Top

news

Stories

 

L.A. Weekly News Editor Responds to L.A. Times Hit Piece

James Rainey of theLos Angeles Times did not contact me for his takedown attempt on me June 19, a column published the same week that news stories I assigned and edited blew the Times out of the water at the Los Angeles Press Club awards. The awards, announced five days before Rainey’s harangue, were judged entirely by journalists in other major cities around the nation to avoid local favoritism. Then, the day before Rainey’s hit piece ran, freelancer Max Taves won a major award for a biomedical story that I assigned and edited, beating The New York Times.

It’s hard to imagine that Rainey wrote this attack without being bothered by a 2007 piece we at the Weekly published about him and his frequent use of blind sources while writing stories about his bosses at the L.A. Times. I assigned and edited that piece, by Luke Y. Thompson, whose report on Rainey used my approach: tough but factual, and filled with excellent sourcing.

I was very sad to see Rainey launch a wrong-headed attack on me without disclosing that I assigned and edited this story critical of him. Our story about Rainey was, in fact, far more extensively reported and far better sourced than his about me. You can see for yourself, by reading the link below. Rainey now tells me that he did not recall this story about him. Perhaps, but reporters are not often the subject of news stories, and it’s a very unusual thing to forget. In today’s tricky journalism world, it was Journo 101 that Rainey disclose it.

Rainey did contact some of our freelance writers, and asked them to “tell me what it’s really like to work with Jill Stewart.” Some said to me that when they insisted on speaking on the record, Rainey was not very interested in the positive things they had to say about me. He did, however, manage to use an off-the-record quote that fit his unfortunate view, shared by some old-guard reporters in L.A.: that my aggressive form of journalism is not good for people.

Judges of media competitions around the country disagree. I disagree. Many disagree. Below are links to recent posts about the Weekly hammering the L.A. Times and getting recognized for great news reporting when judged against the nation’s biggest papers in media competitions.

Some of us at the Weekly were worried about winning local awards this year because we submitted fewer articles to the Press Club competition, as did other papers that have trimmed costs. We needn’t have worried. I and my stunning but small staff, including Christine Pelisek and Patrick Range McDonald, and terrific news freelancers including Tibby Rothman, Daniel Heimpel, Max Taves, Paul Teetor, David Ferrell, Beth Barrett and others, will just have to keep disappointing James Rainey and the L.A. Times.

Finally, we will not stop utilizing bloggers and nontraditional reporters at our alternative newspaper, despite Rainey’s troubling repeat of an old-guard journalist’s rant that such emerging voices are “laughable reporters.” We don’t knuckle under to anybody’s pre-approved list. So in this issue, check out our L.A. News piece about Laura Ling — by Babamoto.

 

Our hammering of the L.A. Times locally:

http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/media/la-weekly-best-in-southern-cal/

Beating The New York Times on biomedical coverage:

http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/media/max-taves-and-la-weekly-beat-n/

Christine Pelisek’s near-win in the Investigative Reporters and Editors competition for her “Grim Sleeper” cover story: (She won second place, but it’s a big win because the IRE award is considered by many to be more prestigious than a Pulitzer. The winning team comprised 14 reporters in 10 nations. Judges said that this huge team beat Pelisek — barely.)

http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/pelisek-finalist-at-ire-agains/

Our 2007 piece on James Rainey:

http://www.laweekly.com/2007-02-15/news/covering-the-bosses/

This newspaper led the awards among major-circulation weekly newspapers, grabbing four first-place honors from the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies at its 14th annual AltWeekly Awards last week in Tucson. Congratulations to all of our finalists and winners.

First Place: Darrick Rainey, Editorial Layout, for “Raven: Death of a Hollywood Beauty.”

First Place: Nancy Rommelmann, Arts Feature, for “No Exit Plan: The Life and Death of JT Leroy.”

First Place: Jonathan Gold, Food Writing, for “Breaking Free,” “Keep on Trucking” and “A Proper Brasserie.”

First Place: Laurie Ochoa and staff, Special Section, for “L.A. People 2008,” featuring photographs by Kevin Scanlon.

Third Place: Scott Foundas, Arts Criticism, for “Benjamin Button,” “Diary of the Dead” and “The Visitor.”

Honorable Mention: Ella Taylor, Arts Criticism, for “From Reverence to Rape,” “Waugh and Remembrance” and “Was Roman Polanski a Pedophile?”

Honorable Mention: Barry Isaacson, Feature, for “From Silver Lake to Suicide.”

Honorable Mention: Dwayne Booth, Cartoon, for “Mr. Fish.”

 
  • Phil 07/13/2009 5:44:00 AM

    How shameful this. This "story" has been up on this site for way more than a week and clearly no one gives a damn. Looks like there's dozen comments and all repudiate the writer and her "Weakly." Jill, resign. Better yet. Don't. If you doi, you are sure to be permanently unemployed and we taxpayers will have to carry you. Let Mike Lacey buy your lunch ticket.

  • Christopher Perez 07/11/2009 2:25:00 PM

    Jill Stewart sounds like a drunk-with-power fascist. She has no place in a newsroom.

  • mike 07/11/2009 1:31:00 AM

    i'm adding my 2% worth. i agree with everyone above. this lady ruined the editorial/news/politics of this paper. please leave.

  • Sharon 07/07/2009 8:46:00 PM

    If I was a legitimate journalist in LA and I had a great story that I had dilligently investigated, LAWeekly would be the last place on earth I would want it published today. Given the situation, I would fear that to publish here would cast doubt on the validity of my research and wrting and could ultimately tarnish my reputation as a real investigative reporter. Rainey is exactly right with is his evaluation of Jill Stewart's bizarre understanding of the word "journalist" and the harm that comes from these less than honorable tactics under the guise of a professional editor. LA Times "LA Weekly's Agressive Slant Erodes Quality" http://theenvelope.latimes.com/la-et-onthemedia19-2009jun19,0,778202.column When is Stewart going to learn that people do not tolerate Bullies? They are a detriment to society.

  • Mike 07/07/2009 12:26:00 PM

    Jill -- Let's see. By my count you are 0 for 8 in this comment thread. Well, with mine, it's now nine. That's even considering that there are only a handful of us who have even bothered to respond to your incredibly sophomoric diatribe of self-defense. We all know that in L.A. journalism circles your name is a punch line. Hang on to that status as long as you can for soon it will just plain be unknown.

  • Ben 07/05/2009 10:56:00 PM

    This back-and-forth war of words is ridiculous. Both papers are seriously lacking on many levels. Too often, the writers fail to simply report what is happening. Instead, they have a clear bias and seek to remove the ability of the reader to make up their own mind. One paper is uber motivated to sell advertising space and increase circulation while the other is obsessed with trying to create major controversy out of mildly interesting topics. It would be a welcomed change to see an LA paper report the news instead of trying to "make" the news.

  • Sharon Kramer 07/03/2009 2:16:00 PM

    If there are any real political investigative reporters out there, call me. 760-746-8026. I have I got a story for you!!! It would be a political investigative report OF Jill Stewart and what she is willing to do for her love of Arnold. The hit piece they did on me and the mold issue was not only eggregious false light, it was politically motivated to protect the Governor. Arnold became our Governor largely on the platform of workers comp reform that was backed by the Ca Chamber of Commerce, the US Chamber of Commerce, Institute for Legal Reform and the Insurance Industry. Then, the Amercian College of Occupational and Environmental Medince (ACOEM) was brought into to write the workers' treatment guidelines. Under SB 899, these guidelines became the law of the land that physicians had to follow when treating injured workers. It became the law of the land of what insurers had to pay for treatments and workers comp benefits. It has been a complete disaster for workers and taxpayers in Ca. It has contributed heavily to our state's financial demise as when people do not receive workers comp, they end up on state disability. This has caused a tremendous burden on our state disablity fund. It has been a real boon to the insurers, though. In 2005, Ca workers comp insurers' profits were higher than their payouts for worker illness and injury. In other words, Arnold shifted the cost burden from insurers to the taxpayers when industry does not protect the safety of their employees. I have saved emails to show that Heimpel was told all of this before he penned his writing last summer. This is who Jill's beloved Governor brought in to write the guidelines: ACOEM A Professional Org In Service To Industry http://www.moldwarriors.com/SK/IJOEH_Oct07_LaDou.pdf This is the same group that brought in an old tobacco scientist, Kelman, to author their position statement on mold. (you know the scientist who, like Heimpel only writes the truth) Heimpel was also provided with this Wall Street Journal article about the matter and even spoke to the WSJ reporter before he wrote. I was the primary source for this article. Its based on my research into conflicts of interest: http://www.moldwarriors.com/SK/WSJOnlineJan92007.pdf Had they written anywhere near the truth in their hit piece on me last summer, it would have been really embarassing for Arnold and may have helped to cause an investigation into how increased state disability costs were adding such a burden on the state. Nope. Instead, Heimpel and Stewart chose to completely fabricate a story of how I was some nut who sits and blogs lies all day because I have an extreme and unrealistic fear of mold. The article starts of with "The old trailer where she forced her daughter to sleep in the bad days takes up most of the driveway." I could keep a trailer in my driveway if I wanted to. My homeowners association would never allow it. It just gets worse from there. http://www.laweekly.com/2008-07-24/news/the-toxic-mold-rush/ This was a political hit piece to silence info that would be really bad for Arnold, with many known false statements, and false quotes. Completely irresponsible and wreckless journalism that was detrimental to the health and safety of California and all US citizens. I intend to let the LA Press Club know of their error of awarding Heimpel Political Investigative Journalist of 2008. That is an afront to all legitimate jounalists out there. Its dangerous and detrimental to the good of the public. BTW, Uncle Teddy shut Arnie down with his holding ACOEM to be the gurus of medical science in health policy. Teddy ordered this Federal GAO audit at my request. Although he stopped short on an all out investigation of ACOEM, seems ACOEM, Heimpel and Stewart were wrong about the mold issue. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-980 I am outraged that Heimpel and thus Stewart received an award for political investigative journalism. Armed with crooked pens and no fact checked publishing capabilites, this duo is a danger to society. If any of you LA investigative reporters has the moxy to write the truth of the matter and would like to do an investigative report OF Jill Stewart and MiniMe Heimpel, call me.

  • john 07/03/2009 8:46:00 AM

    Jill, you don't seem to respond to criticism well, to put it mildly. The hordes of visigoths are not massing outside your "bunker", much, it seems, to your disappointment. Please, get over yourself. Also, please look at your track record. Correct me, but weren't you a big fan of our present (oh so successful) governor. And what about your tenure at New Times? (to name a few of your previous crusades) As Michael Ray Richardson once said, "the ship be sinkin'." (And your strange, libertarian/contrarian? self promoting philosophy is not going to do anything to save the Weekly of yourself from it's demise. By the way, the article on Promises Malibu was the worst bit of AA propaganda - oops, there's another real story that you missed.)

  • Sharon 07/03/2009 3:14:00 AM

    Below is Jill Stewart's and Daniel Heimpel's concept of truth in political investigative journalism: From her blog last summer: "Dozens of mold-obsessed commenters attacked Heimpel on the Weekly's site, airing their beliefs with fundamentalist fervor. Like Kelman, Heimpel merely reported the truth, that scientists have repeatedly shown that household mold is not toxic to healthy people and does not make them sick." Below is the scientist who promotes the same "truth" as Heimpel and Stewart. He is an old tobacco scientist. I have emails showing Heimpel was aware of this fact before he penned and Stewart edited his "political investigative reporting" over the matter in 2008. From the Tobacco legacy library: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ati84d00/pdf?search=%22bruce%20kelman%22 And this is what this guy did over the mold issue in 2002,that has been harmful to so many people. Heimpel was WELL informed of the matter with MUCH documentation before he wrote: http://drcraner.com/images/A%20Critique%20of%20the%20ACOEM%20Statement%20on%20Mold.pdf And what is worse, is that Mike Lacey was also aware that the political and scientifically false hit piece they did on the issue in 2008,(ya know, the year Heimpel won a LA Press Club award as Political Investigative Reporter of the Year for his body of work) was pure garbage because a real investigative reporter for New Times in Phoenix had covered the issue accurately in 2005. http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/2005-10-13/news/mold-attacks/ Its one thing to be a legitimate hard hitting journalist. Its quite another to be a self righteous, bully who pens known lies in self promotion and who could give a damn if their interpretation of journalism is detrimental to the health and safety of US public. Heimpel, LA Press Club Political Investigative Journalist for 2008 and Jill Stewart wronged by the LA Times for the article, "LA Weekly's Aggressive Slant Erodes Quality" What a complete JOKE that this duo even comes close to the practice of professional, responsible journalism.

  • dave 07/03/2009 1:07:00 AM

    Jill, You ruined the Weekely's news/political coverage just as you did at New Times.

  • Sharon Kramer 07/02/2009 8:44:00 PM

    Dear Ms. Stewart, Although we have never met in person, our paths have crossed much to the detriment of myself, my family and thousands of environmentally ill families. As I read your lastest, I currently have a mental image of you sitting at a desk crying "Whaaa, someone wrote something not nice about me in the media". You have got some real nerve to whine about others outting you for the truth of what a macilous bully you are who wouldn't know real journalism if it bit her on the ass. Looks to me like you can dish it out but you can't take it. Wake up, girlfriend. People are telling you they a sick of you promoting your own aqendas under the guise of jounalism. Its not cute anymore. As far as Daniel Heimpel receiving the Polticial Investigative Journalist award for 2008 from the LA Press Club under your stewardship, that's a poor taste joke that needs to have the punch line edited. I know. I was a political victim of you and Heimpel in 2008 and your bizarre interpretation of the concept of truth in journalism. No less than seven of the purported interviewees let LAWeekly and Village Voice/New Times know that they were either grossly misquoted or not even interviewed at all. http://www.laweekly.com/2008-07-24/news/the-toxic-mold-rush/ Even after being told I was getting hang up calls from this hatred inciting false light writing and that I was fearful for the safety of my children from it, what did you do? You and Heimpel blogged it again, even after being told in great detail that it was chalked full of lies. Personally, I am of the opinion that someone needs to conduct an investigation into how and what body of work the LA Press Club examined when giving Heimpel and thus you, and award for his body of political work in 2008. I feel quite certain, the above was not disclosed or included. Do you get it, Jill? People are sick your shit and the devastation you reak on the lives of others with reckless disregard for the truth. Grow up and quit whining just because someone has finally publicly outted you for this. http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2009/06/27/toxlaw-com-post-la-times-outs-jill-stewart-daniel-heimpel-la-weekly/

  • paul bailey 07/02/2009 12:46:00 PM

    congrats! you won some awards. yippee, i didn't realize that there was any competition left in town? if things are so good then why does everybody seem down. good luck with all that.

  • Ronald 07/02/2009 10:27:00 AM

    Jill Stewart positioning herself as some sort of cutting edge new style journalist is just sad. The fact is, she has been around forever, failing upwards. Other than the few losers who employ her now, she is universally despised. Even she knows this.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy