Top

news

Stories

 

Ruining the L.A. Marathon

Preachers pressured City Hall to change it. Now the race faces uncertainties

The L.A. Marathon has never been world-class. The course is hilly and winds through the ugliest parts of the city, a festival of blights. It’s gone through three owners in six years, and the number of entrants is half of what Chicago and New York boast. It’s not a “runner’s marathon” but a very long parade of moisture-wicking wear.

And now it’s morphed into a flash point for religious leaders to browbeat City Hall, with probably more strife to come. Next year’s event is slipping toward turmoil, with officials at the L.A. Marathon failing to release or even hint at a date for next year.

The unsettled situation regarding this decades-old, major-metropolis marathon is extremely unusual; it’s keeping sponsors and runners in limbo, and is an indicator of how the key political players in the drama, City Councilman Tom LaBonge and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, have failed to clean up the marathon mess.

As runner Shanna Moore wrote in an online petition calling for the marathon to return to its longtime date of a Sunday in March, “I proudly attend church on Sundays and often during the week, and I know firsthand that if someone wants to get to services, no once-a-year marathon is going to stop them. This is all ridiculous! Move the race back to a March Sunday or don’t have it at all. These ‘houses of worship’ should be ashamed of themselves!”

For years, the L.A. Marathon, like every other U.S. marathon (save the oldest, in Boston) has taken place on a Sunday. But the closed-off streets were, according to Father John S. Bakas of Pico-Union–based Saint Sophia Greek Orthodox Cathedral, “an infringement on our access and ability to worship on the sabbath,” which tied up “the whole city until 2 p.m.”

In 2004, according to religious leaders, then–mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa had promised them he would move the race to a different day. “He promised me that,” says the Rev. Jeong Song of Mijoo Peace Church in Koreatown.

With religious leaders increasingly insistent, a curious math began to emerge: The numbers of avid churchgoers and others purportedly stymied by street closures during the one-day marathon blossomed to one-quarter of L.A.’s 4 million people. “Using the most conservative estimates, 921,000 people are directly affected,” states Save Our Sabbaths, a group that includes Bakas, on its Web site.

Song, who has opposed the Sunday race for more than 14 years, says, “I told them it was 100,000 people impacted [who] cannot attend church” — a more modest figure but also inflated. By some estimates, the turnout for runners, volunteers and supporters of the marathon is upward of 200,000.

Last fall, the L.A. Marathon, a corporation, was bought by Dodgers owner Frank McCourt. Seizing the moment, the religious community spearheaded by Bakas — the self-proclaimed “biggest mouth and the most passionate” — shook its collective fist and finally prevailed. The 2009 marathon was set to take place on a federal holiday, a Monday, not a Sunday.

In the contract being negotiated by the city of Los Angeles and the McCourt Group, President’s Day in February was the suggested date — as most cities with hot weather hold their marathons in winter to spare the runners from the heat. The contract with McCourt was easily ratified by the Los Angeles City Council, with Villaraigosa’s blessing.

Everyone seemed happy — until the first “pre-planning” meeting, at which police, fire and transportation officials met at Councilman LaBonge’s office. There, somebody thought to ask senior transportation engineer Aram Sahakian about the street logistics of holding the marathon on President’s Day, February 16.

Incredibly, nobody on the vast staff of the 15-member Los Angeles City Council, which employs 320 personal assistants at an annual cost of about $20 million, had bothered to fully review that date with the transportation engineers before the council approved the deal. Instead, Sahakian tells L.A. Weekly, “It was done verbally at a meeting.”

Sahakian informed the pre-planning group that so many people work on President’s Day that he couldn’t recommend a race then. He envisioned a huge commuter-traffic mess. Sahakian, who has worked on the minutiae of road closures and preparations for the marathon for 10 years, says that the query “was just thrown out at us, asking for a recommendation.”

The only other “federal-holiday Monday” in the first part of the year was Memorial Day, May 25. And to the chagrin of runners, fans and residents, the city’s 23-year tradition of holding its race in early March was suddenly being shunned in favor of a marathon date during a much hotter season.

Despite an uproar, religious leaders — insisting on their mythical estimation that 1 million church-going residents would face road closures — refused to back down, citing barriers to religious freedom. Bakas’ loudest battle cry has been “Honor the contract” — a contract whose date was rejected because it had not been fully explored and was unfeasible. He exclaimed to L.A. Weekly, “Why would we have to work it out? It’s already worked out. The City Council voted. We have a contract.”

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Vic 06/23/2009 5:47:00 AM

    This is not a silly issue, nor is it just a runners issue. Marathons are supposed to be a spectacle that advertises the hosting city, and promotes travel to the hosting city. That's the main point of marathons in the modern era. The McCourts buying the marathon should have meant a more glamorous route, and obviously something that incorporates Dodger Stadium or other McCrourt real estate. The mayor and whimpy council are dense. They don't understand how to utilize opportunities to promote anything other than themselves. Example, they agreed to President's Day without a clue of what traffic would be like. Some church leaders said move it or lose our support and what happened? They moved it to the detriment of runners and local businesses.

  • Perri 06/19/2009 8:44:00 PM

    This is a great article! Runners are passionate about their races! I hope they move the marathon back to March. My husband is running his first marathon next year & decided it will be the LA Marathon 2010. It is very important to have a goal date for training so I hope LA can get their act together & decide on March!

  • Chuck O'Shea 06/19/2009 5:22:00 AM

    It's not "what�s wrong with the marathon?" it's "what�s wrong with the people in LA?" Are we so self-centered that we can�t give up a day for a million people (expected number of runners and spectators per the LA Marathon website). Running the race on a Sunday is a no-brainer. Traffic would be worse on a Saturday. People have to get here and pick up their race �stuff� which would be hard to do before Saturday. Other than Boston I don�t know of any major marathon that can pull off a marathon on a holiday. As to churches, if they really had a problem why not give a callout to their parishioners to come on Saturday for worship and come back on Sunday to cheer their fellow residents? When should the marathon be run? There is a lot of history with the first Sunday in March. I like tradition, and it's when the race has been held traditionally. Other than tradition March makes sense to me. Although the weather was good this year history favors March. I checked the history for early March and late May (at wunderground.com) and the record for March is 93, but the record for May is 103. Both are way too warm for my marathon taste but I feel better about March than May. It takes 4 or 5 months for most experienced marathoners to get ready for a race. Training groups like the LA Leggers and the LA Roadrunners start in late summer to get ready, so it takes about 7 months. A March race makes training start times work well. Not knowing at this time when next year's race will be run makes it really hard to know when to start training. I really felt sorry for the Students Run LA program this year. They started their training at the beginning of the school year expecting to run in March. Can you imagine how they felt when they were told to keep training for a couple more months? It is unfortunate with all the date changes this past year that Pasadena was able to scoop up February so now runners will have to pick one over the other. City councils are an elected body that we put our trust in to make decisions for us. LA's elected officials, as far as I�m concerned, are cowards and afraid to make ANY decisions. Standup and do your job, people! I have some qualms with the marathon itself: the course, parking, start time (oh, they fixed that this year!). They started going green this year, too. I hope they can do even better next year. (Especially if they use the new Honda fuel cell car to lead the way.) I�d like to see all prize money go away. We will never have the likes of Haile Gebrselassie in LA with Boston in mid-April, so why bother with a $100,000 challenge in prize money? The Marine Corps Marathon has 30,000 participants, sells out every year, is run on a Sunday, and has NO prize money! Their course has not changed in years. Hum! LA in NOT flat, it will never be flat unless we have the Big One, plus we have a lot of turns on the course. I was very impressed with this year's race. A winning time of 2:08:24 is only about 4 minutes off the world record (which is a lifetime in marathon-speak but still darned fast). Let's take politics and religion out of the marathon and make it about the people who run the marathon. If you�ve never tried a marathon you should, it is a very special moment crossing the finish line that first time.

  • hospital worker 06/19/2009 2:35:00 AM

    I work at the VA hospital in Westwood. any time that the marathon occurs it impacts the hospitals ability to have employees that utilize public transportation get to and from work. Anybody that is involved in "planning" this fails to take that in to concideration. I lose 2 hours of MY time every time one of these fringe sports rears its ugly head and makes poorly planned street closures. I can sympathize with those who want to participate but I have to look at it from the point of how do I serve the Vets that are there with a massive reduction of staff due to street closures and poorly planned transport reroutes.

  • Dennis Smith 06/19/2009 2:30:00 AM

    Tom LaBonge versus Dick Riordan. That'll be a first! Former head honcho turned lobbyist fights former lieutenant turned councilman...and where will Frank McCourt fit in this unholy trinity of Catholic contretemps? Tune in next time!

  • eileen 06/19/2009 2:25:00 AM

    Good grief! Tina has done a nice job of detailing the absolute silliness of the situation. It's a marathon, for pete's sake, and happens one day out of the year! if the people so vehemently fighting against the race took that energy and applied it to, oh I don't know, helping LA's homeless, wouldn't that be a better use of their time and energy? What happens when you hold a marathon and nobody shows up?

  • Heather Shenkman 06/19/2009 12:44:00 AM

    Tina Dupuy has written a very well-researched and thorough piece. The marathon needs to come back to a Sunday. I opted to run the San Diego Marathon, one week later, instead of the LA Marathon on Memorial Day because I couldn't be there because of the holiday. Had they not moved the date, I, and many others, would have run the LA Marathon.

  • blottdada 06/18/2009 10:27:00 PM

    The move of the marathon not only endangers the race's financial prosperity but the health of the runners as well. It is clear that the handling of the contract and the planning was botched, but the demand itself is a bit much. I appreciate the need for people to make religious services and the difficulty marathon traffic may cause, but it is one day. A day when 200k people get together in celebration of sport, and healthy living, and history, and civic pride. Seems wholesome enough, maybe something that religious leaders could get behind. Beyond the pride aspect there are the financial considerations... 4000 less finishers who have probably 1000-2000 people who would have come to cheer them on and pay for parking, or ride the metro, and buy a cup of coffee while they wait. I am sure that the most devout among us would be willing to leave a little early for services, or come to an afternoon mass if it meant that one less person might die from heat exhaustion.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy