibly in Los Angeles County, but not in the city of Los Angeles. BTW, I have yet to hear of a single dispensary that sells its' week in a little green baggie. That's how it is packaged by street dealers.

  • john b 07/28/2009 2:55:00 AM

    Those criticizing this article must not read very well and for a bunch of stoners, very reactionary. If the weed situation in L.A. gets too out of hand, there will be more negative consequences to the medical marijuana movement and will hurt the chances of this needed legislation being passed in other states. Dispensaries need to be regulated and operate without problems, or L.A. could be used to fight ballot initiatives and eventual legalization in other states. So, try to think for a minute before attacking this reporter. You're blase attitude, much like the City Council's, could end medical marijuana for everyone else.

  • Kebra Negast 07/25/2009 7:08:00 AM

    Haile Selassie I is not a "pot celebrity." get the facts straight, Babylonians! There's no evidence that Selassie--ahe ruler of Ethiopia and the man whose speech before the league of nations was the forbear of the UN's later "declaration of human rights"--even smoked herb, though it is said that marijuana grew on the grave of the first ruler in the solomonic dynasty whose throne selassie ascended, solomon.once again: get the facts straight, Babylonians!

  • RT 07/24/2009 2:37:00 AM

    I agree with Robin; I don't see a problem here. Fully legalize it and let the free market decide which ones stay in business and which one's fall to the wayside. I do, however, agree that they shouldn't be within a certain area near a school. But that should go for liquor stores and bars as well...

  • Kate 07/20/2009 11:48:00 AM

    BuddhaNature, Comment 19: Good point, but that doesn't prevent the City from following the lead of Frisco and Berkeley, which they should have done ahead of time so that it wouldn't affect those currently in business--then the rules are out front as you apply to establish the business.

  • BuddhaNature 07/20/2009 8:59:00 AM

    Although Los Angeles has a gazillion dispenseries, the problem of which one to visit is easily solved. Just use the Wheel of Weed. http://wheelofweed.com/

  • Kate 07/19/2009 11:29:00 PM

    Thank you LA Weekly for pealing out the fluff, pomp, and circumstance of the overpaid and under performing LA City Council. I would invite all readers to just listen in to the egotistical Council members kissing up to each other and their re-coronated King, Garcetti on LA City 35, on July 7 available on demand: http://lacity.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=130&clip_id=6319 Be careful not to confuse the issue of the medical use of marijuana with zoning, profiteers, and the protection of the public from criminal activity. An example of the local City Council District Rep dropping the ball lies right across the street from Hollywood High School at the corner of Sunset Blvd and Highland Avenue where a cigarette stand is operating in violation of state and city laws at the same time our politicians use "children" as the excuse (and cover) to promote any of their pie-in-the-sky projects. Citizens with cancer, aides, severe back pain, and other ailments have every right to seek their necessary treatment which may include medical marijuana. But the City Council representing the public's interest has a right to set guidelines on where and how this is distributed. As eloquently illustrated in this article, even progressive cities such as San Francisco and Berkeley recognize this. In Los Angeles, however, our politicians have been asleep at the wheel like they have done with giving away liquor licenses in Hollywood which has the highest density of those licenses--a local gadfly calls the area AlchoHollywood.

  • Robin Adair 07/19/2009 12:42:00 AM

    I don't see a problem here. Let the free market handle the number of Pot Dispensers not more idiotic legislation. Personally I don't care for the other heaten killer weed though eventually in the long run it'll probably be cheaper than the other heathen killer weed I prefer due to onerous taxation and self righteous morons like yourself trying to legislate every aspect of existence. By the way have a nice day :)

  • BHNATIVE 07/18/2009 4:45:00 AM

    Thank you Granma from Orange Cnty. In just Boyle Heights, a suburb in an area of 20 Sq miles we have 249 activeliquor licenses. The community, with harsh opposition from Councilmen Office, has been able to close some 10 bars, and lately stop 3 or 4 new permits requested. However, business owners loaded with big political contributions will allow this business to do what ever they want, they get the key to the city. El Mercado on First Street and Indiana, with a history of violent crimes, drunk driving and nuisance to the residential area, Car theft and burglarize, drug traffic, and two people shot and killed two doors down this business, Oscar's Bar a week before they approved the application at City Hall. In this area the census track (ABC) only allows five liquor licenses, we have 13 licenses, 8 over the allowed number. El Mercado alone has 5 of the licenses, yet the City of Los Angeles, together with our Councilmen of CD14 approved the business owners request for a Full Liquor license, Adult Entertainment, Dancing, and a bridge from the 3rd floor to the parking lot, and the community opposed it all. The community appeal the decision of the PLUM, and than it got nasty, they restricted the neighbors to present their case, after push and shubb by the neighbors of El Mercado, they allow two people to speak. And the only reason was for the LAPD requesting PLUM to hear our side, and also because city Attorney was present. Our Councilmen last words to us after the approval, he does not like our approach. We went to hell and back, spend our own money to appeal the first decision, you think we care what he things about our approach, yes we are pushy women trying to improve our community from any more liquor licenses, and bars that attract drunk drivers to our predomenent poor residential community of Boyle Heights and ELA community. So why do the residents have to fight City Hall, I thought they they are to look out for the majority?

  • bhnative 07/18/2009 4:04:00 AM

    Is questionable as to how some of the City Councilmen that claim to be attorney's can not get a job done in just writing an ordinance, and they are always behind the eight ball. However, this same councilmen spend so much time helping business people get through the approval of the of City Hall, because there is no monitoring what so ever. El Mercado on First and Indiana, was able to get through his permit for building a bridge from the 3rd floor to their parking lot, no blue prints, not plans, no specific size or width, yet the Plum allowed and approved it. It went to City Council and they blessed it, this building, according building and safety, has approximately 33 outstanding permits that have either expired or never completed, no approval have been filed from 2002 to 2009. So for everyone else, if you want to add to your business, don't worry, just draw your idea on a 11-1/2 X 8, forget about dimensions, and don't matter that you have not comply with other building and Safety ordinance, because the City of Los Angeles do not have any systems to allow them to monitor this type of violations, so how other businesses structures are not safe to occupants, public or employees. The Community of Boyle Heights were not allow to present this issues at City Council, the Agenda items 43, July 14, 2009 was approved without public comments in the specific agenda item. This also happend at PLUM, this original request was for a Full Line of Liquor, Adult Entertainment, Sports bar, and dancing. So through out the series of hearings, and even the community appeals, the city attempted in every way to keep us from presenting our side, or restricting or presentation. That is our city, do they do anything right. Marijuana dispensaries should be under the jurisdiction of the State of California, in partnership with the Federal Government. If the Federal Government will not allow the sale, let each person grow their own, but the city want their share of income, and they are spending $$$$M to regulated at a city level. So Please do not let the Mayor or City Council reduce Police Officers in any way, since City Hall can manage to get something done as simple as a ordinance for the City. Don't they do this often? I would think this would be second hand for all this attorneys running our city. Is time to pause, and American Citizens need to go out and vote for the right candidates. We also need to raise the bar for all candidates. We need an attorney to fight for our American rights.

  • ben 07/17/2009 11:28:00 PM

    This story would have a shot at showing some teeth if the author spent as much energy detailing on some level the actual, concrete, negative socio-environmental impacts of the issue at hand, as he did philandering in bellicose rhetoric about hemp clothing and "pothead heroes." Has there been an increase in dropout rates or child pregnancies that correlates to the increase in marijuana retailers? How about a citation here or there? I noticed the story was classified as "news." Is there an editor in the house? Alas, I digress. The real question here is about our futile obsession with attributing responsibility to the supply-side this equilibrium. Does it occur to anyone else that perhaps the real driving force in the drug hierarchy is the skinny, redheaded teenager's desire to use drugs in the first place? I grew up in a city that regularly tops the lists of the safest in the country, and has zero pot stores (verifiable stats for Irvine, CA, population approx. 204,000). Yet as a teenager, getting pot (or worse) was as easy as showing up for first period. As someone who lived there for 18 years, I think I can credibly testify to that town's ability to breed stoners with the best of 'em (I will admit here that although slightly more tested than an afternoon spent at the Thai Town metro stop, my social observations probably can't be regarded as scientific measurements). Anyways, it would be nice to start having more mature public discourse about the possibility that the slew of violent crimes, robberies, gun-smuggling, disease-spreading, and life-shattering addiction related to drug use and distribution in this country are maybe, just maybe, in large part being caused by the prohibition of drugs, not prevented by it. If we really want to solve some problems we'll create a legal economic sector for the currently illegal drug market, and in the process eliminate all the high-paying jobs that exist for the criminals that currently have a stranglehold on it. That's a recession I could live with... and who knows - maybe since we won't be so busy spending all our money on keeping people in prison and policing the crimes of the aforementioned criminal profiteers, we'll have some resources left over to help us tackle the crooks currently in control of the legal drug and health care providing market in America.

  • echoparkjoe 07/17/2009 10:40:00 AM

    daniel, you got the story wrong. that is not what happened. yes, la handled this wrong and it's a mess, but your analysis and facts are wrong. who led you in this story? garcetti's office? no wonder.

  • Daniel Heimpel 07/17/2009 5:17:00 AM

    Hello Stoner with Sense, Yes I have been to Berkeley. That is where I was born and raised. As for Haile Selassie being a pothead hero. You are right it may have been a bit harsh. And of course Bob Marley (a true pothead hero) was a much better writer than me. All the best, Daniel

  • Stoner with sense 07/17/2009 4:49:00 AM

    "Pot-friendly Berkeley, where more people wear hemp than denim..." Have you ever been to Berkeley, my friend? The hemp hardly outnumbers the denim. Or the leggings.

