Top

news

Stories

 

Bill Bratton's Endorsements Spectacle

The LAPD chief's politicking has critics fearing a slide to the bad old days

It’s a spectacle Angelenos have rarely seen, officially frowned upon since the ethics reforms of 1991, when former U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher, leading an LAPD cleanup commission, made something crystal clear: No police chief, a hired hand beholden to politicians who hire him, should ever back anyone in a political race.

Yet as May 19 approaches, Police Chief William J. Bratton has entangled himself in two races: a pitched war for city attorney between Carmen Trutanich and Jack Weiss, and a power struggle for a San Gabriel Valley/Eastside congressional seat in which seasoned pols Gil Cedillo and Judy Chu are slugging it out.

In the past year, Bratton has endorsed Weiss, Cedillo, City Controller–elect Wendy Greuel, Antonio Villaraigosa, Los Angeles County Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, proponents of a massive school-bond measure, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama — and even a candidate for district attorney in New York.

“He is highly sought after,” says Weiss’s campaign manager, Ace Smith. “People actively use him in their campaigns as a critical endorsement.”

Yet Bratton’s increasing endorsements are viewed dimly by former chiefs, law-enforcement experts and others who fear that Bratton, currently dismissing his critics with an “I’ve always done this!” attitude, is now risking dragging the LAPD back to the bad old days.

Bratton’s behavior is far from status quo for a police chief — nationally or in California — and marks a disregard for the Christopher Commission recommendations that sharply warned against old-school practices which decades ago blended the LAPD and City Hall into a single, corrupt entity.

Hubert Williams, president of the Washington-based Police Foundation, contributed to the Christopher Commission probe of institutional racism and police misconduct during the reign of Chief Daryl Gates. The resulting recommendations led to a restructuring of the department and its practices.

“To go out and support candidates publicly, that is not very common, because when a police chief does that, he exposes himself as less objective,” Williams says today.

The Christopher Commission concluded that LAPD used excessive force, had little accountability, and was hampered by poor management. And its report expressly warned against letting LAPD chiefs engage in politics: “Because the Chief’s office is inherently powerful, it is unseemly for the Chief to use that position to influence political process,” it said. “It is particularly ironic to create a system to insulate the Chief from improper political pressure, and then have the Chief use that protected position to campaign on behalf of politicians who thereby become indebted to him.”

Equally dangerous is the prospect that, once a chief backs a politician or ballot measure, he could expect questionable favors in return — such as getting political cover from City Hall politicians during shooting controversies, corruption scandals or other imbroglios.

City Councilman Bernard Parks, a former LAPD chief and frequent critic of Bratton’s, warns that Bratton is sliding toward the politics of old: “When you start endorsing people, the idea that you are at arm’s length from City Hall no longer exists.”

Another former chief, Gates, recalls how he endorsed two candidates during his 14 years in the position: Hal Bernson, for City Council, and Robert Philibosian, for district attorney, the latter because Gates was mad at another D.A. hopeful, City Attorney Ira Reiner, for his failure to defend the LAPD in a lawsuit involving the American Civil Liberties Union.

Gates, speaking last week from his home in Dana Point, says he regrets his anti-Reiner endorsement to this day, and adds, “The chief, without exception, should stay out of politics at all levels.”

Gates predicts that if Weiss is elected city attorney, Bratton will engage in excessively cozy relations with the City Attorney’s Office. “If Weiss gets in, he is going to owe Bratton,” warns Gates — a real problem since one of the city attorney’s purported jobs is to rout out corrupt cops, including police brass.

Weiss’s rival for city attorney, Carmen Trutanich, who has taken City Hall insiders by surprise with a strong race and successful fundraising (see last week’s L.A. Weekly story, “One Cooley Customer”), steers clear of attacking the popular LAPD chief. But Trutanich does take note of Villaraigosa’s political machine, which has long included Weiss, and has grown to include — or perhaps engulf — Bratton.

“I don’t need to tell you who appointed the chief, and tell you the relationship between Jack Weiss and the mayor,” Trutanich says.

Yet Police Commission President Anthony Pacheco, a political appointee of Villaraigosa’s, insists there’s no problem with Bratton’s ever-growing politicking. “I don’t think anyone associates Bratton with cronyism or an old boys’ network,” Pacheco says.

But Pacheco himself is an example of how complicated things have gotten now that Bratton repeatedly injects himself into political races: Bratton endorsed Villaraigosa. Now, as if on cue, one of the mayor’s appointees, Pacheco, is calling that a good thing.

1 | 2 | Next Page >>
 
  • Sharon Kramer 06/06/2009 4:45:00 AM

    I can tell you from personal experience that Daniel Hempel and Jill Stewart have a history of writing known false light articles for LA Weekly with corrupt political motivations. I am an effective whistle blower over a mass deception in US public health policy that adversely impacts the insurance industry. With the help of Senator Kennedy and the Federal GAO I was able to curtail this mass deception. Check out the false light hit piece Hempel and Steward did on not only me last year, but my husband and children. My phone number is 760-746-8026 if anyone is interested in reigning in these two charletons disguised as journalists. http://www.laweekly.com/2008-07-24/news/the-toxic-mold-rush/ And for the record: From: MAKramer To: dheimpel@gmail.com CC: LOchoa@laweekly.com Sent: 8/1/2008 12:20:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time Subj: Mold/LAWeekly Mr Heimpel, I would guess that the purpose of this email would not be a surprise to you. Your mold article that was published last week was riddled with inaccuracy and personal attacks. It has continued the nightmare that I have lived for the last 6 years. I talked to you for only a few minutes and your seeming hidden agenda and lack of compassion was apparent. Your article validated this initial suspicion; I only wish that I had talked to you originally so that I could have warned Sharon not to trust you. You know what, though, I can take it, and you know Sharon can handle it, but what really gets us both is the way you portrayed Erin as the �starring victim.� She just started her first real job out of college, and she had to come back from lunch and explain this horrendous article to her new fellow employees. Of all involved in this article, she does not deserve this. Is this what you wanted to accomplish? Maybe this is your normal mode of operation, maybe the opportunity to be �creative� won out over the basic concept of presenting the truth. Either way it defamed my family and I expect a published apology. Michael Kramer The comments that were attributed to me in this article are false. I want it to be known that I am not ashamed to discuss what my mother does with my college friends, like the article indicated. I have never said any such thing about my mother. I am very proud of what she is accomplishing. I love my mother very much. Comment by Meghan Kramer on Jul 25th, 2008, 12:32 pm

  • susan 05/23/2009 2:07:00 AM

    In today's witnessla.com, vet journo/prof Celeste Fremon writes about how the Weekly and this writer Hempel in particular, write hit piece after hit piece about Bratton, and so has editor Jill Stewart whose views pervade this paper. There was a 6-page article slamming Bratton end of April, and today, Hempel drags him in (unfavorably and mis-construing what he said and why) in an article today ostensibly bashing the council for excessive pay. This paper is so biased against Antonio that anyone he's allied with is automatically a walking target -- especially Weiss. In this s's (5/20) street-hassle.blogspot.com thread re: the impending disaster of Tru and the disgraceful lobbying for him by both the Times and Daily News, while writing hit pieces on Weiss, Joe Mailander says both those papers can't disappear fast enough. But before then, with their help, we've got a situation that will make Bradley-Gates look like the good old days.

  • G 05/15/2009 10:08:00 AM

    My recollection is that while Chief Gates may not have officially endorsed more than a hand full of candidates, he would arrange photo sessions with the candidates of his liking and not object to the photo being used in campaign literature. If he has found religion in his retirement and now says Chiefs should stay out, I hope he means acting on the letter and spirit of his conviction.

  • Greg Fuentes 05/15/2009 6:14:00 AM

    The Weiss supporters� bashing of Trutanich resumes. However, I have yet to see the Weiss supporters or the Weiss television commercials provide one example of a significant cost-effective accomplishment for which Weiss has been responsible during his seven-plus years as a Councilmember. (Adding additional police officers at a cost of a $530 million and growing deficit does not qualify. Occasionally mouthing politically correct bromides concerning the LAPD rape kit backlog disaster but being so ineffective that the backlog disgrace grew under Weiss� watch also does not qualify.) Perhaps if Weiss did not emulate the 11% Mayor so well in the Mayor�s absenteeism from his highly compensated elected duties, Weiss might actually have been a competent Councilmember. Bratton�s decision to ignore the Christopher Commission�s recommendation that City of Los Angeles Police Chiefs refrain from public politicking is highly questionable for many reasons, many of which the article and David Berger address. Let me add the following: Warren Christopher was a highly regarded statesman and attorney�not a wannabe and failed statesman (like Villaraigosa) or an attorney racking up violations and repeatedly displaying incompetence, like Weiss. Furthermore, Warren Christopher was extremely knowledgeable concerning Los Angeles politics and Los Angeles political history. Bratton has spent far less time in Los Angeles than did Christopher. (I may be giving Villaraigosa too much credit�I�m not certain that Villaraigosa has ever aspired to be a statesman.) So, for Bratton to ignore the pertinent Christopher Commission recommendations was, from the beginning, extremely dangerous to his credibility and�far more important�extremely dangerous to the credibility of the LAPD. That Bratton has not publicly withdrawn his endorsement of Weiss increasingly damages his reputation and that of the LAPD. When Bratton first endorsed Weiss, Weiss already had a record of campaign violations that resulted in fines issued by the City of Los Angeles Ethics Commission. Additionally, it was public knowledge that the 2001 Weiss City Council campaign had taken illegal, laundered campaign contributions from Casden Properties; furthermore, unlike some other persons who have taken laundered contributions in City of Los Angeles races, Weiss chose not to reimburse the City or any other governmental entity with respect to these laundered contributions. So much for Weiss�the City Attorney wannabe�displaying any regard for the law or the appearance of legal propriety. Since Bratton�s initial public endorsement of Weiss, Weiss� highly questionable actions have made this endorsement appear increasingly misguided. Mr. Berger addresses the recent fundraiser attended by Weiss that apparently violated the City�s Municipal Code and apparently led to the resignation of a City Commissioner appointed by Villaraigosa. Additionally, the KTTV television broadcast station recently reported that Michael Rosenberg, a convicted felon who had pleaded guilty to four felonies, had recently hosted a fundraiser for Weiss. That Weiss would choose to use such a source for campaign contributions is highly questionable�especially for someone running for City Attorney. Perhaps even more troubling is that�when Weiss and his campaign were questioned by KTTV about the fundraiser--KTTV reported that Weiss and his campaign gave contradictory answers. And Weiss wants our vote for City Attorney? Does any reasonable person doubt that, in light of the above, Bratton�s endorsement of Weiss has damaged the credibility of the City of Los Angeles government and that of the LAPD?

  • Manuel Besemeculo 05/15/2009 4:48:00 AM

    Bratton is Tony Villar's finger puppet. His opinion means nothing.

  • mickey 05/15/2009 12:41:00 AM

    OK now MY comment that #5 refers to is gone too -- what's with the censorship of comments? There was nothing remotely inappropriate in my comment calling attn to the Ch. 7/ John North interviews on May 4th with Trutanich, Weiss, UCI Law School Dean Chemerinsky and others supporting Weiss and raising questions re: Trutanich. The fact that Trutanich and his campaign adviser/COS Jane Usher come off as stunningly incompetent and dishonest by their own words and actions is something the voters need to know. Pls. restore so that this "dialogue" makes sense.

  • Deep Throat 05/15/2009 12:30:00 AM

    Actually, Cooley's relationship to his alleged bosses the County Supervisors is what is dangerously insidious, and prevents them form exerting the influence over him that they're nominally supposed to. Everyone in the DA's office knows he collects dirt on everyone including them, as well as underlings who might disagree with him: the revelations that came out during the last election were eye-popping, but sadly the Asst. DA running against him couldn't raise enough money to make a splash because everyone was too afraid of Cooley. The REAL relationship between him and Trutanich is far deeper than what's been revealed, as are Trutanich's conflicts of interest on behalf of his private criminal clients during his stint at the City Attorney's office.

  • mickey 05/15/2009 12:20:00 AM

    "Jack" comment disappeared in cyberspace? Was just repeating some of Berger's contentions as justification for media bias.

  • Phred 05/14/2009 10:53:00 PM

    Marcie claims that "Cooley and County Sheriff Baca are Bratton's counterparts at the County level". No they are NOT. Baca and Cooley are ELECTED officials. Bratton is an APPOINTED official, who may not have been selected by Mr. Villaraigosa, but who can be fired by the Mayor. That makes Bratton's endorsements suspect.

  • marcie 05/14/2009 10:08:00 PM

    The timing of this article is no coincidence, being the second slam on Bratton by mere innuendo, and citing "critics" who have a bone to pick with him. Like the guy known as "Bitter Bernie" for not getting over being replaced by him, and Chief Gates, whose tenure during the Rodney King debacle was the very cause for term limits. These two former chiefs necessitated the Consent Decree and fostered the negative image of LAPD that Chief Bratton, who's sought-after around the globe, has done a remarkable amount to reverse. He has been a healing force for the City and has EARNED his right to endorse who he wants and who he knows is best for the job. Meanwhile this paper also just coincidentally, as the election nears, decided to run a puff piece FOR Trutanich under the guise of suddenly discovering that Cooley -- who urged him to run in the first place for his OWN reasons -- was playing politics. Cooley and County Sheriff Baca are Bratton's counterparts at the County level yet are doing far MORE than endorsing: they're twisting arms and making inflammatory and ignorant (in Baca's case) public statements to try to manipulate the race. Yet NOT ONE WORD about that from this ludicrously biased paper.

  • Monica 05/14/2009 8:38:00 PM

    This is the second negative story on Chief Bratton from the LA Weekly. I believe Chief Bratton has every right to endorse a candidate. He pays taxes, is a resident of Los Angeles and we are living in a different political climate. Trutanich should know that it was Mayor Hahn who appointed Chief Bratton not Villaraigosa. I find the timing of this story suspect as the election is right around the corner. Bratton has turned around a once Deteriorating LAPD that Parks was taking down the toliet and has done an amazing job increasing the number of police officers. He has done more for this city then our politicians in miniority communities and I thank him for his service.

  • David Berger 05/14/2009 12:41:00 PM

    There's another reason why it is wholly inappropriate for Bratton to continue his endorsement of Weiss. The LA Times reported that on April 27, 2009, Weiss attended a fundraiser in Beverly Hills. Co-Host of the fundraiser was City Pensions Board Commissioner Kelly Candaele. That's a violation of LA Muni Code 49.7.8 a misdemeanor crime for a city appointee to engage in fundraising and for anyone to aid and abet that crime. Weiss knew the law; he voted for it. And Weiss knew Candaele was a city appointee - Weiss voted to appoint him. Yet instead of immediately leaving, Weiss stayed and took the money. The next day the Times broke the story, Candaele resigned and Weiss promised to return the money. According to campaign finance records, Weiss has not returned the money. Weiss is by all analysis a suspect in the violation of LAMC 49.7.8, it is completely inappropriate for Bratton to endorse a suspect in a crime. Will the LA Weekly have the nerve to ask Bratton why he continues his endorsement in these circumstances? I hope so.

 

Most Popular Stories

Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places

    Voice Places

    Discover restaurants, nightlife, travel, shopping...

  • VOICE Daily Deals

    VOICE Daily Deals

    Get 50 to 90% off every day on restaurants, movies, massages...

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    More than 10,000 of the BEST things to eat, drink, and experience

  • My Voice Nation

    My Voice Nation

    Join the Village Voice community and get exclusive deals and info

  • Happy Hour

    Happy Hour

    Your local Happy Hour guide at your fingertips

or

Log in or Sign up

Social Connect:

Use your favorite account to access My Voice Nation.


Use your My Voice Nation account to log in:





Forgot password?
or

Sign Up or Log in

Social Connect:

Sign up for My Voice Nation with your preferred network.


Sign up for a My Voice Nation account:



Privacy policy