  • Johnny Hempseed 07/17/2009 3:38:00 AM

    ....and Bob Marley was a lot better at writing and playing music than you are at yellow journalism.

  • Johnny Hempseed 07/17/2009 3:37:00 AM

    "Pothead heros Bob Marley and Haile Selassie".....show some respect, Haile Selassie is a religious figure for those of the Rastafarian faith. Sort of like calling Jesus the "boozer hero", after all, alcohol is the sacrament of YOUR religion. Don't insult mine.

  • david wyndham 07/17/2009 2:17:00 AM

    pot should be legal, end of story. It has so many uses not the least of which is helping people ( like you) take a moment to "chill out", laugh and smell the roses!

  • hollywoodsteve 07/17/2009 1:07:00 AM

    wow, sam really took offense to this article. i read it and saw it as LA bureaucracy at it's best. the city council gets paid a ton and they're not regulating the dispensaries to make some coin for the city as SF does while weeding out the shady dispensers.

  • echoparkjoe 07/16/2009 11:19:00 PM

    again, another example of the la weekly missing the point and facts.

  • Rick 07/16/2009 10:36:00 PM

    Just close them all down. I know a lot of friends that would love to have their jobs back dealing pot, but these dispensaries are cutting into their business. Put them back in business please! Your High School teenagers depend on them!

  • Sam 07/16/2009 2:08:00 PM

    And another thing. I'm calling bullshit on the lead. I live in Los Feliz. The corner you say you witnessed wanton drug slinging happening on is heavily patrolled during the day by both police and private security. There's no way you saw a bunch of homeless kids dealing during working hours. Waaaaay too dangerous. Although you don't actually specify the time of day you observed this scene, you say that Eric Garcetti can look out his window and see the city's failed marijuana policy in action, implying that the transaction you witnessed took place during working hours. Total bullshit. Either the scene you witnessed took place at night, and was deliberately manipulated to make Garcetti look bad. Or it didn't happen at all and was manufactured wholecloth. But no f'n way is that stuff happening in broad daylight. You can't even jaywalk at Hollywood and Western without someone up your ass.

  • sam 07/16/2009 1:55:00 PM

    And another thing. I'm calling bullshit on the lead. I live in Los Feliz. The corner you say you witnessed wanton drug slinging happening on is heavily patrolled during the day by both police and private security. There's no way you saw a bunch of homeless kids dealing during working hours. Waaaaay too dangerous. Although you don't actually specify the time of day you observed this scene, you say that Eric Garcetti can look out his window and see the city's failed marijuana policy in action, implying that the transaction you witnessed took place during working hours. Total bullshit. Either the scene you witnessed took place at night, and was deliberately manipulated to make Garcetti look bad. Or it didn't happen at all and was manufactured wholecloth. But no f'n way is that stuff happening in broad daylight. You can't even jaywalk at Hollywood and Western without someone up your ass.

  • Grandma 07/16/2009 11:44:00 AM

    I don't live in Los Angeles anymore but I remember seeing liquor stores on every other street corner and bars in between when I did live there. Seems Los Angeles politicians are very hypocritical in the context of this paradigm. Are LA politicians going to be foolish enough to say that booze is safer and therefore justifies this over infestation of drunkard product stores and drunkard fuel up stations? Every time I listen to the news some drunkard has crashed and killed a young family going to the movies or coming home from church, don't the Los Angeles politicians see the same news? They need to stop playing the Harry Anslinger card of the 19th century and join the 21st century of educated responsible adults who see through this! Can you watch another news story of people killed from alcohol and still feel good as a human being because you stopped allowing pot stores to expand in your city? LA politicians have no idea of the real problem in their big old city and that is political stagnation with lack of vision into the 21st century. By the by sensationalize on your own time Daniel Heimpel.

  • Sam 07/16/2009 7:20:00 AM

    I think Bill Bratton was right, it is the 1950's again. What a ridiculous Howdy Doody, Nancy Reagan, non-story. What exactly is the problem here? LA has more medical marijuana dispensaries than other cities? And that's a bad thing why? Is it because children are buying medical marijuana on the street in front of Eric Garcetti's office? No, that doesn't read like political propaganda at all. (A side note: I don't know if you've checked your paper lately, but medical marijuana dispensaries make up a sizable portion of the Weekly's advertising bucks. So the Weekly is both profiting from and enabling this supposed scandal.) I don't see any facts in your story which indicate that medical marijuana isn't being resold on the street in other cities. What I'm gleaning from your article is that because LA has more dispensaries, more weed is sold on the street. So, let me get this strait...instead of having dispensaries that are licensed, taxed and that generate financial windfalls for both the city and your newspaper, we should regulate the hell out of the weed business so no one can do anything. Then, we need to run some of the existing shops out of business so the city can fit the Weekly's notion of a respectable dispensary-to-person ratio -- moving the weed economy completely underground in the process. Then we squander precious city resources with a police crackdown to make sure the kids aren't smoking dope in front of Garcetti's office. Sounds like a plan!

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy